devel June 2015

devel@lists.centos.org

49 participants
40 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] Where to GSoC blog?
by Lei Yang 05 Jun '15

05 Jun '15

Hi, I think writing on a central place like seven.centos.org <http://seven.centos.org/> is a great choice. I’ve written some blog articles in Chinese, and I am willing to write them in English and post on seven.centos.org <http://seven.centos.org/> :) Regards, Lei

1 0

Regarding GSoC project : Documentation Toolchain
by kunaal jain 05 Jun '15

05 Jun '15

Hi, Over the last week, Lei and I have been researching about the review platform where the content submitted can be reviewed, commented, tagged and pushed. This will be an alternative to github pull requests interface, which will thus reduce our dependency on Github in case Github changes its API anytime in future. Even firefox is considering using Github as an alternative medium to receive contribution. http://gregoryszorc.com/blog/2015/01/12/utilizing-github-for-firefox-develo… Lei made a great chart comparing the platforms. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9sUy41_Rk3KdGl4RVhDSXZIZmc/view?usp=shari… So overall Bugzilla looks a great option. But there is one major flaw, we need to view the article submitted at each point(code review) which bugzilla lacks. The solution to this is creating a plugin for markdown previewing. The typical workflow might look like this: 1. Author writes content in markdown language. 2. Makes a pull request on github. 3. Corresponding to the pull request a issue is created on bugzilla. 4. CentOS staff can either review the article on github pull request, or on bugzilla. 5. Comments are two way synced. 6. At each point the article can be viewed on bugzilla, using an extension we propose to make. 7. After many iterations of commenting, and improving, article is finally accepted. 8. Staff tags it, and pushes to git.centos.org. 9. Using git.centos.org, new website is generated and pushed. There are many challenging tasks in this, especially the bugzilla issue creation on pull request and two way comment sync. This has never been done before, but we looked at the API and think we can make it work. Another challenging task is markdown preview on bugzilla. Please let us know, what you think about this? Regards, Kunaal -- Regards, Kunaal Jain

2 1

Cloud SIG meeting minutes (2015-06-04)
by Rich Bowen 05 Jun '15

05 Jun '15

Thanks to those that attended the Cloud SIG Meeting. Minutes follow. Minutes may also be found online at: http://centos.org/minutes/2015/june/centos-devel.2015-06-04-15.00.txt http://centos.org/minutes/2015/june/centos-devel.2015-06-04-15.00.html Full logs may be found at: http://centos.org/minutes/2015/june/centos-devel.2015-06-04-15.00.log.html http://centos.org/minutes/2015/june/centos-devel.2015-06-04-15.00.log.txt ===================== #centos-devel Meeting ===================== Meeting started by rbowen at 15:00:53 UTC. The full logs are available at centos-devel/2015/centos-devel.2015-06-04-15.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * LINK: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cloud_sig_agenda (rbowen, 15:01:05) * rollcall (rbowen, 15:01:16) * Update on Juno/Kilo releases (rbowen, 15:04:19) * GSOC updates (rbowen, 15:06:03) * My project is related to atomic, fedora and centOS (tmrts, 15:07:43) * LINK: https://github.com/TamerTas/cloud-init/blob/master/ROADMAP.md (tmrts, 15:08:38) * First few weeks I'll be focusing on the core part of the cloud-init (users, network, ssh, custom scripts) then I'll get to the specifics of each target system (tmrts, 15:09:37) * Open Floor (rbowen, 15:17:22) * ACTION: I'll add CentOS 6 to the cloud-init test environment (tmrts, 15:22:26) Meeting ended at 15:28:31 UTC. Action Items ------------ * I'll add CentOS 6 to the cloud-init test environment Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * I'll add CentOS 6 to the cloud-init test environment People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * rbowen (33) * kbsingh (19) * tmrts (17) * apevec (6) * centbot (2) * number80 (2) * alphacc (1) * Evolution (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com OpenStack Community Liaison http://rdoproject.org/

1 0

moving ci.dev
by Karanbir Singh 05 Jun '15

05 Jun '15

hi guys, I believe we are fairly well established on the ci.centos.org infra to now consider moving the ci.dev instances from their present location at godaddy.com. This would also allow us to run the ci.dev nightly tests on baremetal machines. It would also allow us to consolidate the jenkins instance, and maybe SIGs and other tested projects could use the distro runs as a trigger for their own validation / testing. Brian, can we find a slot in one of the CBS meetings to work through this ? Regards, -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

4 4

Image builds in cbs.centos.org
by Karanbir Singh 05 Jun '15

05 Jun '15

hi, Why do the image builds in cbs/koji take so long ( upto 45 minutes ) when the same kickstart run with virt-install will finish in ~ 3 min, and the qemu-img converts take a few minutes as well. On similar spec hardware as the koji builders themselves. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

Where to GSoC blog?
by Karsten Wade 04 Jun '15

04 Jun '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 One of the tasks of the GSoC students is to write up their work and experiences as they go, typically with at least one blog post per week. Often projects then put the students on the main project planet or a special GSoC-specific planet. KB had the idea that instead we might want students and mentors to use e.g. seven.centos.org to blog from instead. I've asked around and can't be sure how project planets get used. Some people read them, many don't. Individual blogs get picked up in e.g. Google, so that's one reason for using seven.centos.org -- to improve searching around the GSoC topics. Thoughts? We're a bit in to the process, I should have pushed on a decision sooner, so I appreciate any quick feedback. Thanks - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVwnyIACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEwRQCg2hbch9DkVjoJEL6NKTa8tu6I gmsAoMsQjTAqZep1z2IhT8S928YLVsds =wSd/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting on #centos-devel next week
by Honza Horak 03 Jun '15

03 Jun '15

Sorry for late announcement, but I'm not able to hold today's meeting, let's try the next week. However, if there are some updates since last meeting two weeks back about look-aside cache or koji tags stuff, give us know, please. Adam, Brian, have you got in touch somehow? Honza

1 0

CentOS 7 i686 Repository for mock (Multilib Builds)
by Mykola Ulianytskyi 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

Hi I need to build multilib packages for CentOS 7 using mock. Is CentOS 7 i686 devel repository publicly available (repohost)? mock.cfg example: http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-updates/kernel/20141224145219/3.10.0-123.13.… Thank you -- With best regards, Mykola

7 7

[NFV SIG] Need info
by Gasparakis, Joseph 01 Jun '15

01 Jun '15

Hi Haikel/Dave, As discussed in: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CommunityBuildSystem I created bug #8784 in the CentOS BT (Project Buildsys/Component community builds): http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8784 ...and I believe the next step is for one of you to add a note to the issue to verify my role in the SIG. Can you please take care of it? Thanks Joseph -- Joseph Gasparakis Software Engineer Network Platform Group Software Defined Networking Division

6 10

Re: [CentOS-devel] Setting up fedmsg for centos
by Jan Chaloupka 01 Jun '15

01 Jun '15

On 06/01/2015 03:28 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > can we move this conversation to the centos-devel list please. > > - KB > > On 01/06/15 14:25, Jan Chaloupka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> CentOS does not have any equivalent to fedmsg bus [1] at the moment. >> What is it used for? Services (koji, pkgdb, ...) can send messages about >> their state and result of tasks they run into the bus to notify other >> service which can react accordingly. Thus creating a modular >> infrastructure. E.g. koji send a message about finished build. Agent >> read the message, trigger a jenkins job and run additional tests on the >> build. Daily statistics about number of finished /failed builds can be >> collected. Other application can have their own use cases. Example of >> bus topology [4]. [5] is another source of some info about fedora >> infrastructure. >> >> What needs to be done to set up the bus? Basic demo and setup of fedmsg, >> fedmsg-relay is at [3]. First would be great to setup the bus for koji. >> Koji runs on CentOS 6. fedpkg package is in epel6 repository [2]. We >> will be needing fedmsg-hub, fedmsg-relay, koji-hub and koji-plugin parts >> in the topology at the moment [4]. CentOS koji and Fedora koji are not >> exacly the same but both APIs are compatible. So maybe take an >> inspiration from Fedora's koji plugin. In order to set up bus and >> clients, endpoints has to be set. Setting of endpoints is discussed at >> [6]. Context of endpoints is described at [3]. Configuration files are >> shared and must be the same on all machines using the bus. Bus messages >> can be saved into database [7]. >> >> What we can start with? >> 1) create an instance of centos/fedora for fedmsg to run >> 2) create/reuse koji plugin (where it can be found?) >> 3) set/implement koji plugin to send messages for fedmsg >> >> What other application do you have in centos that could use fedmsg? >> >> Once there is a running msg bus, instances set, etc., it will be easier >> to debug and test. >> >> Ralph, Pierre, what would be the optimal distribution of instances for >> fedmsg? Is one instance of centos enough? What would be the best first >> step to set up fedmsg? Where can I found koji-plugin, resp. its >> implementation? This question is confusing. I supposed fedmsg is a master and all services are slaves. However, as Pierre-Yves informed me there is no master. fedmsg bus is decentralized and distributed among all services. Thus thus the configuration distributed on each host. >> This is only a discussion at the moment. Any other ideas are >> appreciated. Other issues and problems will arise while configuring the >> bus and koji. >> >> [1] https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/ >> [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=630367 >> [3] http://fedmsg.readthedocs.org/en/latest/deployment/ >> [4] http://fedmsg.readthedocs.org/en/latest/topology/ >> [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Messaging_SIG >> [6] http://fedmsg.readthedocs.org/en/latest/config/#term-endpoints >> [7] http://fedmsg.readthedocs.org/en/latest/deployment/#store-all-messages >> >> Kind Regards >> Jan >

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel June 2015