devel

devel@lists.centos.org

2 participants
4653 discussions

Vagrant + network "private_network", type: "dhcp" => Error: Job for network.service failed because the control process exited with error code
by Stéphane Klein 09 Dec '16

09 Dec '16

Hi, I have this error with my Vagrant config: ``` Job for network.service failed because the control process exited with error code ``` My Vagrant file: ``` Vagrant.configure("2") do |config| config.vm.box = "centos/atomic-host" config.vm.hostname = "ceph-client-2" config.vm.network "private_network", type: "dhcp" end ``` full log: https://gist.github.com/harobed/84d275b30ab928e4753b2c772425feca With `journalctl -xe' I have: ``` Dec 08 10:16:30 ceph-client-2 sshd[12198]: lastlog_openseek: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog: No such file or directory ``` How can I fix that? Best regards, Stéphane -- Stéphane Klein <contact(a)stephane-klein.info> blog: http://stephane-klein.info cv : http://cv.stephane-klein.info Twitter: http://twitter.com/klein_stephane

2 1

centos-logos legal problem
by Kouta Ikematsu 08 Dec '16

08 Dec '16

Hello. centos-logos (included CentOS version 7) license tag is "All rights reserved". I see COPYING, This license is not permitted copy and redistribute except copyright/trademark written permission. because "permit copy and redistribute" statement is not find. but this license permit specific usage. I report bug report. https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12269 Is this is legal problem ? I think that this license is not allow copy, redistribute and mirror, It is legal problem. Thank you. Reference: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/

2 2

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2016-12-07)
by Troy Dawson 07 Dec '16

07 Dec '16

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays Date: Today Wedensday, 07 December 2016 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms -- Documentation -- Automated testing -- images / image building - Multi-arch - Open Floor

3 4

[OpsTools] rubygem-fluent-plugin-rewrite-tag-filter
by Yedidyah Bar David 06 Dec '16

06 Dec '16

Hi all, I'd like to have rubygem-fluent-plugin-rewrite-tag-filter in the opstools sig repos. Not sure what exactly should be done for this. There are two github organizations, [1] and [2], and some packages forked between them. Seems like we have a repo per project. So we need a new project, right? In which organization? Who can/should handle this? I currently try to use a build I found in copr [3], and it seems to work. I checked the git repo [4] it was built from, and the spec file there is an unchanged output of gem2rpm. We can start with this, I didn't review it yet myself (and have zero experience with packaging ruby gems). Thanks and best regards, [1] https://github.com/opstools-packages [2] https://github.com/centos-opstools [3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/a15/fluent-0.12/build/469721/ [4] http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/a15/fluent-0.12/rubygem-flue… -- Didi

2 3

Productivity Tooling SIG creation request
by Fabien Boucher 06 Dec '16

06 Dec '16

Hello, Following a discussion during the last CentOS interlock in Paris, we want to propose the creation of a new SIG that will try to package and deliver applications (and related libraries) that can be called productivity applications such as: * Issues trackers * Source code management tools * Job orchestrators In the beginning we want to focus on packaging applications we currently ship inside an Open source CI/CD platform called Software Factory [1] and make them available for every CentOS user. Once packaged, we will use them directly to build the Software Factory image. These applications are (among others): * Storyboard [2] * Gerrit [3] * Zuul [4] * Redmine [5] Software Factory is a software development platform geared towards CI and CD that we've been developing since January 2014. Software Factory pre-configures and runs Gerrit, Jenkins, Nodepool, Zuul (and other optional services) over CentOS. We are going to package these services to ease the Software Factory image creation but we think this effort of packaging and the resulting artifacts make sense under a SIG thus this Productivity Tooling SIG creation request. We intend to provide & maintain an instance of Software Factory that will host the related distgit repositories and automate the CI jobs interacting with CBS. We are looking forward to your comments and we hope this new SIG request make sense. [1]: https://softwarefactory-project.io [2]: https://github.com/openstack-infra/storyboard [3]: https://www.gerritcodereview.com/ [4]: https://github.com/openstack-infra/zuul [5]: http://www.redmine.org/ Cheers, Fabien Boucher on behalf of the Software Factory team.

1 0

aarch64 build of OpenShift Origin
by Troy Dawson 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

Hi, I have built an aarch64 version of OpenShift Origin 1.4.0-rc1+ It is the 1.4.0 release canidate with all the merges as of this morning. Plus a patch to the hack scripts and some changes to the rpm spec file. Anyway, it's here https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=15061 I'll be working on getting the two patches I used into origin, as well as some of the the spec file changes. Again, this isn't the released origin 1.4.0, cuz it hasn't been released, but it should work. Troy

1 0

Adding centos-extras to a cbs build target
by Troy Dawson 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

Hi, I thought I'd read how to do this somewhere, but I've spent alot of time searching with no results. I'm trying to build origin on aarch64, so I am using the oranges7-test64-common-el7 build target. The problem is that origin requires golang. golang for aarch64 is in centos-extras. But when I try to build on oranges7, it doesn't see extras. What can I do so that oranges sees the centos-extras repo? Troy p.s. my build command is cbs build --scratch --arch-override=aarch64 oranges7-test64-common-el7 origin-1.4.0-1.el7.src.rpm

2 2

[scl.org] [SCLo SIG] new sclo-php* packages available for testing
by Remi Collet 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

Yet another small set of packages available in centos-sclo-sclo-testing For rh-php56: * sclo-php56-php-pecl-geoip-1.1.1-1 (CentOS 7 only) * sclo-php56-php-pecl-solr2-2.4.0-1 (CentOS 6 and 7) For rh-php70: * sclo-php70-php-pecl-geoip-1.1.1-1 (CentOS 7 only) * sclo-php70-php-pecl-solr2-2.4.0-1 (CentOS 6 and 7) More packages will come later, according to user requests. Remi. P.S. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo _______________________________________________ SCLorg mailing list SCLorg(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Duffy Source Code
by David Moreau Simard 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

There is a reaper that releases nodes after a certain duration. I believe it's set to 6 hours right now. This is a safeguard for nodes that may not have been released properly in a job and are "leaking". David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] On Dec 5, 2016 7:08 AM, "Julien Pivotto" <roidelapluie(a)inuits.eu> wrote: On 05 Dec 11:49, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 30/11/16 04:55, Julien Pivotto wrote: > > Well, I do think that the code is relevant for every user. I would have > > liked to understand a bit better how we provision upfront, how we do the > > garbage collection, at which point are the nodes killed... With more > > details than what is available in the wiki. > > the user handoff happens at the point where the duffy call is made, and > then again the collection happens when the done call is made, or there > is a timeout on the allocation. > > What specific details are you looking for beyond this ? and how would it > impact your test workers and your use of these nodes ? > I was mainly wondering what happens if I do not release a node. The wiki page is not clear if a garbage collector is actually implemented. I wanted to know if it would have been useful that I create a jenkinsjob running daily that would kill my unreleased nodes. > Regards > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

1 0

Duffy Source Code
by Julien Pivotto 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

Hi all, As per our policies: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup > All code produced within the SIG must be compatible with a FOSS license > presently used by CentOS; if a new license is wanted, again, please > consult with the Devteam member I think that it would be valuable that the SIG in charge of the infra releases the source code of Duffy. It works really well and might be used by other people. I did not find the source code anywhere, sorry if I missed it. Thanks, -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Open-Source Consultant V_/_ Inuits - https://www.inuits.eu

4 6

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel