-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi
My name is Claudio Filho and i was the L10N lead and yet am the
marketing contact and native language to Brazil and pt-BR of
OpenOffice.org project.
Recently, Thiago told with me about the BrOffice.org(Broo) and i asked
why haven't the Broo in CentOS. Today, he sent me informations about
this list, i read all the thread, and now i will try to reply all
questions about this thread.
Just to make some things a little clearer. The name "Open Office" is
trademarked in Brazil. The logo, splash and other branding elements are
not. The trademark itself is registered in Brazil's Patent and Trademark
Office[1] (INPI) and can be checked at their site. Unfortunately there
is no direct link...
[1]http://www.inpi.gov.br/
Because this problem, the owner of brand/trademark started a juridic
campaign to get money of people that are using "OpenOffice*" in Brazil
and requesting compensations($$) from developers like the brazilian OOo
team and Sun Microsystems. They have *goods* lawyers, and we has luck of
to get help with lawyers of Federal Gov for our defense.
The result is that all user (win, mac or linux) that use a program
'OpenOffice*' (can be "Open Office", "OpenOffice" or "OpenOffice.org"),
by interpretation of INPI, is breaking the copyrights of owner of the
brand. So, by determination of Federal Government, is denied the use of
"OpenOffice*", and the official option is BrOffice.org. To protect our
devels and users, we created a NGO (with the same name) and registered
the brand 'BrOffice.org' saving our necks (and of our users) of juridic
problems.
In 2006, i spoke with Rene Engelhard, lead of OOo team in Debian, about
our problem and he created a "semi" meta-package[2] of Broo in him distro.
Why "semi" meta-pkg? Because this pkg depends of OOo pkgs and have more
the files and changes of name and images (splash, about, etc), with ~3.8Mb.
[2]http://packages.debian.org/sid/broffice.org
Today, for brazilian users that uses Debian haven't legal problems, and
what Thiago (and me) wishes is extend this legal situation to brazilian
users of CentOS.
Ah! and the more important is that Broo NOT IS a fork of OOo. Broo is
the pt-BR OOo! This question was discussed in the OOo Council and
approved, and reflected in our page[3] inside of OOo Project.
[3]http://br-pt.openoffice.org/
Best regards
Claudio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknLbdwACgkQ0U74969cpYkgrQCeORaaTZcwiHbFxlHNmQag/xXt
VwAAnREt4+SODl0Uyae+Zlsp3mxkzMq9
=wmS6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To all...
I know the Sparc EL5 port is beta/alpha/gamma...
I was able to install base server package using a tftp image.
ls -la /tftpboot/tftp64.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9154949 Mar 24 16:39 /tftpboot/tftp64.img
I even was able to download the recent curl-7.15.5-2.1.el5.4 update from
redhat and rebuild it...
(After installing alot of other rpms) . Using "sparc32 rpmbuild -ba
specfile" worked like a champ..
Great job. The Sparc EL5 port works in my book.
How can I get the SRPMS used to build the sparc el5 port?...
It looks like a few have sparc specific changes/additions...
For example...
silo-1.4.13-8.c5sparc.src.rpm
initscripts-8.45.17.EL-1.c5sparc.1.src.rpm
There are others but I can only find a couple at
http://sparc.centos.org/os/SRPMS/
Some of the rpms were recently rebuilt so someone is using t2000-c5 for
fun....
Thank you...
David
Ultra80 with 4 CPU's
uname -a
Linux lpaper 2.6.18-53.c5sparc #1 SMP Mon Mar 10 21:50:16 CDT 2008 sparc64
sparc64 sparc64 GNU/Linux
grep cpu /proc/cpuinfo
cpu : TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird)
ncpus probed : 4
ncpus active : 4
> Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people
> through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple
> question: What are you doing? Join today to start receiving CentOS's
> updates.
quick? haha...
Hello contributors and OSS friends,
(Who am I?)
My name is Sascha Thomas Spreitzer and I live in the eastern outback
of Munich in Bavaria Germany.
I am 23 years old and started with C and GNU Linux in the early age of 13.
(What am I doing?)
Most time I spend in the office fixing Unix dependant problems. Since
now at Germanys biggest stock broker "Baader Bank".
In future (starting first of April) ill design and realize AIX and
z/Linux environments for the government insurance sector.
If I'm not in the office, I go out with my girlfriend Lisa and we
enjoy the little time we have together.
I used to do traditional Shotokan Karate in JKA style. But stopped it
a year ago, because I had no time left to do it.
In holidays I try to gain progress with my software development skills.
(Why centos and what I'm up to?)
I had a chance to get a look at IBM's z/Series in the past and it
arouse my interest. Some years passed and now I have to face z/Linux
in my new position.
>From the skills I gained in the past and the skills i'll gain in
future, I want to contribute back to the community.
Since a decade I'm using OSS and I deeply esteem the freedom.
It's time for me to contribute.
PS.:
you can can IM me via IRC or Jabber:
irc.freenode.net: sspreitzer
Jabber: icefox(a)im.relinked.org
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / with kind regards,
Sascha Thomas Spreitzer
http://spreitzer.name/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Guys,
During the last few weeks I've been working on a migration script
(newbb_to_phpbb) based on a code provided to me by Marcus Moeller to
move Xoops+CBB forums, topics and posts into phpBB system.
The users are copied from xoops user table onto an LDAP server.
More information in the wiki page:
http://wiki.centos.org/WebsiteVer2/forums/newbb_to_phpbb
It would be nice if you could test this application, and check the
overall process so we can get what we need to migrate newbb to phpbb.
The application's download link is in the wiki page above. Note that it
is in a test mode yet and requesting for comments.
Best Regards,
- --
Alain Reguera Delgado <al(a)ciget.cienfuegos.cu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJx6kDyXxCQEoXDZARApRNAJ0b3BHLIKJtTCLmHZup2LyDq+FIswCg3GNA
AGrAbi69dWEfQmpLesXH5c8=
=BWg6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I though I was going crazy because rpm would not accept my password to
sign some new rpms.
The problem is however that the gpg key has expired:
pub 1024D/16FF0E46 2004-03-15 CentOS-2 Key <centos-2key(a)caosity.org>
sub 2048g/63E158BD 2004-03-15 [expires: 2009-03-14]
Who is looking after keys now? Do I need a new one or should I try and
extend the old one? The caos key which was used to sign the key has also
expired.
Advice is most welcome.
Thanks
John.
--
John Newbigin
ITS Senior Analyst / Programmer
Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies
Swinburne University of Technology
Melbourne, Australia
http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin
Hi,
I'm missing security updates for centos 5.2 since a few days.
There is at least one security issue for apache, which is fixed in the
upstream but not via yum for centos.
Did I miss something?
Regards
Robert
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Guys,
We have a theme customization for trac-0.11.3-1.el5.rf in:
https://projects.centos.org/svn/artwork/trunk/Extras/Trac/0.11
and some screenshots in:
https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/browser/trunk/Extras/Trac/0.11/Tou…
It would be nice if someone could test it and comment about it.
After that, I think that the Trac upgrade planned some time ago could
take place if nothing else delays it.
Best Regards,
- --
Alain Reguera Delgado <al(a)ciget.cienfuegos.cu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJwVdqyXxCQEoXDZARAoTsAJwOFl4wjnuwVDFnwnXlP5hKBIlY0ACgzBdP
RkuN7WdUtHmIelrAP4h8ow8=
=wwS+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > I've been struggling to install the httpd 2.2.8, php 5.2.6 and postgresql 8.2.9 RPMS in testing on a minimal CentOS 5.2 due to issues with libpq and apr-utils. I put these packages into a custom repo, assigned then to a custom group in comps.xml, and am working with kickstart.
> > Anyway, it appears apr-util is a dependency of httpd. apr-util in turn depends on libpq.so.4, provided by postgresql-libs.
> libpq.so.4 should be provided by
> postgresqlclient81-8.1.11-1.el5s2.x86_64.rpm in the same repository.
> > The postgresql-libs 8.2.9 package installs libpq.so.5, so things go belly up and won't install (no apr-utils, therefore no httpd, therefore no php).
> >
> > If however I install the compat-postgresql-libs package from http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64/repoview/applications.dat…,
> > installation of all packages proceeds. This package obviously reconciles the lippq.so.4/libpq.so.5 conflict.
> >
> > So maybe something like this package is needed in testing?
Except that I want to install PG 8.2.9 (from testing), which appears to install libpq.so.5
Do you mean that postgresqlclient81-8.1.11-1.el5s2.x86_64.rpm is similar to the compat-postgresql-libs RPM I mentioned above? Is it happy to install without dependency problems alongside PG 8.2.9?
Hi All,
I'm working on getting the rhn-client tools (that have traditionally
been not included in centos) into the distro so it can be used with
spacewalk more easily and invite any of those interested to help. Since
5.3 has already been released, we're targeting to include it in extras
for now.
I've created a wiki page to track the progress here:
https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/CentPackages
I figured a meeting would be good for interested parties to discuss what
needs to be done and to divvy up the tasks. How about next Wednesday
(3/25) at 21:00 GMT (5:00 pm EST).
Thanks
--
Justin Sherrill, RHCA 1801 Varisty Drive.
Software Engineer Raleigh, NC 27603
Red Hat, Inc.