devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4592 discussions

Kernel Source code
by Dipak Dudhabhate 23 Mar '15

23 Mar '15

Hi, I am trying to download rhel7 kernel code using git as follows. $ git clone https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/kernel.git Cloning into 'kernel'... fatal: unable to access 'https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/kernel.git/': gnutls_handshake() warning: The server name sent was not recognized $ git clone git://git.centos.org/git/rpms/kernel.git Cloning into 'kernel'... fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. Do i need git account to access it ? if yes where can do it? -Dipak

6 11

Make a installer ISO to install Xen 4.4 + CetOS 4.4
by Gautam Malu 22 Mar '15

22 Mar '15

Hi, I am Masters student at IIIT Hyderabad, India. I have made a set of scripts to make a customized installer ISO which installs Xen4.4 + CentOS 6.6. I have tested it on a Xen HVM VM. I would be great if anyone can test it out. https://github.com/gautammaloo/centos-xen Best regards, Gautam Malu

2 2

Meetings infrastructure?
by Dave Neary 22 Mar '15

22 Mar '15

Hi everyone, I would like to have a kick-off meeting for the CentOS NFV SIG next Thursday, at 14h UTC, and I had a question about meeting infrastructure - is there a preferred meeting method (IRC, phone, hang-outs, etc)? For the first meeting, I would like to have a phone call, and I can arrange a conference call bridge, but I thought perhaps CentOS preferred/required SIGs to use something a bit more community friendly. What infrastructure for community meetings exists, and how can I go about reserving a time slot if there's something like an IRC meeting channel with meetbot recording minutes? Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338

5 7

Reminder: CentOS Atomic SIG meeting today @ 16:00 UTC
by Joe Brockmeier 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

Hey all, Reminder, we have the weekly Atomic meeting today at 16:00 UTC. Meet in #centos-devel. Last week's minutes: http://centos.org/minutes/2015/march/centos-devel.2015-03-12-16.06.html KB is providing the tea and biscuits. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

(no subject)
by Rupesh Dubey 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

1 0

Storage SIG Meeting 13-March-2015 15:30 UTC
by Lalatendu Mohanty 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Greetings All! Time for a Storage SIG meeting [1] ( We are following a bi-weekly schedule) . We will be meeting in #centos-devel on Freenode. Agenda: #info Topic: Action items from previous meeting #info Topic: Status Updates #info Subtopic: GlusterFS #info Subtopic: OpenAFS #info Subtopic: Ceph #info Subtopic: SCST #info Open Floor Thanks, Lala

2 4

CBS build tags and git branches names for SCL
by Honza Horak 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

I'm about to submit a couple of requests into bugs.c.o to create necessary infrastructure for collections from RHSCL-1.2 at least. But first I want to make sure about the tag and branches names. Currently we have some testing build tags: scl6-el6-mariadb100-build scl7-el7-mariadb100-build and branches in dist-git (in sclo project): scl-mariadb100-el6 scl-mariadb100-el7 And the SIG has codename 'sclo'.. So, it's kind of messy already in the beginning :) Thinking about keeping it simple and uniform, what about this way: Keep 'sclo' as SIG codename to indicate it's combination of SCL on openness :) CBS build tags in format like: sclo6-mariadb100-build sclo7-mariadb100-build and branches in dist-git (in both sclo and rpms projects): sclo6-mariadb100 sclo7-mariadb100 This mail is to check whether we're fine to go this way or if there are some limitations we need to follow. dist-git and CBS gurus, please, provide your PoV. Thanks! Honza

6 16

CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting on #centos-devel (2015-03-18)
by Honza Horak 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 12:00 Boston, 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode. = Topics = * temporary solution before authtag is ready as proposed at [1], based on the yesterday's hangout [2] * other workflow issues consulting [3] [1] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-March/013029.html [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unOKuq7r9lg [3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2015-March/msg00030.html Honza

1 0

What can SCLo SIG do without authtag
by Honza Horak 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

This is more or less a stream of my thoughts, as a respond to the yesterdays' CBS hangout [1] which was dedicated to git/cbs issues and design. I've been thinking what the things mentioned on the hangout mean for SCLo SIG, especially that the authtag thing (which implies working lookaside cache except other stuff if I'm not mistaken) is not ready yet, since it needs to be done rather properly than doing it twice (which seems correct). Thus, SIG-maintained lookaside cache under rpms/ won't work for some time still and we're not able to build already released RHSCL content ourselves (in the rpms/ project). So, what can we do even right now, without authtag working? Just to sum it up, what are our options right now: * git access under sclo/ project works for all SCLo SIG members * we can use Fedora's lookaside cache for creating SRPMs, since pretty much all the SCL packages are in the Fedora already * building RHSCL 1.2 packages from SRPM is not possible, since we'd block that NVR for future builds from SCM (we don't want to cause the duplicate NVR issue in koji). Thus, we need to use another disttag --> build into SCL future only as described at [2]? Anyway, if we had the packages ready in sclo/ witch tarballs in fedora only -- could someone from CentOS power men do the import into rpms/? If so, what about bootstraping in this case? Maybe we can come up with some cookbook for packages rebuilds, that would be parseable by a tool; that tool would create srpm from sclo/ project (specific hash may be given so we may build one package twice because to bootstrap) and import it and build within rpms/ project.. That should allow us to build RHSCL-1.2 packages without having commit rights in rpms/.. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unOKuq7r9lg [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2015-March/msg00030.html Honza

1 0

CBS Google Hangout 16-Mar-2015 14:00 UTC - SIG workflows!
by Brian Stinson 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hi All, For our 16-Mar meeting, I thought we could do our format a little differently. We will post a link to the Google Hangout to this thread once the details are finished. One thing I'd like us to talk through is the contribution process from New User to Released Components. SIGs: we would like for this discussion to be driven by your real-life processes so please bring questions, comments, suggestions Hope to see you all there! Brian -- Brian Stinson bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk

12 15

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel