devel

devel@lists.centos.org

10 participants
4625 discussions

missing packages from buildlogs repo
by Bojtos Péter 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hi all, I tried to built some RHEL packages for i686 architecture. I tried to use the i686 packages here: http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest/ The build did not succeed, since several packages are missing. (that's ok since Red Hat dropped i686 support) The interesting part is that there is the source package cracklib , which produces the following packages: cracklib, cracklib-devel, cracklib-dicts, cracklib-python. Cracklib and cracklib devel is in the repo for i686 but the other two packages are missing. How can it be? Did I miss some information about populating the repo? Thank you, Peter Bojtos ULX Ltd.

3 7

Docker images for CentOS-7qa are now available
by Karanbir Singh 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hi, http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/docker/ has docker images, along with a sha256sum to validate the image. Its a 32MB payload size. Note that since its built from the centos7qa tree's - there is no yum.conf present inside. -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

CentOS-7 Public QA Buildtag 140617
by Karanbir Singh 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

hi builds from 2014 06 17 are now online, the entire tree is refreshed and livecd + livemedia-gnome and livemedia-kde are also available. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

6 13

[PATCH] Added -q to get_sources for less chatty operation
by Pat Riehecky 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> --- get_sources.sh | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/get_sources.sh b/get_sources.sh index 6451bd0..b43cb51 100755 --- a/get_sources.sh +++ b/get_sources.sh @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ fi #parse command line args BRANCH='' +QUIET='' while (($# > 0)) do case $1 in @@ -31,6 +32,11 @@ do surl=$2 shift 2 ;; + -q) + # Be less chatty + QUIET='--silent' + shift + ;; esac done @@ -92,7 +98,7 @@ while read -r fsha fname ; do if [ ! -e "${fname}" ]; then for br in "${branches[@]}" do - curl -f "${surl}/${pn}/${br}/${fsha}" -o "${fname}" && break + curl ${QUIET} -f "${surl}/${pn}/${br}/${fsha}" -o "${fname}" && break done else echo "${fname} exists. skipping" -- 1.7.1

3 3

[PATCH] Fixes for show_possible_srpms.sh
by Pat Riehecky 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> The last batch of commits for centos changes breaks the previous script's behavior. I've adjusted the filtering and made -r a bit more aggressive. Pat Riehecky (1): Updated -r to be more targeted show_possible_srpms.sh | 40 +++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

2 3

[PATCH] Verify SHA sum of source archive download
by Pat Riehecky 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> Not too sure where it happened, but I got some bad source archives off of git.c.o. Could be the connection terminated and I didn't notice, could be something else. Anyway, I've added an optional check to verify the SHA sum of downloaded files. Pat Riehecky (1): Added optional check for sha1sum of downloaded source file get_sources.sh | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

2 2

[PATCH 0/2] Verify hash of downloaded file
by Tyler Parsons 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

This patch attempts to resolve the hash type used in .metadata and then perform verification using the correct tool. I attempted to submit a similar patchset last week (17th) but it seems to have never made it onto the list. Tyler Parsons (2): Verify that each file hash listed in .metadata matches the hash of the downloaded file. Fixing URL get_sources.sh | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 1.8.4

2 3

[PATCH] Updated into_srpm.sh
by Pat Riehecky 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> With the recent adjustment of README.md to add GPLv2 as a default licence, I've updated the into_srpm.sh script to be a bit more flexible and use that licence by default. README.md is also updated to reflect this new script Pat Riehecky (1): Added script to re-create SRPM from git commit README.md | 2 + into_srpm.sh | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100755 into_srpm.sh

2 2

Re: [CentOS-devel] Latest builds are now online 2014-06-25_build 4
by Morten Stevens 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

2014-06-25 17:50 GMT+02:00 Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org>: > Note: this tree now has a centos-release that implements the scope of > change we were talking about in the numbering thread. I went through > quite a few permutations and what we have here seems like the best > middle ground to be on. I am also going to try and circle back to some > of the RH folks to make sure they are ok with how we message around > where the CentOS Linux release is built from. This change is not the majority of the community. # rpm -q centos-release centos-release-7-1406.el7.centos.0.4.x86_64 7-1406 looks confusing... Is it possible to remove the YYMM section from centos-release rpm? All other Red Hat projects like Fedora doesn't use this strange release numbering. 1406 sounds like an Ubuntu release... Overall, it's a rebuilt of RHEL 7.0. Why not call it CentOS 7.0? Best regards, Morten

3 2

centosplus kernel naming
by Jim Perrin 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

As we gear up for the upcoming CentOS 7 release, we're tracking a few things for the CentOSPlus kernel as well. One of the proposals (via http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828 ) is that we change the current name of the centosplus kernel to be a bit more consistent with other kernel names. The proposed new name would look like 'kernel-plus' or 'kernel-centosplus'. This is in keeping with other kernel names such as 'kernel-ml', 'kernel-xen', 'kernel-lt' etc. And allows for /etc/sysconfig/kernel to be used to set the DEFAULTKERNEL as desired. This change would only be for CentOS 7. Thoughts, comments, questions, flames? Please speak up with support for or against this change. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

9 15

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel