devel October 2015

devel@lists.centos.org

41 participants
40 discussions

content movement from CBS into various places.
by Karanbir Singh 21 Oct '15

21 Oct '15

hi this image highlights content movement from cbs into various places : http://www.karan.org/CBS_ContentPromotion.png note that the sync to buildlogs is automatic, but you need to opt into that, also move from -release tag to mirror.centos.org is manual, since it involves a sign process ( again, sig's must opt into that, its not doing automatically, yet ) regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

SIG's and groups announcing content
by Karanbir Singh 20 Oct '15

20 Oct '15

hi, Quite a few groups in and around the CentOS Project are getting ready to announce code, releases, images etc. so I thought it might be good to get a draft of what a good-announcement looks like, as a template others might ( or might not ) want to follow. I've had a very brief crack at it here : https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AnnouncingReleases Everyone in the SIGs space should be able to edit that page, and add/extend, please do so. Or just leave comments and patches here on the list, and I'll merge them into the page. regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 1

bootstrap for CentOS Configuration Management SIG
by Karanbir Singh 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

hi, Julien Pivotto is going to undertake bootstrapping the ConfigManagement SIG, and I've setup a wiki page under the SIG space. We can use this co-ordinate the initial proposal and also as a way to bring together and document scope + deliverables from people who would be interested in joining this effort. config management is a core component of many infra setups around the world these days, and i am sure we have a fair level of interest within the existing SIGs as well as the existing contributor base. So everyone lets get behind Julien and help with this effort. He is putting together his initial thoughts at : https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/ConfigManagementSIG ; we can use this centos-devel mailing list as a means of communication and for questions etc. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 2

moving to a regular account admin schedule
by Karanbir Singh 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

hi folks, we've now gotten to a point where we regularly have account requests for various CentOS resources, to a point where its harder to track things down constantly. I'd like to move towards a schedule based admin cycle for the following resources: - cbs.centos.org - ci.centos.org - devcloud Ideally, this would run through in a way to have the backlog cleared on every alternate Monday, for the buildsystem meeting every alternate Monday to confirm new-users onboarded and followup with any new-user training we need to run through. Note that every resource needs some level of support or sponsorship, so folks requesting accounts should make sure that is in place, before the next cycle. ofcourse we would look into emergency and downtime situations as soon as we are able to. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

CentOS-7 / powerpc LE bring up
by James O'Connor 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

Starting a new status thread for CentOS 7 POWER Little Endian. On Monday, Arrfab turned over the keys to a pairf of shiny new Fedora 21 ppc64le VMs running atop PowerKVM. I created a f21-ppc64le mock config and built a Linux from Scratch [1] toolchain with CentOS 7.1.1503 sources. This is necessary to jump back in time from Fedora 21 glibc-2.20 to CentOS 7 glibc-2.17. I then proceeded to build enough ppc64le.el7 rpms with the LFS toolchain to construct a minimal c7.01.01-ppc64le mock buildroot. As of last night, the minimal c7.01.01-ppc64le buildroot is complete and I’m untangling circular dependencies in the CentOS 7.1.1503 source rpms. I’ve built 700 of 2523 source packages so 27% complete with this first pass. Next, I’ll bootstrap java-1.7.0-openjdk and continue to loop through ppc64le rpm builds with mock. In the next 1-2 weeks, I should have 95+% of the source packages building for ppc64le. At which point we can create the first CentOS 7 ppc64le VMs and rebuild c7.01.02-ppc64le atop CentOS 7 instead of Fedora 21. CentOS 7.1.1503 ppc64le Alpha images for the early adopters sometime after that. [1] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable-systemd/

5 9

[Atomic] 20151001 Atomic seems to be broken
by Dusty Mabe 14 Oct '15

14 Oct '15

For some reason I can't seem to get it [1] to boot. I get a "No bootable device" massage from the BIOS for both libvirt/kvm and a local openstack setup. Can someone confirm or refute this? Dusty [1] - http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/atomic/images/CentOS-Atomic-Host-7.2015100…

2 3

Re: [CentOS-devel] [scl.org] validating scls being built
by Karanbir Singh 12 Oct '15

12 Oct '15

On 11/10/15 03:21, Subhendu Ghosh wrote: > It would also be useful if the repo definitions did not use > ReleaseVersion to allow use by CentOS and other distroa. let me see if we can parametrise those from the jenkins side of things - should be possible, and we can default to something that works here for the scl/cbs process. regards, > > Sent from Nine <http://www.9folders.com/> > > *From:* Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org> > *Sent:* Oct 10, 2015 6:29 PM > *To:* centos-devel(a)centos.org; sclorg(a)redhat.com > *Subject:* [scl.org] validating scls being built > > firstly, apologies for the cross post. > > I've setup an example to illustrate some very simple things we can do to > validate a collection. In this case the vagrant collection. > > https://github.com/kbsingh/validate-vagrant-scl has the test script. > > It does 2 things: > 1) makes sure all the rpms we expect to have in the repo are there. > 2) it will install the collection, run a centos/7 vagrant box, and run > the centos functional test suite inside the box. if this passes, we can > assert that vagrant installed ok, was able to run a libvirt backed box > properly, and was able to provide typical expected functionality. > > There maybe 100s more features of the collection we are not testing > here, but that might not be needed if a simple baseline is established. > And this test can be run, from triggers in ci.centos.org, watching the 3 > repos we care about for the vagrant collection ( ruby22 / ror41 and > vagrant itself ). > > thoughts ? > > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

CBS/Infra Meeting 12-Oct-2015 1400UTC
by Brian Stinson 12 Oct '15

12 Oct '15

Hi All, It's time for another meeting to talk about the Community Build System[0]. We will meet in #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net Proposed Agenda: - Cloud SIG was curious about mirroring some tags to buildlogs.centos.org - 3rd party Repositories Proposal - Last half of the meeting devoted to an introduction to ci.centos.org https://plus.google.com/events/ckne86ufafpbfm00ducc9rl711g See you there! --Brian

1 0

validating scls being built
by Karanbir Singh 10 Oct '15

10 Oct '15

firstly, apologies for the cross post. I've setup an example to illustrate some very simple things we can do to validate a collection. In this case the vagrant collection. https://github.com/kbsingh/validate-vagrant-scl has the test script. It does 2 things: 1) makes sure all the rpms we expect to have in the repo are there. 2) it will install the collection, run a centos/7 vagrant box, and run the centos functional test suite inside the box. if this passes, we can assert that vagrant installed ok, was able to run a libvirt backed box properly, and was able to provide typical expected functionality. There maybe 100s more features of the collection we are not testing here, but that might not be needed if a simple baseline is established. And this test can be run, from triggers in ci.centos.org, watching the 3 repos we care about for the vagrant collection ( ruby22 / ror41 and vagrant itself ). thoughts ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

Atomic-developer-bundle for inclusion in Atomic SIG
by Lalatendu Mohanty 08 Oct '15

08 Oct '15

Hi, Asapart of Project Atomic [1], we are working ona toolchain (as of now it is a Vagrant box),atomic-developer-bundle [2],for helping application developers package their microservice architecture applications for delivery vialinux containers.ADB (atomic developer bundle) is supported on GNU/Linux distributions, OSX and WIndows. It has (or isgoing to have) all the goodies that are part of Project Atomic to better enableLinux containers. Currently, the Vagrant box is based on CentOS. Therefore I think itmakes more sense toinclude it in the CentOS Atomic SIG. I believe this willopen channels with thecommunity and lead togreater participation. Let me know your thoughtson including the ADB as part of the Atomic SIG. For details please go through the README in ADB github repo [2] [1] https://github.com/projectatomic [2] https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle Thanks, Lala On behalf of ADB developers

4 10

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel October 2015