devel September 2019

devel@lists.centos.org

90 participants
37 discussions

CentOS 8 srpms and debuginfos
by Dominique Martinet 25 Sep '19

25 Sep '19

Hi, (Welcome to supporting a new distro hell -- thanks for all the work getting CentOS 8 out and everything involved) As usual, I come myself needing some debuginfo packages pretty fast, and found that both debuginfo.centos.org and vault.centos.org (and thus their mirrors either) are yet to have any 8 directory (8.0.1905 or 8-stream) For the srpms, since I've already been told twice I've finally remembered I could get them on git.centos.org e.g. https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/commits/c8 For the debuginfos I can obviously just rebuild what sources I got locally and carry on. So this isn't a pressing question at all, but when are the two estimated to become more broadly available ? (Will the 'Stream' version work the same? git.centos.org does not have a c8-stream branch, for example, so it might just be a binary dump of some internal rhel git?) Cheers, -- Dominique

2 2

Meaning of separate kickstart/ and os/ folders in CentOS 8 repos?
by Anthony Alba 25 Sep '19

25 Sep '19

What is the significance of separate kickstart/ and os/ folders in the repos? (If you are using kickstart does that mean you should point to kickstart/ instead of os/ in the ks file?) I could not find a mention of it in the release notes. E.g. under centos/8.0.1905/BaseOS/x86_64/ my nearest mirror has kickstart/ os/ Cheers Anthony Alba

3 2

CentOS 8/7.7
by victor mason 23 Sep '19

23 Sep '19

What's the hold up on both of these? Are we back to the old days? https://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/07/30/130249/CentOS-Project-Administrat… The whole point of setting the update page at https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 was so people didn't constantly ask about release dates. Redirecting queries there is completely fair if someone updates the damn thing. It's now been a few weeks with complete radio silence. It's been 4 months since RHEL8 was released and we are coming over a month for 7.7 with a bunch of security updates piling up. Nobody from the outside who depends on this has any visibility into it and it's frustrating. Is this an IBM thing? What the hell is going on?

32 60

CentOS 7.7 sources
by Jacco Ligthart 19 Sep '19

19 Sep '19

Hi Guys, Thanks for the hard work. I noticed some minor issues with the 7.7 sources: 1. There are many SRPMs double in the os source tree. I guess that from every item from the 7.6 CR tree there is also still the old version present 2. There are some source packages *older* in 7.7 than previously in 7.6. I made this list with repodiff: Downgraded Packages: gnome-boxes: gnome-boxes-3.28.5-4.el7 -> gnome-boxes-3.28.5-2.el7 kmod-kvdo: kmod-kvdo-6.1.2.41-5.el7 -> kmod-kvdo-6.1.1.125-5.el7 libpsm2: libpsm2-11.2.78-1.el7 -> libpsm2-10.3.58-1.el7 nbdkit: nbdkit-1.8.0-1.el7 -> nbdkit-1.2.6-1.el7 nvml: nvml-1.5.1-2.1.el7 -> nvml-1.4-3.el7 opa-ff: opa-ff-10.9.0.0.204-1.el7 -> opa-ff-10.7.0.0.133-1.el7 opa-fm: opa-fm-10.9.0.0.204-1.el7 -> opa-fm-10.7.0.0.141-1.el7 oracleasm: oracleasm-2.0.8-26.el7 -> oracleasm-2.0.8-22.el7 shim: shim-15-2.el7.centos -> shim-15-1.el7.centos shim-signed: shim-signed-15-2.el7.centos -> shim-signed-15-1.el7.centos spice: spice-0.14.0-7.el7 -> spice-0.14.0-6.el7 spice-streaming-agent: spice-streaming-agent-0.2-4.el7 -> spice-streaming-agent-0.2-3.el7 tboot: tboot-1.9.9-1.el7 -> tboot-1.9.6-3.el7 vdo: vdo-6.1.2.41-4.el7 -> vdo-6.1.1.125-3.el7 Jacco

1 0

1:libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.ppc64le required kernel-core on POWER8
by Lance Albertson 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

I was working on upgrading some of our POWER8 ppc64le nodes and ran into the following issue with the libguestfs package that's currently in updates: $ yum upgrade libguestfs Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libguestfs = 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 for package: 1:libguestfs-tools-c-1.38.2-12.el7_6.2.ppc64le --> Processing Dependency: libguestfs = 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 for package: 1:perl-Sys-Guestfs-1.38.2-12.el7_6.2.ppc64le --> Processing Dependency: libguestfs = 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 for package: 1:libguestfs-tools-1.38.2-12.el7_6.2.noarch --> Processing Dependency: libguestfs = 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 for package: 1:python-libguestfs-1.38.2-12.el7_6.2.ppc64le ---> Package libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: kernel-core for package: 1:libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.ppc64le --> Running transaction check ---> Package libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: kernel-core for package: 1:libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.ppc64le ---> Package libguestfs-tools.noarch 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated ---> Package libguestfs-tools.noarch 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update ---> Package libguestfs-tools-c.ppc64le 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated ---> Package libguestfs-tools-c.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update ---> Package perl-Sys-Guestfs.ppc64le 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated ---> Package perl-Sys-Guestfs.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update ---> Package python-libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated ---> Package python-libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.ppc64le (updates) Requires: kernel-core You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest It seems as though this package was likely built using the power9 repos since kernel-core only shows up on the POWER9 nodes. Is anyone else seeing this problem? Thanks! -- Lance Albertson Director Oregon State University | Open Source Lab

2 2

llvm-toolset-7.0 availability
by Ken Roser 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

Redhat has had llvm-toolset-7.0 available since March 2019. It adds support for clang and llvm version 7. See https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019 ... rust-1-31/ <https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/03/29/red-hat-enterprise-linux-comp…> Is this going to be available on Centos 7 and if so, when? Don't confuse this with llvm-toolset-7 which supports the older clang version 5 which is already available with Centos 7.

5 7

Please remove
by Paige “Stormblade” Roberts 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

This is every day this has gone way overbord with email i have a business to run this is spaming when it is emailing daily remove us from the list now.

3 2

CentOS 7.7.1908 being available in CBS/koji
by Fabian Arrotin 17 Sep '19

17 Sep '19

As you probably saw it, we released CentOS 7.7.1908 for all architectures earlier today : - https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-September/023405.ht… - https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-September/023406.ht… Just after that we regenerated the koji internal repos to use that new release so it's now done : https://cbs.centos.org/koji/tasks?state=all&owner=koji&view=flat&method=cre… That means that all your builds for CentOS 7 will be built against 7.7.1908 content. -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab

3 2

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 175, Issue 15
by Paige “Stormblade” Roberts 17 Sep '19

17 Sep '19

This dont pertain to shit wtf > > On Sep 17, 2019 at 7:00 AM, <Centos-Devel-Request (mailto:centos-devel-request@centos.org)> wrote: > > > > > Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to > centos-devel(a)centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-devel-request(a)centos.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. unexpected failure emails from centos container pipeline and > maintenance window (Bamacharan Kundu) > 2. Re: CentOS 8/7.7 (Chandan kumar) > 3. Re: CentOS 8/7.7 (Chandan kumar) > 4. Re: CentOS 8/7.7 (Anssi Johansson) > 5. Re: {Disarmed} Origin RPMs for ppc64le (Peeyush Gupta) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:41:38 +0530 > From: Bamacharan Kundu <bkundu(a)redhat.com> > To: centos-devel(a)centos.org > Subject: [CentOS-devel] unexpected failure emails from centos > container pipeline and maintenance window > Message-ID: <3e66c77b-b3e3-dd5d-ab0e-3d5450d8f41c(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Hi, > There have been few unexpected failure emails today from centos > community container pipeline, due to pods failing to run the builds in > the cluster. > Please ignore today's failure emails we are working to get things > sorted. > We would also need to update the nodes, so will take some > maintenance window this week (we will keep a separate thread posting for > that). > > We are sorry for the inconvenience caused. > > Note: There is no affect on the availability of registry.centos.org > (build logs will not be available for sometime). > > Thanks and Regards > Bama Charan Kundu > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:45:14 +0530 > From: Chandan kumar <chkumar246(a)gmail.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 8/7.7 > Message-ID: > <CAMzQOd=aSh_VRzo6=gUyOiK2V1kTL+nChxhYTLvhZdT50P=OhA(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Hello, > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:42 AM Akemi Yagi <amyagi(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:00 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote: > > > > I've been able to do much of my RHEL8 bootstrapping from the RHEL8 > > > > UBI containers. > > > > > Can we update this page https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 > as twitter says https://twitter.com/CentOSProject/status/1173652996305170432 > CentOS 8 is coming on 24th Sept, 2019 ? > > Thanks, > > Chandan Kumar > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:53:25 +0530 > From: Chandan kumar <chkumar246(a)gmail.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 8/7.7 > Message-ID: > <CAMzQOdk6ZtKJpiqtET1zJqDZGryPYOdEfag+-Z2jSvAHu4EXyw(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:45 PM Chandan kumar <chkumar246(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:42 AM Akemi Yagi <amyagi(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:00 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote: > > > > > I've been able to do much of my RHEL8 bootstrapping from the RHEL8 > > > > > UBI containers. > > > > > > > > Can we update this page https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 > > as twitter says https://twitter.com/CentOSProject/status/1173652996305170432 > > CentOS 8 is coming on 24th Sept, 2019 ? > > > > Sorry taking my statement back, It might be CentOS 7.7 as it mentions > next version of CentOS. > > Thanks, > > Chandan Kumar > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:59:44 +0300 > From: Anssi Johansson <avij(a)centosproject.org> > To: centos-devel(a)centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 8/7.7 > Message-ID: <71660186-a255-1d3f-0dd7-315d72d05f3e(a)centosproject.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Chandan kumar kirjoitti 16.9.2019 klo 21.15: > > Hello, > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:42 AM Akemi Yagi <amyagi(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:00 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:48:43PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote: > >>>> I've been able to do much of my RHEL8 bootstrapping from the RHEL8 > >>>> UBI containers. > >>> > > > > Can we update this page https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 > > as twitter says https://twitter.com/CentOSProject/status/1173652996305170432 > > CentOS 8 is coming on 24th Sept, 2019 ? > > Yes, I just updated the page. The tweet indeed refers to the next major > version, not 7.7.1908 which is just around the corner to be released. > > Thank you for your patience! I know it's been a long wait, but it's > worth it. > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:43:45 +0000 > From: "Peeyush Gupta" <peeygupt(a)in.ibm.com> > To: centos-devel(a)centos.org > Cc: centos-devel(a)centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] {Disarmed} Origin RPMs for ppc64le > Message-ID: > <OF3A11BFE6.F238D82A-ON00258478.003A8174-00258478.003AF031(a)notes.na.collabserv.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190917/3a99c26…> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > ------------------------------ > > End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 175, Issue 15 > ********************************************* >

1 0

Origin RPMs for ppc64le
by Peeyush Gupta 17 Sep '19

17 Sep '19

3 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel September 2019