devel

devel@lists.centos.org

5 participants
4641 discussions

Errata in the Repo
by Steven Crothers 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

As the subject says, I know it's been discussed before (albeit not any great length); however, can we open discussions again about including errata in the repositories? With the more communal nature of the CentOS project and management through "Special Interest Groups" or SIGs, can we perhaps open up a packaging SIG? Nothing to big, something simply to start packaging errata into the repositories to start. Later on it can evolve, but I think that would be a great first step to tackle. Thoughts? Steven Crothers steven.crothers(a)gmail.com

3 9

Requests from Atomic SIG + Starting SIG meetings
by Joe Brockmeier 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

Hi all, To get the Atomic SIG rolling a bit faster we'd like to start weekly meetings and ensure the community has access to the components it needs to build images. What we need at the moment: - Space on git.centos.org for Atomic materials. - Current JSON files for the CentOS POC builds. - System for building images (can we use the system that's been used currently for the proof of concepts?) - System to build packages (Koji) that aren't in EPEL or CentOS core - Place to host the repository. - A key to sign the tree. I think part of this may be collaborating with the CBS SIG? We're looking at Thursday or Friday before Noon Eastern as a meeting time. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

how does the minimal and netinstall ISO install media created
by 耳东 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

hi guys. I want to create a cutomed centos 6.5 LiveOS (adding some sysadimn tools), which could boot from PXE. I want to consult CentOS-6.5-x86_64-minimal.iso or CentOS-6.5-x86_64-minimal.iso , but I can NOT find how does it created. I have find a ks.cfg from: https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd/browser/trunk/CentOS6/rhel6beta-liv… but it was 4 years ago, it too old. thanks.

3 3

debug info
by Nathanael D. Noblet 15 Sep '14

15 Sep '14

Hello, So this isn't strictly a devel issue but I'm not sure what's going on. I have a CentOS 6 server that has some issues I'm trying to debug however debuginfo-install fails to work. For example running debuginfo-install httpd returns: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror enabling epel-debuginfo Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.metrocast.net * epel: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * epel-debuginfo: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * extras: mirror.ash.fastserv.com * updates: mirror.us.leaseweb.net Checking for new repos for mirrors Could not find debuginfo for main pkg: httpd-2.2.15-31.el6.centos.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package apr-1.3.9-5.el6_2.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package apr-util-1.3.9-3.el6_0.1.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package db4-4.7.25-18.el6_4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package expat-2.0.1-11.el6_2.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package openldap-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package openldap-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package pcre-7.8-6.el6.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package zlib-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64 No debuginfo packages available to install This happens on multiple systems (2 real hardware and 1 VM). Not sure how to address it as those packages are definitely in the repo http://debuginfo.centos.org/6/x86_64/ as defined by CentOS-Debuginfo.repo . Thoughts? -- Nathanael

1 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] 32-bit CentOS 7 - can I help?
by Ian and Alison 13 Sep '14

13 Sep '14

Hi, I've also managed to compile the 32-bit kernel by adding in the missing function. (This part of the code appears to be a backport of a feature from 3.15, which could explain why it's got bits missing.) I also enabled a lot of device driver modules that were disabled in the kernel-3.10.0-i686.config, and created a config for a debug kernel. I can share my specfile and configs if someone can tell me where to send them. I've also built all the other 32-bit packages that I think should be present. Just a couple need the ExclusiveArch x86_64 line changed. Nothing has been tested yet - about to start creating a 32-bit install disc. Ian Gosling On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 12:00 +0000, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org wrote: > On 09/12/2014 12:00 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > FYI, I've successfully built kernel-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.i686.rpm (and > > friends), using kernel-3.10.0-i686.config from 3.10.0-121.el7. I had > > to unset CONFIG_PARAVIRT to work around this error: > > > > kernel/sched/cputime.c: In function 'steal_account_process_tick': > > kernel/sched/cputime.c:273:3: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'jiffies_to_nsecs' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > this_rq()->prev_steal_time += cputime_to_nsecs(steal_ct); > > ^ > > I figured this error out. > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7592 > -- CONFIDENTIAL NOTE: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the mail. Thank you.

1 0

CentOS6 & CentOS7 on PowerKVM/ppc64
by Rishi 12 Sep '14

12 Sep '14

Dear List, I would like to express interest in running CentOS7 & probably CentOS6 production servers on ppc64 architecture. With OpenPower we have access to PowerKVM and want to understand current progress around this. Ubuntu is found to be working as ppc64el. I found blog entry http://www.karan.org/blog/2014/06/12/can-we-deliver-a-powerpc-build-for-cen… which refers to a mailchain of last month http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/010625.html followed by http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7236 Let me know if we can help in any way to get it general available. Regards, Rushikesh

3 2

[Atomic SIG] Setting base packages for Atomic
by Joe Brockmeier 12 Sep '14

12 Sep '14

Sent this to the atomic-devel list a bit ago, but also wanted to put it in front of centos-devel for any interested parties who aren't on atomic-devel. Also was sitting in my drafts folder for a few days, so "today" was actually like Monday of this week. Sorry! -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [atomic-devel] Setting base packages for Atomic Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:08:25 -0500 From: Joe Brockmeier <jzb(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: jzb(a)redhat.com Organization: Red Hat (Open Source and Standards) To: atomic-devel(a)projectatomic.io Hi all, So - question came up on Fedora's Cloud SIG mailing list today about whether to include Mesos. The reply was "we want to stick to the upstream definition... but there isn't one." We need to define this to help Fedora and CentOS (and also encourage those communities to join this discussion). Here's the repo for Fedora Atomic, currently: [master] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-atomic.git/tree/ [f21] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-atomic.git/tree/?h=f21 I'd like to pull together a default template for Atomic or minimal set of packages, though I think it's fine of CentOS and Fedora depart from that as needed as long as the core set of services are intact. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

koji build for golang
by Lokesh Mandvekar 11 Sep '14

11 Sep '14

I'm trying to build golang-1.3 in koji for CentOS7, but I see this error: Task info: https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=473 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): free 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): free -> open (x86_64-0.centos.org) 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): open (x86_64-0.centos.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: package golang not in list for tag bananas7-testing 0 free 0 open 0 done 1 failed Does the package have to be pre-added to this tag? -- Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5

2 2

Weird output of system load
by Mingfei Hua 11 Sep '14

11 Sep '14

All, One server of mine running CentOS 6.3. The load is very high, but few process in running or blocked. Followed is the output of /proc/stat, /proc/loadavg and top /proc/stat cpu 5351723 61716 6974590 161365578 240734 141769 380525 0 0 cpu0 4016881 9686 2510787 79408769 110721 141549 351075 0 0 cpu1 1334842 52029 4463802 81956808 130013 220 29449 0 0 intr 1081538370 139 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 0 73 0 0 531522246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3929190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ctxt 1074666354 btime 1409530629 processes 9684115 procs_running 1 procs_blocked 0 softirq 1418158114 0 367862840 177073 609942882 3679591 0 2 53962455 1790447 380742824 /proc/loadavg 11.21 22.50 10.74 1/2536 16895 Top -H top - 05:08:02 up 10 days, 4:50, 1 user, load average: 13.24, 23.26, 10.86 Tasks: 2535 total, 1 running, 2534 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 3.1%us, 4.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 92.5%id, 0.1%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st Mem: 3925040k total, 3780944k used, 144096k free, 31464k buffers Swap: 2064376k total, 1196k used, 2063180k free, 3201568k cached Sincerely, Mingfei Hua

2 1

Fwd: Re: docker-registry, inclusion of python-rsa (and perhaps others) in CentOS
by Karanbir Singh 10 Sep '14

10 Sep '14

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel