January 2015 - devel - lists.centos.org

forums + portal for {lang}.centos.org sites
by Karanbir Singh 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi, Earlier in the evening today Ralph, Fabian and I had a chat about the present state of the language subsites. This email sort of summarises the main issue ( s/w ). We seem to have run into a slight technical hitch with punbb/fluxbb. They dont support LDAP as a backend. And we had decided a few months back that all new rollouts must have ldap backend so we can rollin CentOS-DS / openldap based backend. So we need to look at alternatives, and since the primary focus of these international sites is going be forums : Here is a shortlist ( if there is anything else that people are aware of, please add to this list ) - phpBB - SMF - Fudforum - phorum - fluxbb Requirements: - Must be able to scale ( couple of hundred thousand msgs ) - Must be able to handle ldap auth ( if it cant, whats involved in writing the ldap-auth portion ) - Must address the specific requirements raised by the present www.centos.org forum users ( Can you please fill this section in ? ) - Must support all languages we need ( pure utf8 support would be good ) - Secure - Skin'able Nice to have: - Capable of running multiple instances from a single deployment - responsive community :D Things we will need to do: - Decide on what s/w to use. - Give the ArtWork people enough time to get the look & feel sorted. - Migrate newbb forums from www.centos.org to $system ( hey, english is a language too :D ). - Migrate fr.centos.org into the final s/w - setup {de/es/ja/it/pt_br}.centos.org Actions: Ralph and Fabian are going to work on setting up a test ldap server, once that is online we will then start by installing into our test-vm-farm the various s/w to eval them. If anyone would like to help, please feel free to jump right in. I'll setup a wiki page for this issue, which might be a good place to track progress. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

22 81

cbs feature req: building embargoed content
by Karanbir Singh 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

hi guys, we need a way to build embargo'd content like reimzul's priv-build, that does not make stuff public till a specific date ( the actual push to public can be manual ); how would we achieve this on cbs ? I guess the git stuff is easier since it can just be a scratch build from srpm and people need not push the git content back to git.centos.org till embargo expiry. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

7 14

SIG repo layout and conflicts between projects within a SIG
by George Dunlap 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

At the moment, we're essentially using yum repos as the "patch" mechanism to CentOS Base: SIGs populate a repo with packages they want to add / override, and all other packages default to Base. The current setup is that every sig has exactly one production repo per CentOS version. Also, we seem to be wanting to see SIGs not as individual projects, but to make the 'G' an actual "group": so, for instance, the Virt SIG has both Xen and Docker, and we've recently approved oVirt. But there's a bit of a conflict here: what if one project in the SIG wants to use the package from Base, and another project in the SIG wants to use a custom-built package? Or what if both projects want to customize their packages in different ways? In particular: the Docker project in the Virt SIG wants to supply updated versions of Docker; but at the moment uses the kernel package from Base. The Xen project, on the other hand, needs to supply a different kernel package that has dom0 support enabled. Up until this point, this hasn't been an issue because I've been doing Xen development in virt6-testing, and Lokesh has been doing Docker development in virt7-testing. But I'm hoping to get Xen for CentOS 7 out soon, and I was just about to upload the Xen kernel to the CBS, when it occurred to me that if I did so, then everyone using the virt7-testing repo for Docker would suddenly get my updated kernel as well. So it seems we have a couple of ways to approach it. 1. Keep it one repo per SIG, and make all projects in a SIG sort out shared dependencies. 2. Allow one repo per *project* within a SIG (e.g., virt6-xen, virt7-docker) 3. Have some alternate way of doing a "patch", instead of repos. In the case of xen / docker, I haven't talked with Lokesh about this at all; it may be that he's fine with sharing a kernel with Xen. But it does increase the workload: now Lokesh needs to maintain the Docker side of the kernel, whereas before they could just rely on our upstream to do a lot of that testing. Furthermore, it increases the complexity of development and testing: before when doing kernel work, I could just test Xen; now the kernel needs to be tested by both Xen and Docker. And finally, now users of both projects get a kernel update whenever either one does. Which, of course, is pretty much the same as any other distro; but as a whole, at the moment at least, we have a lot less resources than any other distro our size and popularity. On the whole I'm inclined to prefer #2. Thoughts? -George

5 8

a kernel-cloud
by Karanbir Singh 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

In conversations, the idea of a trimmed down kernel for cloud images has come up repeatedly. I was wondering if anyone would like to help define what this might look like and then help maintain something of this nature for the CentOS Project ( ideally targetting CentOS-6 and 7 ). - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

5 6

Centos 7 - gnome-initial-setup with uid < 500
by Olivier Delhomme 12 Feb '15

12 Feb '15

Hi there, I install Centos 7 machines through kickstart + a post install script. I do not need the gnome-initial-setup to run at all. My post install script create a user and deletes the guest account. When the uid of the newly created user is > 500 everything is fine but when the uid is < 500 the gnome-initial-setup still shows up. Can anyone tell me how to disable/configure gnome-initial-setup for users with uid < 500 ? Cheers, Olivier DELHOMME.

3 7

CentOS Bug Tracker and ABRT
by Jakub Filak 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

Hello everyone, I want to briefly introduce myself. I am a Red Hat employee working on ABRT[1]. We have recently added support for CentOS on the ABRT server[2] and we would like continue in these integration efforts. First of all, I want to submit a pair of patches improving ABRT's UX on CentOS: - do not offer users to report to Red Hat Portal - offer users to send an email to upstream - stop wasting of resources by running sos, because its output is useless for CentOS users In the near future, we would like to integrate ABRT with CentOS Bug Tracker in the same way as ABRT integrates with Red Hat Bugzilla[3]. We are done with the analysis phase[4] and, now, we are working on a testsuite[5]. Unfortunately, MantisBT misses more advanced searching what prevents us from implementing a tool similar to one we have for Bugzilla. At least we need to search by DUPHASH (an unique identifier of a crash, something like tag). Would you be willing to run a MantisBT plugin adding the things we need, if we develop it? Best regards, Jakub http://wiki.centos.org/JakubFilak 1: https://github.com/abrt 2: https://abrt.fedoraproject.org/ 3: https://github.com/abrt/libreport/issues/272 4: https://github.com/abrt/libreport/wiki/MantisBT 5: https://github.com/abrt/abrt/tree/reporter-mantisbt

4 12

Xfce for CentOS group
by Anders F Björklund 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Hi list! Since the Alternative Desktop SIG didn't happen, we thought we would make a more focused effort and improve the Xfce desktop environment experience on CentOS. That might end up being a dedicated CentOS SIG, or just a couple of improvements to the existing packages from EPEL. Once upon a time, or more precisely: back in the CentOS 5.0 days, Xfce 4.4 was available in Extras and it was a pretty simple install that just worked "out of the box". Now, there's the newer versions available via EPEL - but the experience is nowhere near painless... Going to try to meet up with other interested parties during FOSDEM, to see if we can't improve upon that and at least fix the low hanging issues. And get some better Xfce testing and feedback going, as well. A more long-term goal is make it an alternative to GNOME (Workstation). I've rounded up some of the issues, that currently exist: * The theme and icons are wrong, either missing or just ugly * The background image is wrong, ending up with a single color * X11 and Fonts are missing, so just adding the group doesn't work * Some bugs need backporting or fixing, like in Terminal or Xfwm. See http://afb.users.sourceforge.net/xfce/centos/centos-xfce.html Right now, one starts with a Minimal (or Server) install of CentOS. Then adds Base, X11 (including fonts), and finally Xfce (from EPEL). Once the aforementioned problems are taken care of, that should be it. Eventually, it might even end up being a "spin" or available image ? As mentioned earlier, here are the applicable versions of each: * CentOS 5 - Xfce 4.4 (in CentOS Extras) * CentOS 5 - Xfce 4.6 (based on Fedora 6) * CentOS 6 - Xfce 4.8 (based on Fedora 12) * CentOS 7 - Xfce 4.10 (based on Fedora 18) To replace GNOME PackageKit there's the Yum Extender, and to replace GDM there's LightDM (more work is needed, to make a CentOS-6 version). The GNOME icons and GNOME themes will probably "work" to start with, but one can probably improve upon that as well (as a lower priority). Something like http://afb.users.sourceforge.net/xfce/xfce-brave.png If you are interested in helping out with testing, packaging or developing (backporting, fixing the upstream issues, and so on) then please say so. I'll try to have some more detailed lists and updated packages with me, for the FOSDEM meetup in the weekend... * http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Fosdem2015 --anders

5 10

Where should golang-github-gorilla-mux live?
by Matthias Schroeder 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Hi guys, I noticed that golang-github-gorilla-mux 0-0.15.git136d54f.el7_0 is in the ‘updates' and in the ‘extras' repo. Older versions where only in ‘extras’. Is that a conscious change of policy, or did something go wrong with the routing of that version? Cheers, Matthias - just curious

3 3

Port CloudSigma to CentOS's CloudInit
by Viktor Petersson 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hey guys, I had a conversation with Jim Perrin and Karanbir Singh about this and it should be relatively trivial. However, Jim suggested that we moved the discussion here. Here is the status today: * The CloudSigma provider for CloudInit is complete and is maintained by Canonical[1] and is included in (12.04 and forward) * Jim wrote a patch (attached). It isn't complete, but it is a start. * There is also a port to CoreOS (re-written in Go) [2] * Since I didn't write the code, I don't know of the exact workflow, but I think these are the relevant files: ** cloudinit/cs_utils.py ** cloudinit/sources/DataSourceCloudSigma.py ** tests/unittests/test_datasource/test_cloudsigma.py I'm involved with CloudSigma, and I'd be happy to sponsor anyone willing to take on the task of porting this with resources at CloudSigma for testing. Unfortunately, I don't have any internal resources to allocate towards this at this point, but I know that we have plenty of customers running CentOS that would love to see this happen. I'd also be happy with answering any questions and help with the QA of this. Thanks! [1] https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cloud-init-dev/cloud-init/trunk/view/head:/cl… [2] https://github.com/coreos/coreos-cloudinit/issues/184

3 3

comps in SIG content repos
by Karanbir Singh 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

hi, thoughts around requiring SIG repos to carry a comps.xml file ? that will allow us to also have SIG repo configs be usable at install time and yum group operations to run on installed machines. regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 1

Proposal to Cancel the CBS/Infra Meeting on 02-Feb
by Brian Stinson 28 Jan '15

28 Jan '15

Hi All, Since quite a few of us will be traveling or recovering from Fosdem, I propose that we cancel the CBS meeting on Monday 02-Feb. If there are any discussion items, please send them to the centos-devel list. One item would be scheduling the next CBS meeting since I'm not sure of everyone's schedule over the next couple of weeks. Cheers! Brian -- Brian Stinson bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk

1 0

Meeting face to face CentOS Project and EPEL
by Karanbir Singh 28 Jan '15

28 Jan '15

hi, crossposting this to centos-devel and epel-devel we are working to arrange a meeting with the EPEL folks at Fosdem 2015, on 31st Jan at 7pm ( venue to be confirmed ), to try and workout some options on how the two efforts might best co-ordinate. A key part of the conversation would also focus on how SIGs and other contributors to downstream repos in centos.org can interface with and set expectations on the epel repos. Everyone able to make it please let me know your names so I can track attendance and make reservations accordingly. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

17 24

RHSA-2015:0092-1 / CVE-2015-0235
by Jacob Yundt 27 Jan '15

27 Jan '15

About how long does it typically take for the rebuild of upstream glibc RPMs? -Jacob

3 2

Minutes of Jan 27 2015 VIRT SIG Meeting
by Lars Kurth 27 Jan '15

27 Jan '15

Hi all, seems we are making good progress. Thank you everyone! * First Xen release via the SIG is imminent (see Xen section) * We are also close to a Docker release (see Docker section) * We also need to look at cross-SIG dependencies to be able to make use of Gluster support in the Storage SIG (see oVirt section) Regards Lars = Attendees = * Lars Kurth * George Dunlap * Sandro Bonazzola * Lokesh Mandevar = Agenda = == Replace audio meetings in favor of IRC meetings, which seem to work better == <All agree with IRC meetings> ACTION :Send mail to list: If anyone objects, let us know. ACTION: Lars to changeg invite and wiki to reflect IRC meetings always. == Xen Update (George) == 4.4.1 Virt-Sif testing for several weeks now. Everything appears to be working Have a wiki now: covering xend to libxl migration - see http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/Xen4QuickStart Jonny has pushed the signed packages Thus, this is the 1st Xen release from the VIRT SIG ACTION: George to send quick mail to the list and write up a blog post. CC publicity@xenproject and KB such that he can cross post to the CentOS blog if he wants to Note: 4.4.1 is still using the new old 3.10 kernel. DISCUSSION: George: do we have a conflict on kernel versions for CentOS 7. For xen we would need to override the CentOS 7 kernel to make Xen work with CentOS 7 Lokesh: there is no kernel requirement for Docker except that the kernel needs to be >= 3.10 – this should be a match George: potential issue is that Docker is officially supported in RHEL/ CentOS 7 Lokesh: 3.14 should work for Docker, but needs to be verified. George: before we push to public repo we need to test it. Lokesh: CentOS and Docker are tested with 3.10. For Fedora we test with 3.18. Docker has its own test suite. So covering 3.14 should be straightforward George: would you mind if I uploaded 3.10 and see whether it works? But there may be an issue that we would be missing RedHat backports in CentOS 7 Lokesh: Since yesterday have been doing a daily test for rawhide in addition to the stable branch. I don't think there should be an issue George: Checking understanding that a new kernel is totally OK. Lokesh: As long as we are not disabling standard kernel functionality we are fine ACTION: George upload the latest kernel and coordinate with Lokesh re testing to ensure that nothing breaks = Docker update (Lokesh) = Still on 1.4.1 Yesterday I was talking to Jim and KB re a daily rebuild for CentOS and that should be fine Maybe we will have an additional package Docker-upstream or Docker-unsupported (TBD) I have also been talking to people from Kubernetes and Cockpit re new versions. ACTION: Lokesh to make an announcements on the list(s) and then we can try and make a public release. ACTION: Lokesh to create a getting started wiki page ACTION: Lars to link to any announcements in FOSDEM VIRT SIG presentation = oVirt update (Sandro) = 3.5.1 is upstreamed and released Now we have a bit more time to investigate CBS, etc. We also have credentials for wiki and CBS Sandro: I had asked for some HowTo for CBS / Coogee by mail, which is still unresolved George: has some runes for basic stuff which he can share ACTION: George to create brief howto and share on list/wiki. One of the other issues Sandro brought up is that the Storage SIG now has Gluster support and that he would like to build oVirt with support from Gluster packages in the storage SIG. There may a requirement for QEMU and KVM packages (details needed) from that SIG. George: this will require some cross-SIG coordination that we need to resolve. At the moment we don’t have a way to cover inter-SIG dependencies ACTION: Sandro email storage SIG (via centos-devel) and virt SIG and lay out problem to kick off a discussion. Lars can try and follow up with KB and others at FOSDEM. = Any other business = None

1 0

New Xen 4.4 and libvirt 1.2 from Virtialization SIG now Available
by Johnny Hughes 27 Jan '15

27 Jan '15

The new xen-4-41-5 and libvirt-1.2.10-3 RPMs produced by the Virtualization SIG are now live in the Xen4CentOS repo for CentOS-6.6. Thanks to the Virt SIG and the CBS team for all the hard work. Looks like this SIG thing is finally taking off. Stuff from Atomic, Storage, and Virt .. good job guys :) Thanks, Johnny Hughes

1 0

source code of Centos
by Rock Lee 26 Jan '15

26 Jan '15

Hi: I want to make a linux OS based on Centos recently. I searched on Google several days, but still can't find the whole source code of Centos. Is there any way to get the whole source code of Centos, like android, just do a few command and then get the image files --------------------------------

4 7

GlusterFS is now available from Storage SIG
by Lalatendu Mohanty 26 Jan '15

26 Jan '15

Hi All, GlusterFS and ecosystem packages (e.g. Samba, NFS ganesha and CTDB) are available in testing repo. These packages have been signed with storage sig gpg keys. We have a 7 step quick start to get you going really fast [3] . For more info please refer the the admin guide [4] or GlusterFS documentation home page [5]. While testing these packages, if you run in to any issues , you can get in touch with us on centos-devel , gluster-users mailing lists or on irc channel #gluster (on Freenode) Let us know if things work as expected as only after we get some positive feedback , we will we be able to move these packages to the stable released repositories. I have put some extra links below for reference. Looking forward for feedback, comments and suggestions from the community. Thanks a lot to Karanbir Singh for his immense help and efforts to make this happen. [1] http://blog.gluster.org/2014/10/glusterfs-3-6-0-is-alive/ [2] http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/gluster-Quickstart [3] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/release-3.6/doc/admin-guide/en-US… [4] http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Main_Page [5] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users Thanks, Lalatendu Mohanty #lalatenduM on Freenode Coordinator for Storage SIG http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage

2 1

Scope of testing done by CentOS Development Team
by Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS 25 Jan '15

25 Jan '15

Hello, What types of tests does the CentOS Development Team do for software in its repositories? Where does it get its test catalog from? I want to create a testing process which is equal to if not more rigorous that the CentOS process for any third party software we use. For example, if I install the php-mysqlnd package from the Remi repository, I want to test it just as carefully as the php-mysql package has been tested before I get it from the CentOS repository. If somebody can point me in the right direction I'd appreciate it. Thanks! David P.S. I've moved this question from the centos thread to the centos-devel thread as Sven suggested. Original post: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2015-January/149091.html

3 3

No Atomic SIG Meeting for 29 January 2015
by Joe Brockmeier 23 Jan '15

23 Jan '15

Hi all, Many of the folks involved in Project Atomic are going to be traveling to FOSDEM or involved in other activities related to FOSDEM next week. It makes sense to skip next week's meeting, because I doubt many of us would be able to actually attend. However, we do have a few action items from this week's meeting [1]: imcleod imcleod to request git.centos.org credentials, work on acting as "mirror" for github/atomic -> git.centos.org jzb work with walters and imcleod to set up github repo for collaboration jzb jzb work with walters and imcleod to set up github repo for collaboration walters jzb work with walters and imcleod to set up github repo for collaboration It'd be great if folks who have active AIs could send an update to the lists with the status there. I'll be sure to do so. Thanks! jzb [1] http://centos.org/minutes/2015/january/centos-devel.2015-01-22-16.02.html -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

Storage SIG Meeting 23-Jan-2015 15:30 UTC
by Lalatendu Mohanty 23 Jan '15

23 Jan '15

Greetings All! Time for another Storage SIG meeting [1] . We will be meeting in #centos-devel on Freenode. Agenda: #info Topic: Action items from previous meeting #info Topic: Status Updates #info Subtopic: GlusterFS #info Subtopic: OpenAFS #info Subtopic: Ceph #info Subtopic: SCST #info Open Floor Action items from previous meetings: * ACTION: billings to build OpenAFS using koji (lalatenduM, 15:35:29) * ACTION: billings to try out reimzul's way of kmod building and yum priorities stuff for openafs repo (lalatenduM, 15:49:54) * ACTION: alphacc to validate the storage7 koji targets and setup new tags as needed for openafs (kbsingh, 15:53:42) * ACTION: kbsingh to see if openafs is GPL compatible or not (lalatenduM, 15:53:54) * ACTION: lalatenduM will help deason to get standard policy or guidance on packaging selinux rules (lalatenduM, 15:54:48) * ACTION: lalatenduM will help scuttlemonkey on 101 for building Ceph on cbs (lalatenduM, 15:55:47) * ACTION: hchiramm needs to finalize wiki articles for GlusterFS (lalatenduM, 16:01:23) [1] http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage Thanks, Lala #lalatenduM on Freenode

2 1

CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting on #centos-devel (2015-01-21)
by Honza Horak 23 Jan '15

23 Jan '15

WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston, 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode. = Topics = * current status * summarize the current work-flow to build collections * Fosdem plans

1 1

Cloud SIG meeting summary
by Kushal Das 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

=============================== #centos-devel: CentOS Cloud SIG =============================== Meeting started by kushal at 15:02:37 UTC. The full logs are available at centos-devel/2015/centos-devel.2015-01-22-15.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll call (kushal, 15:02:42) * Action items from last meeting (kushal, 15:11:48) * ACTION: rbowen will followup the RDO community for the help on Juno on EL6 (kushal, 15:14:08) * David Hill volunteered to maintain Centos/RHEL/EL6 packages for Juno on rdo-list (rbowen, 15:14:19) * LINK: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rdo-list/2015-January/msg00066.html (rbowen, 15:14:44) * ACTION: number80 will open a ticket to get access to the box to install RDO from CBS (kushal, 15:17:03) * kbsingh got the machines for number80 to install RDO (kushal, 15:18:32) * ACTION: send to centos-devel list of packages and builds to sign for CBS RDO repo and open a ticket (number80, 15:21:24) * ACTION: kushal to send emails to the SIG members before meetings, and for once to the -devel and -user lists for those projects. (kushal, 15:37:38) * LINK: http://markmail.org/message/onebulgjkquotgkc (rbowen, 15:50:50) Meeting ended at 15:51:14 UTC. Action Items ------------ * rbowen will followup the RDO community for the help on Juno on EL6 * number80 will open a ticket to get access to the box to install RDO from CBS * send to centos-devel list of packages and builds to sign for CBS RDO repo and open a ticket * kushal to send emails to the SIG members before meetings, and for once to the -devel and -user lists for those projects. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * kushal * kushal to send emails to the SIG members before meetings, and for once to the -devel and -user lists for those projects. * number80 * number80 will open a ticket to get access to the box to install RDO from CBS * rbowen * rbowen will followup the RDO community for the help on Juno on EL6 * **UNASSIGNED** * send to centos-devel list of packages and builds to sign for CBS RDO repo and open a ticket People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * kushal (67) * kbsingh (40) * rbowen (24) * number80 (15) * centbot (4) * jzb (1) * bstinson (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot Kushal -- Fedora Cloud Engineer CPython Core Developer Director Python Software Foundation http://kushaldas.in

1 0

Publish Errata for CentOS
by Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

Hello, I originally asked on the centos mailing list when CentOS will publish errata like Red Hat does for RHEL. It has since turned into a discussion which seems more fit for the centos-devel list, so I'm moving it here now. Here is the last post on the centos list: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2015-January/149122.html The current problem which needs to be tackled is where to get the data from. It has been suggested that getting the data from Red Hat's emails would not be a breach of Red Hat's ToU. Can anybody confirm this? If this is the case, then we can just subscribe a bot to the emails and generate the data from that and put it in updateinfo.xml. Thanks, David

8 13

Say hello to CentOS DevCloud
by Karanbir Singh 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

hi, We've been working on this on and off for a while, and are pretty close to taking up user accounts now. I've started documenting the User part of things here : http://wiki.centos.org/DevCloud There is a GUI as well, but meh. Everyone can CLI it. This is running off OpenNebula on 4 machines, with gluster doing the storage under it. There are another 4 machines waiting to do in, as soon as we get extra power capacity at the DC it will expand ( from 64 cores now, to 128 cores ); there are a few TiB of fairly performant storage backing this entire setup. There are no real limits for the users at this point, and unless we get lots of people being abusive of resources, we will try and keep it that way. regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

atomic-anconda-nightly tree's are paused
by Karanbir Singh 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

hi, I've disabled the nightly run for the atomic-anaconda builds, there seems to be some issue in lorax running from cron; will investigate this and also, this might be a good time to start looking at running tests against the atomic ostree repo and atomic-anaconda images. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel January 2015