devel

devel@lists.centos.org

2 participants
4653 discussions

CS9 buildroots in CBS for SIGs
by Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 06 Aug '21

06 Aug '21

Hi, With regards to the update about the plans for CentOS Stream 9 in [1], when should SIGs expect availability of CS9 buildroots in CBS and be able to create c9 branches in git.centos.org?, once we have signed packages or after getting them published in mirrors? Best regards, Alfredo [1] https://blog.centos.org/2021/07/centos-community-newsletter-july-2021/

6 6

subversion / CS8 update / status of workflow
by Leon Fauster 05 Aug '21

05 Aug '21

Hi, inspired by a different thread here, I did a dnf distro-sync on a CS8 node and noticed that subversion would be downgraded: from subversion-1.10.2-4.module_el8.3.0+703+ba2f61b7 to subversion-1.10.2-3.module_el8.3.0+393+21cd8ae8 Coming from C8 and swapping the repos to CS8 leads to this situation (especially when doing upgrade instead of distro-sync) but that is not my point. The above downgrade path recovered that subversion in CS8 still does not have # rpm -q --changelog subversion-1.10.2-4.module_el8.3.0+703+ba2f61b7.x86_64 | head -3 * Mi Feb 10 2021 Joe Orton <jorton(a)redhat.com> - 1.10.2-4 - add security fix for CVE-2020-17525 Such question comes here and there again and again. How does the package update process in CS8 looks like? Is the process mature, any glitches. This subversion update already exists in C8 since February. Why is it not incorporated into CS8? Would CentOS Stream only be promoted as "upstream" development platform, then ... but its also promoted as successor of CentOS Linux for people with production fleeds. I do not argue that C8S should be like C8 (in a wider sense) but at least it should have some basal property (like updates are at most after 1 or 2 month all there or so ...). Any insight about the goal of the current process? Any wiki or doc page for that? Some transparency would be my main goal, to have base for decisions ... I'd really appreciate any feedback. Thanks, Leon

3 3

glibc with clone3 in the CentOS 9 buildroot
by Florian Weimer 05 Aug '21

05 Aug '21

We have merged a toolchain update which brings in a glibc build very close to glibc 2.34 upstream release. This build starts using clone3 for creating threads. This may require browser and container tools updates which adjust seccomp filters. clone3 kernel support is NOT required, but a proper “system call not supported” error (ENOSYS, like older kernels report without seccomp filters) or a working clone3 system call is now necessary. Thanks, Florian

2 1

RHEL build roots in CBS
by Jack Aboutboul 05 Aug '21

05 Aug '21

Hello All, I’ve opened an issue in the centos-infra pagure (https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/400) regrading getting RHEL buildroots in CBS. If you think your SIG would benefit from this, would you mind chiming in and registering your interest? I am sure that there are already several SIGs that this can be of use to and it would help the community at large. Thanks, Jack

1 0

x509watch / private sub directory
by Leon Fauster 03 Aug '21

03 Aug '21

$ curl https://src.fedoraproject.org/_dg/bzoverrides/rpms/x509watch { "epel_assignee": "robert", "fedora_assignee": "robert" } Hi Robert, I just wanted to ping you regarding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964728 I'd really appreciate any feedback. Thanks. -- Leon

1 0

CPE Feedback Survey
by Ant Carroll 03 Aug '21

03 Aug '21

Hey folks, Over the last several months we’ve been trying to continue our improvements with how we interact and share information with you all based on the feedback of the last surveys. From the blog posts, to mails and how we work on the tickets you send us. Here is a link to our very short survey where you can give us that feedback: https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/5 If you could take the time (5mins max) to complete it for us it would be massively appreciated as always. We're also moving the cadence of this to once every 6 months. The shorter survey times at the start were great to give us that initial burst of improvements to work on, and the increases in happiness we've seen from you reflect the work the team has done. Hope to see some of you at Nest, Ant -- Ant Carroll Associate Manager, Software Engineering Red Hat Waterford <http://www.redhat.com> Communications House Cork Road, Waterford City ancarrol(a)redhat.com M: +353876213163 IM: ancarrol @redhatjobs <https://twitter.com/redhatjobs> redhatjobs <https://www.facebook.com/redhatjobs> @redhatjobs <https://instagram.com/redhatjobs> <https://www.redhat.com/>

1 0

python3-pyOpenSSL missing from CentOS Stream 9
by Markus Falb 29 Jul '21

29 Jul '21

Hi, There was a package mentioned recently that is not in the composes for cs9 https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2021-July/077184.html I have another example, python3-pyOpenSSL https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=6236 This package was built for cs9, but it is not in the composes. I noticed it because python3-pyOpenSSL is a requirement for some ansible modules, for example https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/2.7/modules/openssl_certificate_module.html https://docs.centos.org/en-US/stream-contrib/quickstart/#_whats_going_on_wi… has some information about koji tags, but to me it is not clear to what it means if specific koji tags are missing, but it seems to me that it should have c9s-gate and possibly other tags too to land in the composes. My question is: why is this? best regards, markus

3 5

Re: [CentOS-devel] Updated KDE Plasma Desktop ready for testing on CentOS Stream 8
by Troy Dawson 28 Jul '21

28 Jul '21

First off, thank you very much for that. That is perhaps the best "Here is my environment" anyone has ever sent me. The problem is that you don't have the epel-next repo anywhere. At the very least you need to have "epel-next-release" in kickstarts/8/base.ks If you wanted the newer kde packages installed during install you need to add the epel-next repo to kickstarts/8/base-repo.ks I believe it should be repo --name=epel-next --mirrorlist= https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-next-$releasever&arch=… or possibly just repo --name=epel-next --mirrorlist= https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-next-$releasever&arch=… Hope this helps. Troy On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 3:13 AM Massi aka Ergosum <massi.ergosum(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Il giorno mar 27 lug 2021 alle ore 17:24 Troy Dawson > <tdawson(a)redhat.com> ha scritto: > > > > I've been able to install, and update all of the packages listed here. > > So, unless you are able to give more details about how your machine is > setup, there isn't much I can help with. > > > > A "fresh install" means an image build using the following kickstarts: [1] > [2]. > I'm using repos listed here [3]. > > I'm still investigating, but I suspect I'm not using the latest versions. > > Thanks > Massimiliano > > [1] https://github.com/mbugni/centos-remix > [2] > https://github.com/mbugni/centos-remix/blob/master/kickstarts/8/l10n/kde-wo… > [3] > https://github.com/mbugni/centos-remix/blob/master/kickstarts/8/base-repo.ks > _______________________________________________ > kde mailing list -- kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >

2 3

[NFV SIG] NFV SIG meeting minutes - 2020-07-28
by Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 28 Jul '21

28 Jul '21

============================================= #centos-meeting: NFV SIG meeting - 2020-07-28 ============================================= Meeting started by amoralej at 15:02:45 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://www.centos.org/minutes/2021/July/centos-meeting.2021-07-28-15.02.… . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (amoralej, 15:03:15) * updates from RDO consumer (amoralej, 15:05:20) * RDO xena and wallaby have been moved to ovs2.15 and ovn-2021 (amoralej, 15:05:28) * jobs to gate NFV sig updates have been modified accordingly (amoralej, 15:05:50) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/project:nfvinfo (amoralej, 15:07:57) * LINK: https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6193 (amoralej, 15:10:16) * updates from oVirt consumer (amoralej, 15:13:11) * ovirt is working to move to ovs2.15 and ovn-2021 (amoralej, 15:13:25) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980269 (amusil, 15:15:09) * ovirt found issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980269 (amoralej, 15:15:58) * open floor (amoralej, 15:23:53) * amusil proposal is to move this meeting to monthly (amoralej, 15:26:09) * AGREED: to move the NFV SIG meeting to monthly cadence, on first wednasday of each month (amoralej, 15:30:27) * ACTION: amoralej to send patch to centos calendar (amoralej, 15:30:39) * AGREED: to skip meeting on first week of august, next meeting will be in September (amoralej, 15:34:27) Meeting ended at 15:36:18 UTC. Action Items ------------ * amoralej to send patch to centos calendar Action Items, by person ----------------------- * amoralej * amoralej to send patch to centos calendar * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * amoralej (61) * amusil (27) * ykarel (5) * centbot (5) * dholler (2)

1 0

firefox branding issue
by Leon Fauster 28 Jul '21

28 Jul '21

JFI: $ rpm -q firefox firefox-78.12.0-2.el8_4.x86_64 /usr/lib64/firefox/defaults/preferences/all-redhat.js has redhat.com as homepage configured ... (instead centos.org)? -- Leon

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel