devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4655 discussions

CentOS 7.6.1810 UEFI/Shim issue .. feedback wanted !
by Fabian Arrotin 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

We got some reports from people unable to reboot their nodes after updating to 7.6.1810, and basically to newer shim (v15). It seems to affect only nodes in UEFI mode, but without SecureBoot. We wrote that in the ReleaseNotes, including a link to the bug report : https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15522 We have now a workaround in that bug report, and also a new interim build (not signed by Microsoft yet) but we need feedback , as the only node on which I could test this myself is my old 2008 iMac computer .. :-( Once we'll have enough positive (but also negative) feedback about this new build, we'll be able to send to Microsoft for signing and so consider that bug closed. Worth also noticing that if we can have that ready in the updates, we'll be able to spin a monthly iso that will then work on such uefi nodes too. Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

1 0

building nfs-ganesha for ceph
by Ken Dreyer 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

Hi Niels and Kaleb, I'm wondering how we could best build nfs-ganesha's ceph FSALs in CBS. Right now, since we'll likely support multiple versions of nfs-ganesha simultaneously for different versions of Ceph, I'm leaning towards using a custom "dist tag" like thing in the Release field so we don't collide with what Kaleb's doing at http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=98 Eventually it would be nice to have a unified nfs-ganesha build shared between Ceph and Gluster. If we built it in storage7-common-candidate, we would have to tag gluster and ceph into that, which sounds kinda messy, because you only get to choose one version of each. It'd be more manageable to have a separate set of tags and targets just for nfs-ganesha versions. Like: storage7-nfs-ganesha-26-el7 storage7-nfs-ganesha-27-el7 ... etc But that still leaves the problem of shipping a nfs-ganesha-gluster sub-package that will not have its runtime deps fulfilled in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ceph-nautilus/ . Vice versa, we'd have a nfs-ganesha-ceph sub-package that lacks runtime deps in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-5/ What do you think? Just have separate nfs-ganesha builds for now? - Ken

3 5

building nfs-ganesha against older Ceph versions
by Ken Dreyer 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

Hi Matt, We're discussing building + distributing nfs-ganesha in centos-devel, https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-December/017121.html Does it make sense to build nfs-ganesha V2.7 against Luminous's librgw and libcephfs, and then also allow users to install that build along with Nautilus' newer librgw and libcephfs? It sounds like this is what Gluster's doing with their ABI guarantees for libgfapi.so. The idea is that we'd always build against the "oldest supported" version of Ceph, but distribute it so that Luminous and Nautilus users would install the same libfsalrgw.so and libfsalceph.so binaries. - Ken

1 0

Pushing oVirt 4.3 packages to buildologs
by Sandro Bonazzola 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

Hi, now that 7.6 is out, can you please have a look at https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15480 ? It will help getting ready for oVirt 4.3. Thanks, -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>

1 0

CentOS 7.6.1810 release available for builds in CBS/Koji
by Fabian Arrotin 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

Hi, As announced (https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2018-December/023082.html) , CentOS 7.6.1810 is now available and realeased for the following arches : x86_64, aarch64, ppc64le, armhfp So that release is now the default one for the CBS/koji build tasks (and all koji regen-repos tasks are currently running) That means that for your next builds, you'll be building against 7.6.1810 (even if technically that was already the case with the 7.5.1804+updates+CR repositories) That should also mean the end of the "freeze" wrt pushing tagged pkgs for release to mirror.centos.org -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

3 5

[URGENT] qemu-kvm-ev packages for CentOS 7.6
by Sandro Bonazzola 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

Hi, just got following report and indeed the new qemu-kvm-ev-2.12 is not in CentOS 7.6 repo despite it's tagged for release: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24629 qemu-kvm-ev needs to be aligned with kernel / libvirt and other deps to properly work so we need the build to be added to the 7.6 repos as soon as possible. Can you please check where it did got stuck and let it in? Thanks, Il giorno mar 4 dic 2018 alle ore 16:03 Morten Stevens < mstevens(a)imt-systems.com> ha scritto: > Hi Sandro, > > Just a small question: Is it possible to update the qemu-kvm-ev packages > for CentOS 7.6 to qemu-kvm-ev-2.12.0-18.el7_6.1.1? > http://mirror.centos.org/centos-7/7.6.1810/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ > > Actually, there is only the latest release for CentOS 7.5 > (qemu-kvm-ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.7.1) available. > > Thank you very much. > > Best regards, > > Morten > -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>

2 2

Volunteer needed: Track chair at FOSDEM Dojo
by Rich Bowen 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

I have a volunteer to be track chair for half the day at the FOSDEM Dojo, and I'm looking for one or more people to take another half day. A track chair is responsible for: * Speaker intro * Telling the speaker when they have 10, 5, 0 minutes left, and dragging them off stage when they go over * Telling the audience to turn off their beeping devices, and to use the mic when they ask questions * Announcing what's next in the other room, so that people can switch if they desire * Ensuring that people in the room behave in a way that is compatible with our community ethos --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

new repo for "centos-release-ceph-nautilus"
by Ken Dreyer 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

Hi Niels, I'm looking to create a new "centos-release-ceph-nautilus" package, like the "luminous" one we have today at https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-ceph-luminous I'm wondering if it would be easier to keep all of these in a single "centos-release-ceph" repository, with per-release branches. Would you be up for creating a https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/centos-release-ceph repo? - Ken

6 13

CentOS Dojo at ORNL, April 16th 2019
by Rich Bowen 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

We are pleased to announce that we'll be holding a CentOS Dojo at Oak Ridge National Laboratories, in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on April 16th, 2019. ORNL is home to the fastest supercomputer in the world. It's also home to a huge quantity of CentOS, OpenStack, Ceph, Gluster, and many other open source projects that we love. We are accepting talk submissions now: https://goo.gl/forms/UBjcVbaqhwSg69Qj1 Please have a look at the schedule from our most recent Dojos - https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/CERN2018 , https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/DevConfUS2018 - for some idea of what kinds of talks are typically popular with our audiences. We are also looking for help connecting with area businesses, both to encourage them to attend, and also to submit their interesting use cases as presentations. If you'd like to help with the event in any way, please let me know, or come discuss it on the CentOS-Promo mailing list. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

2 2

Monday deadline to get something into the December newsletter
by Rich Bowen 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

If you want something in the December newsletter, please get it to me by Monday. Thanks. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel