devel November 2014

devel@lists.centos.org

55 participants
52 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 15
by Alemesegd GIDEY 16 Nov '14

16 Nov '14

On 11/16/14, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> wrote: > Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to > centos-devel(a)centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-devel-request(a)centos.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." >

1 0

CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 117, Issue 5
by Alemesegd GIDEY 15 Nov '14

15 Nov '14

On 11/6/14, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> wrote: > Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to > centos-devel(a)centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-devel-request(a)centos.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) > 2. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Sameer Kumar) > 3. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them > (Gururaj S Alagwadi) > 4. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Elias Persson) > 5. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Jeffrey Scheel) > 6. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) > 7. Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:31:32 +0000 > From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org> > To: centos-devel(a)centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: <5459E064.8090608(a)karan.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 05/11/14 03:55, Sameer Kumar wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org >> <mailto:mail-lists@karan.org>> wrote: >> >> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various >> secondary >> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is >> just >> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these. >> >> http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead and >> fill >> it out and lets make something happen next week. >> >> >> ?I am not sure why but I am not able to save my response. But Friday >> afternoon GMT works for me. >> >> Any heads up on what architectures we are planning to discuss? >> > > I am going to do the demo bits on i686, but the process is overall arch > agnostic; the only special case is arm32 where the delivery path is > largely via rootfs - but were a fair distance from that. > > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:33:38 +0800 > From: Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar(a)ashnik.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build > them > Message-ID: > <CADp-Sm6DFsgkAYokny1iykuizMik80sY4x+ySg7pKMReueYKtA(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" <scheel(a)us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary >> > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just >> > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these. >> Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting. Please include me > and >> the others on the needtomeet request. Thx, >> -Jeff >> >> Jeffrey J. Scheel > > Please include me in the invite for next call. > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel(a)centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> >

1 1

How to mirror https://git.centos.org/project/rpms and https://git.centos.org/sources/
by Wang, Weiwei 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Hi Centos friends, Recently I am trying to do a mirror for centos rpm git repos and lookaside cache, but I meet some problems and hope someone can give me some instructions here: 1. For the git repos from https://git.centos.org/project/rpms, how can I get a complete list for all the rpm repos, and then I can create a script to clone them together; 2. For the lookaside cache, I tried to use rsync or lftp to mirror it, but all failed, Is there any special steps I need to follow to do the mirror? Thanks in advance. Weiwei

2 3

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Atomic SIG Image Ready for Testing
by Stef Walter 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I just tested out the CentOS-7-x86_64-AtomicHost-20141029_02.qcow2 > and found an issue with the cockpit-docker integration. To read the > images and containers currently residing on the atomic host, > cockpit-agent needs to connect to /var/run/docker.sock to which it > does not have permission. I did a "chmod o+rw /var/run/docker.sock" > to make it work on my test system. Is this a known issue or should > I file a bug somewhere? In this case you can go into the 'Users Accounts' in cockpit, click on the user, and 'Change Roles' to add 'Container Administrator'. Then log out and back in. This gives the user the permission to access /var/run/docker.sock (ie: puts them in the docker group). Stef -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlRjwOgACgkQe/sRCNknZa9JIwCgwOm4PRr1Gnx2DIdbEo5Wj8YO xnIAn0znYnjAYsmBYXJe/QFYviFj3N0W =ZOHr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 5

CentOS Cloud SIG meeting today, 15:00 UTC Nov 13th
by Karanbir Singh 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

hi, Were hosting the second CentOS Cloud SIG meeting on #centos-devel irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC Nov 13th Thursday. Everyone is welcome to come along and talk about things they care about. We are in the early stages of formulating a plan and delivery schedule, so this is a great time to come and join the conversations. You can get more information on the Cloud SIG here : http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud We aim to work on building, delivering, testing and helping community support Cloud Infrastructure on and around the CentOS Linux ecosystem. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Critical update for bash was released today.
by Jason Parks 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

Thanks Jim On Sep 24, 2014 10:33 AM, Jim Perrin <jperrin(a)centos.org> wrote: > > You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue. > > > Here's why you should care: > > https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environme… > > > Links to the centos updates: > > CentOS-5: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020582.html > > CentOS-6: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020585.html > > CentOS-7: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020583.html > > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

1 0

Switching to centralized authentication for centos.org infra (aka FAS vs IPA)
by Fabian Arrotin 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So, We've been discussing randomly about this for quite some time now, and things always get in the way .. But let's try to continue the thread around this and also get forward. Following our CBS/Infra meeting held today (minutes available here : http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/november/ ) , we started a requirements list about what the centralized authentication system should support. Long story short : more and more tools need a central users DB and puppet (our current CM tool for centos.org infra) doesn't scale for that. The first tool that needs it is Koji (for the CBS - http://cbs.centos.org - builders) but other are still to come. We've temporary found a "workaround" for Koji, in a sense that we've created our internal CA and are signing x509 certs with that local CA, but switching to something that scales was on the list since "Day 1" In the short list, we have selected IPA and FAS. The requirement list is there : http://wiki.centos.org/InfraWiki/CentralizedAuth (still a draft, and to be completed) Feel free to comment here, or update the wiki (if you have already edit rights, otherwise feel free to ping someone from the infra team) Cheers, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlRg1jEACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6JcgCfaU4CapZ6m/aRCoRzA3ZDp8xp EaMAnRNzJ9+bGQbVQuOaSBu5QbUAIEzL =wQ/r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[PATCH] Updates for scl 1.2/devtoolset-3
by Pat Riehecky 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> The previous return_disttag code expected a smaller number of '-' in the SCL name. This newer version now searches a bit more rationally. I should have written it this way from the start.... Pat Riehecky (1): Updated for compat with devtoolset-3 software collection name return_disttag.sh | 25 ++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

3 14

CentOS Atomic SIG Image Ready for Testing
by Joe Brockmeier 11 Nov '14

11 Nov '14

Hi all, Happy to announce we have a CentOS Atomic Host image ready for testing! Kudos to all the folks who've worked on this so far - it's going to be a lot of fun working from these and making Atomic the best way to run containers. Please see the post here: http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2014/11/centos-atomic-sig-image-ready-for-… Images are here: http://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/ Let the testing commence! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

7 9

CentOS 7 gome system monitor CPU usage
by Leo Brandewie 11 Nov '14

11 Nov '14

Hey Devs, Not sure if this is the right place to post this; if not, my apologies. I've been testing CentOS 7 and I've been having a problem with CPU usage. I first set up a VM with 4 procs (2.66 GHz Xeons), loaded the Gnome desktop, and ran system monitor. I got ~50% CPU usage on all four procs, doing absolutely nothing but running system monitor. I was suspicious of this result since it was in a VM. So I loaded 7 onto a real server (a Dell PowerEdge 1800) and tested again. The 1800 has 2 x 2.8GHz Xeons and system monitor maxed out both CPUs. I'm astounded. I have no way of knowing if the problem is also present in RHEL 7. I can say it's not at all present in CentOS 6.5. I have a fair amount of experience with that OS. Thanks all, Leo

5 7

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel November 2014