devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4696 discussions

sig-configmanagement git workflow
by Julien Pivotto 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Hi, here is a proposal regarding the way we could enable cooperation around the centos SIG: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/ConfigManagementSIG/Git The idea is to link github to CBS and ci.c.o to provide quick and secure builds/feedback. -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt

1 0

sig-configmanagement CBS tag requests
by Julien Pivotto 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Hi, It is now time for sig-configmanagement member to discuss and open bug requests on bugs.centos.org about CBS tag requests. CBS: https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CommunityBuildSystem How to: https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CentosPackager Bug requests to create new tags need to be open under the buildsys category. This is the bug request I opened for Puppet and common tags: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10604 I would also like that any member plays with CBS by trying to make scratch builds to CBS. I encourage you to make scratch builds in the "bananas" tags. ! Please ask for help it anything is not clear. It would be great if as much people could test CBS before the next meeting and ask for tags. -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt

1 0

sig-configmanagement SCL prefix
by Julien Pivotto 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Hi all, For the Config Management SIG, we will need to rebuild some EPEL packages. However, we do not want to rebuild them 'as it' because we do not want to depend on EPEL version etc. EPEL is not always "stable" and we do not want our users to be in troubles regarding EPEL decisions (https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-December/014101.html) Some projects use Python or Ruby librairies that we could also put in a SCL. What prefix should we use for those SCL? Some ideas: /opt/centos/ /opt/centos-sig-configmanagement /opt/centos/sig-configmanagement Thanks for your feedback. -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt

1 0

sig-configmanagement comitee
by Julien Pivotto 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Hi At the last sig-configmanagement meeting, we decided to have a comitee to lead the SIG. Any sig member can be part of the comitee. If you are interested and want to join the comitee, please add yourself to the following wiki page: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/ConfigManagementSIG/Meetings More information about sig governance can be found here: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/ConfigManagementSIG/Governance -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt

1 0

sig-configmanagement: next meeting
by Julien Pivotto 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Hi, I was expecting the SIG meetings to be shifted by one hour due to DST. However, that is not possible because the pass-sig meetings are not DST affected. I will NOT be able to join the next meeting, because I was expecting it to be held one hour earlier. The date of the next meeting is: date -d 'Wed Apr 13 16:00:00 UTC 2016' (Wed Apr 13 18:00:00 CEST 2016) Another member of the sig will need to take the lead of the meeting. -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt

1 0

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2016-04-06)
by Troy Dawson 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1500 UTC - Wedensdays Date: Today Wedensday, 06 April 2016 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms - origin 1.1.6, docker 1.9.1-origin -- repo(s) --- https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/centos/CentOS-OpenShift.repo --- testing (buildlogs) --- candidate -- images - not started -- Quickstart - not started - What is our criteria for a release? - Building image demo ?? - Open Floor

3 4

Reminder: CentOS Cloud SIG meeting tomorrow, 15:00 UTC
by Rich Bowen 06 Apr '16

06 Apr '16

Reminder: CentOS Cloud SIG Meeting, tomorrow, 15:00 UTC, on the #centos-devel channel on Freenode IRC. Agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/centos-cloud-sig -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com OpenStack Community Liaison http://rdoproject.org/

1 0

Custom docker in PaaS common target
by Karanbir Singh 05 Apr '16

05 Apr '16

hi, While working on the push to buildlogs, I noticed there is a custom docker ( 1.9 ) in the PaaS Common target, i presume the distro docker ( 1.9.1 ) isnt suitable ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 3

rehashing all the buildlogs repos from cbs.centos.org
by Karanbir Singh 05 Apr '16

05 Apr '16

hi, I've just done a complete rehash of all the buildlogs repos from their corresponding cbs.centos.org tag's, please let me know if there are any issues. It does mean a lot of the older stale content will be gone ( saving us 50+ GB ) Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

Update on CentOS Container Pipeline
by Karanbir Singh 04 Apr '16

04 Apr '16

hi Guys, We've made some progress on the Pipeline bringup. Highlights from the last few days: - Welcome Dharmit to the team, he's going to be contributing on the testing side of things. - We've got some baseline user stories written up, in the coming days the aim is to try and get some acceptance criteria written up, following which we will try and do some estimates and task allocations around them. We'll then get these in front of a larger audience to see how things map to expectations and what folks feel is the best priority order to work on. - Within our devel infra, we've established an idea of Project V/s Job. Users will now have their built containers delivered as <hostname>/<project name>/<job id>:<tag> - We've got a test instance up for pulp 2.8, that seems to meet all the requirements of delivering both a v1 and v2 container format; although we are likely only going to be looking at v2 from now onwards. - We've started working on a deploy script that would allow us to run managed deploy's and also help us move into a CD like setup, where we can test / deploy often. - Hardware to locate the first user facing version of the stack is now in place, and we have the required firewall policy etc setup. In the coming days, we will start doing some load testing and also start working through the implementation plans for the user service. Most of our effort is now focused on getting the content together to have a user facing deployment up. Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel