devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4677 discussions

[PATCH 0/3] Somewhat standardize overrides and on getopt
by Pat Riehecky 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> These three patches try and create a generic interface for some basic overrides, drawing from get_sources.sh I've also updated get_sources.sh to utilize getopt for arg parsing Pat Riehecky (3): Allow overrides of $RHELAUTHOR May want to set defaults from the override file.... Refactor to use getopt for arg parsing get_sources.sh | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ show_possible_srpms.sh | 11 +++- 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

2 4

Subject=Re: secure boot comments
by Keivan Motavalli 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

I downloaded and burned livecd-centos-7-live-gnome-201406261459.iso (checking its hashsum). It does boot flawlessly on a lenovo thinkpad T430-2349H3G using uefi only and secureboot enabled. modsign-uefi throws "Couldn't parse DBX signatures: -74", but the boot process continues. The live image, however, is not usable, neither textually nor graphically. The laptop comes with an integrated 3G modem, "Ericsson HSPA+ WWAN Minicard (H5321gw)". modem-manager.service fails to start, and subsequently also "systemd-logind.service" repetitively fails to starts, leaving the system in an unusable state, without any working tty and/or display manager. IMHO, systemd-logind tries to start getty on one of the 3g modem serial interfaces, probably not recognizing it as one, thus failing. disabling the integrated modem and wlan adapter via a physical switch is a workaround to the issue. This seems to be a fedora 19-20 bug gone unfixed into RHEL7.

2 1

EL 7 Extras Test BUild
by Johnny Hughes 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

EL7 Extras contain docker and the things to make it work, including several golang-* RPMs. It seems that the golang addon packages (golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-0-0.4.git9d69345.el7.src.rpm, golang-github-godbus-dbus-0-0.1.gitcb98efb.el7.src.rpm, golang-github-gorilla-context-0-0.22.git708054d.el7.src.rpm, golang-github-gorilla-mux-0-0.11.gite718e93.el7.src.rpm, golang-github-kr-pty-0-0.19.git98c7b80.el7.src.rpm, golang-github-syndtr-gocapability-0-0.5.git3454319.el7.src.rpm, golang-googlecode-net-0-0.12.hg84a4013f96e0.el7.src.rpm, golang-googlecode-sqlite-0-0.9.hg74691fb6f837.el7.src.rpm) were built before the final golang-1.2.1-3.el7.src.rpm that is in git.centos.org. We have seen in the past where Red Hat uses interim staged packages that are older (and not published) in their build systems for development, and that the released SRPMs build on those older staged packages but not the released ones. As I said, we have seen this in the past and it was one of the main reasons that we could not get all of CentOS-6.0 to build properly before. So, how this is relevant now is that several of those addon golang packages (and docker) do not build with the RPMs provided by building golang-1.2.1-3.el7.src.rpm. After talking with the golang maintainer and some people who worked on the golang and docker packages via email, while I could not look inside the build trees (we don't have access to any of that for RHEL products), I did get conformation that the packages in EL7 extras were built on older versions of golang that 1.2.1-3 and that golang-1.2.1-3 is in the middle of a process to transition things to a new set of packages instead of most things directly in the one main RPM. I was also pointed to golang.el7 rpms here as potential versions that would work: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16224 The greatest specific version of golang required to build the packages of EL7 Extras (docker-0.11.1-19.el7.src.rpm) is golang >= 1.2-7 (see the spec file for the golang BuildRequires): https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!docker.git/b28b51e15aa6779281060b1e61368d9… So, looking for golang-1.2-7.el7 put me here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=499629 I downloaded that SRPM (golang-1.2-7.el7.src.rpm) and built it into c7-extras instead of the 1.2.1-3 version and then rebuilt all the other golang-* SRPMs from git.centos.org into c7-extras as well. They all built OK against golang 1.2-7. I then built all the other things that are in EL7 Extras into c7-extras and the final result is here: http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-extras/ Here is a bug filed on this issue for reference: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7252 So, the short summary is, please test the c7-extras in the buildlogs repo ... it has the same version of packages built from git.centos.org except for golang, where I had to get version 1.2-7 from EPEL. All the SRPMs, buildlogs, mock configs, etc used are available for review from the buildlogs.centos.org link above. Lets get this tested and it is certainly considered a test build. Hopefully newer versions of everything will be out soon so we can build / use the RHEL version of golang and we are likely not to officially release these packages until then, although if these packages work for you feel free to use them. Thanks, Johnny Hughes

5 7

ipa-server package and sort of branding issue
by Gianluca Cecchi 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hello, I'm configuring ipa server on CentOS 6.5 and I notice that when the ipa-server-install command configures ntp.conf it puts inside "rhel" for pool of ntp servers instead of "centos". ### Added by IPA Installer ### server 0.rhel.pool.ntp.org server 1.rhel.pool.ntp.org server 2.rhel.pool.ntp.org The rpm involved is ipa-server-3.0.0-37.el6.x86_64 and the file involved is /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ipaserver/install/ntpinstance.py where there is this if conditional statement # We use the OS variable to point it towards either the rhel # or fedora pools. Other distros should be added in the future # or we can get our own pool. os = "" if ipautil.file_exists("/etc/fedora-release"): os = "fedora" elif ipautil.file_exists("/etc/redhat-release"): os = "rhel" So I think this should be changed in something like os = "" if ipautil.file_exists("/etc/fedora-release"): os = "fedora" elif ipautil.file_exists("/etc/centos-release"): os = "centos" What do you think? Possibly valid for rhel 7 too, but not already tested. Gianluca

4 4

missing packages from buildlogs repo
by Bojtos Péter 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hi all, I tried to built some RHEL packages for i686 architecture. I tried to use the i686 packages here: http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest/ The build did not succeed, since several packages are missing. (that's ok since Red Hat dropped i686 support) The interesting part is that there is the source package cracklib , which produces the following packages: cracklib, cracklib-devel, cracklib-dicts, cracklib-python. Cracklib and cracklib devel is in the repo for i686 but the other two packages are missing. How can it be? Did I miss some information about populating the repo? Thank you, Peter Bojtos ULX Ltd.

3 7

Docker images for CentOS-7qa are now available
by Karanbir Singh 26 Jun '14

26 Jun '14

Hi, http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/docker/ has docker images, along with a sha256sum to validate the image. Its a 32MB payload size. Note that since its built from the centos7qa tree's - there is no yum.conf present inside. -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

CentOS-7 Public QA Buildtag 140617
by Karanbir Singh 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

hi builds from 2014 06 17 are now online, the entire tree is refreshed and livecd + livemedia-gnome and livemedia-kde are also available. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

6 13

[PATCH] Added -q to get_sources for less chatty operation
by Pat Riehecky 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> --- get_sources.sh | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/get_sources.sh b/get_sources.sh index 6451bd0..b43cb51 100755 --- a/get_sources.sh +++ b/get_sources.sh @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ fi #parse command line args BRANCH='' +QUIET='' while (($# > 0)) do case $1 in @@ -31,6 +32,11 @@ do surl=$2 shift 2 ;; + -q) + # Be less chatty + QUIET='--silent' + shift + ;; esac done @@ -92,7 +98,7 @@ while read -r fsha fname ; do if [ ! -e "${fname}" ]; then for br in "${branches[@]}" do - curl -f "${surl}/${pn}/${br}/${fsha}" -o "${fname}" && break + curl ${QUIET} -f "${surl}/${pn}/${br}/${fsha}" -o "${fname}" && break done else echo "${fname} exists. skipping" -- 1.7.1

3 3

[PATCH] Fixes for show_possible_srpms.sh
by Pat Riehecky 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> The last batch of commits for centos changes breaks the previous script's behavior. I've adjusted the filtering and made -r a bit more aggressive. Pat Riehecky (1): Updated -r to be more targeted show_possible_srpms.sh | 40 +++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

2 3

[PATCH] Verify SHA sum of source archive download
by Pat Riehecky 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> Not too sure where it happened, but I got some bad source archives off of git.c.o. Could be the connection terminated and I didn't notice, could be something else. Anyway, I've added an optional check to verify the SHA sum of downloaded files. Pat Riehecky (1): Added optional check for sha1sum of downloaded source file get_sources.sh | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

2 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel