devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4687 discussions

No CentOS SCLo SIG meeting this week
by Honza Horak 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

I'm sorry but this week is too busy for me and I have another meeting at the same timeslot. If anybody else wants to hold the meeting, feel free to do so. Honza

3 5

Off - Convert centos instaled to iso or .tar
by Marcos Carraro 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

The scenario: - Centos 6.5 perfectly running as a network gateway. doubt Is there any way that I can create some Linux iso installed for later installations? Or create some of the tar / and then transfer it to disk "Create partition, create mbr, create grub, restore files"? Thanks, *--* Att Marcos Carraro about.me/marcoscarraro

3 3

404 - broken redirect?
by Dariusz Lisiak 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi there, I think http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=6.5&arch=x86_64&repo=os should point to: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/ instead of: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.5/os/x86_64/ which returns 404. I noticed the same problem for updates, extras, centosplus, contrib also. Unfortunatelly it breaks down updates on some of our servers based on custom image, that has 6.5 in /etc/yum/vars/releasever. -- regards, D.

2 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] Publish Errata for CentOS
by Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

On 01/21/2015 05:41 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 01/21/2015 10:06 AM, Tony Coffman wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >>> >>> the question isnt 'how' its just a xml file, you can write it by hand if >>> you wish. the question is what do we put inside it and how do we make >>> sure what we put inside it is accurate. >>> >> >> >> Why not do a minimal version that simply includes the information from >> the centos-announce mailing list and no external data? There are a >> few other errata fields that can simply be filled in with "not >> available". This minimal solution is nearly there using existing open >> source scripts tied together. > > If someone from the community would be willing to script something up > for this we can take a look at it. Is this the kind of script you are envisioning? Input: Announcement data input by author or CentOS announcement. Output: Announcement email text updateinfo.xml patch > I've been toying with the idea of > adding an rss feed to www.centos.org for the repositories in place of > updateinfo, mostly since Johnny is quite correct, we don't validate > cve closure, so providing that info as if we do seems a bit wrong. I don't see anything wrong with filling errata fields with "not available" as Tony suggested, at least to start with.

1 1

SIG members for State of CentOS panel at OSCON?
by Karsten Wade 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi: I've proposed a panel for OSCON in Portland, OR this year that is the second annual State of the CentOS Project. Are there any SIG members planning to attend OSCON who would be interested in being on the panel? The idea is to be able to give a short update on your SIG and answer questions from the audience about Virt, Storage, Cloud, et al. I got the proposal in under the deadline and indicated to the organizers that I'm seeking additional panelists. Let me know if you plan to attend and would like to represent your SIG. I think it's OK if we have up to 2 people per SIG, unless we really fill out and need to pare down to 1-per-SIG. Regards, - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTSbPcACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEE5PwCgqpwmRc+OQRDJqjn6lIjuzWh2 bi0AoJMkFji1Ij19haEGy09yWtDvjWMY =sxny -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

CentOS Bug Tracker and ABRT
by Jakub Filak 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

Hello everyone, I want to briefly introduce myself. I am a Red Hat employee working on ABRT[1]. We have recently added support for CentOS on the ABRT server[2] and we would like continue in these integration efforts. First of all, I want to submit a pair of patches improving ABRT's UX on CentOS: - do not offer users to report to Red Hat Portal - offer users to send an email to upstream - stop wasting of resources by running sos, because its output is useless for CentOS users In the near future, we would like to integrate ABRT with CentOS Bug Tracker in the same way as ABRT integrates with Red Hat Bugzilla[3]. We are done with the analysis phase[4] and, now, we are working on a testsuite[5]. Unfortunately, MantisBT misses more advanced searching what prevents us from implementing a tool similar to one we have for Bugzilla. At least we need to search by DUPHASH (an unique identifier of a crash, something like tag). Would you be willing to run a MantisBT plugin adding the things we need, if we develop it? Best regards, Jakub http://wiki.centos.org/JakubFilak 1: https://github.com/abrt 2: https://abrt.fedoraproject.org/ 3: https://github.com/abrt/libreport/issues/272 4: https://github.com/abrt/libreport/wiki/MantisBT 5: https://github.com/abrt/abrt/tree/reporter-mantisbt

4 12

Xfce for CentOS group
by Anders F Björklund 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Hi list! Since the Alternative Desktop SIG didn't happen, we thought we would make a more focused effort and improve the Xfce desktop environment experience on CentOS. That might end up being a dedicated CentOS SIG, or just a couple of improvements to the existing packages from EPEL. Once upon a time, or more precisely: back in the CentOS 5.0 days, Xfce 4.4 was available in Extras and it was a pretty simple install that just worked "out of the box". Now, there's the newer versions available via EPEL - but the experience is nowhere near painless... Going to try to meet up with other interested parties during FOSDEM, to see if we can't improve upon that and at least fix the low hanging issues. And get some better Xfce testing and feedback going, as well. A more long-term goal is make it an alternative to GNOME (Workstation). I've rounded up some of the issues, that currently exist: * The theme and icons are wrong, either missing or just ugly * The background image is wrong, ending up with a single color * X11 and Fonts are missing, so just adding the group doesn't work * Some bugs need backporting or fixing, like in Terminal or Xfwm. See http://afb.users.sourceforge.net/xfce/centos/centos-xfce.html Right now, one starts with a Minimal (or Server) install of CentOS. Then adds Base, X11 (including fonts), and finally Xfce (from EPEL). Once the aforementioned problems are taken care of, that should be it. Eventually, it might even end up being a "spin" or available image ? As mentioned earlier, here are the applicable versions of each: * CentOS 5 - Xfce 4.4 (in CentOS Extras) * CentOS 5 - Xfce 4.6 (based on Fedora 6) * CentOS 6 - Xfce 4.8 (based on Fedora 12) * CentOS 7 - Xfce 4.10 (based on Fedora 18) To replace GNOME PackageKit there's the Yum Extender, and to replace GDM there's LightDM (more work is needed, to make a CentOS-6 version). The GNOME icons and GNOME themes will probably "work" to start with, but one can probably improve upon that as well (as a lower priority). Something like http://afb.users.sourceforge.net/xfce/xfce-brave.png If you are interested in helping out with testing, packaging or developing (backporting, fixing the upstream issues, and so on) then please say so. I'll try to have some more detailed lists and updated packages with me, for the FOSDEM meetup in the weekend... * http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Fosdem2015 --anders

5 10

Where should golang-github-gorilla-mux live?
by Matthias Schroeder 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Hi guys, I noticed that golang-github-gorilla-mux 0-0.15.git136d54f.el7_0 is in the ‘updates' and in the ‘extras' repo. Older versions where only in ‘extras’. Is that a conscious change of policy, or did something go wrong with the routing of that version? Cheers, Matthias - just curious

3 3

Port CloudSigma to CentOS's CloudInit
by Viktor Petersson 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hey guys, I had a conversation with Jim Perrin and Karanbir Singh about this and it should be relatively trivial. However, Jim suggested that we moved the discussion here. Here is the status today: * The CloudSigma provider for CloudInit is complete and is maintained by Canonical[1] and is included in (12.04 and forward) * Jim wrote a patch (attached). It isn't complete, but it is a start. * There is also a port to CoreOS (re-written in Go) [2] * Since I didn't write the code, I don't know of the exact workflow, but I think these are the relevant files: ** cloudinit/cs_utils.py ** cloudinit/sources/DataSourceCloudSigma.py ** tests/unittests/test_datasource/test_cloudsigma.py I'm involved with CloudSigma, and I'd be happy to sponsor anyone willing to take on the task of porting this with resources at CloudSigma for testing. Unfortunately, I don't have any internal resources to allocate towards this at this point, but I know that we have plenty of customers running CentOS that would love to see this happen. I'd also be happy with answering any questions and help with the QA of this. Thanks! [1] https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cloud-init-dev/cloud-init/trunk/view/head:/cl… [2] https://github.com/coreos/coreos-cloudinit/issues/184

3 3

comps in SIG content repos
by Karanbir Singh 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

hi, thoughts around requiring SIG repos to carry a comps.xml file ? that will allow us to also have SIG repo configs be usable at install time and yum group operations to run on installed machines. regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel