devel

devel@lists.centos.org

3 participants
4654 discussions

[ceph storage sig] Possible Ceph Mimic package issue?
by Tobias Urdin 28 Jun '18

28 Jun '18

Hello, Sorry for starting a new thread, I accidentally wiped all email in my CentOS folder... Trying to install the Mimic packages from the test mirror here: http://cbs.centos.org/repos/storage7-ceph-mimic-candidate/x86_64/os/ You can see the commit where its tested here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571990/ (ignore the ceph-luminous-sig part, I just override the repo URL and not the name as of now). Puppet (err): Execution of '/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install python-rbd' returned 1: Error: Package: lttng-ust-2.10.0-1.el7.x86_64 (ceph-luminous-sig) Requires: liburcu-bp.so.6()(64bit) Error: Package: lttng-ust-2.10.0-1.el7.x86_64 (ceph-luminous-sig) Requires: liburcu-cds.so.6()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

2 4

CentOS 7.4 installation getting failed because of nss password prompt during installation.
by Veetil, Vyshnav 26 Jun '18

26 Jun '18

Hi, We have been observing that after migration to CentOS 7.4 the installation fails due to password being prompted for the execution of below command as part of the install script. <custom_location>certutil -N -d <custom location> -f <custom location>/nsspassword The install script contains the above command to create the NSSDB at the install time. Ideally, this command should never prompt for a password when it is already provided as part of '-f' argument but seeing this issue after migration to centOS 7.4. Also frequency of the issue is intermittent. Can anyone please help us to find the cause of this issue? Thanks and regards, Vyshnav

1 0

Removing old centos-release-<sig-project><version> from CentOS Extras?
by Niels de Vos 25 Jun '18

25 Jun '18

Hi, How are other SIGs handling the removal of repositories from the mirrors? There are centos-release-<sig-project> packages around that have YUM .repo files pointing to the now non-existing repos. Some (all?) of these centos-release-<sig-project> packages are still available in CentOS Extras. From #gluster: 21:25 < mallorn1> Anyone know why the 3.13 repository is gone from CentOS? http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ 21:25 <@glusterbot> Title: Index of /centos/7/storage/x86_64CentOS Mirror (at mirror.centos.org) 21:26 < mallorn1> Installed the centos-release-gluster313.noarch package that CentOS has, but then you can't install gluster because the target doesn't exist. At the moment I am tempted to create a centos-release-gluster-DONTUSE package that replaces centos-release-gluster313 and other unmaintained versions (suggestions for an alternative to DONTUSE welcome!). I do not want to force users to upgrade to a newer Gluster version without manual intervention. Some versions are/may not be compatible between client/server, or require some additional steps depending on the features that are used. Thanks, Niels

3 4

Packages tagged for release not showing up on mirrors
by Sandro Bonazzola 22 Jun '18

22 Jun '18

Hi, cockpit-169-1.el7 <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=22966> has been tagged for release on Jun 19. I see it published for x86_64: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/ovirt-4.2/common/ It's still missing on ppc64le: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/ppc64le/ovirt-4.2/common/ and aarch64: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/aarch64/ovirt-4.2/common/ Seems to be recurring issue not only in virt sig: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14226 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13633 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13283 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14782 Can we prioritize investigation on root cause and a fix for this? Thanks, -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>

1 0

Fedora CoreOS and CentOS Atomic Host
by Jason Brooks 20 Jun '18

20 Jun '18

Today, the Fedora Project announced [1] a new project, Fedora CoreOS, which will serve as a successor to Container Linux and Fedora Atomic. [1] https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-coreos/ There's an FAQ [2] that addresses, among other things, the future of CentOS Atomic Host: "CentOS Atomic Host will continue producing downstream rebuilds of RHEL Atomic Host and will align with the end-of-life. The Fedora CoreOS project will be the consolidation point for the community distributions. Users are encouraged to move there in the future." [2] https://coreos.fedoraproject.org/faq Red Hat has announced [3] plans to ship a product called "Red Hat CoreOS." It's my impression that the delta between the Fedora CoreOS project and the Red Hat CoreOS product will be small enough that there won't be a need for a CentOS CoreOS. [3] https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-unveils-roadmap-core… There are limited technical details about Fedora CoreOS available at this point, but the new host will be based on the same rpm-ostree foundation on which Fedora Atomic and CentOS Atomic are now built. I encourage CentOS Atomic users interested in the future of the platform to get involved [4] in the new project, and come say hello in #fedora-coreos on freenode. [4] https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/coreos

1 0

SIG updates requested for July newsletter
by Rich Bowen 19 Jun '18

19 Jun '18

The July CentOS newsletter is being drafted, and we need to hear from the SIGs. If you have something that you'd like to announce to the wider CentOS user audience, please let me know. The draft is growing here : https://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1802 You can * (if you have write access) add items directly to the draft * email me directly at rbowen(a)centosproject.org with what you want to say. * Or, if you put #info items in your IRC meeting minutes, I'll see those when you post your minutes (ie, I'll see them here: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2018/June/ ) and add those to your section of the newsletter. Thanks! -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

How do you want CentOS8 to look and feel?
by Alain Reguera Delgado 19 Jun '18

19 Jun '18

Hi, How do you want CentOS 8 to look and feel? It would be nice to see your ideas. It would be nice to know what the community expects in matters of artwork for CentOS 8. So to organize and direct forces in the right direction. Just to set some random ideas, I've started the following page: https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Motifs/CentOS8/Sketch2 Best Regards, -- Alain Reguera Delgado <alain.reguera(a)gmail.com>

2 2

CFP for Dojo @ DevConf.us closes this weekend
by Rich Bowen 19 Jun '18

19 Jun '18

The CentOS Dojo at DevConf.us is rushing up on us, and I'd like to have a speaker schedule published by early next week. If you are considering submitting a talk, please do it NOW, so that we don't have to consider canceling this event. Thank you. Event details: https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/DevConfUS2018 Call for papers: https://goo.gl/forms/kKta9IasJGNxIVR53 DevConf information: http://devconf.us/ Thanks. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

%{?dist} changed from .el7.centos to .el7
by John Steele Scott 19 Jun '18

19 Jun '18

[I tried sending this last week, but it never showed up in the list archive, I guess because I wasn't subscribed. Resending.] I recently found that the "centos" suffix dropped off the default rpm ${?dist} macro sometime between CentOS 7.3 and 7.5. I applaud the change, but could someone point me to any bug reference, git commit or mailing list discussion about it? A project I maintain needs some change to accommodate this, and I'd like to refer to the original discussion in my own commit message. All I could find about this in the CentOS bug tracker was https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7416 (resolved wontfix). And https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!centos-release.git/c7 only has up to CentOS 7.3. So where should I be looking? Thanks, John

2 2

[dpdk-users]Problem compiling dpdk on Centos aarch64
by Thomas F Herbert 18 Jun '18

18 Jun '18

When compiling dpdk for aarch64 on Centos, I receive compilation error. I see this in the Centos 1804 distribution. I haven't tried locally n F28 but I see buildlogs in Fedora28 for dpdk. I have also reproduced it in qemu-system aarch64 emulation: uname -a Linux aarch64-centos7 4.14.0-49.2.2.el7a.aarch64 #1 SMP Sat May 19 18:51:40 BST 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux l3fwd_em.c:245:2: error: #error No vector engine (SSE, NEON, ALTIVEC) available, check your toolchain #error No vector engine (SSE, NEON, ALTIVEC) available, check your toolchain Buildlogs show that dpdk built fine on Fedora 28/29. -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel