devel December 2016

devel@lists.centos.org

49 participants
38 discussions

Fwd: Vagrant boxes (7.2.1511)
by Carlos Rodrigues 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

Hi, Now that CentOS 7.3 has been released, vagrant boxes have become broken when the vagrant-vbguest plugin is used to build guest additions at creation time due to the "kernel-devel" package matching the running kernel not being available in the default repos anymore (since the base repo is not cumulative with older point releases). Of course, once there's an official CentOS 7.3 base box available, the problem should fix itself, but a somewhat important usecase remains broken and it's why I'm posting this: Using vagrant is especially useful when you want reproducible environments, and this includes pinning the base box to a particular version. As it stands, new CentOS point releases permanently break this usecase and I believe it would be important to have a solution for this. Best regards, -- Carlos Rodrigues

5 7

Cloud SIG: lessons learn in transition to 7.3
by Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

Hi, During the transition to CentOS 7.3, we have been hitting some issues in Cloud SIG and have collected them in https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/release-centos-7.3 so that we can learn for next releases. As some of the issues are generic and related to the CentOS release process, please feel free to comment on the etherpad or #centos-devel any feedback or questions that you may have about it. Best regards, Alfredop

1 0

keeping Extras in sync with Core
by Colin Walters 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

So right now following the instructions on: https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/Docker results in a non-working Docker because the version in Extras hasn't been rebuilt yet, and there's a strong dependency on selinux policy. I'm still trying to wade through the pile of virt7* repos to find something working, right now hitting a requirement on `skopeo-containers`. In the future, can we ensure that there's a "CR" version of Extras[1] that is built at the same time, and they're all released at once? We also need to figure out how CR interacts with the CBS content better. [1] And ideally other things like the atomic host content, but let's start with Extras

1 0

Atomic SIG: discussion about kubernetes-node in downstream image
by Jason Brooks 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

With the goal of slimming down the size of our atomic host image and of allowing users the flexibility to choose different component versions, we removed kubernetes and few other packages from the continuous/alpha version of centos atomic host back in august[1]. [1] https://github.com/CentOS/sig-atomic-buildscripts/commit/3ce19d58a5f1d9b5d5… Fedora made a similar change[2] in Fedora Atomic 25. [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/c/219c9bb26426811a5f32188c59682ad70c3283e5 RHEL Atomic host, in the 7.3 version, went halfway and removed the master half of kubernetes, but left the node half of the package in place. When we update the downstream version of CentOS Atomic Host, if we follow the lead of RHEL AH, we'll be pinned to kubernetes 1.3 for the kubelet and kube-proxy, and we'll have to run the master components in containers. I want to discuss diverging from RHEL AH by not including the kubernetes-node pkg in our downstream image. This would allow users to install a newer version of the kubernetes-node, such as this 1.4.5 version from my copr[3] that I hope to see move into the virt-sig soon. [3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jasonbrooks/kubernetes/ The 1.3 kube would still be available in the extras repo (once it's built), and users will have the option of installing that one, if they choose, using package layering. [4] [4] http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2016/07/hacking-and-extending-atomic-host/ Either way, we'll need to document this, and I'm working on those docs now. Jason

3 4

Plan to cancel Paas SIG meeting this week (Dec. 14)
by Troy Dawson 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

Hi, I will not be available on December 14th so I will not be able to run the Paas SIG meeting. If anyone wants to step up and run it, they can. Otherwise we'll cancel it. Troy

4 3

Fwd: Release 7.3.1611 and qemu-ev-2.6.0
by Víctor Córcoles López 12 Dec '16

12 Dec '16

---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: "Víctor Córcoles López" <vcl.centos(a)gmail.com> Fecha: 7/12/2016 13:32 Asunto: Release 7.3.1611 and qemu-ev-2.6.0 Para: <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Cc: I would like to know when 7.3.1611 will be released, I would like install a server and I am waiting to 7.3.1611 because I need New libguestfs and p2v versions. On the other hand, Will be qemu-kvm-2.6.0 introduced in Virtualization SIG ?

2 4

Vagrant + network "private_network", type: "dhcp" => Error: Job for network.service failed because the control process exited with error code
by Stéphane Klein 09 Dec '16

09 Dec '16

Hi, I have this error with my Vagrant config: ``` Job for network.service failed because the control process exited with error code ``` My Vagrant file: ``` Vagrant.configure("2") do |config| config.vm.box = "centos/atomic-host" config.vm.hostname = "ceph-client-2" config.vm.network "private_network", type: "dhcp" end ``` full log: https://gist.github.com/harobed/84d275b30ab928e4753b2c772425feca With `journalctl -xe' I have: ``` Dec 08 10:16:30 ceph-client-2 sshd[12198]: lastlog_openseek: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog: No such file or directory ``` How can I fix that? Best regards, Stéphane -- Stéphane Klein <contact(a)stephane-klein.info> blog: http://stephane-klein.info cv : http://cv.stephane-klein.info Twitter: http://twitter.com/klein_stephane

2 1

centos-logos legal problem
by Kouta Ikematsu 08 Dec '16

08 Dec '16

Hello. centos-logos (included CentOS version 7) license tag is "All rights reserved". I see COPYING, This license is not permitted copy and redistribute except copyright/trademark written permission. because "permit copy and redistribute" statement is not find. but this license permit specific usage. I report bug report. https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12269 Is this is legal problem ? I think that this license is not allow copy, redistribute and mirror, It is legal problem. Thank you. Reference: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/

2 2

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2016-12-07)
by Troy Dawson 07 Dec '16

07 Dec '16

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays Date: Today Wedensday, 07 December 2016 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms -- Documentation -- Automated testing -- images / image building - Multi-arch - Open Floor

3 4

[OpsTools] rubygem-fluent-plugin-rewrite-tag-filter
by Yedidyah Bar David 06 Dec '16

06 Dec '16

Hi all, I'd like to have rubygem-fluent-plugin-rewrite-tag-filter in the opstools sig repos. Not sure what exactly should be done for this. There are two github organizations, [1] and [2], and some packages forked between them. Seems like we have a repo per project. So we need a new project, right? In which organization? Who can/should handle this? I currently try to use a build I found in copr [3], and it seems to work. I checked the git repo [4] it was built from, and the spec file there is an unchanged output of gem2rpm. We can start with this, I didn't review it yet myself (and have zero experience with packaging ruby gems). Thanks and best regards, [1] https://github.com/opstools-packages [2] https://github.com/centos-opstools [3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/a15/fluent-0.12/build/469721/ [4] http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/a15/fluent-0.12/rubygem-flue… -- Didi

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel December 2016