devel September 2014

devel@lists.centos.org

68 participants
55 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] 32-bit CentOS 7 - can I help?
by Ian and Alison 13 Sep '14

13 Sep '14

Hi, I've also managed to compile the 32-bit kernel by adding in the missing function. (This part of the code appears to be a backport of a feature from 3.15, which could explain why it's got bits missing.) I also enabled a lot of device driver modules that were disabled in the kernel-3.10.0-i686.config, and created a config for a debug kernel. I can share my specfile and configs if someone can tell me where to send them. I've also built all the other 32-bit packages that I think should be present. Just a couple need the ExclusiveArch x86_64 line changed. Nothing has been tested yet - about to start creating a 32-bit install disc. Ian Gosling On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 12:00 +0000, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org wrote: > On 09/12/2014 12:00 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > FYI, I've successfully built kernel-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.i686.rpm (and > > friends), using kernel-3.10.0-i686.config from 3.10.0-121.el7. I had > > to unset CONFIG_PARAVIRT to work around this error: > > > > kernel/sched/cputime.c: In function 'steal_account_process_tick': > > kernel/sched/cputime.c:273:3: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'jiffies_to_nsecs' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > this_rq()->prev_steal_time += cputime_to_nsecs(steal_ct); > > ^ > > I figured this error out. > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7592 > -- CONFIDENTIAL NOTE: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the mail. Thank you.

1 0

CentOS6 & CentOS7 on PowerKVM/ppc64
by Rishi 12 Sep '14

12 Sep '14

Dear List, I would like to express interest in running CentOS7 & probably CentOS6 production servers on ppc64 architecture. With OpenPower we have access to PowerKVM and want to understand current progress around this. Ubuntu is found to be working as ppc64el. I found blog entry http://www.karan.org/blog/2014/06/12/can-we-deliver-a-powerpc-build-for-cen… which refers to a mailchain of last month http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/010625.html followed by http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7236 Let me know if we can help in any way to get it general available. Regards, Rushikesh

3 2

[Atomic SIG] Setting base packages for Atomic
by Joe Brockmeier 12 Sep '14

12 Sep '14

Sent this to the atomic-devel list a bit ago, but also wanted to put it in front of centos-devel for any interested parties who aren't on atomic-devel. Also was sitting in my drafts folder for a few days, so "today" was actually like Monday of this week. Sorry! -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [atomic-devel] Setting base packages for Atomic Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:08:25 -0500 From: Joe Brockmeier <jzb(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: jzb(a)redhat.com Organization: Red Hat (Open Source and Standards) To: atomic-devel(a)projectatomic.io Hi all, So - question came up on Fedora's Cloud SIG mailing list today about whether to include Mesos. The reply was "we want to stick to the upstream definition... but there isn't one." We need to define this to help Fedora and CentOS (and also encourage those communities to join this discussion). Here's the repo for Fedora Atomic, currently: [master] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-atomic.git/tree/ [f21] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-atomic.git/tree/?h=f21 I'd like to pull together a default template for Atomic or minimal set of packages, though I think it's fine of CentOS and Fedora depart from that as needed as long as the core set of services are intact. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

koji build for golang
by Lokesh Mandvekar 11 Sep '14

11 Sep '14

I'm trying to build golang-1.3 in koji for CentOS7, but I see this error: Task info: https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=473 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): free 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): free -> open (x86_64-0.centos.org) 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): open (x86_64-0.centos.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: package golang not in list for tag bananas7-testing 0 free 0 open 0 done 1 failed Does the package have to be pre-added to this tag? -- Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5

2 2

Weird output of system load
by Mingfei Hua 11 Sep '14

11 Sep '14

All, One server of mine running CentOS 6.3. The load is very high, but few process in running or blocked. Followed is the output of /proc/stat, /proc/loadavg and top /proc/stat cpu 5351723 61716 6974590 161365578 240734 141769 380525 0 0 cpu0 4016881 9686 2510787 79408769 110721 141549 351075 0 0 cpu1 1334842 52029 4463802 81956808 130013 220 29449 0 0 intr 1081538370 139 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 0 73 0 0 531522246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3929190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ctxt 1074666354 btime 1409530629 processes 9684115 procs_running 1 procs_blocked 0 softirq 1418158114 0 367862840 177073 609942882 3679591 0 2 53962455 1790447 380742824 /proc/loadavg 11.21 22.50 10.74 1/2536 16895 Top -H top - 05:08:02 up 10 days, 4:50, 1 user, load average: 13.24, 23.26, 10.86 Tasks: 2535 total, 1 running, 2534 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 3.1%us, 4.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 92.5%id, 0.1%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st Mem: 3925040k total, 3780944k used, 144096k free, 31464k buffers Swap: 2064376k total, 1196k used, 2063180k free, 3201568k cached Sincerely, Mingfei Hua

2 1

Fwd: Re: docker-registry, inclusion of python-rsa (and perhaps others) in CentOS
by Karanbir Singh 10 Sep '14

10 Sep '14

2 1

package telepathy-idle missing?
by Sven Kieske 10 Sep '14

10 Sep '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Devs, thanks for your great work with CentOS 7 :) Now to my problem: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7580 In order to use IRC (e.g. connecting to #centos and #centos-devel ;) ) I need telepathy-idle for the standard IM program called "empathy" in EL7. Is there really no upstream package for this? I couldn't find anything in git.centos.org After some miscommunication with toracat (sorry if I was a little harsh) he told me that this must be an upstream error. I would just like to verify this on this list before I go bothering upstream with a bugreport. So it would be nice to know if someone can confirm the findings of toracat. Then I can start arguing with RH what the hell they thought about not adding irc support in their standard IM client, then install pidgin (again). kind regards Sven -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJUD2myAAoJEAq0kGAWDrql4G0MAIHeghF4vT97aWokDLSUxb6n XjWEBllksUHCC/vs+P3gQyOo80MDSeH7FFwfRdkt9eY62nwv+LQV0DzeNHCIEKHq orxpbJm4k3qY9lOovCjKezy84Mf1ozOGWxnlUy7Z7yX72RjJ6D/sd4fVIhXXm0j1 01ZSNK2VyflKWEYrrWy9gM6SmHuzAgzN8n4SChy3VCvFFujQ5H9i1wrGKmfVZzlX /1cbPpn0lUkh6anM0eYJXc9o/8HmXd2TFeMw8BVBxJALHKyyN9Qp9S9aFtuwi0E2 F5OZEzRrSU3aHZN2hxARB78o1uiZmfu3dMyFlY1M3kWy0yoE+OH9LCju+mq4cXQO 5f4TedYkozvZfScCW0YP0pnn680r1/OtyDy6mFVf0SOMzK4AsShwHHwW102ObYzM P18v3IQ9HfiX07jKFbgqV+gLBLSfuF4qu2d0VRwk81z/nKNlEwj4MWYzsTwOhBtY aN3iOAvXPch7W+JnvSv2TOp8e+PNSlfRkfUl4cAoSw== =u7Xu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 4

Fwd: [CentOS-build-reports] Build Done: qemu-kvm 1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386 on c7-updates
by Pat Riehecky 09 Sep '14

09 Sep '14

Noticed this used the RHEL RC kernel rather than the GA kernel. Was that on purpose? Pat -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [CentOS-build-reports] Build Done: qemu-kvm 1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386 on c7-updates Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:27:54 +0000 From: <buildsys(a)centos.org> Reply-To: <centos-devel(a)centos.org> To: <centos-build-reports(a)centos.org> logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386 logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/build.log logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/libcacard-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/libcacard-devel-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/libcacard-tools-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/mock.cfg logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/mock.exitcode logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/qemu-guest-agent-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/qemu-img-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/qemu-kvm-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.src.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/qemu-kvm-debuginfo-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/root.log logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/state.log logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/stderr logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/stdout _______________________________________________ CentOS-build-reports mailing list CentOS-build-reports(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-build-reports

2 1

Xen4Centos7
by Nuno Fernandes 07 Sep '14

07 Sep '14

Hello, Is there any timeline or sig planned to xen4centos7? I was using xen4centos6 as a base to our distro (http://nuxis.com) and i would like to start working on rebasing it to centos7, but i would need xen as dom0. Thanks, Nuno Fernandes --

5 5

CentOS source rpm repository
by Tetsuo Handa 07 Sep '14

07 Sep '14

Hello. I'm writing a Japanese serial based on LinuxCon Japan 2014's presentation material "How to obtain information for troubleshooting enterprise servers" ( http://i-love.sakura.ne.jp/tomoyo/LCJ2014-en.pdf ). In one installment in the serial, I'm planning to explain how to browse source code by extracting source rpm packages. I thought that it would be convenient if we can refer all source rpm packages in non-latest minor releases using single baseurl= line of yum's repo file (e.g. something like ---------- /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Source.repo begin ---------- [base-source] name=base-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/centos/6/os/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [updates-source] name=updates-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/centos/6/updates/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [oldreleases-source] name=oldreleases-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/centos/6-oldreleases/ gpgcheck=1 ---------- /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Source.repo end ---------- rather than ---------- /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Source.repo begin ---------- [base-6.0-source] name=base-6.0-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.0/os/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [updates-6.0-source] name=updates-6.0-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.0/updates/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [base-6.1-source] name=base-6.1-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.1/os/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [updates-6.1-source] name=updates-6.1-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.1/updates/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [base-6.2-source] name=base-6.2-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.2/os/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [updates-6.2-source] name=updates-6.2-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.2/updates/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [base-6.3-source] name=base-6.3-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.3/os/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [updates-6.3-source] name=updates-6.3-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.3/updates/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [base-6.4-source] name=base-6.4-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.4/os/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [updates-6.4-source] name=updates-6.4-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [base-6.5-source] name=base-6.5-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.5/os/Source/ gpgcheck=1 [updates-6.5-source] name=updates-6.5-source baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/ gpgcheck=1 ---------- /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Source.repo end ---------- ) so that we don't need to update the repo file when CentOS 6.6 is released. In other words, I'd like to hear if any progress can be made since http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-May/134906.html ... Regards.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel September 2014