August 2018 - devel - lists.centos.org

ksplice and CentOS
by Karanbir Singh 25 Sep '25

25 Sep '25

hi guys, lots of people on this list are keen on contributing to the CentOS effort - and one place where we could, as a group of people, make a massive difference is being able to deliver a ksplice upgrade model. A couple of people have started in silo's to try and get something together but I feel it might be a good time to try and see if we can do somethng as a group. Do we have people on the list who find the idea of rebootless kernel upgrades interesting ? Is there some desire to try and make that happen within the CentOS Ecosystem ? - KB

24 47

anaconda dependency calculation?
by Nicholas Byrne 04 Aug '25

04 Aug '25

Hi all, I'm trying to find a tool that calculates all dependencies for a specific package or group of packages for use with CentOS 5 (beta) with the intention of putting together a custom single CD build of CentOS 5. With CentOS 4 i used a python script that used the hdrlist module to find all dependencies which borrowed code from a number of sources. I've looked at yumdownloader and how it checks dependencies (using the --resolve option) but if i pass it the list of packages defined in say the Base and the Core yum groups which generally form an absolute minimal install i end up with about 200 packages. If i do a custom install (using beta 1 disks) and deselect everything i end up with over 300 packages. So i'm guessing anaconda calculates dependencies in a slightly different way, can anyone point me to files/code where i should be looking to find out? Thanks very much in advance for help Nick This e-mail is the property of Quadriga Worldwide Ltd, intended for the addressee only and confidential. Any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message or any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to and from Quadriga may be monitored. Quadriga cannot guarantee any message delivery method is secure or error-free. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. We do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this message and/or attachment that arise as a result of transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Quadriga.

6 11

forums + portal for {lang}.centos.org sites
by Karanbir Singh 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi, Earlier in the evening today Ralph, Fabian and I had a chat about the present state of the language subsites. This email sort of summarises the main issue ( s/w ). We seem to have run into a slight technical hitch with punbb/fluxbb. They dont support LDAP as a backend. And we had decided a few months back that all new rollouts must have ldap backend so we can rollin CentOS-DS / openldap based backend. So we need to look at alternatives, and since the primary focus of these international sites is going be forums : Here is a shortlist ( if there is anything else that people are aware of, please add to this list ) - phpBB - SMF - Fudforum - phorum - fluxbb Requirements: - Must be able to scale ( couple of hundred thousand msgs ) - Must be able to handle ldap auth ( if it cant, whats involved in writing the ldap-auth portion ) - Must address the specific requirements raised by the present www.centos.org forum users ( Can you please fill this section in ? ) - Must support all languages we need ( pure utf8 support would be good ) - Secure - Skin'able Nice to have: - Capable of running multiple instances from a single deployment - responsive community :D Things we will need to do: - Decide on what s/w to use. - Give the ArtWork people enough time to get the look & feel sorted. - Migrate newbb forums from www.centos.org to $system ( hey, english is a language too :D ). - Migrate fr.centos.org into the final s/w - setup {de/es/ja/it/pt_br}.centos.org Actions: Ralph and Fabian are going to work on setting up a test ldap server, once that is online we will then start by installing into our test-vm-farm the various s/w to eval them. If anyone would like to help, please feel free to jump right in. I'll setup a wiki page for this issue, which might be a good place to track progress. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

22 81

Problems with qemu-img when generating Vagrant images
by Laurentiu Pancescu 02 Oct '18

02 Oct '18

Hello everyone, we switched from using qemu-img from CentOS 7.x to qemu-img-ev from the Virt SIG several months ago, to allow us to generate Hyper-V images. My attempts to build Vagrant images are failing the automated tests since the beginning of July, apparently due to corrupt filesystems. I see XFS metadata corruption in the CentOS 7 images when using qemu-img-ev, as well as ext4 superblock corruption in the CentOS 6 images.[1] The distro installer runs just once and the resulting disk image is converted by Image Factory to different formats, depending on the virtualization target. Since the VirtualBox images are working as expected, while the libvirt images don't even boot due to filesystem corruption, I would assume that the installation produces a valid image, but the conversion of the disk images for libvirt-kvm fall prey to bugs in qemu-img-ev and the stock qemu-img. If anyone has the possibility to test with VmWare or Hyper-V, please write me off-list. I noticed that qemu-img-ev is at version 2.1.2, while Debian Stable has version 2.8 and Fedora 28 has version 2.11. Maybe such bugs, if real, were already fixed upstream - would it be possible to use a newer version than what qemu-img-ev provides? We reverted to using the EL7 qemu-img, but this still produces broken libvirt images and wețd have to drop the Hyper-V images as well. Any help or suggestions are appreciated. Best regards, Laurențiu [1] https://people.centos.org/bstinson/vagrant/c6-vagrant.png

2 4

Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
by Fabiano Fidêncio 19 Sep '18

19 Sep '18

People, Firstly, sorry for the cross-list post (centos-devel and centos-docs). I'd like to reach you in order to ask for a formal authorization to use CentOS logo on GNOME Boxes[0]. GNOME Boxes already shows a few other distro's logos as you can check here[1]. Would be possible to get the explicit confirmation that we could use CentOS logo as well? [0]: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Boxes [1]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-boxes/raw/master/README.logos Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio

4 5

SecureBoot : rolling out new shim pkgs for CentOS 7.5.1804 in CR repository - asking for testers/feedback
by Fabian Arrotin 30 Aug '18

30 Aug '18

When we consolidated all CentOS Distro builders in a new centralized setup, covering all arches (so basically x86_64, i386, ppc64le, ppc64, aarch64 and armhfp those days), we wanted also to add redundancy where it was possible to. The interesting "SecureBoot" corner case came on the table and we had to find a different way to build the following packages: - shim (both signed and unsigned) - grub2 - fwupdate - kernel The other reason why we considered rebuilding it is that the cert we were using has expired : curl --location --silent https://github.com/CentOS/sig-core-SecureBoot/raw/master/CentOS_7/kernel/SO… | openssl x509 -inform der -text -noout|grep -A2 Validity While technically it doesn't really matter for Secureboot itself, it was better to get a new key/cert rolled-in and use the new one for new builds. That's where it's interesting as because shim embeds the certs in the Machine Owner Key (MOK), and that each other component used in the boot chain is validated against that (so grub2 first, then kernel and kernel modules) that means that once deployed , the new shim would not be able to boot previous grub2/kernel. But there is a solution for that : instead of "embedding" only the new cert, we can have both the old one and new one, permitting us to still boot older kernels but also the new ones we'll build/push soon (built on the new build system), and that's what we used for that new shim package. That's where we'd like you (SecureBoot users) to give us feedback about that new shim pkg. It was already validated on some hardware nodes, passed some QA tests, but we'd prefer to have more feedback. Worth noting that such rebuild has also a patch that should fix an issue we had with shim not allowing to import key in MOK through mokutil (see https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14050) How can you test ? If you're using UEFI with SecureBoot enabled , we have signed/pushed those pkgs to the CR repository (see https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR) That repo is by default disabled, but following command would let you update shim : yum update shim --enablerepo=cr Then reboot and it should work like before, so validating the boot chain (while still using grub2/kernel packages signed with previous key) We'd appreciate feedback on this list, or #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net I'd like to thank Patrick Uiterwijk and Peter Jones for their help for the patch and validation for that shim -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

1 0

LinchPin v1.6.0 (enhancement release) has been released
by Clint Savage 29 Aug '18

29 Aug '18

We are happy to announce that LinchPin v1.6.0 has been released. This release marks some useful enhancements and features: * Jenkins releases to pypi #578 / #567 * CI tests allow for ignoring, provider, and more #587 / #528 / #576 * Beaker enhancement #614 * Introduce support for 'family' and 'tag' fields in bkr topology files #612 * Allow boolean expressions on hostrequire #611 * Generate a unique name if one isn't specified. #629 / #575 / 564 * Linchpin Container Build in Jenkins #613 / #602 / #304 * Replace inventory generation role with python code #601 / #599 / #448 / #624 * Rework credentials expansion in tests #632 / #620 * Updates to os_server module & additional volumes to os_server topologies #622 / #329 / #544 / #330 * Integrate virt-customize to make linchpin work with generic images #610 / #532 Additional bugs were also fixed along the way: * Make linchpin work with Ansible 2.5.x #564 - Fixes #516 * Allow absolute path to resources. #624 - Fixes #623 * Beaker hostrequires force no longer working #616 - Fixed by #614 All in all, over 30 Issues and Pull Requests were closed on Github with this release, that's a mighty large release. Future releases will be smaller, and should occur about every 3 weeks. Alpha, beta or full releases should occur each 3 week cycle. Check https://pypi.org/project/linchpin/#history for the latest package updates. The official release notes are available at https://github.com/CentOS-PaaS-SIG/linchpin/releases/tag/v1.6.0 This update is available via PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/linchpin/ If you discover any errors or regressions, please open a Github issue ( https://github.com/CentOS-PaaS-SIG/linchpin/issues) Cheers, Clint Savage Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat twitter: @herlo, github: herlo, IRC: herlo, #linchpin (freenode)

1 0

git19 from sclo-rh missing from repodata
by BC 29 Aug '18

29 Aug '18

http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/sclo/x86_64/rh/repodata/ On 28-Jun-2018 09:07 git19 was in the repodata. On 03-Jul-2018 it was not. Is this package no longer supported?

4 8

rpm-ostree local updates
by Harry Mallon 29 Aug '18

29 Aug '18

Hello all, I am looking at using rpm-ostree and CentOS atomic. Is it possible to update rpm-ostree with a usb stick? As in provide a version as a download for updating offline devices. Best, Harry Harry Mallon Senior Software Engineer T+44 203 7000 989 60 Poland Street | London | England | W1F 7NT

2 1

rh-postgresql95-postgresql-9.5.14-1.el7 works for me
by Sandro Bonazzola 29 Aug '18

29 Aug '18

Hi, not sure how to rpovide feedback to scl sig, but for what it's worth, rh-postgresql95-postgresql-9.5.14-1.el7 which is in testing works for me. Looking forward to see this released. Thanks, -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> <https://www.redhat.com/en/events/red-hat-open-source-day-italia?sc_cid=701f…>

1 0

Sftp connections timing out in Centos 7
by Veetil, Vyshnav 28 Aug '18

28 Aug '18

Hi, We are facing some issues in Centos 7. When we create sftp connection and sync data from server to client and vice-versa. Whenever we are running load on the setup SFTP connections are frequently getting timed out. Resulting in unnecessary sftp processes on system. Is there any known issue related to sftp timeout. Please let us know your suggestions to overcome this issue. Thanks and Regards, Vyshnav

2 1

In place upgrade to Centos 7
by Akshar Kanak 28 Aug '18

28 Aug '18

Dear team Is there any standard documnet released for upgrading from Centos 6.5 (Final) to Centos & version . The upgrade tool (https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool) is not available . Thanks and regards Akshar

2 1

Missing Dependency of Openshift 3.10 (Ansible 2.4.3) in repo
by Robert.Grumann＠t-online.de 26 Aug '18

26 Aug '18

On a virgin system CentOS 7.5 can, unfortunately, after the command #yum install centos-release-openshift-origin" the following command not be executed without error. # yum install openshift-ansible There is a dependency to Ansible 2.4.3 in Openshift 3.10, which unfortunately is not in the repo (Only Ansible 2.4.2). Can you please include Ansible 2.4.3 in the rpm repo? Thanks. Robert

7 7

Re: [CentOS-devel] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1804) on POWER9 (ppc64le)
by Sandro Bonazzola 25 Aug '18

25 Aug '18

2018-08-15 20:26 GMT+02:00 James O'Connor <jpoc(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>: > I am pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7 (1804) > for POWER9 processors (ppc64le - powerpc 64-bit little endian). This > release is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5 ALT. > > Note this release is 99% equivalent to the existing CentOS 7 Linux 7 > (1804) for POWER8 processors (ppc64le - powerpc 64-bit little endian). The > key difference being that kernel-4.14.0 is used for POWER9 enablement and > kernel-3.10.0 is used for POWER8 enablement. > > You will find the CentOS 7 (1804) Power9 installation images here: > > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7.5.1804/isos/power9/ > > sha256sum power9: > 753c5b55c9ff681c925ec7d7c5295890284f40ec981f4da35b1f36f1ecbad95a > CentOS-7-Power9-Everything-1804.iso > 58d9af172656db71947b5db2d0d1f577217bbc1a86eada7ca3ce7bfcf7d7d9b4 > CentOS-7-Power9-NetInstall-1804.iso > > CentOS 7 (1804) Power9 repositories: > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7.5.1804/os/power9/ > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7.5.1804/updates/power9/ > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7.5.1804/extras/power9/ > > A special thank you to Johnny Hughes and Pablo Greco for their assistance > making this release possible. > This is a great news. Can we have a power9 arch repo in http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/ as well? I guess other SIGs are in same situation. > > -James O’Connor > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-announce mailing list > CentOS-announce(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce > -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> <https://www.redhat.com/en/events/red-hat-open-source-day-italia?sc_cid=701f…>

4 5

CentOS AMIs for AWS
by Rich Bowen 24 Aug '18

24 Aug '18

While at DevConf.us this past weekend, I was asked by a couple of people, who is responsible for producing the AMIs for AWS, and how we can go about getting updated ones there. Can someone help out with this? --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

2 2

SRPMS for AltArch (more specifically aarch64 kernel)
by Dominique Martinet 22 Aug '18

22 Aug '18

Hi folks, I've asked on IRC and have been pointed to this list. I can't seem to find this particular source rpm: kernel-aarch64-4.5.0-29.el7.src.rpm which is what is pointed by `rpm -qi kernel` on my system. Are these supposed to be available anywhere? Looking on google I only see one for an older release in someone's centos user/people page, but I can't seem to find these in any repo. The debuginfo are properly here but it's good to have sources as well when messing around with low level stuff :) Cheers and thanks for the hard work, -- Dominique Martinet

3 8

[RFC] New SIG Messaging
by Matthias Runge 22 Aug '18

22 Aug '18

Creation of a new SIG "Messaging" ================================= Hereby, I'm asking for comments about founding a new SIG to handle messaging stacks in CentOS. We currently have in CentOS RabbitMQ handling AMQP 0.9, and QPID, which provides messaging using AMQP 1.0. There are also packages supporting Kafka, but not Kafka itself. Collaborating SIGs would be the Cloud and the Opstools SIGs. Both would be consuming built packages produced by the Messaging SIG. We also briefly took into consideration to incorporate the newly proposed SIG into one of the others. At the end, messaging is different than Cloud or Operational tools. It doesn't really fit. The best solution seemed to us to have another SIG. If there are any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to reply to the list, and let's find the best proposal here. Matthias -- Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de>

8 13

CentOS Atomic Host 7.1807 Available for Download
by Jason Brooks 21 Aug '18

21 Aug '18

The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (7.1807), an operating system designed to run Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host. CentOS Atomic Host includes these core component versions: atomic-1.22.1-22.git5a342e3.el7.x86_64 cloud-init-0.7.9-24.el7.centos.1.x86_64 docker-1.13.1-68.gitdded712.el7.centos.x86_64 etcd-3.2.22-1.el7.x86_64 flannel-0.7.1-4.el7.x86_64 kernel-3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64 ostree-2018.5-1.el7.x86_64 rpm-ostree-client-2018.5-1.atomic.el7.x86_64 Download CentOS Atomic Host CentOS Atomic Host is available as a VirtualBox or libvirt-formatted Vagrant box, or as an installable ISO, qcow2 or Amazon Machine image. For links to media, see the CentOS wiki. Upgrading If you’re running a previous version of CentOS Atomic Host, you can upgrade to the current image by running the following command: # atomic host upgrade Release Cycle The CentOS Atomic Host image follows the upstream Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host cadence. After sources are released, they’re rebuilt and included in new images. After the images are tested by the SIG and deemed ready, we announce them. Getting Involved CentOS Atomic Host is produced by the CentOS Atomic SIG, based on upstream work from Project Atomic. If you’d like to work on testing images, help with packaging, documentation – join us! You’ll often find us in #atomic and/or #centos-devel if you have questions. You can also join the atomic-devel mailing list if you’d like to discuss the direction of Project Atomic, its components, or have other questions. Getting Help If you run into any problems with the images or components, feel free to ask on the centos-devel mailing list. Have questions about using Atomic? See the atomic mailing list or find us in the #atomic channel on Freenode.

1 0

[!HPC] Request to join HPC Sig
by Beth Lynn Eicher 19 Aug '18

19 Aug '18

Hello, Please let me introduce myself. I am Beth Lynn Eicher with the FAS username of bethlynn. My background is a career in engineering systems deployments in research computing. I have worked at the Carnegie Mellon University, the Department of Energy, and the University of Chicago. Currently, I am a High Performance Computing consultant with clients like Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center and the University of Wyoming. There, I worked with Bridges, an XSEDE participating site. Bridges uses CentOS 7 as do many other large installations. If you look at the top500, CentOS is the most popular named distribution. I hypothesize that CentOS is in the majority of the overall market share. It is a solid choice for all HPC systems. The tools for use with HPC are often built by our greater community but seldom packaged by EPEL. I am unware of rpm builds for the following Free Software projects: https://github.com/OSC/Open-OnDemand https://www.psc.edu/hpn-ssh https://portal.tacc.utexas.edu/tutorials/multifactor-authentication https://github.com/TACC/Lmod As an industry contributor from a small company, I am unencumbered by institutional politics which may cause reluctance to collaboration. Therefore, I believe that I would be a very useful contributor to a HPC SIG within the CentOS community. Yesterday, I spoke about cybersecurity in HPC at the CentOS Dojo. There we had a significant amount of energy around HPC and I would like to see this conversation continue. Today, I sought out the HPC SIG of CentOS. While there is evidence of activity, I have not seen anything more recent than Fall of 2017. Where is everybody? Thanks, Beth Lynn Eicher Arcutek | Solutions Consultant beicher(a)arcutek.com<mailto:beicher@arcutek.com> W: 312-767-2894 M: 312-566-8947 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

3 5

Canceling Today’s CBS meeting
by Brian Stinson 13 Aug '18

13 Aug '18

Hi folks, We won’t be holding today’s CBS meeting. We will pick up where we left of next Monday. If there are items we should discuss in the meantime please let us know here on-list. -- Brian Stinson brian(a)bstinson.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] [CentOS PaaS SIG]: Origin v3.10 rpms released to mirror.centos.org repo
by Daniel Comnea 09 Aug '18

09 Aug '18

Cheers Patrick, we trying our best ;) On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Patrick Tescher <patrick(a)outtherelabs.com> wrote: > Wow, this is so much faster than any recent release. Good job team! > > > On Aug 8, 2018, at 11:46 AM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Following my previous [1] notification, happy to announce the official > release of Origin v3.10 rpms which can be found at [2] > > > > Thank you, > PaaS SIG team > > [1] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshift-archives/dev/ > 2018-August/msg00001.html > [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/ > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev(a)lists.openshift.redhat.com > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev > > >

1 0

[CentOS PaaS SIG]: Origin v3.10 rpms released to mirror.centos.org repo
by Daniel Comnea 08 Aug '18

08 Aug '18

Hi, Following my previous [1] notification, happy to announce the official release of Origin v3.10 rpms which can be found at [2] Thank you, PaaS SIG team [1] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshift-archives/dev /2018-August/msg00001.html [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/

1 0

CERN Dojo: Volunteers needed to help select schedule
by Rich Bowen 08 Aug '18

08 Aug '18

As you may know, we're planning a Dojo at CERN in October. (Details at http://cern.ch/centos ) I need 4 or 5 people to vote on our schedule. I hope to publish a schedule by the end of next week. So, if you are planning to go, and are willing to volunteer to read some session abstracts, please let me know by the end of this week. Thanks. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

[CentOS PaaS SIG]: Origin v3.10 rpms available for testing
by Daniel Comnea 07 Aug '18

07 Aug '18

Hi, We would like to announce that Origin v3.10 rpms are available for testing at [1]. As such we are calling for help from community to start testing and let us know if there are issues with the rpms and its dependencies. And in the spirit of transparency see below the plan to promote the rpms to mirror.centos.org repo: 1. in the next 24/72 hours the packages should be promoted to the test repo [2] (currently it does not exist, we are waiting to be sync'ed in the background) 2. in a week time if we haven't heard any issues/ blockers we are going to promote to [3] repo (currently it doesn't exist, it will once the rpm will be promoted and signed) Thank you, PaaS SiG team [1] https://cbs.centos.org/repos/paas7-openshift-origin310-testing/x86_64/os/Pa… [2] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/ [3] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/

1 1

Documentation help requested (Re: Upgrading from 6 to 7)
by Rich Bowen 06 Aug '18

06 Aug '18

Hi, folks, I was hoping that someone with more knowledge than I about the 6 -> 7 upgrade process would have a look at https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool The page starts with a vague warning, and then continues to give detailed instructions, leaving it very unclear which parts the warning refers to. If the process is broken, let's remove all of this and point to the correct process. If only a part of the process is broken, we need to remove that from the doc, and drop the scary warning. As it is, the page *appears* to be a "don't do it this way" kind of page, and, as you know, 90% of people will simply skip past the warning and cut-paste the instructions. Thanks for any advice and/or edits that can happen here. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

4 4

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel August 2018