devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4687 discussions

reporting to Redhat's Jira
by lejeczek 08 Dec '23

08 Dec '23

Hi guys. Where should bug reports go to theses days? I've been using Redhat's Jira for a while and inasmuch I can file against Centos, when I go RHEL and -> Centos as a product I get a pop-on windows but no matter how I fiddle with it, when I click _Create_ that pop-up only flashes, no errors nor warnings, but won't create a BZ. It that an incorrect way/place or something else is at play there or perhaps Jira suffers from some issues - would anybody know? thanks, L.

4 6

FOSDEM, Distros Devroom, and CentOS Connect
by Shaun McCance 04 Dec '23

04 Dec '23

Hi folks, In case you missed it, the Distributions Devroom will be back at FOSDEM 2024. The CFP deadline is TOMORROW: https://blog.centos.org/2023/12/distributions-devroom-fosdem-2024/ Are you doing something cool that would be interesting to people working on the various distros? You should submit a proposal. Also remember that we're hosting CentOS Connect the two days before FOSDEM. The CFP for that is open a bit longer, until December 18. Please submit proposals for anything related to CentOS or the wider Enterprise Linux ecosystem. We also have a half day for meetups. If you'd like to host a meetup around a team or project, submit that in the CFP system as well. https://connect.centos.org/ Thanks, Shaun

1 0

mdadm: --update=resync not understood for 1.x metadata
by Strahil Nikolov 03 Dec '23

03 Dec '23

Hi All, Recently I had to update a host that uses raid1 for /boot and /boot/efi and I noticed that my resync service is failing with "mdadm: --update=resync not understood for 1.x metadata”. Does anyone know why 'mdadm-4.2-rc2.el8.x86_64.rpm’ supports it but 'mdadm-4.2-13.el8.x86_64’ not ? Why the version is not properly bumped if such drastic change is intentional ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] [Storage-SIG] ceph reef (Kaleb Keithley)
by Alvaro Fernandez Casani 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

Thank you both for the information! I will use that repository. It seems is not yet available on some of the repositories we are using ( on some machines with Alma9): https://repo.almalinux.org/almalinux/9/extras/x86_64/os/Packages/ but this will have to be reported in another mailing list. Cheers, Álvaro El 23/11/23 a las 13:00, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org escribió: > Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to > centos-devel(a)centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-devel-request(a)centos.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [Storage-SIG] ceph reef (Kaleb Keithley) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 07:46:53 -0500 > From: Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle(a)redhat.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] [Storage-SIG] ceph reef > Message-ID: > <CAC+Jd5CgarSz=XR7c-4-2JSkx-9gKq4z4Et+0_AZaYwbA6fKKA(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > It is released on EL9. It was tagged for release around 15 Nov. I am able > to install 18.2.1 packages and/or update to 18.2.1 on my Stream9 machine. > > Joel Capitao confirmed the same in his email. > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 3:47?AM Alvaro Fernandez Casani < > Alvaro.Fernandez(a)ific.uv.es> wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> We have upgraded to ceph reef v18.2.1 but only on EL8 >> >> centos-release-ceph-reef is available on EL8 but not on EL9, although I >> can see the packages here: >> >> >> https://mirror.stream.centos.org/SIGs/9-stream/storage/x86_64/ceph-reef/Pac… >> >> >> Is it going to be relased on EL9? >> >> Cheers, >> ?lvaro >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel(a)centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> >

1 0

[Storage-SIG] ceph reef
by Alvaro Fernandez Casani 22 Nov '23

22 Nov '23

Hi all. We have upgraded to ceph reef v18.2.1 but only on EL8 centos-release-ceph-reef is available on EL8 but not on EL9, although I can see the packages here: https://mirror.stream.centos.org/SIGs/9-stream/storage/x86_64/ceph-reef/Pac… Is it going to be relased on EL9? Cheers, Álvaro

3 2

kickstart module stream has no effect ?
by lejeczek 22 Nov '23

22 Nov '23

Hi. I have in kickstart: module --name postgresql --stream 15 which seems to cause no errors but further down in %packages: postgresql postgresql-server and Anaconda stops, saying that those are missing. Also with: @postgresql:15/server Anaconda is not happy, saying that "group or modules" is broken. Installation is of Centos 9 latest. Any & all thoughts are much appreciated. many thanks, L.

1 0

centos-nfv-openvswitch package ovn23.09.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support
by Sri kor 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

Hi Team, I am on Rocky linux version 9.1. I have installed the centos-nfv-openvswitch package repo. When I tried to install /upgrade ovn-controller, the latest version I could see was 23.06. But 23.09 is out and probably not available in this repo. Do we have any package repo to get the 23.09 version? Thanks Srini $ yum search ovn Not root, Subscription Management repositories not updated This system is not registered with an entitlement server. You can use subscription-manager to register. Last metadata expiration check: 6 days, 8:28:47 ago on Wed 08 Nov 2023 09:53:33 PM UTC. ============================================================================= Name Matched: ovn ============================================================================= ovn-2021.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn-2021-central.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn-2021-host.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn-2021-vtep.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.03.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.03-central.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.03-host.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.03-vtep.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.06.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.06-central.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.06-host.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.06-vtep.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.09.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.09-central.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.09-host.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.09-vtep.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.12.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.12-central.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.12-host.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn22.12-vtep.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn23.03.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn23.03-central.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn23.03-host.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn23.03-vtep.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn23.06.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn23.06-central.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn23.06-host.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ovn23.06-vtep.x86_64 : Open Virtual Network support ~$

2 2

Weekly meetings for the Docs SIG
by Shaun McCance 15 Nov '23

15 Nov '23

In last week's meeting, the CentOS board voted to formalize the Documentation SIG, with Amy and me as co-chairs. I'd like to start weekly meetings, like we do for the Promo SIG. I don't expect that everybody will make it every week. I've opened a poll to find a good time for everybody. Please fill it out if you're interested in participating: https://whenisgood.net/pfywzpz The poll is for the week of Nov 27 (I'll be out next week), but you should fill it in based on when you regularly (not necessarily always) have time each week. Make sure to select your location to see the times in your time zone. Thanks, Shaun

1 0

[infra] Planned outage : RDU2 network maintenance (please read) : 2023-11-17
by Fabian Arrotin 15 Nov '23

15 Nov '23

Due to a mandatory network maintenance at the RDU2 (Community Cage) facility/DC, we'll have to power off some CentOS infrastructure components hosted in that DC. Impacted services: - https://cbs.centos.org (impossible to submit any build, nor push to delivery network) - ns1.centos.org - all centos linux / stream 8 / stream 9 release engineering workflow (stream 8/9 can be built but not pushed out, while for the rest, all will be down) - https://git.centos.org - CI infra: - while openshift in aws is self-contained, there will be no way to request duffy nodes for tests - various other services Migration is scheduled for """"Friday November 17th, 1:00 pm UTC time"""". You can convert to local time with $(date -d '2023-11-17 13:00 UTC') The scheduled maintenance window (communicated to us) is estimated to 3h, but we'll restart infra services as soon as possible, following ourselves the current status internally. Thanks for your understanding and patience. on behalf of the Infra team, -- -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org]

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] status of CentOS Linux 7 usage in centos infra (please read)
by Mike Rochefort 15 Nov '23

15 Nov '23

> The potential impact when we'll just decommission mirrorlist.centos.org > is for SIGs building for RHEL (and not Stream) 8 and so still relying on > mirrorlist= in their shipped .repo. > The list of impacted SIGs should be really small and as the content > itself will probably moved to mirror.stream.centos.org, there will be a > different thread to discuss how to do that I've been wondering what the plan for CentOS Stream content has been for a while. Though since CentOS Stream 8 will EOL before CentOS Linux 7, I guess it's a moot point and only EL8 SIGs supporting RHEL will be relevant to move off of m.c.o. > # CentOS Forums (https://forums.centos.org) > We discussed this already in the past (on this list and elsewhere) : > while we can quickly migrate that service to newer stack, the underlying > question was more about current moderators saying that nobody will > maintain that service after June 2024. So in the current situation, > we'll just decommission the forums in 2024 with no replacement. > Should the situation change between now and June 2024, we'd be able to > migrate (or not) the service. Should we be taking this opportunity to promote and direct CentOS Stream users to the CentOS category on the Fedora Discussion[0] platform? Similar to the Asahi Linux category, we could pitch up sub-topics to filter Project discussion and community support. While instant messaging and email platforms are available, I believe having an easier point of entry for longer lived and easily searchable material is a benefit to the community at large. Letting it passively wither or just outright decommissioning the platform without a similar service is not an ideal situation. Instant messaging is easy to get lost in and lose track of important discussions even with available *in-platform* search, and email is... well I don't think the vast majority of people on the net care for it that much or know how to use it "correctly". Maybe migrating to a HyperKitty platform like lists.fp.o[1] could help with that? > # centos linux 7 buiders (infra) > Not publicly visible but pretty obvious that we'll just keep that infra > running until CentOS Linux 7 EOL and then we'll just decommission it > entirely (as we'll not have to care about building/shipping anything for > centos linux 7 If there are hardware resources involved, would they be wholly decommissioned or repurposed for CentOS Stream + SIG usage? [0] https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/neighbors/centos [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/ -- Mike Rochefort

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel