devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4679 discussions

CNet article
by Dag Wieers 01 Aug '09

01 Aug '09

Hi, I was surprised to read on CNet http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10300222-92.html that: "Dag Wieers, who works on the security, Web, and infrastructure aspects of CentOS" Which is not true and in fact was never true, but on the centos.org "development team" website I am listed as such. http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=2 Can someone remove my name from that page ? Thanks in advance, -- -- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] [CentOS] Open Letter to Lance Davis
by Farkas Levente 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

On 07/30/2009 02:34 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > I'd personally like to hear what the community has to say about this, > as it's not just an internal matter. Please speak up so that we know > where the community stands on this. I'd rather be wrong, but know how > people feel than take a stand for a community who has other ideas. this's not the only thing (but may be one of the most dangerous). i also like to know who are responsible for what is the community?: - who are the centos-3 updates maintainers - who are the centos-4 updates maintainers - who are the centos-5 updates maintainers - who will be the centos-6 maintainers - who are qa team - who are responsible for the centos.org domain and dns (ok lance) - who are responsible for the website, wiki, mailing list - how has root access to the hardware infrastructure and i hope none of the above is a single element set:-) - what is the hardware infrastructure of centos team - is there any cvs, svn, git for the development why not public - how the release and update build process look like - can we see the build farm status, build logs etc. - what is the qa process all of these information cab be put up to the wiki in a few hours by those who know the answers. if these and may be a few other question can be public and clean to the community we can arrange resources and probably can speed up the updates and release process. eg. i'm very interesting how long will it take the 5.4 release (as we all remember how can one man can stop the whole 5.3 release process and no one like to repeat it again). -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

8 8

need some testing help
by Karanbir Singh 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

The Bind update for EL4 was just announced, packages that fix the issues ( see https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1179.html ) are available for C4 at http://dev.centos.org/~z00dax/c4-bind/ we dont normally release updates till the packages used for the build are also available, however since this is a major issue - it would be nice to get these updates out right away. Keeping that in mind could someone test for : a) install these packages, make sure they work for the basic stuff b) update an existing bind install on C4 and make sure it does not break anything c) ensure that the deps for the actual binaries are met cleanly within the existing CentOS-4 os + updates set. As soon as we can get reasonable testing feedback here, we can push these packages into the released updates pool. Thanks -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

6 10

nss-3.12.3.99.3-1.el5_3.2 cacert missing
by Farkas Levente 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

hi, is it a bug or intentional that from latest nss-3.12.3.99.3-1.el5_3.2 the cacert patch missing? -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

2 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 53, Issue 9
by Alan Zheng 24 Jul '09

24 Jul '09

Dear everyone: I have a question, when I try to compile *kernel-2.6.30.1*, but after I compiled modules, I always cannot get any .ko files, and it showed: *Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 0 modules* My working kernel is *2.6.18-128.2.1.el5* CentOS 5, and I have update everything to up-to-data by "yum update". Did anyone know why it is? By the way, my compile kernel step is that: 1) make mrproper 2) make menuconfig 3) make bzImage 4) make modules 5) make install 6) make modules_install Refer to: http://www.microsuncn.com Best Regards Alan Zheng

3 2

xfs-kmod
by Farkas Levente 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

hi, i try to rebuild kmod-xfs, but none of the centosplus and extras xfs-kmod-0.4-2.src.rpm are rebuild. i try on x86_64 but i've got these errors on i386 not even start to build (may be my fault?) while on x86_64 bellow. is there any plan to fix it? ------------------------------------------------ Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7636 + umask 022 + cd /home/robot/rpm/BUILD + cd xfs-kmod-0.4 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + for kvariant in '""' + ksrc=/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5-x86_64 + cd _kmod_build_ + make TOPDIR=/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5-x86_64 modules -j4 make -C /usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5-x86_64 OOT_BUILD=y SUBDIRS=/home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_ modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5-x86_64' CC [M] /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_dquot.o CC [M] /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_dquot_item.o CC [M] /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_trans_dquot.o In file included from /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/xfs.h:21, from /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_dquot.c:19: /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'set_buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'set_buffer_unwritten' was here /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'clear_buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'clear_buffer_unwritten' was here /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'buffer_unwritten' was here make[2]: *** [/home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_dquot.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... In file included from /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/xfs.h:21, from /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_dquot_item.c:19: /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'set_buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'set_buffer_unwritten' was here /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'clear_buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'clear_buffer_unwritten' was here /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'buffer_unwritten' was here make[2]: *** [/home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_dquot_item.o] Error 1 In file included from /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/xfs.h:21, from /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_trans_dquot.c:19: /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'set_buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'set_buffer_unwritten' was here /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'clear_buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'clear_buffer_unwritten' was here /home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:120: error: redefinition of 'buffer_unwritten' include/linux/buffer_head.h:126: error: previous definition of 'buffer_unwritten' was here make[2]: *** [/home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_/quota/xfs_trans_dquot.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make[1]: *** [_module_/home/robot/rpm/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5-x86_64' make: *** [modules] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7636 (%build) ------------------------------------------------ -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

2 1

Centos 5.3 linux askmethod FTP install problem with wrong url
by Pasi Kärkkäinen 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Hello. I submitted this bug: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3734 We can also discuss it here, if needed. -- Pasi

1 0

[Patch] request for add VIA VX800 storage support on CentOS 5.3
by BruceChang＠via.com.tw 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

To whom it may concern: I would like to request your help to integrate following patch for the HDD support of VIA VX800/VT8261/VT8237/CX700 platform: Signed off by Joseph Chan <JosephChan(a)via.com.tw> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2009-06-04 11:43:38.000000000 +0800 +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2009-06-08 18:43:22.000000000 +0800 @@ -1336,9 +1336,11 @@ #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251 0x3287 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A 0x3337 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237S 0x3372 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8261 0x3402 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8231 0x8231 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8231_4 0x8235 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8365_1 0x8305 +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_5324 0x5324 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700 0x8324 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX800 0x8353 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8371_1 0x8391 --- a/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c 2006-09-20 11:42:06.000000000 +0800 +++ b/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c 2009-06-08 18:42:28.000000000 +0800 @@ -78,7 +78,12 @@ u8 rev_max; u16 flags; } via_isa_bridges[] = { + { "vx800", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX800, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, + { "cx700", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, + { "vt8237s", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237S, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, + { "vt8237a", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, { "vt6410", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6410, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, + { "vt8261", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8261, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, { "vt8251", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, { "vt8237", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, { "vt8237a", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST }, @@ -498,6 +503,7 @@ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C576_1, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0}, { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6410, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1}, + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_5324, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1}, { 0, }, }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, via_pci_tbl); Thanks and Best Regards ================================================= Bruce C. Chang(張祖明) VIA Technologies, Inc. Address: 1F, 531, Chung-Cheng Road, Hsin-Tien, 231 Taipei Tel: +886-2-22185452 Ext 7323 Mobile: +886-968343824 Fax: +886-2-22186282 Skype: Bruce.C.Chang Email: BruceChang(a)via.com.tw

4 5

php-mcrypt 5.2.6 test repo
by Adam Adamou 13 Jul '09

13 Jul '09

Hello all, I ve been using php 5.2.6 from the testing repo for a month now and everything works fine. The only thing is I cant find php-mcrypt for 5.2.6 from the testing repo. phpmyadmin is saying that is missing but php-mcrypt from the base repo is installed. Thanks, Adam

5 4

Questions about the centos rebuild process / s390x related
by Sascha Thomas Spreitzer 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

Hello hackers, i have been asked from some companies, 1. how long it would take to rebuild a centos from scratch if I would have a whole CP (common processor) for it. 2. What the build process includes, meaning "steps to success" 3. whether the licenses force a maintainer to push the resulting distribution upstream. 4. In which cases the maintainer is liable for the resulting distribution rpms, binaries, etc... It would be VERY helpful if I can clarify those questions. It might spend us 1 CP. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / with kind regards, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer http://spreitzer.name/

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel