devel June 2020

devel@lists.centos.org

29 participants
27 discussions

CentOS 8 on AWS
by Thomas Stephen Lee 14 Jun '20

14 Jun '20

Hi, I am a user of CentOS 8. When can we expect an image on AWS? I am just learning AWS and would like to use CentOS 8 for that. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/CloudInstance says that this is the list to ask. thanks --- Lee

11 25

Re: [CentOS-devel] Missing dependencies while rebuilding OpenStack packages
by Jose Castro Leon 11 Jun '20

11 Jun '20

Thanks a lot, I see it there now, I am just trying to build our downstream packages Cheers Jose -----Original message----- From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 4:52 PM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Missing dependencies while rebuilding OpenStack packages On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 4:19 PM Jose Castro Leon <jose.castro.leon(a)cern.ch <mailto:jose.castro.leon@cern.ch> > wrote: Hi, This recipe worked like a charm, but now we are seeing again the same issue, openstack-macros is no longer available in ussuri nor in train Could you please tell me what happened? I see it in train repo: $ repoquery --repofrompath=train,https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-train/build-deps/latest/--disablerepo="*" --enablerepo=train -q openstack-macros openstack-macros-0:2019.2.3-1.el8.noarch In ussuri it was missing after bootstrapping deps, I just added: $ repoquery --repofrompath=ussuri,https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-ussuri/build-deps/latest/--disablerepo="*" --enablerepo=ussuri -q openstack-macros openstack-macros-0:2019.2.3-1.el8.noarch Best regards, Alfredo Cheers Jose -----Original message----- From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com> > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 1:52 PM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel(a)centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Missing dependencies while rebuilding OpenStack packages Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jose Castro Leon <jose.castro.leon(a)cern.ch <mailto:jose.castro.leon@cern.ch> > wrote: Hi Cloud SIG, With every OpenStack release (and also with CentOS 8), we have to rebuild some OpenStack packages to be installed at CERN. Those packages carry downstream patches for integration into our environment. While building those, we have observed that there are some packages that are required to build but are not provided in the testing repositories. In the past, there was a build repository in which those dependencies were available. If I recall correctly from a previous discussion, this is no longer available due to several reasons. Would it be possible to have the dependencies available in the testing repo at least to build the main OpenStack components? If this is not possible, what would be your suggestion to help us out? Since some releases ago, we tag and ship in -testing and -release repositories only runtime dependencies. There are some packages which are only required to build packages which are tagged in -el8-build tag to be available during building in CBS and are also shipped in build-deps repository in RDO Trunk server, i.e.: https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-ussuri/build-deps/latest/ I'd propose you to use or mirror that repository or you can find the list of packages and download them from CBS in rdoinfo data file for the specific tag: https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/buildsys-tags/cloud… I hope this helps, let me know if you need further assistance. Best regards, Alfredo Kind regards, Jose Castro Leon CERN Cloud Infrastructure Team _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Missing dependencies while rebuilding OpenStack packages
by Jose Castro Leon 11 Jun '20

11 Jun '20

Hi, This recipe worked like a charm, but now we are seeing again the same issue, openstack-macros is no longer available in ussuri nor in train Could you please tell me what happened? Cheers Jose -----Original message----- From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 1:52 PM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Missing dependencies while rebuilding OpenStack packages Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jose Castro Leon <jose.castro.leon(a)cern.ch <mailto:jose.castro.leon@cern.ch> > wrote: Hi Cloud SIG, With every OpenStack release (and also with CentOS 8), we have to rebuild some OpenStack packages to be installed at CERN. Those packages carry downstream patches for integration into our environment. While building those, we have observed that there are some packages that are required to build but are not provided in the testing repositories. In the past, there was a build repository in which those dependencies were available. If I recall correctly from a previous discussion, this is no longer available due to several reasons. Would it be possible to have the dependencies available in the testing repo at least to build the main OpenStack components? If this is not possible, what would be your suggestion to help us out? Since some releases ago, we tag and ship in -testing and -release repositories only runtime dependencies. There are some packages which are only required to build packages which are tagged in -el8-build tag to be available during building in CBS and are also shipped in build-deps repository in RDO Trunk server, i.e.: https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-ussuri/build-deps/latest/ I'd propose you to use or mirror that repository or you can find the list of packages and download them from CBS in rdoinfo data file for the specific tag: https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/buildsys-tags/cloud… I hope this helps, let me know if you need further assistance. Best regards, Alfredo Kind regards, Jose Castro Leon CERN Cloud Infrastructure Team _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

2 1

[RDO][OpenStack] Removal of Pike and Ocata Trunk repos
by YATIN KAREL 10 Jun '20

10 Jun '20

Hi, The topic was discussed in yesterday's RDO meeting[1] and to reach a wider audience it's being raised here. Ocata and Pike are in the Extended maintenance phase[2] for more than a year now, The promotion jobs which used to test these repos were dropped long ago[3][4]. Now we are planning to drop these trunk repos[5][6] in the first week of June, 2020. We already stopped building new commits for pike/ocata[7]. So if anyone still using these repos consider moving to upgrade to queens or any later releases. If something is blocking you to stop relying on ocata/pike repos raise your voice here so we can consider it before dropping the repos. [1] https://lists.rdoproject.org/pipermail/dev/2020-May/009379.html [2] https://releases.openstack.org/ [3] https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/topic:remove_pike [4] https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16485/ [5] http://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-ocata/ [6] http://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-pike/ [7] https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/c/18347/ On Behalf of RDO Team Thanks and Regards Yatin Karel

1 1

Current state of CentOS 8.2
by filbar＠centrum.cz 08 Jun '20

08 Jun '20

Hello, what is timeline or current state of CentOS 8.2? For CentOS 8.1 I watched https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x, but for CentOS 8.2 I don't found something like this. Thanks, Filip Bartmann

2 1

CPE Weekly: 2020-06-07
by Aoife Moloney 07 Jun '20

07 Jun '20

--- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- # CPE Weekly: 2020-06-07 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and other strategic tasks that need more dedicated time than volunteers can give. See our wiki page here for more information:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/ ## General Project Updates Please check out our updated initiative timetable for briefing in new projects to our team here:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/time_tables/ *Note: Initiatives are large pieces of work that require a team of people and weeks/months to complete. Please continue to open tickets in the normal way for bugs, issues, etc. Dont forget to view our taiga board to see the projects we are currently working on, what we have scoped and whats in our backlog https://tree.taiga.io/project/amoloney1-cpe-team-projects/kanban?epic=null CPE Product Owner Office Hours: Thursdays @ 1300 UTC on #fedora-meeting-1 ## Fedora Updates ### Data Centre Move * A reduced services offering of Fedora will begin tomorrow, June 8th until July 28th, est. * This is to complete the final shipment of hardware from Phoenix to Washington, so please be patient and understanding during this timeframe as some services will be off and the rest, much slower. * Please read the below email sent by kfenzi if you have not already done so: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapr… * Details on what this move may mean for you can be found here https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapr… * If an application is not working correctly at all, please check this list https://hackmd.io/hpYYJQRjQy-oHxUS7IonIA?view before opening a ticket to make sure its not listed as being moved. If it is being moved, please wait a day or two, then try again. * Similarly, please be patient when opening tickets for service issues in general as we have now reached the critical point in this move and all of our sys-admins and wider teams will be assisting in the successful bringup of the reduced Fedora service and facilitation of the final hardware shipment and move. ### AAA Replacement * The team are working on implementing an aspect of the service that will allow users to select their applicable contributor agreement(s) as we are merging both Fedora and CentOS authentication system under the Noggin' solution. * The team have also added a blog pref to the feature set in Noggin * They have added pagination to the solution * And are working through redirecting applications to interface with the new API * Please feel free to check out the team kanban board for more information on the features the team are working on and have already completed here https://github.com/orgs/fedora-infra/projects/6 ### Mbbox * Project Dashboard here https://github.com/fedora-infra/mbbox/projects/1 * Sprint 4 is underway with the following work being addressed: * Kojira CRD & Documentation completed * MBS Backend CRD is almost done * And the team are now waiting on a staging environment to deploy and test in. We hope to have this in place by the end of this week ### Gitforge Good discussion on the CPE PO Office Hours meeting this Thursday, 4th June around the possibility of scheduling an AMA session/technical panel session with some folks from GitLab to allow the Fedora community a direct line to discuss services, potential blockers, etc. General feedback is that this will be welcome so I will work with GitLab and cverna, who is still leading the technical side of the project (link to ticket below) to plan the best time for this session & work with you all to set an agenda/discussion points for the meeting. NOTE: Due to the data centre move, this session will not happen before late August or early September at a minimum. Thank you for your engagement with us on this! Link to public issue ticket: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/217350 Meeting minutes log https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-06-04/cpe_po_office… ## CentOS Updates ### CentOS * CentOS Linux 8.2.2004 RC composes are with QA ### CentOS Stream * The team resolved all of the 8.2 build failures in CentOS Stream in their recent sprint (May 21st - June 5th) * An issue where a SIG was unable to push new content to git.centos.org was resolved, and is currently in staging * The team are also investigating how best to separate CentOS Linux branding from CentOS Stream * We are also focusing on building more packages in Stream for our current sprint (June 5th - 19th) and working on more automation and variance to help improve the current process and time it takes for our team to build packages As always, feedback is welcome, and we will continue to look at ways to improve the delivery and readability of this weekly report. Have a great week ahead! Aoife Source: https://hackmd.io/8iV7PilARSG68Tqv8CzKOQ?view -- Aoife Moloney Product Owner Community Platform Engineering Team Red Hat EMEA Communications House Cork Road Waterford

1 0

Storage SIG meeting minutes (02 June 2020)
by Niels de Vos 02 Jun '20

02 Jun '20

Today we helt our monthly Storage SIG meeting again. The next one will be on Tuesday 7 July 2020. Please add your topics to the agenda at https://hackmd.io/Epc35JIESaeotoGzwu5R5w Thanks, Niels Minutes: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/June/centos-meeting.2020-06-02-13.01.ht… Minutes (text): https://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/June/centos-meeting.2020-06-02-13.01.txt Log: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/June/centos-meeting.2020-06-02-13.01.lo… Meeting summary --------------- * Welcome everyone! (ndevos, 13:01:54) * agenda (ndevos, 13:05:05) * LINK: https://hackmd.io/Epc35JIESaeotoGzwu5R5w?edit (ndevos, 13:05:31) * fmount and gfidente attending OpenStack PTG (ndevos, 13:06:23) * blog.centos.org post with quarterly report (ndevos, 13:07:44) * ACTION: ndevos to check with other maintainers to put a quarterly SIG report on a blog post (ndevos, 13:09:48) * nfs-ganesha-2.8.4, el7, el8; nfs-ganesha-3.3 coming soon, ceph-15 (octopus) for el8 (ndevos, 13:10:05) * status of centos-release-ceph c8 packages (ndevos, 13:17:00) * Open Floor (ndevos, 13:18:50) Meeting ended at 13:27:28 UTC. Action Items ------------ * ndevos to check with other maintainers to put a quarterly SIG report on a blog post Action Items, by person ----------------------- * ndevos * ndevos to check with other maintainers to put a quarterly SIG report on a blog post * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * ndevos (46) * kkeithley (21) * centbot (2)

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel June 2020