devel

devel@lists.centos.org

2 participants
4652 discussions

Possible 7.1 Install Bug
by Kirk Bocek 27 Apr '15

27 Apr '15

Hope I'm not spamming the devs here, but I've got what really feels like a bug with the installer here. I've got a new SuperMicro X10-DRI motherboard with a 3Ware 9750 raid card that hangs during installation of 7.1. If I pull the card, the installer proceeds normally. CentOS 6.6 installs without error on this hardware so I know the hardware is working. I've documented this here: https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=52231 If there is more information I can provide, please let me know. Kirk Bocek

1 0

Upstream for dist-git [RFC]
by Miroslav Suchý 27 Apr '15

27 Apr '15

Hi, Adam Samalík took dist-git files from fedora-infra ansible.git. He separated what belongs to dist-git itself and what is Fedora specific and with cooperation of Dan Mach and Palo Babincak he created upstream for dist-git: https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git This is Fedora version of dist-git and already have passed first round of comments in fedora-infra. The changes from ansible.git version are described here: https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git/blob/master/changes.txt and he extracted some code to be configuration driven: https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git/blob/master/configs/dist-gi… I know that CentOS is one of the user of dist-git. It would be nice if you can contribute your changes to dist-git to this upstream and eventually use dist-git rpm package - it passed through package review in Fedora just now. Future plans: 1) Listen to your initial feedback and do alternations according to your feedback. 2) Change Fedora dist-git server to use this package. .... 5) Enjoy the benefits of common upstream. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys

2 1

confd spec file
by stephan schultchen 27 Apr '15

27 Apr '15

Hey CentOS fellows, i have created confd spec for centos 7, that is more or less based on the etcd spec file found on cbs ( http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=102) that i would like to contribute. I guess it would fit nicely to the SIGs that etcd is part off. What are the steps to take to get the spec reviewed and added to these SIGs? Cheers, schlitzer

1 0

CBS/Infra Meeting 27-Apr-2015 14:00 UTC
by Brian Stinson 27 Apr '15

27 Apr '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi All! It's time for another meeting to discuss the Community Build System. We will be meeting in #centos-devel on Freenode. Here's our Agenda: #info Topic: Quick Updates #info Topic: Central Authentication #info Topic: Open Floor See you there! Brian - -- Brian Stinson brian(a)bstinson.com | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVPYx/AAoJEIMGvNKzCweMUAcP/3XWzoMuE0YCHJZE1RnOmPxq LM8IOtiWqoRkH2kpvmxsaNiOdW1xuEC/oMIwzCzVdYIGOeb4m2rGO6fJqNpor3SE M8JizlzX/siBHpDvJrNfElbKUbwdzqxdOJQYbNo1jUVECimGtko4Vmhgb3fYXJr0 xDbqU/qqVBiVgZWHFcjBabK7GUE/JV61JLxgt7Ttnt4Uc+q+N8bFf533JjgEhRz7 BseYRH8s6EDGpqwunBmoTDSj64lEP2r2ceLmSC+YiOTeCP9GfP0u9cWOlpx8szRs jqVZ1w7b/MSGN9FJLvR3eGA4Dfh0fzuI5L8qf/KutlGc8uA+/q5Xv4Jd/twkGZli iHtfltwkJUXxL8TcwEe05D6doImjnvnJHhVdtfk8L/PXap9/0KJmfiMm5YEdaX9q 6Fofm+HFs9tOvjDV7h899yIIqtoF0XbDftKTQAVPM0bQZalgaswT86hBlk357DDq ffMdKrltdm4nWAhsCdtUmhGVUD7B+4kK7Yg86VFp89ghqDt1Rj6k4JneVd27wE7M CS5O3PWojKlgZ1MdQSAB0bgI9IpsvJ1p4XEO7TVFZqx9rocrNDvqTa1MHUsE9Tu5 MR9m/4GLl2BKjHUWfCd4MO0paODux0KfDcGUNSpecf2BN/A/hDJ+djNNx9SIKUcy PD50QMjYZcqhvO+hsdtr =ri6T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

CentOS - SIG Hardening
by Earl A Ramirez 22 Apr '15

22 Apr '15

Dear CentOS Development Team, I am interested in starting a new SIG or merging with the ‘Hardening’ SIG, I didn’t find sufficient information about the hardening SIG. I have been on the mailing list for some years and I have noticed a number of concerns with regards to security, e.g. the default sshd_config, gnome user list and more. My goal is to use the base and modify the OS with these changes and make it available for the CentOS community, I will mention this on the mailing list to get the community feedback so that they can have an opportunity to contribute, and more importantly get an OS that meets their needs, with regards to their security concerns. I’m not too familiar with the CentOS build system, however I started to read up on it and practice to get a feel on things. Some of the things that I will like to change are as follow: SSH: disable root (uncomment 'PermitRootLogin' and change to no) enable 'strictMode' modify 'MaxAuthTries' modify 'ClientAliveInterval' modify 'ClientAliveCountMax' Gnome: disable Gnome user list Console: Remove reboot, halt poweroff from /etc/security/console.app Looking forward for your response on how can I proceed with this? -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez

5 12

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS - SIG Hardening
by James B. Byrne 22 Apr '15

22 Apr '15

Earl A Ramirez earlaramirez at gmail.com Mon Apr 13 11:24:27 UTC 2015 > I am interested in starting a new SIG or merging with the > Hardening SIG, I didnt find sufficient information about > the hardening SIG. I have been on the mailing list for some > years and I have noticed a number of concerns with regards > to security, e.g. the default sshd_config, gnome user list > and more. I will participate; given that the SIG is established. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 0

Probably no CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting (2015-04-22)
by Honza Horak 22 Apr '15

22 Apr '15

Unfortunately, I've just learnt can't make it for today's 3 UTC sync-up meeting, so unless anybody else is volunteering to chair it after such a short notice, we can skip and talk on IRC/ML. Just for getting some update, we've just had an earlier talk about tags for SCL, cleared up few things and agreed to continue with further discussions about tags/branches on IRC. Honza

1 0

bugs.centos.org summary posted
by Karanbir Singh 22 Apr '15

22 Apr '15

hi I guess this is more for Jim / Ralph : but is there anyway to get mantis to send out an email nightly, with a list of 'new' bugs reported during the last 24 hrs ? Additional win if we can also get a list of bugs that have had no activity for > 60 days and are not in status: Feedback Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 1

Atomic devel builds automation
by Karanbir Singh 21 Apr '15

21 Apr '15

hi, The Atomic devel builds are now running from cron again, after a 2 week lag, they now run every 12 hours, midnight and midday UTC. These builds now also run with a complete toolchain update taking place before the build gets run. The build script is now in git itself : https://github.com/CentOS/sig-atomic-buildscripts/blob/master/build_ostree_… and the cron worker will git pull, before running this, so updates are consumed immediately. That does make line 10 to 12 of this script completely redundant, but I've left it in as an indicator. Build runs are logged at : http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/atomic/x86_64/Builds/ And the ostree repo remains at : http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/atomic/x86_64/repo/ Once the installer image starts building, we can push that to http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/atomic/x86_64/ which would in turn allow the vagrant and image builds to also run. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

3 5

summary for tags/branches in SCLo SIG
by Honza Horak 20 Apr '15

20 Apr '15

Hi guys, few days back we talked about tags and branches names on the SCLo meeting and I found out that I missed the important CBS meeting [1].. which I'm sorry.. Anyway, we ended with things in our heads but I can't find anything written, so I tried to summarize what should be the result (as I understood it) and would like to ask for correction if I failed to get it... I realize that rh-mariadb100 confuses people, because it includes rh- in the name, but for tags/branches names it is nothing more than part of the collection name. If the dash is an issue, then we may use underscore (rh_mariadb100) or just rhmariadb100 if necessary for tags/branches, but mariadb100 alone is simply not correct. What is more, not all collections in RHSCL have rh- prefix (existing collections) although the new collections should have it in the future. Anyway, I rather took another collection (that doesn't use rh- prefix) to not complicate it even more and the bellow are examples of two collections within SCLo -- one that *is part of RHSCL* (mariadb55) and one that is only part of SCLo (mariadb55extra; could include packages that extend mariadb55 collection for example), which *is not part* of RHSCL. final tags (and repositories) for non-RHSCL collections (include also packages from rhscl repos bellow): sclo6-sclo-release sclo6-sclo-candidate sclo6-sclo-testing sclo7-sclo-release sclo7-sclo-candidate sclo7-sclo-testing final tags (and repositories) for RHSCL collections (separate in order to allow using the sclo- repositories together with RH's rhscl channel, the same as epel is used): sclo6-rhscl-release sclo6-rhscl-candidate sclo6-rhscl-testing sclo7-rhscl-release sclo7-rhscl-candidate sclo7-rhscl-testing build tags: sclo6-el6-mariadb55extra-sclo-build sclo7-el7-mariadb55extra-sclo-build sclo6-el6-mariadb55-rhscl-build sclo7-el7-mariadb55-rhscl-build (el6- and el7- part used for keeping the disttag in the name as agreed from the beginning for all SIGs -- that was mentioned as a requirement before already) build targets: sclo6-el6-mariadb55extra-sclo sclo7-el7-mariadb55extra-sclo sclo6-el6-mariadb55-rhscl sclo7-el7-mariadb55-rhscl git branches under sclo/ project: sclo6-mariadb55extra-sclo sclo7-mariadb55extra-sclo sclo6-mariadb55-rhscl sclo7-mariadb55-rhscl git branches under rpms/ project: sclo6-mariadb55extra-sclo sclo7-mariadb55extra-sclo sclo6-mariadb55-rhscl sclo7-mariadb55-rhscl Are we on the same page with the schema above? [1] http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/april/centos-devel.2015-04-13-14.01.log.… Honza

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel