devel April 2018

devel@lists.centos.org

31 participants
30 discussions

anaconda dependency calculation?
by Nicholas Byrne 04 Aug '25

04 Aug '25

Hi all, I'm trying to find a tool that calculates all dependencies for a specific package or group of packages for use with CentOS 5 (beta) with the intention of putting together a custom single CD build of CentOS 5. With CentOS 4 i used a python script that used the hdrlist module to find all dependencies which borrowed code from a number of sources. I've looked at yumdownloader and how it checks dependencies (using the --resolve option) but if i pass it the list of packages defined in say the Base and the Core yum groups which generally form an absolute minimal install i end up with about 200 packages. If i do a custom install (using beta 1 disks) and deselect everything i end up with over 300 packages. So i'm guessing anaconda calculates dependencies in a slightly different way, can anyone point me to files/code where i should be looking to find out? Thanks very much in advance for help Nick This e-mail is the property of Quadriga Worldwide Ltd, intended for the addressee only and confidential. Any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message or any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to and from Quadriga may be monitored. Quadriga cannot guarantee any message delivery method is secure or error-free. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. We do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this message and/or attachment that arise as a result of transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Quadriga.

6 11

forums + portal for {lang}.centos.org sites
by Karanbir Singh 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi, Earlier in the evening today Ralph, Fabian and I had a chat about the present state of the language subsites. This email sort of summarises the main issue ( s/w ). We seem to have run into a slight technical hitch with punbb/fluxbb. They dont support LDAP as a backend. And we had decided a few months back that all new rollouts must have ldap backend so we can rollin CentOS-DS / openldap based backend. So we need to look at alternatives, and since the primary focus of these international sites is going be forums : Here is a shortlist ( if there is anything else that people are aware of, please add to this list ) - phpBB - SMF - Fudforum - phorum - fluxbb Requirements: - Must be able to scale ( couple of hundred thousand msgs ) - Must be able to handle ldap auth ( if it cant, whats involved in writing the ldap-auth portion ) - Must address the specific requirements raised by the present www.centos.org forum users ( Can you please fill this section in ? ) - Must support all languages we need ( pure utf8 support would be good ) - Secure - Skin'able Nice to have: - Capable of running multiple instances from a single deployment - responsive community :D Things we will need to do: - Decide on what s/w to use. - Give the ArtWork people enough time to get the look & feel sorted. - Migrate newbb forums from www.centos.org to $system ( hey, english is a language too :D ). - Migrate fr.centos.org into the final s/w - setup {de/es/ja/it/pt_br}.centos.org Actions: Ralph and Fabian are going to work on setting up a test ldap server, once that is online we will then start by installing into our test-vm-farm the various s/w to eval them. If anyone would like to help, please feel free to jump right in. I'll setup a wiki page for this issue, which might be a good place to track progress. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

22 81

SRPMS for AltArch (more specifically aarch64 kernel)
by Dominique Martinet 22 Aug '18

22 Aug '18

Hi folks, I've asked on IRC and have been pointed to this list. I can't seem to find this particular source rpm: kernel-aarch64-4.5.0-29.el7.src.rpm which is what is pointed by `rpm -qi kernel` on my system. Are these supposed to be available anywhere? Looking on google I only see one for an older release in someone's centos user/people page, but I can't seem to find these in any repo. The debuginfo are properly here but it's good to have sources as well when messing around with low level stuff :) Cheers and thanks for the hard work, -- Dominique Martinet

3 8

Status of Ansible within CentOS 7 and SIGs
by Thomas Oulevey 09 Jun '18

09 Jun '18

Hello Folks, Starting with CentOS 7.5, ansible package will no be available in CentOS -extras anymore as Red Hat decided to ship Ansible on a separate channel. Looking at ansible package in CBS [1] I see that Troy, Fabian, Sandro and Alan are rebuilding it. Can we get better at that task ? My proposal would to initiate a rebuild of the new Ansible channel[2](within the Config Management SIG) and follow a better release cycle. What do you think ? Would it be a solution from all SIG, or should we continue to ship Ansible within each SIG ? I would be happy to contribute the rebuild/debranding of existing source rpms (all available versions) if we all agree. Please note that EPEL is shipping again Ansible 2.5 as it was removed from Extras [3] -- Thomas Oulevey [1]: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1947 [2]: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/Ansible/SRPMS/ [3]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13842

8 14

Notes from CERN pre-dojo
by Rich Bowen 23 May '18

23 May '18

The notes from the pre-dojo meeting at CERN, yesterday, may be found in the etherpad at https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/cern-centos-thursday Those involved in the various discussion topics are requested to elaborate, where appropriate. Thanks to everyone who attended this very productive discussion. --Rich -- -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @rbowen // @rdocommunity // @CentOSProject 859 351 9166

5 7

URLs in centos-release-<sig> packages: /altarch vs. /centos/
by Brian Stinson 13 May '18

13 May '18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks, Now that we have SIG Content in the /altarch directories for CentOS 7 on the mirrors, we need to come with some requirements and recommendations for dealing with the different locations. tl;dr The current thinking is to add the following snippet in the %post of centos-release and release to all of the arches. This will set a yum var to the correct content location when a new system gets installed: `uname -m | grep -q 'x86_64' && echo 'centos' >/etc/yum/vars/contentdir || echo 'altarch' >/etc/yum/vars/contentdir` Here's the start of a proposal from the SIG perspective ## Requirements: - - The same noarch binary RPM *must* be distributable to the Extras repo for each architecture - - The centos-release-<SIG> packages *must* require centos-release ## New Recommendations for creating a centos-release file: - - A yum variable called 'contentdir' will be populated with the toplevel directory for SIGs to use 1.) Modify baseurls in the SIG repo files to look like the following (using openstack-queens as an example): [centos-openstack-queens] name=CentOS-7 - OpenStack queens baseurl=https://mirror.centos.org/$contentdir/cloud/$basearch/openstack-que… gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-SIG-Cloud exclude=sip,PyQt4 ## Discussion I'd like to hear thoughts, additions, and subtractions here before we update the SIGGuide and rework centos-release. Cheers! - -- Brian Stinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJanjEMAAoJEIMGvNKzCweMR6oQAMbsKqvJcfKW1+5yHsbEV33d QAAMwjEcKfZ+v9ypejErbPPh5RhuNCoRFFHUDAn4hBJNo2zb0YC0vKZJF3RIPIkV 9GAOwnnrWIvFJbeZ7sY4POMa/50IJXC3N8CeiW2XonDtf58rXZPsXM9/9JN9xCv7 X39FAIufCYA7rmedta236NMAutiEolyDFKWWJN6kwDzhm4p7BT9UVSyf7sWCBDzx t+TuCo7LZei4iwQWho1YL/9jbm0YP6EEyL3jJ/YT68cE8q9Mqd8qiE0gEMy0Eoof FuGNOLMrFhsvg3jNQr5DkbToDU+VwO3B+YVR29pTrd0Gf8bodmGTH31eCEljlhjg uPlms2cDvkaXlJmjO6XHM0D2cxmlTzBfVG7YrRwlD40JSk1Z3iyPyLkWJ967oyVM 9mmkhv4spNCX4okQlNI737bULwcxILM6ks3oCdO4i4Yk8BbZp/iwrJ9jcxr7U5YT Cvq2SuV5EbcXlxnhmMd/V6+F/VkgKqi0xrltKURlVUk+JzabHTw5zGwcRjnHxUQR nz2YiQ0mdR/pPuGyXl6xOqXl+M6khPBdCk4FHHdrZYw6aijo8FHzR1DYc63m4ibf Pkad1V9Awetuz0YwewgTp3MviRlklQte8jXMV/1Nh0TTp8xIs5e4ISNBwD3EtINL oqQYqpSGC0jkrwXD5fRG =F1Fp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

7 14

[Artwork] Is the Artwork SIG alive?
by Rich Bowen 03 May '18

03 May '18

I've been working through the various SIGs, trying to determine which ones are active. I'm curious about the state of the Artwork SIG. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Artwork Is this still an ongoing effort, or is it "done"? -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @RDOcommunity // @CentOSProject // @rbowen

4 3

Reboot issue with kernel 3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64
by Lamar Owen 02 May '18

02 May '18

Ok, so I'm trying out CR for 7.5.1804, and I have upgrade three machines with it. One is my laptop, a Dell Precision M6700, which worked fine. Another is a Dell R715 server, and that worked fine. The third machine will not successfully reboot with the 3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64 kernel, throwing endless errors of the form "qla2xxx [0000:03:07.0]-5046:4: Async-gpdb failed - hdX-xxx portid=xxxxxx status=38 mb1=0 mb2=0 mb6=0 mb7" (that's as long as the line is on the screen, and it's not recorded into /var/log/messages (and C7 by default doesn't implement persistent journal storage; journalctl --list-boots only lists the current boot log)). System is a bit old, but is only used for development: Dell PowerEdge SC1425 two single-core Xeon 3.2GHz (obviously 64-bit capable, as it is running stock CentOS 7 already, with kernel 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.x86_64 running fine. System is connected to two EMC Clariion arrays via a dual-port Fibre-Channel card: lspci tells me: 03:07.0 Fibre Channel: QLogic Corp. ISP2312-based 2Gb Fibre Channel to PCI-X HBA (rev 02) 03:07.1 Fibre Channel: QLogic Corp. ISP2312-based 2Gb Fibre Channel to PCI-X HBA (rev 02) Yeah, I know, not new, and maybe even deprecated (I actually don't see that adapter in the deprecated list for RHEL 7.5, but I do see ISP24xx ones in the deprecated list), but it worked fine with the 7.4.1708 kernel. I set the system to boot the older kernel until I can more fully troubleshoot. I have a lot invested in ISP24xx-based cards, which are on the deprecated list, and I am still running fibre-channel, so will have to find another solution before 7.x EOL. So I consider this a regression; for the moment I'll boot the older kernel, but I know that isn't sustainable.

3 5

CentOS 7.4.1708 CR Available in CBS
by Brian Stinson 27 Apr '18

27 Apr '18

Hi Folks, The CR (https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR) repository was released earlier today. We have regenerated all the CentOS 7 buildroots in CBS so you can build against the content that will make it into the next point-release of CentOS Linux. Machines in ci.centos.org are available with CR as well so you may continue your testing. As we discussed earlier (https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-April/016627.html) we are currently in Point-release Freeze which means anything tagged for release will *NOT* get pushed out to mirror.centos.org and we will be holding new push requests until we have a GA point-release. If there are any questions please find us here or in #centos-devel on Freenode. Cheers! -- Brian Stinson

3 2

[HPC SIG] "talking points" for an HPC event
by Rich Bowen 27 Apr '18

27 Apr '18

I was hoping to get the attention of folks from the HPC SIG to help me craft a message to take to an HPC event that I'll be attending soon - ISC-HPC in Frankfurt. I expect that you're aware of it. Last year, I got questions regarding what's happening in the HPC SIG in CentOS, and I know at that time it was still fairly young. I was hoping to get something from you - whether bullet points, a blog post, a video I should watch, or whatever - so that this year I will be better informed, and can answer questions intelligently about what's happening in HPC in CentOS. I see just one email to this list, from back in October, from Adrian Reber, about the first SIG meeting, but nothing since then. Are you having regular meetings that I should attend between now and June? Thanks for any info you can pass my way. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel April 2018