devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4677 discussions

Providing newer versions of packages from base CentOS/RHEL
by Darryl L. Pierce 12 May '14

12 May '14

Here's the back story: Base RHEL 6 has Qpid 0.14, which is a very old release. Our team wants to make a more recent version, 0.26, available for projects such as Open Stack. They are adopting CentOS as a platform and would like to use 0.26, which includes AMQP 1.0 support. We can't package 0.26 for EPEL6 due to 0.14 being in the base. So it was suggested to me in IRC to come here and ask for guidance. We would like to make our newer packages available for CentOS 6. What's the right path to follow? -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/

5 6

c7.00.00 build reports
by Karanbir Singh 12 May '14

12 May '14

hi for those of you who are tracking the build-reports, the c7.00.00 build running at the moment is just a scratch-build, to try and scope up the issues we are likely to hit in the i386/x86_64 build splits and to quantify exactly what part of i386 we need to owl as a bare minimal. its running on a single builder node, and were not running the powerpc / arm builds in parallel ( yet ). Early next week, we should be in a position to start a proper buildrun off the rhel7rc codebase. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

4 14

Re: [CentOS-devel] unsuscribe
by Chandana De Silva 12 May '14

12 May '14

S* Saket Sinha <saket.sinha89(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS-devel mailing list >CentOS-devel(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

3 2

Hosting SIG
by Major Hayden 07 May '14

07 May '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello there, I've been using CentOS for quite a while but I haven't gotten involved with the overall community quite yet. I'm using this email as a step towards changing that. ;) Karanbir mentioned that the Hosting SIG[1] needed an owner and I'd like to take on that challenge I've worked with web/application hosting since 2002 from basic LAMP stacks to large-scale, highly orchestrated OpenStack-based virtualization environments. There are some nuances to the world of hosting that demands quite a few changes from a standard CentOS minimal installation. Some of my goals for the SIG would be: 1) How do we make it easier for system administrators to host applications using various development languages and server platforms? 2) How can we make configuration automation frameworks more effective and easier to use on CentOS in hosting environments? (Think ansible, puppet, chef, etc) 3) I'd like to see if we could make a boot-from-PXE squashfs live OS (similar to Debian's live system) a supported solution for very large server environments. These are just some of my initial thoughts on the topic. I welcome your feedback! [1] http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup - -- Major Hayden -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTalLIAAoJEONAdDQ9I/mwLWoH/3rcjwp7cljHv+brfCuwY2HR u/IBQM1beyHPhcapggHyVExWdQzaWlVmU6UIjNmF3fKrE4kJnJLyEhBNWi6AD++I VW+YmwJ4oNWu9M38MggLyYcaWqW6tkOtqXGXC1AqQMg/QHDbEfECsWiVqM5f62gS xdOYPiepVy3t1hNrR2itqJziuJPxtd3x01PImp+m+rgqcCdTugX2ZAYx9xYEr6mX ReXJqkyjstzlBarjOa3UE6poe8NT4RZdmextNFFwJTFEdInTnCZGqmSOVgoKtJN3 LdxDVaKpoKzRnPb17GroKbUWIY+tT8T0St2DKySDzXQuAQVLbEucNLFX9Z2vNs4= =RVWs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 4

rhel7rc guest image
by Karanbir Singh 07 May '14

07 May '14

who has the kickstart and metadata worked out for this : ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/rc/7/GuestImage/ -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 1

github mirrors and subgroups
by Karanbir Singh 06 May '14

06 May '14

hi, Working on getting some of the git.c.o stuff into place, and we came up against an interesting problem - in a single organisation on github, one cant have sub groups or sub directories. So if we intend to run a complete set of git mirrors from git.c.o on github.c then were going to have a single listing of a few thousand repos. It is possible to setup teams, that are then visible as github.com/orgs/CentOS/teams/virtsig etc - and one can see just the repos that team is responsible for - but might there be a more elegant solution ? one potential solution is to have github.com/CentOS as the parent organisation, and setup CentOS-SIG-Virt etc as completely different organisations, with teams that are able to completely admin that namespace ( maybe CentOS-SIGVirt or something shorter ). I've had a few conversations with the folks over at github and there doesnt seem to be any other obvious workaround to this. Unless, I am missing something ? thoughts / comments on a potential plan ? -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

3 4

Request for epel-release package in CentOS repo
by Martin Jackson 01 May '14

01 May '14

Hello, With the changes in CentOS, would it be possible now to include the epel-release package in the main CentOS repositories? I believe this would help make the process of setting CentOS up a bit more convenient and accessible for both new users (who may have an awkward time finding and installing the epel release package) as well as more veteran administrators, who could effectively choose to enable epel by default by including it in kickstarts and so on. Thanks, Marty

13 22

Secure Boot in RHEL7beta
by Akemi Yagi 29 Apr '14

29 Apr '14

RHEL 7 beta can be installed on systems with 'Secure Boot' enabled as seen in the Installation Guide [1]. More info about Secure Boot is available from Fedora docs and the links therein [2,3] Question is how the implementation of Secure Boot should be handled in CentOS. Akemi [1] https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux… [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secureboot [3] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/UEFI_Secure_Boot_Guide/i…

2 3

Is it a bug that.Xauthority-c or .Xauthority-l was generated to lock authentication?
by jupiter 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Hi, I am running CentOS 6.4. Occasionally, some new created user account encountered authentication problems where .Xauthority-c or .Xauthority-l was generated to lock the authentication. I would think it is a bug, but please correct me if the .Xauthority-c or .Xauthority-l is some kind symptoms to indicate something wrong in my system. Thank you. Kind regards, jupiter

1 0

unsuscribe
by Saket Sinha 26 Apr '14

26 Apr '14

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel