devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4677 discussions

Start a nNew thread

docker package missing
by 彭勇 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

docker is in *rhel-7-server-extras-rpms of *RHEL 7. and it's missing from CentOS 7 -- Peng Yong

9 13

srpms for RHEL 7
by Connie Sieh 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

In the expected place for srpms for RHEL7 there is a README ftp.redhat.org:/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/os/README It's contents are ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current sources for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 have been moved to the following location: https://git.centos.org/project/rpms ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Who/what is populating this area? How are updates to packages handled? Do they go straight to https://git.centos.org/project/rpms/ as the updates are published by RedHat? Does CentOS modify any of these packages? Since it is implied that this "represents" the "srpm" for a given RHEL package (given the above README from ftp.redhat.com) how do I know it has not been tampered with? -Connie Sieh

13 25

rhn tools and subscription manager
by Karanbir Singh 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

Hi Yup, its that question again : do we want to leave, but patch-to-non-functional the rhn and subscription-manager tools in the distro. I know its useful to some projects to leave in, but do they care ? - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

9 12

CentOS 7 QA qcow image
by Tim Bell 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

I had a look at http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-20140614/ but I could not find any qcow images for a VM guest. Is it planned to produce one ? Creating a cloud instance is our lowest effort way of testing new releases. Thanks Tim

7 8

CentOS 7 "nightly builds" and Live Media iso images
by Fabian Arrotin 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

As Karanbir announced it today, there will be "nightly builds" happening every day, starting from today (the first one being scheduled to start at 8PM UTC). The whole process will be automated and would also start to reflect those new trees. That means that the url to enter for new network install, and yum repositories will need to be using the 'latest' symlink when that one will appear. (Normally full URL would be http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest) As it will be the first time we'll test the end-to-end automation script, we have no real ETA, but we estimate the "time-to-process" between 3 and 4 hours (so content would be available on buildlogs.centos.org around 11 pm UTC, or slightly later) We've also worked today on the Live Media iso images, so those ones will also be pushed on buildlogs.centos.org (later today, during the "nightly build" process) (see also https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-core!livemedia.git) As a reminder : * RPM packages are still unsigned * yum config files are still missing (but you can point yum to the mentioned repository) * that tree is still "not production" ready and still needs to be investigated (branding hunt, anyone ?) * we count on you to provide feedback (positive or negative, but feedback requested please) * use #centos-devel (irc.freenode.net) @centos-devel list (here), but also file bugs reports on our bugs tracking system (http://bugs.centos.org) and report those under the "CentOS-7" project So , (ab)use the tree, break it, fix it (by filing bug reports - patches *welcome* :-) ) -- Fabian Arrotin gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

7 14

BRANDING ISSUE
by Fred Smith 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

FYI: I've just filed bug # 7206 regarding a branding issue: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7206 -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:3 (niv) -----------------------------

2 1

[PATCH] *** add license and author information to centos.git.repolist.py ***
by Bonnie King 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

bonniek (1): add license centos.git.repolist.py | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

1 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] Multipath-TCP in the centosplus kernel?
by Philip Mather 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Guillaume, Don't see why not, sounds like the right place for it? I rebuilt a 6 kernel some while back for work that had MP-TCP and F-RTO in it along with some twiddling of initRTO as well, those other two are in mainstream now and the MP-TCP patch must have been fairly simple if I managed to work it in. Shout if you need any help, I've got some doco somewhere. > Message: 19 > Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:54:29 +0200 > From: Guillaume Derval <guillaume.derval(a)student.uclouvain.be> > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Multipath-TCP in the centosplus kernel? > To: centos-devel(a)centos.org > Message-ID: > <A8BF2232-7620-433F-82D0-C74FBEE5597B(a)student.uclouvain.be> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hello everyone, > > I am thinking about building custom kernels for CentOS-7 with a support > for Multipath-TCP (http://multipath-tcp.org/) and I am wondering if a > such heavy modification should have its place in the centosplus kernel? > > Modified kernel sources are available at > https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp and equivalent patches are there: > http://multipath-tcp.org/patches/. > > Best regards, > Guillaume Derval. > -- Regards, Phil

1 0

Multipath-TCP in the centosplus kernel?
by Guillaume Derval 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Hello everyone, I am thinking about building custom kernels for CentOS-7 with a support for Multipath-TCP (http://multipath-tcp.org/) and I am wondering if a such heavy modification should have its place in the centosplus kernel? Modified kernel sources are available at https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp and equivalent patches are there: http://multipath-tcp.org/patches/. Best regards, Guillaume Derval.

6 14

RHEL Extras and what we might do with them
by Karanbir Singh 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

hi, So we now have RHEL media, RHEL optionals and RHEL Extras. Optionals and media seems to tie in as before, however Extras has its own policy + lifeterm etc. Thoughts on what we might do with those rpms ? I'd have though that putting them in CentOS-Extras would line up nicely. Content that is available out of the blocks to anyone with a CentOS install, but not themselves included in the distro. thoughts ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

8 7

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel