Hi everyone,
I reduced my IRC office hours to once per month, on the 2nd tuesday of
every month and today is that day! :)
Ill be on #centos-meeting @ 1500 UTC today if anyone would like to stop by
and chant. I have no agenda set, but will probably give a quick rundown of
the projects CPE are working on in Q4 and how our quarterly planning
session went.
If you want to chat about the above, or anything else, you know where
to find me!
Thanks,
Aoife
--
Aoife Moloney
Product Owner
Community Platform Engineering Team
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com>
Communications House
Cork Road
Waterford
<https://www.redhat.com>
Is there any way to correlate modular package versions in RHEL8.x with ones from Centos8.x in any way, no matter how difficult?
For example, looking at package list for https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:3714:
- RedHat lists httpd-2.4.37-21.module+el8.2.0+5008+cca404a3.x86_64.rpm
- in CentOS this (probably?) matches httpd-0:2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+494+1df74eae.x86_64
AFAIK, the non-modular packages shared the same NEVRA between RHEL and Centos (not sure if there were exceptions, though).
Thanks,
Antal
============================================================
#centos-meeting: CentOS Storage SIG Monthly, October Edition
============================================================
Meeting started by ndevos at 13:04:08 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/October/centos-meeting.2020-10-06-13.04…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (ndevos, 13:04:19)
* Agenda (ndevos, 13:06:02)
* LINK: https://hackmd.io/Epc35JIESaeotoGzwu5R5w (ndevos, 13:06:06)
* Ceph Builds (ndevos, 13:08:11)
* AGREED: kkeithley stepped in to help get Ceph back on track, but
wasn't volunteering to keep doing building ceph packages for ever
(ndevos, 13:08:36)
* centos-release-gluster packages (ndevos, 13:09:30)
* hughesjr will try to include centos-release-gluster8 when 7.9 is
released (ndevos, 13:17:01)
* Open Floor (ndevos, 13:21:14)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/50 (ndevos, 13:28:35)
Meeting ended at 13:30:28 UTC.
Yesterday (Saturday) evening we got zabbix notifications that some nodes
in CI environment were unreachable. After a quick look, I discovered
that it was an embedded network switch in a chassis hosting multiple
nodes (including but not limited to jenkins node behind ci.centos.org)
that went nuts.
I tried a remote "hardware reset" and nodes were back online after ~10min.
But this morning (sunday), I see through zabbix that same issue happened
again, and in the hour after I already did the "hardware reset", but
this time, even that doesn't work anymore.
So that means that we have a network switch not working anymore.
As that chassis (like almost *all* equipment in CI) *isn't* under
warranty, we'll see on monday what can be done and how we give priority
to try to dispatch services elsewhere (and that probably means then
powering down other services , depending on priority that will be
given), but it's easy to understand that we can't even give any ETA at
this point.
Thanks for your comprehending,
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab