devel October 2020

devel@lists.centos.org

19 participants
15 discussions

Module version differences between RHEL8 and Centos8?
by Antal Nemeš 08 Oct '20

08 Oct '20

Is there any way to correlate modular package versions in RHEL8.x with ones from Centos8.x in any way, no matter how difficult? For example, looking at package list for https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:3714: - RedHat lists httpd-2.4.37-21.module+el8.2.0+5008+cca404a3.x86_64.rpm - in CentOS this (probably?) matches httpd-0:2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+494+1df74eae.x86_64 AFAIK, the non-modular packages shared the same NEVRA between RHEL and Centos (not sure if there were exceptions, though). Thanks, Antal

7 15

[NFVSIG] NFV SIG meeting minutes - 2020-10-07
by Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 07 Oct '20

07 Oct '20

============================================= #centos-meeting: NFV SIG meeting - 2020-10-07 ============================================= Meeting started by amoralej at 15:00:44 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/October/centos-meeting.2020-10-07-15.… . Meeting summary --------------- * openvswitch and ovn 2.13 updated to sync with FDP 20.G (amoralej, 15:03:10) * ovs and ovn have been updated to sync with FDP erratas (amoralej, 15:03:27) * LINK: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3773 (amoralej, 15:03:42) * LINK: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3816 (amoralej, 15:03:53) * packages are ready to be tested in nfvsig testing repo https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/8/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/ (amoralej, 15:04:36) * new centos-release-nfv to include network-extras (amoralej, 15:08:23) * https://git.centos.org/rpms/centos-release-nfv/c/f7cfaf46d4caca3259ec8c723c… (amoralej, 15:09:12) Meeting ended at 15:19:31 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * amoralej (29) * dholler (4) * centbot (3)

1 0

Meeting minutes of the CentOS Storage SIG Monthly, October Edition
by Niels de Vos 06 Oct '20

06 Oct '20

============================================================ #centos-meeting: CentOS Storage SIG Monthly, October Edition ============================================================ Meeting started by ndevos at 13:04:08 UTC. The full logs are available at https://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/October/centos-meeting.2020-10-06-13.04… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (ndevos, 13:04:19) * Agenda (ndevos, 13:06:02) * LINK: https://hackmd.io/Epc35JIESaeotoGzwu5R5w (ndevos, 13:06:06) * Ceph Builds (ndevos, 13:08:11) * AGREED: kkeithley stepped in to help get Ceph back on track, but wasn't volunteering to keep doing building ceph packages for ever (ndevos, 13:08:36) * centos-release-gluster packages (ndevos, 13:09:30) * hughesjr will try to include centos-release-gluster8 when 7.9 is released (ndevos, 13:17:01) * Open Floor (ndevos, 13:21:14) * LINK: https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/50 (ndevos, 13:28:35) Meeting ended at 13:30:28 UTC.

1 0

EPEL-6 is End of Life in 2020-11
by Troy Dawson 05 Oct '20

05 Oct '20

EPEL 6 is End Of Life (EOL) on November 2020. EPEL 6 will be moved to archives in December 2020. Plan ahead now.

4 4

[unscheduled outage] hardware issue impacting CI services (including https://ci.centos.org)
by Fabian Arrotin 04 Oct '20

04 Oct '20

Yesterday (Saturday) evening we got zabbix notifications that some nodes in CI environment were unreachable. After a quick look, I discovered that it was an embedded network switch in a chassis hosting multiple nodes (including but not limited to jenkins node behind ci.centos.org) that went nuts. I tried a remote "hardware reset" and nodes were back online after ~10min. But this morning (sunday), I see through zabbix that same issue happened again, and in the hour after I already did the "hardware reset", but this time, even that doesn't work anymore. So that means that we have a network switch not working anymore. As that chassis (like almost *all* equipment in CI) *isn't* under warranty, we'll see on monday what can be done and how we give priority to try to dispatch services elsewhere (and that probably means then powering down other services , depending on priority that will be given), but it's easy to understand that we can't even give any ETA at this point. Thanks for your comprehending, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel October 2020