devel

devel@lists.centos.org

5 participants
4641 discussions

[!HPC] Request to join HPC Sig
by Beth Lynn Eicher 19 Aug '18

19 Aug '18

Hello, Please let me introduce myself. I am Beth Lynn Eicher with the FAS username of bethlynn. My background is a career in engineering systems deployments in research computing. I have worked at the Carnegie Mellon University, the Department of Energy, and the University of Chicago. Currently, I am a High Performance Computing consultant with clients like Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center and the University of Wyoming. There, I worked with Bridges, an XSEDE participating site. Bridges uses CentOS 7 as do many other large installations. If you look at the top500, CentOS is the most popular named distribution. I hypothesize that CentOS is in the majority of the overall market share. It is a solid choice for all HPC systems. The tools for use with HPC are often built by our greater community but seldom packaged by EPEL. I am unware of rpm builds for the following Free Software projects: https://github.com/OSC/Open-OnDemand https://www.psc.edu/hpn-ssh https://portal.tacc.utexas.edu/tutorials/multifactor-authentication https://github.com/TACC/Lmod As an industry contributor from a small company, I am unencumbered by institutional politics which may cause reluctance to collaboration. Therefore, I believe that I would be a very useful contributor to a HPC SIG within the CentOS community. Yesterday, I spoke about cybersecurity in HPC at the CentOS Dojo. There we had a significant amount of energy around HPC and I would like to see this conversation continue. Today, I sought out the HPC SIG of CentOS. While there is evidence of activity, I have not seen anything more recent than Fall of 2017. Where is everybody? Thanks, Beth Lynn Eicher Arcutek | Solutions Consultant beicher(a)arcutek.com<mailto:beicher@arcutek.com> W: 312-767-2894 M: 312-566-8947 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

3 5

Canceling Today’s CBS meeting
by Brian Stinson 13 Aug '18

13 Aug '18

Hi folks, We won’t be holding today’s CBS meeting. We will pick up where we left of next Monday. If there are items we should discuss in the meantime please let us know here on-list. -- Brian Stinson brian(a)bstinson.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] [CentOS PaaS SIG]: Origin v3.10 rpms released to mirror.centos.org repo
by Daniel Comnea 09 Aug '18

09 Aug '18

Cheers Patrick, we trying our best ;) On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Patrick Tescher <patrick(a)outtherelabs.com> wrote: > Wow, this is so much faster than any recent release. Good job team! > > > On Aug 8, 2018, at 11:46 AM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Following my previous [1] notification, happy to announce the official > release of Origin v3.10 rpms which can be found at [2] > > > > Thank you, > PaaS SIG team > > [1] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshift-archives/dev/ > 2018-August/msg00001.html > [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/ > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev(a)lists.openshift.redhat.com > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev > > >

1 0

[CentOS PaaS SIG]: Origin v3.10 rpms released to mirror.centos.org repo
by Daniel Comnea 08 Aug '18

08 Aug '18

Hi, Following my previous [1] notification, happy to announce the official release of Origin v3.10 rpms which can be found at [2] Thank you, PaaS SIG team [1] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshift-archives/dev /2018-August/msg00001.html [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/

1 0

CERN Dojo: Volunteers needed to help select schedule
by Rich Bowen 08 Aug '18

08 Aug '18

As you may know, we're planning a Dojo at CERN in October. (Details at http://cern.ch/centos ) I need 4 or 5 people to vote on our schedule. I hope to publish a schedule by the end of next week. So, if you are planning to go, and are willing to volunteer to read some session abstracts, please let me know by the end of this week. Thanks. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

[CentOS PaaS SIG]: Origin v3.10 rpms available for testing
by Daniel Comnea 07 Aug '18

07 Aug '18

Hi, We would like to announce that Origin v3.10 rpms are available for testing at [1]. As such we are calling for help from community to start testing and let us know if there are issues with the rpms and its dependencies. And in the spirit of transparency see below the plan to promote the rpms to mirror.centos.org repo: 1. in the next 24/72 hours the packages should be promoted to the test repo [2] (currently it does not exist, we are waiting to be sync'ed in the background) 2. in a week time if we haven't heard any issues/ blockers we are going to promote to [3] repo (currently it doesn't exist, it will once the rpm will be promoted and signed) Thank you, PaaS SiG team [1] https://cbs.centos.org/repos/paas7-openshift-origin310-testing/x86_64/os/Pa… [2] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/ [3] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/

1 1

Documentation help requested (Re: Upgrading from 6 to 7)
by Rich Bowen 06 Aug '18

06 Aug '18

Hi, folks, I was hoping that someone with more knowledge than I about the 6 -> 7 upgrade process would have a look at https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool The page starts with a vague warning, and then continues to give detailed instructions, leaving it very unclear which parts the warning refers to. If the process is broken, let's remove all of this and point to the correct process. If only a part of the process is broken, we need to remove that from the doc, and drop the scary warning. As it is, the page *appears* to be a "don't do it this way" kind of page, and, as you know, 90% of people will simply skip past the warning and cut-paste the instructions. Thanks for any advice and/or edits that can happen here. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

4 4

Re: [CentOS-devel] Storage SIG: Samba vfs CEPH
by Harry Mallon 06 Aug '18

06 Aug '18

Hi Ken, Is there anything I can do to help this along? Should I make a feature request in Bugzilla or anything? Thanks, Harry > The Ceph upstream developers do not test Samba's integration as well > as they develop and test the nfs-ganesha plugin. So it's unknown to me > how well the plugin works today. > > However, you're right Fedora has built it for a while, so I don't see > an issue with providing it in the Storage SIG. This would let CentOS > users can test it more easily. > > - Ken > > > Harry Mallon Senior Software Engineer T+44 203 7000 989 60 Poland Street | London | England | W1F 7NT On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Harry Mallon > > <Harry.Mallon(a)codex.online> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > The samba package in base for CentOS 7 doesn't have the CEPH VFS module (only on fedora I believe). Is that indicative of a known bug, or could the samba-vfs-ceph package be provided in the Storage SIG repos? > > > > Thanks, > > Harry

1 0

Using meetbot commands in your SIG meetings
by Rich Bowen 02 Aug '18

02 Aug '18

A reminder, as we head into August: If you will use the meetbot commands in your IRC SIG meetings (especially #info, #agreed, and #help - full command documentation is here - https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot ) this will greatly simplify going back and extracting monthly summaries from your meeting minutes (published here - https://www.centos.org/minutes/2018/July/ ) and turning them into blog posts, tweets, and the monthly newsletter. Remember that your SIG meeting is not *just* for you, but is also one of the ways that you "report" back to the larger community what you've been working on. Related, if there's any way in which I can help you promote what you're doing on your SIGs, please don't hesitate to let me know. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

2 5

[altarch][ppc64le] Packages needed for Triple O Container Builds
by Michael Turek 01 Aug '18

01 Aug '18

Hello all, We've been trying to enable tripleo container builds in the centos rdo community and quickly ran into some problematic RPMs. Specifically, centos-release-ceph-luminous and centos-release-opstools. They were problematic for altarch but have recently been patched to work with the $contentdir var. I set up a test to see how they install, linked below [0][1], and found that centos-release-storage-common would also be needed. Adding that seemed to allow everything to install properly. The test also installs ceph, as the centos-release-ceph-luminous package just enables a repo. If you would like any more testing to be done here please let me know, I'd be happy to help move this along. To reiterate, the packages we'd like to see published by altarch are: centos-release-ceph-luminous http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=23175 centos-release-storage-common http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=7274 centos-release-opstools http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=23201 Thanks! Mike Turek <mjturek> [0] https://ci.centos.org/job/rdo-test-day-tools-ppc64le/15/consoleFull [1] https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15069/

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel