devel August 2019

devel@lists.centos.org

21 participants
13 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] [NFS-Ganesha-Support] Re: CentOS 7 Dependency Issues surrounding userspace-rcu
by Kaleb Keithley 13 Aug '19

13 Aug '19

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:12 AM Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)poochiereds.net> wrote: > On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 18:59 -0400, Alexander Bauer wrote: > > Error: Package: lttng-ust-2.4.1-4.el7.x86_64 (epel) > > Requires: liburcu-cds.so.1()(64bit) > > Removing: userspace-rcu-0.7.16-1.el7.x86_64 (@epel) > > liburcu-cds.so.1()(64bit) > > Updated By: userspace-rcu-0.10.0-3.el7.x86_64 > (centos-nfs-ganesha28) > > ~liburcu-cds.so.6()(64bit) > > Error: Package: lttng-ust-2.4.1-4.el7.x86_64 (epel) > > Requires: liburcu-bp.so.1()(64bit) > > Removing: userspace-rcu-0.7.16-1.el7.x86_64 (@epel) > > liburcu-bp.so.1()(64bit) > > Updated By: userspace-rcu-0.10.0-3.el7.x86_64 > (centos-nfs-ganesha28) > > ~liburcu-bp.so.6()(64bit) > > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem > > You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest > > Why is centos-nfs-ganesha28 repo providing its own userspace-rcu > package? It seems like it ought to be picking that up from EPEL as > well. > CentOS Storage SIG packages aren't built with EPEL packages, nor can they be. At least not at present AIUI. Thus I would claim, generally, that you should not mix CentOS SIG and EPEL on the same machine. I believe there are plans afoot to more tightly integrate CentOS, EPEL, and Fedora, such that SIG packages would be able to use EPEL, but those haven't come to fruition yet, AFAIK. Maybe we will get a status update at the upcoming CentOS dojo in Boston in a couple of weeks. I don't remember the timing of ganesha using userspace-rcu, but even Gluster has been shipping its own userspace-rcu. The ganesha-2.7 builds under gluster in the Storage SIG would have used it, if it was even using it all at. > If there is a need for it then it should probably provide lttng packages > as well, as they typically require a certain version of urcu. > Centos, or more accurately, the Ceph builds in the Storage SIG, provide the lttng-ust packages that were (apparently) used to build ganesha. I say apparently because I don't see where else they could have come from. Looks like I need to tag those into the ganesha-28 repos. -- Kaleb

3 3

SIG reports requested
by Rich Bowen 07 Aug '19

07 Aug '19

Hi, folks, Due to a very busy travel schedule in June and July (and a lovely long family vacation!) I have dropped the ball on requesting SIG reports for the past two months. As per https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup we attempt to do quarterly reporting for our SIGs. I request the following reports of any activity in the past quarter: June reports: OpsTools Public CI Virtualization July reports: Core Config Management PaaS Software Collections You are welcome to submit your report in any way that's convenient for you. What's most convenient for me, however, is that you post directly to the CentOS blog. Instructions for doing so are here: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Promo/Blog If you need an example of what to aim for in your report, I'd recommend looking at this one: https://blog.centos.org/2019/01/centos-cloud-sig-quarterly-report/ Thanks! -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

llvm-toolset-7.0 availability
by Ken Roser 01 Aug '19

01 Aug '19

Redhat has had llvm-toolset-7.0 available since March 2019. It adds support for clang and llvm version 7. See https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019 ... rust-1-31/ <https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/03/29/red-hat-enterprise-linux-comp…> Is this going to be available on Centos 7 and if so, when? Don't confuse this with llvm-toolset-7 which supports the older clang version 5 which is already available with Centos 7.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel August 2019