devel September 2014

devel@lists.centos.org

68 participants
56 discussions

CentOS Firewall and UTM SIG
by Shafiee Roozbeh 26 Sep '14

26 Sep '14

Hello everybody is it any Firewall and UTM SIG based on IPTables and web interface in CentOS project? I would like to start this if is not exist. what's your idea? -- Roozbeh Shafiee Linux/BSD System Administrator and Python Developer RoozbehShafiee.Com

8 24

centos 6 to 7 upgrade tool report
by David Mansfield 26 Sep '14

26 Sep '14

Hi All, I used the upgrade tool on a centos 6.5 fully-updated system, used as a graphical workstation with GDM and gnome2. Before going into details, I want to thank the CentOS team for all the hard work over the years, and especially the top-notch effort to get C7 out, and kudos to the individuals getting the upgrade tool to work too. I feel spoiled. Back to the story: The system had significant use of 3rd party repositories. After I ran the pre-upgrade tool, I used the report of "unsigned" packages (which includes the source repo in the report, which is very useful) to remove all of these packages before update. I ran the tool again and was satisfied that the list of inplace upgrade risks was acceptable and ran the update. Issue#1: The system upgraded and rebooted to the emergency recovery shell. This was because an NTFS partition could not be mounted (ntfs-3g not installed by default during upgrade for some reason). This was somewhat a problem for the user before the upgrade, so I cannot be 100% sure that mounting this a boot was always working 100% before. Solution#1 I commented it from fstab and rebooted - 1st problem solved (see Issue#4 below). Issue#2: The system booted to a black screen with a movable mouse cursor - GDM not working. I tried a bunch of things - uninstalling GNOME stuff, re-installing, installing a bunch of package groups. This one had me stumped for quite a while. Solution#2 Ultimately, the solution was (I believe) that some modifications in /etc/pam.d needed to be merged from the .rpmnew files. On this system, I don't believe the pam.d configuration had been modified from defaults, so I copied the .rpmnew files over (beware: this can be dangerous) and voila! Issue#3: I installed MATE Desktop from epel, and things looked good except that NetworkManager wasn't running: Solution#3: service NetworkManager start chkconfig NetworkManager on Issue#4: Back to the NTFS volume not mounting. Solution#4: I installed ntfs-3g packages and everything mounts fine through nautilus, which is all the user needs. Now everything I could test is working, spice client, Citrix client, google-chrome, vlc, rhythmbox playing mp3s, handbrake (thanks "nux" again), VPN etc. Hope this helps, I was going to update the wiki, but there's no edit button! -- Thanks, David Mansfield Cobite, INC.

1 0

CentOS 6 on ppc64 - OpenJDK
by Kai-Thorsten Hambrecht 25 Sep '14

25 Sep '14

Hi folks, we are currently "porting" an application to Linux on Power. As our application is java-based, this would be very easy. We already have packaging for CentOS 6.x (x86_64), which is of course also suitable for RHEL 6.x. Since there is no released CentOS PPC port yet, we are currently working on RHEL6.5 ppc64, however this lacks OpenJDK-7 packages (java-1.7.0-openjdk, compared to i386/x86_64). Building java-1.7.0-openjdk from Source RPM with a tweaked spec file does not work quickly as there are also lots of missing required build packages on ppc64. Does anyone have a proper bootstrap build chain to successfully build the OpenJDK-7 package (java-1.7.0-openjdk). Or does anyone have already build ppc64 packges? Thanks in advance, Kai.

3 3

CentOS Atomic SIG meeting minutes (23 September 2014)
by Joe Brockmeier 25 Sep '14

25 Sep '14

Apologies - getting this out a bit late. =================== #atomic: CentOS SIG =================== Meeting started by jzb at 14:31:32 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2014-09-23/atomic.2014-09-23-14.31.… . Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda (quaid, 14:34:19) * request for a git repository on git.centos.org (quaid, 14:34:30) * access to JSON files & build system that's been used so far for builds. (quaid, 14:34:39) * build locations and sources (quaid, 14:34:48) * git repo (quaid, 14:36:13) * LINK: http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup (kbsingh, 14:38:23) * LINK: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/011225.html (jbrooks, 14:38:46) * LINK: http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic (jzb, 14:38:47) * ACTION: jzb to put SIG proposal up on (quaid, 14:40:40) * LINK: http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic (jbrooks, 14:43:36) * ACTION: committee needs to appoint a chair (quaid, 14:44:37) * ACTION: remaining committee members need to join centos-docs to request wiki access (quaid, 14:45:18) * having the SIG build be a submodule of the instance-build would make building things easier in the long-term (quaid, 14:50:30) * ACTION: jzb survey on whether an Atomic Key is OK. (jzb, 15:03:26) * ACTION: Evolution request build tag per KB's info (jzb, 15:10:37) * ACTION: jzb open discussion on how Atomic should be listed in bugs.centos.org (jzb, 15:15:01) * ACTION: walters to post on atomic-devel on Anaconda work (jzb, 15:32:41) Meeting ended at 15:34:13 UTC. Action Items ------------ * jzb to put SIG proposal up on * committee needs to appoint a chair * remaining committee members need to join centos-docs to request wiki access * jzb survey on whether an Atomic Key is OK. * Evolution request build tag per KB's info * jzb open discussion on how Atomic should be listed in bugs.centos.org * walters to post on atomic-devel on Anaconda work Action Items, by person ----------------------- * Evolution * Evolution request build tag per KB's info * jzb * jzb to put SIG proposal up on * jzb survey on whether an Atomic Key is OK. * jzb open discussion on how Atomic should be listed in bugs.centos.org * walters * walters to post on atomic-devel on Anaconda work * **UNASSIGNED** * committee needs to appoint a chair * remaining committee members need to join centos-docs to request wiki access People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * kbsingh (94) * jzb (74) * jbrooks (25) * bexelbie (19) * walters (18) * quaid (16) * Evolution (8) * centbot (4) * zodbot (4) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

Critical update for bash was released today.
by Jim Perrin 24 Sep '14

24 Sep '14

You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue. Here's why you should care: https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environme… Links to the centos updates: CentOS-5: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020582.html CentOS-6: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020585.html CentOS-7: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020583.html -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

4 3

planning and coordination with EPEL
by Jim Perrin 24 Sep '14

24 Sep '14

So, for the short term(relatively speaking), it seems that CentOS contributors wishing to push packages into EPEL would need to follow epel policy[1] for getting their packages pushed. For some this is fine, as they're already contributing. For others, this is a duplicated workload with added stress. I'd like to propose that we form a group of CentOS participants who are fedora/EPEL packagers to curate packages marked for sharing. SIGs who have common packages to be shared would then be able to request that this group of curators submit the package via existing EPEL processes. This process assumes a couple things: 1. curators have access to modify the package in both systems (to correct things in spec files for example) 2. We adopt the fedora/EPEL packaging guidelines as much as possible to minimize changes required by the curators group. 3. We have some method of assigning package ownership to SIGs and to the curators. Longer-term, I think we'll be able to work something out with EPEL that's a bit less manual, but I think this process should work for now. Comments, questions, suggested changes before I propose this to the EPEL folks as well? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

6 7

pending updates notification on login
by Karanbir Singh 23 Sep '14

23 Sep '14

hi, I'd really like to have something where a user, on login to the vm or machine instance is told 'you have XX pending updates'. the data can come from a yum-plugin writing something somewhere ( so its not a case of running yum on each login ). Who wants to take a stab at writing something for this ? - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

12 22

Re: [CentOS-devel] [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic SIG weekly meetings: Tuesdays in #atomic at 14:30 UTC
by Karsten Wade 22 Sep '14

22 Sep '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/19/2014 01:22 AM, Haïkel wrote: > HI Karsten, > > we should try before meetings but it will probably conflict at > least when using the #topic command In Fedora, all meetings reports > are CC'ed to a list called meetingminutes, maybe we could do the > same with CentOS ? Haïkel, I think it would only conflict if both bots had chanops, they would step on each other rewriting the topic (and maybe just one would win out randomly by server response time.) But yes, let's test. :) Looks like centbot is in there ... and my test seems to have worked, they both logged: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2014-09-22/atomic.2014-09-22-18.26.… Note that the zodbot minutes are a side effect of having the meeting in the upstream channel, there really isn't an intention to have a CentOS SIG minutes in the Fedora Project tracker. - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQga7AACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEFuHwCg1hLXd8UF+/G55FDZUtIND1rL R1QAnRowtW98z6U1v5Aw0N4SyguOpUnT =ENQo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Proposal: CBS/Infrastructure Meeting 15-Sep-2014 13:00 UTC
by Brian Stinson 22 Sep '14

22 Sep '14

Hi All, There is quite a bit going on with Community Build System developers and those of us working on other tools. I thought it might be helpful to get in the same (virtual) room on a regular basis to help us coordinate our efforts. I propose that our first meeting be held at 13:00 UTC Monday September 15th, 2014 in #centos-devel on Freenode My topics for this meeting: - Is this a good recurring time for all? - What's next for Centpkg - Authentication? - Certificate Delivery? - Open Flood If there is something specific you would like included on the "agenda" let me know. Questions? Comments? Counter-proposals? Brian -- Brian Stinson bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk

8 19

CBS/Infra Meeting Tomorrow 22-Sept 13:00 UTC
by Brian Stinson 22 Sep '14

22 Sep '14

Greetings everyone! The CBS and Infrastructure teams will be meeting tomorrow, Monday, 22-September 2014 at 13:00 UTC in #centos-devel on freenode. Suggested topics: #topic Greetings #topic Old Business - FAS/IPA Testing - Centpkg Progress #topic Brainstorm SIG branch and build target names - Proposal will go out to the centos-devel ML #topic Open Floor -- Brian Stinson bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk

3 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel September 2014