devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4592 discussions

RDO - CentOS Stream version poll - request for volunteers
by Amy Marrich 03 Feb '25

03 Feb '25

The results of the poll showed an interest in having both Stream 9 and 10 versions for the Epoxy release. Due to limited resources, we are looking for volunteers in the community who would be interested in learning to build the RPMs and help maintain them. Please reach out if you are interested in participating in this effort. Amy (spotz) *Amy Marrich* She/Her/Hers Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms Red Hat, Inc <https://www.redhat.com/> amy(a)redhat.com Mobile: 954-818-0514 Slack: amarrich IRC: spotz

2 2

January 2025 News
by Shaun McCance 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Hi all, The January newsletter is now available: https://blog.centos.org/2025/01/january-2025-news/ We have updates from the Hyperscale SIG, Alt Images SIG, and Virtualization SIG. Thanks, Shaun

1 0

Board Meeting Recap
by Shaun McCance 10 Jan '25

10 Jan '25

The recording of the January CentOS Board meeting is now available. Watch the recording: https://youtu.be/SHAB4RVLMIE Read the minutes: https://hackmd.io/@centosboard/H1P1F3dLyg The recording has timestamps so you can skip to the parts that interest you. Here are a few highlights of the meeting: * We had further discussions on the CentOS, Fedora, and RHEL leadership interlock proposal. * The Board will be moving forward with the SIG Council proposal. * People are largely in favor of the proposal to default to GitLab.

1 0

CentOS Alt Images January 2025 Update
by Troy Dawson 09 Jan '25

09 Jan '25

1 0

[Storage-SIG] - missing package python3-pyxattr in all the gluster-11 repos
by kAja Ziegler 08 Jan '25

08 Jan '25

Hello developers and maintainers, I want to report, that the package python3-pyxattr-0.7.2-4.el9s.*.rpm is missing in all the gluster-11 repos. Due to missing dependency then the glusterfs-server package cannot be installed. Repositories for gluster-9 and gluster-10 contain such package. With best regards, -- Karel Ziegler e-mail: ziegleka(a)gmail.com

3 2

2025-01-08 - CentOS Public Board Meeting
by Thomas Oulevey 06 Jan '25

06 Jan '25

Hi Everyone, Our next board meeting will take place at 21:00 UTC next Wednesday `date -d "2025-01-08 21:00 UTC"` If you would like to attend please send me an email to alphacc(a)centosproject.org ( please do not reply to @centos-devel or use another email address) and you will receive a link to a meeting room with a passcode, 1 hour before the meeting takes place. The agenda can be checked at (work in progress) : https://hackmd.io/@centosboard/H1P1F3dLyg As a reminder we will enforce few rules : * Wait to be recognized by the Chair before speaking * Respect the Chair when told your time to speak is over - this will allow us to remain on agenda, and complete the meetings in the allotted time * In the event that there are Board-confidential topics, these will be put at the end of the meeting, in Executive Session, and guests will be asked to leave. We hope to minimize these items, but they do sometimes happen. The most common scenarios in which this may happen are personnel issues, or information that Red Hat wishes to share with the Board, but is not yet public. * Muting of participants, or, in extreme situations, ejection from the meeting, is at the sole discretion of the Chair. * Meetings will be recorded, and published to YouTube (possibly with edits/redaction, as approved by the Directors). Thus, by joining the meeting you consent to have your presence at the meeting, and anything you say during the meeting, made public. I hope some of you can join. thanks, -- Thomas 'alphacc' Oulevey CentOS Board of Directors Secretary alphacc(a)centosproject.org

1 0

December 2024 News
by Shaun McCance 20 Dec '24

20 Dec '24

Hi all, For your holiday reading, the December newsletter is now available: https://blog.centos.org/2024/12/december-2024-news/ Cheers, Shaun

1 0

December Board Meeting Recap
by Shaun McCance 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

The recording of the December CentOS Board meeting is now available. Recording: https://youtu.be/8ficzt0l-xo Minutes: https://hackmd.io/@centosboard/S1ta-46Xkx Recap: https://blog.centos.org/2024/12/centos-board-meeting-recap-december-2024/ The recording has timestamps so you can skip to the parts that interest you. Here are a few highlights of the meeting: * Firefox is not in CentOS Stream 10. We discussed ways of getting web browsers, and documenting them. * The board discussed disabling GitLab Duo on CentOS repositories. * The community architect provided an update on CentOS Connect and the efforts to revamp the web and docs. * The board discussed encouraging SIGs to use GitLab by default. Thanks, Shaun

1 0

Proposal to default to GitLab for SIG packaging
by Davide Cavalca 16 Dec '24

16 Dec '24

In the last Board meeting we discussed the future of git.centos.org, and whether it would make sense to encourage SIGs to move over to GitLab, as we already have a group at gitlab.com/centos and that's where CentOS Stream development is happening (under gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream) GitLab also provides features (notably, CI integration via Pipelines and an improved code review flow) that some SIGs would like to use and would benefit from. To this end, I have filed https://git.centos.org/centos/board/issue/129 to summarize the discussion and decide the next steps. We'd welcome any comments and feedback on this. To be clear, there are no plans to sunset git.centos.org at this time. Cheers Davide

6 7

CentOS bootc images - Where should they go
by Troy Dawson 08 Dec '24

08 Dec '24

The CentOS Alternative Images SIG has recently been asked about making CentOS bootc images.[1] Investigation is showing that we should be able to. But that leads to the next question. After we build them, where would they go? (A) Initial thoughts are someplace in the CentOS SIG infrastructure. But there currently isn't anything setup for serving containers. It's also not the first place people would look. I was thinking of having them on quay.io. But if we do publish our bootc/container images on quay.io, where? (B) centos:<some-name> ? That would mean that the SIG's would have access to that account. I also don't know what we would have for <some-name>. We would have to have something different for each SIG. (C) centos-sig:<some-name> ? The SIG's would still have to share authentication in some manner. I still don't know what to do for the names. (D) centos-<sig-name>:<some-name> The SIG's would have their own authentication. The sig's would have control of their own naming convention. centos-altimages:stream10-bootc centos-altimages:stream10-bootc-kde centos-isa:stream9-bootc-baseline centos-isa:stream9-bootc-optimized There are some drawbacks for this. Someone would have to know the SIG name to find the image. Possibly other things. I personally am leaning towards (D). But I could be persuaded towards the others. And it's possible I haven't even thought of the correct solution. Ideas / thoughts / comments welcomed and wanted. Troy [1] - https://pagure.io/centos-sig-alt-images/sig/issue/10

6 6

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel