April 2020 - devel - lists.centos.org

forums + portal for {lang}.centos.org sites
by Karanbir Singh 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi, Earlier in the evening today Ralph, Fabian and I had a chat about the present state of the language subsites. This email sort of summarises the main issue ( s/w ). We seem to have run into a slight technical hitch with punbb/fluxbb. They dont support LDAP as a backend. And we had decided a few months back that all new rollouts must have ldap backend so we can rollin CentOS-DS / openldap based backend. So we need to look at alternatives, and since the primary focus of these international sites is going be forums : Here is a shortlist ( if there is anything else that people are aware of, please add to this list ) - phpBB - SMF - Fudforum - phorum - fluxbb Requirements: - Must be able to scale ( couple of hundred thousand msgs ) - Must be able to handle ldap auth ( if it cant, whats involved in writing the ldap-auth portion ) - Must address the specific requirements raised by the present www.centos.org forum users ( Can you please fill this section in ? ) - Must support all languages we need ( pure utf8 support would be good ) - Secure - Skin'able Nice to have: - Capable of running multiple instances from a single deployment - responsive community :D Things we will need to do: - Decide on what s/w to use. - Give the ArtWork people enough time to get the look & feel sorted. - Migrate newbb forums from www.centos.org to $system ( hey, english is a language too :D ). - Migrate fr.centos.org into the final s/w - setup {de/es/ja/it/pt_br}.centos.org Actions: Ralph and Fabian are going to work on setting up a test ldap server, once that is online we will then start by installing into our test-vm-farm the various s/w to eval them. If anyone would like to help, please feel free to jump right in. I'll setup a wiki page for this issue, which might be a good place to track progress. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

22 81

@SIG HighAvailability - repo conflicts
by lejeczek 30 Jun '20

30 Jun '20

hi devel. Could you, someone please fix this: $ dnf update Last metadata expiration check: 2:58:26 ago on Thu 30 Apr 2020 07:19:18 BST. Error: Problem: package corosync-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 requires corosynclib(x86-64) = 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both corosynclib-3.0.3-2.el8.x86_64 and corosynclib-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package corosynclib-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package corosync-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) many thanks, L.

2 2

Centos 8.1 - missing src.rpms (again)
by Antal Nemeš 31 May '20

31 May '20

Hi all, After the last updates to centos 8.1 packages, it seems the src.rpms have not been pushed to vault. For example, kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.src.rpm is nowhere to be found, even in 8.1.1911 I am also using this opportunity to again request that vault symlink for centos/8 be updated to point to latest (8.1.1911) state. Currently it is still pointing to 8.0.1905. Thanks and best regards, Antal

6 11

SCL maintenance
by BC 05 May '20

05 May '20

I was trying to find a good alternative to rh-git29 on el6 and had some problems sorting it out. 1) https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo/CollectionsList is out of date compared to either https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhscl-rhel6 or https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhscl-rhel7. 2) https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo/CollectionsList is out of date compared to what yum shows. 3) https://www.softwarecollections.org lists both sclo-git{25,212} as TBD even though they are both in the repos. Is there a published lifecycle for non-rhscl packages like sclo-git212? Thanks a bunch!

4 3

@ SIG Openstack / Centos8 repos colliding
by lejeczek 02 May '20

02 May '20

4 6

registry.centos.org/centos:latest still points to CentOS-7
by Derek Carter 01 May '20

01 May '20

Shouldn't `registry.centos.org/centos:latest` point to CentOS 8? That's what https://hub.docker.com/_/centos leads me to believe. Where is the CentOS registry managed? -- Derek aka goozbach

4 4

[CloudSIG] Meeting Minutes (2020-04-30)
by Rain Leander 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

A quiet meeting, but I double checked on a few bugs from recent meetings and they're mostly resolved, which is nice. Have a great weekend, CloudSIG! 14:01:52 <leanderthal> #startmeeting CentOS Cloud SIG meeting (2020-04-30) 14:01:52 <centbot> Meeting started Thu Apr 30 14:01:52 2020 UTC. The chair is leanderthal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:52 <centbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:03:12 <leanderthal> #topic rollcall 14:03:13 <leanderthal> o/ 14:03:29 <leanderthal> How're we doing CloudSIG? 14:11:54 <rbowen> Any issues for the board, or for the infra team? 14:28:47 <leanderthal> I think we're okay at the moment? 14:29:15 <leanderthal> I just went through the bugs that were open and they're all resolved. 14:29:18 <leanderthal> So.... 14:29:57 <smooge> hi 14:30:04 <smooge> thanks for running the meeting :) 14:30:30 <smooge> I didn't have anything to say but realized no one else was saying anything so I thought I would say a thankyou 14:30:42 <smooge> I would end meeting anytime 14:32:55 <leanderthal> thank you smooge !! ! 14:33:02 <leanderthal> #topic open floor 14:34:07 <leanderthal> #endmeeting -- K Rain Leander OpenStack Community Liaison Open Source Program Office https://www.rdoproject.org/ http://community.redhat.com

1 0

c8stream - faulty criu-3.12-9.module_el8.1.0+294+988780c8.x86_64
by lejeczek 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

hi devel, it looks like an orphan. many thanks, L.

1 0

Odd message from package-cleanup
by Lamar Owen 29 Apr '20

29 Apr '20

So, updated to 7.8.2003 today on my main laptop, and went to do the normal post-update kernel cleanup. Got a message I've not seen before; the command worked fine, but the message was new: [root@dhcp-pool102 ~]# sudo package-cleanup --oldkernel Loaded plugins: elrepo, fastestmirror, langpacks, nvidia, product-id, : subscription-manager This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to register. --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7 will be erased ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 will be erased ---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7 will be erased ---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 will be erased --> Finished Dependency Resolution http://lnxrelease-02/yum/stable/main/binary-x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] curl#6 - "Could not resolve host: lnxrelease-02; Unknown error" Trying other mirror. Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Removing: kernel x86_64 3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7 @updates 64 M kernel x86_64 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 @updates 64 M kernel-devel x86_64 3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7 @updates 38 M kernel-devel x86_64 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 @updates 38 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Remove 4 Packages Installed size: 204 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading packages: Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded Running transaction Erasing : kernel.x86_64 1/4 Erasing : kernel.x86_64 2/4 Erasing : kernel-devel.x86_64 3/4 Erasing : kernel-devel.x86_64 4/4 Verifying : kernel-devel-3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7.x86_64 1/4 Verifying : kernel-devel-3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7.x86_64 2/4 Verifying : kernel-3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7.x86_64 3/4 Verifying : kernel-3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7.x86_64 4/4 http://lnxrelease-02/yum/stable/main/binary-x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] curl#6 - "Could not resolve host: lnxrelease-02; Unknown error" Trying other mirror. Removed: kernel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7 kernel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 kernel-devel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7 kernel-devel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 Complete! [root@dhcp-pool102 ~]#

2 4

Staging CentOS website redesign
by Alain Reguera Delgado 29 Apr '20

29 Apr '20

Hi everyone, Along the CentOS Logo redesign effort recently mentioned by Tuomas, I would like you to know the availability of https://www.stg.centos.org/, the place where changes pushed to the staging branch of https://github.com/areguera/centos-jekyll-sites are made visible for you to test on-line. I encourage you all interested in CentOS website redesign to look at https://www.stg.centos.org/ and use https://github.com/areguera/centos-jekyll-sites to open issues or even better create merge requests. A big thank you to Fabian Arrotin for making the staging site online and create the github connection that keeps content up-to-date in a pretty fast way. Also to all of you that one way or another contribute to make CentOS a better place. Best regards, -- Alain Reguera Delgado <alain.reguera(a)gmail.com>

4 4

Proposed Reddit AMA
by Rich Bowen 29 Apr '20

29 Apr '20

Our friends at Reddit have proposed an AMA (Ask Me Anything) and we're looking for volunteers to be the experts for that. https://www.reddit.com/r/CentOS/comments/g3x3c0/would_you_like_to_see_an_am… Please let me know if you're interested, and I can make intros to the people in charge. Thanks. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

3 3

libicu-50.2-4.el7_7.i686 missing from 7.8.2003 repository
by Dustin C. Hatch 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

Hello, There seems to be an issue with the libicu package for i686. The version in 7.8.2003 is different for i686 vs x86_64, so they cannot be installed together: Protected multilib versions: libicu-50.2-4.el7_7.x86_64 != libicu-50.2-3.el7.i686 It looks like the i686 version is missing from the 7.8.2003/updates repository? It's there in 7.7.1908. -- ♫Dustin

1 0

Packages missing in SCLo Testing Repository on buildlogs
by Diego Abelenda 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

Hello, I am trying to sync SCLo Testing repository in Katello, to have a local mirror of the repository. And sadly Katello is unable to sync the repository because a number of packages are missing (I have contradictory error messages). Katello sync status is "New packages: 189 (187 MB). Failed to download 189 packages." and the Foreman Task error message is " An error occurred during the sync {"url"=>"https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/sclo/Packages/s/sclo-cass…", "errors"=>["Not Found"]} " Best regards, Diego Abelenda

2 3

[Resolved] Unplanned outage: apps.ci.centos.org
by Brian Stinson 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

Hi Folks, One of the servers hosting physical volumes for apps.ci.centos.org was configured to automatically update to CentOS 7.8.2003 and we lost NFS services for a little bit. I rebooted some of the nodes in the cluster, and restarted the NFS server. You may notice some pod flapping for the next bit while things settle down, but things seem to be trending toward normal. If you have questions, please let me know. Apologies for the inconvenience. -- Brian Stinson CentOS Infrastructure Team

1 0

CenetOS 7.8.2003 content directly available for koji/cbs.centos.org
by Fabian Arrotin 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

Hi all, You probably all got the news that we released earlier today CentOS 7.8.2003. That means that all new builds in cbs.centos.org will be built against updated tree. Worth knowing that in practice, you were already building against most of pkgs, as CR repo (containing those pkgs) were used but now it's official that cbs is consuming 7.8.2003 for all enabled architectures. Happy building ! PS : after our release this morning, I resumed the new Signing process (which was on "hold" because of this release) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab

2 1

building modules
by Tane Adam 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

Hi. I was wondering if someone here can provide some guidance on how I can rebuild modules on CentOS (locally)? I found the instructions here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/building-mod… But I'm not sure it applies directly on CentOS. For example I can locate 'module-build-service'. Any help or advice appreciated. Tane.

4 5

CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
by Aoife Moloney 26 Apr '20

26 Apr '20

# CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26 --- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS.Check out our teams info here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/ ## GitForge Updates * We will be tracking our progress here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Git_forge_update * Please be aware this does not contain any new information, as we don't have any to share yet. * However once we have more information for you, we will be posting it to the above link, and with the URL in the weekly emails for quick access. * We are currently doing a technical deep-dive with our own team on what we need from GitLab * We are also still engaging with Fedora Council who are tracking the Fedora Communities needs here https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/292 * And we are looking at ways to engage closer with the CentOS community too to share information as and when we have it * Public Q&A sessions are still being discussed to allow for open conversations in public forums too as we move through this journey, so thank you for your patience with us. ## Fedora Updates * F32 release is a Go! * Estimated release date is April 28th - well done to everyone involved! ### Data Centre Move * Due to Covid-19 restrictions at each datacentre, we have unfortunately experienced a delay during the initial move. * The need to push out our dates by 2-3 weeks was made necessary on Thursday 23rd April, following meetings with Red Hat IT on network connectivity status and estimate connection times for our team to access the new datacentre. * We will need to adjust our outage schedule and move schedule to properly reflect the new dates of services being turned off and reduced, and the full amended schedule will be published to hackmd, with emails sent to the devel-announce & infra lists next week (week ending 1st May) * We will also include links to the updated move schedule and service impact schedule in next weeks CPE Weekly * Please be aware that CommuniShift is now down indefinitely until earliest May 8th. ### AAA Replacement * The team have begun phase two of the project and you can view their board for more technical information on their work here https://github.com/orgs/fedora-infra/projects/6 * They are doing amazing work :) ### CI/CD * Monitor-gating is now running in production and has already caught a couple of issues with bodhi (both in stg and in prod)! * Rpmautospec * In review as a Fedora package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816124 * Work progressing on Koji tagging plugin (post-build), full use case support for bumping releases * Plan is still to get it deployed in staging ### Sustaining Team * Mbbox Upgrade * Some progress on CRD for koji-builder and koji-hub components * Bodhi 5.2.2 released * Some issues with celery tasks, however rawhide monitoring super useful. * Compose tracker enhancement * Focusing on tagging issues, and having the ability to ping maintainers Odcs-backend-releng01 provision to enable testing in Fedora Minimal Compose * Infra * The daily standup the team has has helped a lot with managing infra tickets - they are down to 99 tickets! * Mass update of stg and prod * Please note you may experience some Kojira slowness * New review-stats application deployed - (https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/) ## CentOS Updates ### CentOS * ppc64le and aarch64, 8 and 8-stream nodes now available in cico for tenants to checkout. -- Email sent to ci-user list * New signing for SIGs (through https://cbs.centos.org) live on 25th April 2020 ### CentOS Stream * Summit Videos took our attention this week * We have a booth, so don't forget to register your attendance! https://www.redhat.com/en/summit * Qt5.12 pushed in response to an internal request * NetworkManager re-imported As always, feedback is welcome, and we will continue to look at ways to improve the delivery and readability of this weekly report. Have a great week ahead! Aoife Source: https://hackmd.io/8iV7PilARSG68Tqv8CzKOQ -- Aoife Moloney Product Owner Community Platform Engineering Team Red Hat EMEA Communications House Cork Road Waterford

1 0

re/building Samba from git sources
by lejeczek 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

Hi devel, I'm looking for some help with this below which should be rather simple. $ git clone https://git.centos.org/rpms/samba.git $ git checkout c8 $ sudo dnf builddep SPECS/samba.spec Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:40 ago on Thu 23 Apr 2020 14:13:34 BST. Package gawk-4.2.1-1.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package gnupg2-2.2.9-1.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package gnutls-devel-3.6.8-8.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package krb5-devel-1.17-9.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libldb-devel-1.5.4-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libtalloc-devel-2.1.16-3.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libtasn1-devel-4.13-3.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libtdb-devel-1.3.18-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libtevent-devel-0.9.39-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libuuid-devel-2.32.1-17.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libxslt-1.1.32-3.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package ncurses-devel-6.1-7.20180224.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package perl-Archive-Tar-2.30-1.el8.noarch is already installed. Package perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-1:7.34-1.el8.noarch is already installed. Package perl-Test-Simple-1:1.302135-1.el8.noarch is already installed. Package perl-interpreter-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package python36-devel-3.6.8-2.module_el8.1.0+245+c39af44f.x86_64 is already installed. No matching package to install: 'python3-ldb-devel >= 1.5.4' No matching package to install: 'python3-talloc-devel >= 2.1.16' Package python3-tdb-1.3.18-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package python3-tevent-0.9.39-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. No matching package to install: 'quota-devel' Package readline-devel-7.0-10.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package sed-4.5-1.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package xz-5.2.4-3.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package zlib-devel-1.2.11-10.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Not all dependencies satisfied Error: Some packages could not be found. Missing packages are really missing or something wrong with Git's Samba? many thanks, L.

7 17

where to find Python devel packages
by lejeczek 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

hi guys How to get these two for example: python3-talloc-devel python3-ldb-devel Should these be available, exist in repos? It seems like they should, since a few things during rpmbuild call those two explicitly as dependencies. many thanks, L.

3 2

Question: Gluster v7.4 package build status
by Strahil Nikolov 23 Apr '20

23 Apr '20

Hello CentOS Storage SIG, Can someone tell me how I can check the build status of the Gluster v7.4 packages ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov

3 7

conflicts in yum repos
by lejeczek 21 Apr '20

21 Apr '20

hi everyone. dnf updates collide: $ dnf update corosynclib Last metadata expiration check: 0:19:02 ago on Fri 17 Apr 2020 14:57:48 BST. Error: Problem: problem with installed package corosync-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 - package corosync-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 requires corosynclib(x86-64) = 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both corosynclib-3.0.3-2.el8.x86_64 and corosynclib-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package corosynclib-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) $ dnf list corosynclib --showduplicates Last metadata expiration check: 0:18:45 ago on Fri 17 Apr 2020 14:57:48 BST. Installed Packages corosynclib.x86_64 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1 @AppStream Available Packages corosynclib.i686 3.0.2-3.el8 AppStream corosynclib.x86_64 3.0.2-3.el8 AppStream corosynclib.i686 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1 AppStream corosynclib.i686 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1 HighAvailability corosynclib.x86_64 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1 AppStream corosynclib.i686 3.0.3-2.el8 Stream-AppStream corosynclib.x86_64 3.0.3-2.el8 Stream-AppStream It cannot be that those(some of?) repos exclude each other, right? many thanks, L.

5 11

[Cloud SIG]: Building updated RPMs for OpenStack Client and SDK for CentOS 7
by Nils.Magnus＠t-systems.com 20 Apr '20

20 Apr '20

Hi CentOS developers, especially Cloud SIG team, tl;dr: I need some help in packaging Python3 packages available in PyPI for CentOS 7. Details: we are a public cloud provider based on OpenStack and many of our customers and partners unfortunately still request CentOS 7 images for their VMs. In my team we support the upstream development of OpenStack SDK and OpenStack Client (both seem to be de facto one combined team now) and also provide some extensions specific to our cloud (via a plugin mechanism in recent releases of the SDK). Our clients frequently ask for updated RPMs for CentOS 7. I wonder if you as CentOS community at large are interested in having them as well, or, if not, if you could point me in the right direction how to build them. One major conflict I am currently struggling with is that virtually all Python 2.7 code is not only no longer supported (due to a community goal in OpenStack), but actually removed (which is in itself a good decision, no doubt about it). The mentioned packages work well with Python 3, but as I understand it, Python 3 is not available by vanilla CentOS 7. The affected packages are available in PyPI: * https://pypi.org/project/openstacksdk/ (version 0.46.0) * https://pypi.org/project/python-openstackclient/ (version 5.2.0, not to be confused with "openstackclient" without the "python-" prefix, which is stuck at 4.0.0) * https://pypi.org/project/otcextensions/ (version 0.6.9, but this our own business) They are all easily installed with "pip" once you have a Python 3 environment, but draw a total of 100 other packages as dependencies. Could you please advise how to proceed if someone insists on RPMs for those? Thank you + Regards, /Nils

4 3

CPE Weekly: 2020-04-18
by Aoife Moloney 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

--- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- # CPE Weekly 2020-04-18 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Check out our team's info here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/ ## GitForge Updates We are still actively engaging with the Fedora Council and have not made any further progress with this project. We are focusing on ensuring we have captured the most granular of requirements before further engaging with GitLab by rereviewing what we have gathered so far and requesting more specific technical clarifications on some. We are also as a team discussing the best way to track the updates on this project publicly and hope to have something published early next week. We will send an email to the devel list as soon as we have agreed and created this. Thank you for your patience and engagement with us thus far. ## Fedora Updates * Fedora 32 release: RC 1.3 was tested this week * Go/No-Go meeting happened on Thursday 16th April - decision:No Go https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapr… ### Data Centre Move * Please note Communishift is now down and is en route to the datacentre in RDU-CC. * We have a list of affected services that will be in effect from May 25th - July 1st (est) as part of the full datacentre move. You can view that list here https://hackmd.io/hpYYJQRjQy-oHxUS7IonIA * As always, please view our public schedule here for more a more detailed overview https://hackmd.io/@fedorainfra2020/rJpsA4FLL#First-draft-of-schedule-for-PH… ### AAA Replacement * The team officially kicked off phase two of the project development today. * They are going to look at applications that currently use the FAS client to change their codebase to the FASJSON client post production. * The team are also working on adding a python library to the API so that this maps to python objects easily. * They are also working on API endpoints, specifically to be able to retrieve the open-api specification in JSON format & provide a health endpoint for monitoring tools. * Our work is publicly tracked here if you want to find out more https://github.com/orgs/fedora-infra/projects/6 ### CI/CD * rpmautospec is available for testing in staging, find more info here https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapr… ### Sustaining Team * The team are looking at creating a ticket dashboard for tickets and have reused most the fedora-gather-easyfix code base to work on this * https://fedorapeople.org/~humaton/cpe/ * Some cool stats about tickets from the infra repo here https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapr… * Mbbox: * Review koji-hub CRD PR https://github.com/fedora-infra/mbbox/pull/19 Starting to play around with koji-ansible collections for releng work (here). Automation of the openh264 packages. ## CentOS Updates ### CentOS * CentOS CI - stable with 0 downtime * 7.8 QA tree is being tested by CentOS QA folks ### CentOS Stream * The team are working on having Stream be publically consumable in the coming months, with SIG enablement so watch the devel lists for more technical updates as and when they are announced! As always, feedback is welcome, and we will continue to look at ways to improve the delivery and readability of this weekly report. Have a great weekend! Aoife Source: https://hackmd.io/gSci385uRoeNVEuoNUS1pg?view -- Aoife Moloney Product Owner Community Platform Engineering Team Red Hat EMEA Communications House Cork Road Waterford

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] New KDE available for testing on CentOS Stream
by Andy Hall 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

> Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:36:45 -0700 > From: Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> > Subject: [CentOS-devel] New KDE available for testing on CentOS Stream > Message-ID: > <CAKndyUTRpN_fsqs2o1CGbnGSOMAtmOso=rJS3mjxp4masnqQhw(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > CentOS Stream has recently been updated to include the updated > qt5-5.12.5 that will be part of RHEL 8.2. The qt5-5.12.* releases are > the LTS version of qt5, we this very good news. > > The problem is that the KDE packages in EPEL were built on qt5-5.11.*, > and many of them won't install on 5.12. > > I have rebuilt KDE for RHEL 8.2 x86_64 and have it in my Fedora people area. > I have updated all the added qt5 packages to be 5.12.*, to match the > qt5-5.12 in RHEL 8.2. > I have also updated most of the plasma packages to 5.18.*. This is > the corresponding plasma LTS release that goes with qt5-5.12. > I have also updated most of the kf5 packages to 5.67.* / 19.12 . > There is no LTS release for the kf5 packages, there were the latest at > the time I was rebuilding them. > > In summary, this is a new shiny KDE Plasma Desktop. > > It would be great if people could test it before RHEL 8.2 / CentOS 8.2 > comes out. Hey Troy now the qt packages have been updated to 5.12 do we have a date for the 8.2 release as I'd like to just "dnf groupinstall KDE" for a shiny new ( stable ) desktop but right now this will fail :-( Thanks !

3 4

.config file for pxeboot kernel
by Christoph 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

Hi where I can find the .config file for the pxeboot kernel of centos 8? -- ------ Greetz

2 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel April 2020