devel

devel@lists.centos.org

1 participants
4605 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Atomic SIG Image Ready for Testing
by Stef Walter 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I just tested out the CentOS-7-x86_64-AtomicHost-20141029_02.qcow2 > and found an issue with the cockpit-docker integration. To read the > images and containers currently residing on the atomic host, > cockpit-agent needs to connect to /var/run/docker.sock to which it > does not have permission. I did a "chmod o+rw /var/run/docker.sock" > to make it work on my test system. Is this a known issue or should > I file a bug somewhere? In this case you can go into the 'Users Accounts' in cockpit, click on the user, and 'Change Roles' to add 'Container Administrator'. Then log out and back in. This gives the user the permission to access /var/run/docker.sock (ie: puts them in the docker group). Stef -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlRjwOgACgkQe/sRCNknZa9JIwCgwOm4PRr1Gnx2DIdbEo5Wj8YO xnIAn0znYnjAYsmBYXJe/QFYviFj3N0W =ZOHr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 5

CentOS Cloud SIG meeting today, 15:00 UTC Nov 13th
by Karanbir Singh 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

hi, Were hosting the second CentOS Cloud SIG meeting on #centos-devel irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC Nov 13th Thursday. Everyone is welcome to come along and talk about things they care about. We are in the early stages of formulating a plan and delivery schedule, so this is a great time to come and join the conversations. You can get more information on the Cloud SIG here : http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud We aim to work on building, delivering, testing and helping community support Cloud Infrastructure on and around the CentOS Linux ecosystem. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Critical update for bash was released today.
by Jason Parks 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

Thanks Jim On Sep 24, 2014 10:33 AM, Jim Perrin <jperrin(a)centos.org> wrote: > > You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue. > > > Here's why you should care: > > https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environme… > > > Links to the centos updates: > > CentOS-5: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020582.html > > CentOS-6: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020585.html > > CentOS-7: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020583.html > > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

1 0

Switching to centralized authentication for centos.org infra (aka FAS vs IPA)
by Fabian Arrotin 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So, We've been discussing randomly about this for quite some time now, and things always get in the way .. But let's try to continue the thread around this and also get forward. Following our CBS/Infra meeting held today (minutes available here : http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/november/ ) , we started a requirements list about what the centralized authentication system should support. Long story short : more and more tools need a central users DB and puppet (our current CM tool for centos.org infra) doesn't scale for that. The first tool that needs it is Koji (for the CBS - http://cbs.centos.org - builders) but other are still to come. We've temporary found a "workaround" for Koji, in a sense that we've created our internal CA and are signing x509 certs with that local CA, but switching to something that scales was on the list since "Day 1" In the short list, we have selected IPA and FAS. The requirement list is there : http://wiki.centos.org/InfraWiki/CentralizedAuth (still a draft, and to be completed) Feel free to comment here, or update the wiki (if you have already edit rights, otherwise feel free to ping someone from the infra team) Cheers, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlRg1jEACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6JcgCfaU4CapZ6m/aRCoRzA3ZDp8xp EaMAnRNzJ9+bGQbVQuOaSBu5QbUAIEzL =wQ/r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[PATCH] Updates for scl 1.2/devtoolset-3
by Pat Riehecky 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> The previous return_disttag code expected a smaller number of '-' in the SCL name. This newer version now searches a bit more rationally. I should have written it this way from the start.... Pat Riehecky (1): Updated for compat with devtoolset-3 software collection name return_disttag.sh | 25 ++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

3 14

CentOS Atomic SIG Image Ready for Testing
by Joe Brockmeier 11 Nov '14

11 Nov '14

Hi all, Happy to announce we have a CentOS Atomic Host image ready for testing! Kudos to all the folks who've worked on this so far - it's going to be a lot of fun working from these and making Atomic the best way to run containers. Please see the post here: http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2014/11/centos-atomic-sig-image-ready-for-… Images are here: http://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/ Let the testing commence! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

7 9

CentOS 7 gome system monitor CPU usage
by Leo Brandewie 11 Nov '14

11 Nov '14

Hey Devs, Not sure if this is the right place to post this; if not, my apologies. I've been testing CentOS 7 and I've been having a problem with CPU usage. I first set up a VM with 4 procs (2.66 GHz Xeons), loaded the Gnome desktop, and ran system monitor. I got ~50% CPU usage on all four procs, doing absolutely nothing but running system monitor. I was suspicious of this result since it was in a VM. So I loaded 7 onto a real server (a Dell PowerEdge 1800) and tested again. The 1800 has 2 x 2.8GHz Xeons and system monitor maxed out both CPUs. I'm astounded. I have no way of knowing if the problem is also present in RHEL 7. I can say it's not at all present in CentOS 6.5. I have a fair amount of experience with that OS. Thanks all, Leo

5 7

CBS/Infra Meeting 10-Nov-2014 14:00 UTC
by Brian Stinson 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

Hi All, It's time for another CBS/Infra meeting on 10-Nov-2014 at 14:00 UTC in #centos-devel on freenode. Agenda: #info Topic: Status Updates #info Subtopic: IPA #info Subtopic: Other Infra #info Subtopic: Centpkg #info Topic: Old Business: Ad-Hoc Upstream Development Repositories #info Topic: Open Floor Cheers! Brian -- Brian Stinson bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk

2 1

git upgrade
by cybernet 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

already did, yesterday: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157180 i want to compile the last version of git 2.1.2, but i don't know how to make a install kit ( rpm archive ) can you help ?

2 1

i386 version of CentOS 7
by Harald Villemoes 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

Any Progress on this activity ? I am looking forward to get my systems up to par :-) Thanks Harald Villemoes Denmark

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel