devel

devel@lists.centos.org

18 participants
4604 discussions

BRANDING ISSUE
by Fred Smith 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

FYI: I've just filed bug # 7206 regarding a branding issue: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7206 -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:3 (niv) -----------------------------

2 1

[PATCH] *** add license and author information to centos.git.repolist.py ***
by Bonnie King 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

bonniek (1): add license centos.git.repolist.py | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

1 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] Multipath-TCP in the centosplus kernel?
by Philip Mather 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Guillaume, Don't see why not, sounds like the right place for it? I rebuilt a 6 kernel some while back for work that had MP-TCP and F-RTO in it along with some twiddling of initRTO as well, those other two are in mainstream now and the MP-TCP patch must have been fairly simple if I managed to work it in. Shout if you need any help, I've got some doco somewhere. > Message: 19 > Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:54:29 +0200 > From: Guillaume Derval <guillaume.derval(a)student.uclouvain.be> > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Multipath-TCP in the centosplus kernel? > To: centos-devel(a)centos.org > Message-ID: > <A8BF2232-7620-433F-82D0-C74FBEE5597B(a)student.uclouvain.be> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hello everyone, > > I am thinking about building custom kernels for CentOS-7 with a support > for Multipath-TCP (http://multipath-tcp.org/) and I am wondering if a > such heavy modification should have its place in the centosplus kernel? > > Modified kernel sources are available at > https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp and equivalent patches are there: > http://multipath-tcp.org/patches/. > > Best regards, > Guillaume Derval. > -- Regards, Phil

1 0

Multipath-TCP in the centosplus kernel?
by Guillaume Derval 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Hello everyone, I am thinking about building custom kernels for CentOS-7 with a support for Multipath-TCP (http://multipath-tcp.org/) and I am wondering if a such heavy modification should have its place in the centosplus kernel? Modified kernel sources are available at https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp and equivalent patches are there: http://multipath-tcp.org/patches/. Best regards, Guillaume Derval.

6 14

RHEL Extras and what we might do with them
by Karanbir Singh 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

hi, So we now have RHEL media, RHEL optionals and RHEL Extras. Optionals and media seems to tie in as before, however Extras has its own policy + lifeterm etc. Thoughts on what we might do with those rpms ? I'd have though that putting them in CentOS-Extras would line up nicely. Content that is available out of the blocks to anyone with a CentOS install, but not themselves included in the distro. thoughts ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

8 7

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 Public QA, > Release Beginner's Question - Part Duex
by Bob Lightfoot 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/15/2014 08:00 AM, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org wrote: > Message: 8 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:22:33 +0100 From: Karanbir > Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 > Public QA Release Beginner's Question To: centos-devel(a)centos.org > Message-ID: <539C68B9.1080703(a)karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=ISO-8859-1 On 06/14/2014 01:28 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: >>> Looks like a great lot of work, so thanks for the effort. As >>> a Fedora Testor I am puzzled somewhat though. Is there >>> available reading material and such as how I would go about >>> using these rpm with a qemu/kvm for testing without having the >>> installer available yet? Obviously I can test the install media >>> when it exists just like I do for Fedora, but using these trees >>> of rpms is a new skill I am hoping to add. Don't want to bog >>> anyone down with explaining it in detail, as I don't mind >>> reading and teaching myself, just need pointed where to look. > we also spend quite a bit of time looking at and working with the > rpms themselves to make sure they built ok, carry the right > metadata, and then work on the branding stuff - ideally that, and > migration paths from 6 to 7 are what we'd be expecting people to be > consuming and testing here. > > - KB KB - you mention migration paths from 6 to 7 and branding stuff. Are you envisioning a test like taking an up to date c6 installation and the yum installing c7 rpms and looking for hiccups and issues? I'm not quite sure I understand what is meant by migration when as yet there is no C7 installer or install tree. Sincerely, Bob Lightfoot -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTndCiAAoJEKqgpLIhfz3XyvcH/0RPkamdyK9zJgARJxWE2ZQa svvEwdDz41DtYSMlPfHp/FxU8pX/c4abIjebqFhnUlcfSmVR2jUAIdGzpwsN6Twm uq4ypJz5UYFPcQx3bJQu1xYKSDJ2EzgI3oBLXYK67ZB4rLFZuPc3lJMt1wG2e4Ut 5sfCMi/T5hmtTS6QQBUkSK105IpA2/krC8s/v77ys3QGmcjjS00QPy2ME3DjoD4O HBwsQAHgmMQicT3RAL1SImfjIInt+Bq7fcdHJpl1UxGFZb2MEAaj137KYIM5Emsh Yijlj4b1l9y2A2QEEfKLQK57acGDOEBtK25oovSZWIxT3oQpZ52bFRBFeNVH4EI= =Hcps -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

6 12

[PATCH 0/3] Mostly patches adding show_possible_srpms.sh
by Pat Riehecky 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> I was looking for some automated tooling to determine what SRPMS can be generated by a given git repo. Since none was out there, I've tossed this together. Pat Riehecky (3): Minor updates to some doc, nothing of real interest Added script to show srpms contained within a given repo Added switches for setting branch to check, alas I've no idea how to do this return_disttag.sh | 3 +- show_possible_srpms.sh | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100755 show_possible_srpms.sh

3 9

Atomic build for CentOS7qa tree
by Karanbir Singh 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

hi, Just wondering if anyone has had a stab at an rpm-ostree build + atomic host from the content hosted in centos7qa tree's. Will need to find docker, but that can come from EPEL7 ( or for now, step1, just an atomic host might be a good start ). - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

3 4

Branding and change requests : workflow
by Karanbir Singh 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

hi, There still seems to be some level of ambiguity as to how we are doing the change requests, rebuild requests and change requests so I wanted to get a short summary on the list and we can pickup details where needed. For anything that anyone sees that needs a change : file an issue report at bugs.centos.org; this is most important. Then see if you can also propose a patch. In order to propose a patch you need to run through a few steps( in this example assuming we want to patch httpd ): $ git clone https://git.centos.org/git/centos-git-common.git $ git clone https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/httpd.git $ cd httpd $ git branch -a $ git checkout c7 $ bash ../centos-git-common/get_sources.sh $ git rev-parse HEAD > `whoami`.start-point $ bash ../centos-git-common/rpm-tree-prep.sh At this point you should be good to make changes to SPECS/ SOURCES/ and BUILD/package-name ( note that the rpm-tree-prep.sh script will setup a __orig dir for you to build patches against. once you have the content ready, git commit the changes, in multiple commits, to have a complete, but as small as possible, change in one commit. Eg. if you are fixing 5 things, ideally end up with 5 commits. Also, if you are adding content, to replace something else that is going away, make sure you have the delete and addition in the same commit. Eg. replacing xulrunner-redhat-prefs.js with xulrunner-centos-prefs.js - add the git rm and git add into the same commit. Once you are happy with the state of play, go back to the root of the git repo, and : $ git format-patch $(cat `whoami`.start-point) this will leave behind files, one per commit that you made, in the format : NNNN-<commit summary>.patch : these are the files you need to attach to bugs.centos.org; these files contain your user metadata as well, and can then be applied as is. So you get credit for the changes, and we are able to replay exactly the change you had in mind. NOTES: CentOS patches added to the SPEC file should be named : <packagename>-CentOS-<change being made>.patch When added to the spec file, its a good practise to skip a few hundred spots on the patch list. Eg. if the spec has no patches, then start the CentOS patches at Patch1000 onward. If the spec already has patches, then skip a large number. This is just so we dont have ( or are less likely to have ) Patch number conflict with upstream changes in the life of CentOS-7 lets get patching, todays build is definitely on. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

5 7

RHEL7 crashes on IBM Intellistation Power 285 (Power5+)
by Timo Schöler 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

Hi, as I'm messing around with upstream's installer, I see that it crashes on my Intelli: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6Xv-IAqdukmd3luaE5EODYwY2c/edit?usp=shari… The machine is in perfect condition, Fedora 20 (Heisenbug) runs like a charm. However, I don't even find detailed information on whether RHEL7 supports this hardware or not. Cheers, Timo

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel