devel

devel@lists.centos.org

8 participants
4623 discussions

Request for virtual IP-addresses in the CI for fail-over testing
by Niels de Vos 19 May '16

19 May '16

Hi, there is an integration in place with Gluster, NFS-Ganesha and Pacemaker. This combination makes it possible to have an active-active high-available NFS-server backed by Gluster volumes. We'd like to add automated testing for functional fail-over in the CI. This requires the use of virtual-IPs that get assigned to the different NFS-Ganesha servers, which will migrate to other servers upon failure. On https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/PubHardware is a mentioning of "reserved IP addresses" where the Gluster project in the CI would like to get listed too. What is the process to request a few IPs, and what are the restrictions we need to be aware of (and how to put them in the Jenkins job)? Thanks, Niels

2 2

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2016-05-18)
by Troy Dawson 18 May '16

18 May '16

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays Date: Today Wedensday, 18 May 2016 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms / Upstream --- centos-openshift-future ?? build target -- Automated testing -- images / image building -- Documentation - Duffy Demo -- by bstinson - Open Floor Last Weeks minutes: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2016/may/centos-devel.2016-05-11-17.00.log.h…

1 1

CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting (2016-05-17)
by Honza Horak 17 May '16

17 May '16

The meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 15:00 Brno) in #centos-devel on Freenode. Agenda: * setting up Jenkins for Github PRs * anything else? Honza

2 1

#0010838: support for RHEL's 7Server in centos-release-scl
by Dominic Cleal 16 May '16

16 May '16

I'm trying to get ticket #0010838 fixed[1] which would allow centos-release-scl (and -rh) to be used unaltered on RHEL to access the SCLo SIG's repositories. Not all RHELs have the upstream RHSCL repos, and there are additional collections published by the SIG that are useful. In the Foreman project I'd like to mirror this RPM to provide centos-release-scl for all EL users during installation to get access to SCLo builds and rebuilds. I'm aware of the RHEL centos-release-sclo builds in Copr[2], but they remove centos-release-rh and I'm trying to ensure the same RPMs can be used on all EL builds. The baseurl in the package is http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/sclo/$basearch/sclo/, which on RHEL Server expands to .../centos/7Server/sclo/. Only the "7" directory exists on the mirror. Either the mirror could contain symlinks for 7Server -> 7, or the release repo file[3] could be built with the URL hardcoded without using $releasever, which was suggested in today's CBS IRC meeting. Does anybody have any strong preference? If not, I'd like to suggest we change the release repo file. [1]https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10838 [2]https://github.com/sclorg/centos-release-scl#readme [3]https://github.com/alphacc/centos-release-sclo/blob/master/CentOS-SCLo.re… -- Dominic Cleal dominic(a)cleal.org

1 0

missing important EL6 patch for qemu CVE-2016-3710 ?
by Sven Kieske 15 May '16

15 May '16

Hi, I saw no announcement on centos-announce for this: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0997.html has it fallen through the cracks somehow? I find the corresponding update for EL7, but not for EL6. It would be nice if someone could investigate this. I also didn't find the necessary versions on my local mirror synced, e.g.: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.491.el6_8.1.x86_64.rpm Is this due to the work done in preparation for EL 6.8 release? But I also do not find any CR repo yet. As this is an important update I'd like to know if there is help needed to get it out faster. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +495772 293100 F: +495772 293333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen

4 3

where do I request a config option to the CentOS-plus kernel? (9pfs)
by Hans Ecke 13 May '16

13 May '16

All- I'd like the maintainers of the CentOSplus kernel to enable the CONFIG_NET_9P_RDMA, CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE, and CONFIG_9P_FS_POSIX_ACL config options. How do I ask for that? Bugzilla? Thank you Hans

2 2

sig-configmgt SCL Prefixes
by Julien Pivotto 13 May '16

13 May '16

Hi guys, we would like to chat abu the different possibilities of SCL Prefixes: /opt/centos /opt/centos-sig-configmgt /opt/centos/sig-configmgt /opt/centos/sig-configmgt-hiera44 /opt/centos-sig-configmgt/hiera44 /opt/centos/sig-configmgt/hiera44 What is your opinion about this? My preference would go to /opt/centos/sig-configmgt-ruby22. Please remember that ze do not plan to expose that to users (e.g puppet will be installed in /usr, not in a SCL). However, those SCL will be used for dependencies and/or rebuilds of EPEL packages. -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt

4 7

OT projects email to the dev list
by Phil Wyett 13 May '16

13 May '16

Hi all, We seem to be now getting many mails to the list about builds (with failures) and projects that do not directly relate to centos development. Are these proper for dev list at all? Should we not have these mails on a centos-customs/centos-customs-devel list? Regards Phil -- Irregulars Engineering Leigh, Lancashire, UK Email: philwyett(a)irregulars-engineering.com Web: https://www.irregulars-engineering.com Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/irregulars_eng

1 0

anjuta crash when open UI file
by Andreas Benzler 13 May '16

13 May '16

Hello Everyone, While I poke today on totem, anjuta crash on open preferences.ui. glade = 3.15 I downgrade glade to version 3.14.3. Now it works as expected. http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/other/SRPMS/glade-3.14.3-6.el7.centos.sr… fixed to compile man pages. Sincerely Andy

1 0

[Config Management SIG] Ansible version(s)
by François Cami 12 May '16

12 May '16

Hi, The main Ceph Jewel installer is based on Ansible, so the Ceph part of the Storage SIG would like to be a consumer of the Config Management SIG Ansible bits. However, Ceph upstream has confirmed: * 1.9.4 and 2.0.0.1 are 100% compatible * 2.1 should work (but is quite probably not tested at all) This raises the following questions: * would any member of the Config Management SIG be interested in building and maintaining either 1.9.4 or 2.0.0.1 for the Storage SIG? * if not, would the Config Management SIG be open to let Storage SIG members maintain an Ansible 2.0 branch? Regards, François

4 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel