Hi Sancho,
I want to re-config networking in the "first boot" stage,
but there are just "welcome", "create user" and so on except "networking",
how to add "networking" configuration in the "first boot" stage ?
Thanks,
- Jojo
hi Guys
One of the key problems we need to solve / resolve and do so with some
level of urgency is the mirror problem : How do we get content 'out
there' fast enough to reduce the time-to-release lag. Typically, from
the time everything is ready to go and the release notes / release email
are done, it takes 3 days to get to a releaseable stage for the mirror
network.
The rsync tree that we are using at this point is clearly not
good-enough ( either because of how we use it, or because of what it is
and how it works ). Also, release time activity and how donors react to
them makes it tricky to rely on specific nodes - something we really
need to get to in order to improve the rsync tree cascading setup we
have in place.
Thoughts, ideas ? Discuss!
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Hi,
I am a newbie about for building CentOS iso,
i want to build specific image based on CentOS du to stability, clean of the CentOS :)
i find some wiki from homepage of CentOS.org (http://CentOS.org) except nothing about for building image/iso from scratch :(
anyone could give me any hits for building instruction for CentOS image ?
Thanks,
- Jojo
Hi,
I have recently found a problem of randomly being blocked by ssh
connection to a 64 bit CentOS 6.4 virtual machine, the dmesg shown
following error:
..........
INFO: task gnome-settings-:16976 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
gnome-setting D 0000000000000000 0 16976 1 0x00000080
ffff8800dc3e5dd8 0000000000000082 0000000000000000 ffff8800be54faf0
ffff8800dc3e5d98 ffff8800daf07540 ffff8800daf07540 ffff8800daf07540
ffff8800daf07af8 ffff8800dc3e5fd8 000000000000fb88 ffff8800daf07af8
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff811a1bc0>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x30/0x110
[<ffffffff8150efbe>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13e/0x180
[<ffffffff8150ee5b>] mutex_lock+0x2b/0x50
[<ffffffff8118e890>] lookup_create+0x30/0xd0
[<ffffffff81192589>] sys_symlinkat+0x99/0x120
[<ffffffff81186b4e>] ? vfs_lstat+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff81186b74>] ? sys_newlstat+0x24/0x50
[<ffffffff810dc8f7>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200
[<ffffffff81192626>] sys_symlink+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
--------
Searched from Internet and found similar bug report for Fedora 19
declared the issue to a blocker. It seems to me that the bug I
encountered is the same in Fedora 19. While Fedora has a workaround
patch, I am not clear if that bug has been reported to CentOS dev and
if you have a patch as well? Please advice and update.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
jupiter
Hello,
I will to build a new iso for myself with custom packages and kickstarts.
Currently which tools do you use to build your centos builds? According to
my research, pungi and revisor are some tools. Do you have any
recommendation?
Regards,
Hi,
The current gdm update https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1213.html
comes with an updated initscripts package.
Currently a CentOS 5 gets the gdm update but not the initscripts package.
Isn't it dangerous for those running with X because gdm doesn't create
/tmp/.X11-unix anymore and the new initscripts, which creates it now, is
not already available?
Regards,
Simon
According to this bug report:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6548
(originally from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642729 )
a patch introduced in kernel 2.6.32 causes a performance drop in
[certain] SSDs. This patch was later reverted in the mainline kernel.
With this kernel, the reporter says, the SSD performance is now what
is expected from the spec.
I have built a centosplus kernel that has the referenced patch
reverted. My limited test (using hdparm) did show some improvement
with this kernel. kernel-ml from ELRepo (currently at 3.10.0-1.el6)
gave a number similar to this plus kernel.
http://people.centos.org/toracat/kernel/6/plus/bug6548/
Please test if you can and report back with your findings (good, bad,
no diff ...). Note that the packages are not signed and are provided
for testing purposes only.
Thanks in advance for your input.
Akemi / toracat
Hi,
the major topics have been:
- forummigration: so far on test instances looking good, import work mostly
completed, some DB and VM tuning still to do. A dedicated eMail will be setup to
get in contact with in case of outdated email-accounts. Current ETA for the new
forum in september.
- blog: will be depending in the site move
- t_functional: some more tests and fixes made their way into git over the last
few weeks. Most instability issues with the tests are from various network
related issues. freeipa tests will only use on VM, so no further outside
dependency.
I hope I didn't miss anything important.
cheers
Christoph