Does RH make available the SRPMs for JBoss EWS? Specifically, I'm
looking for tomcat7 (tomcat7-7.0.30-5_patch_02.ep6.el6.src.rpm)
I poked around the JBoss SRPMs[1] but couldn't find any of the SRPMs for EWS.
-Jacob
[1] http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/JBEAP/SRPMS
Hello,
I am trying the xen 4.2 packages for centos 6.4 from
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/xen-c6/. I've found that some files are
misplaced. Saving a domain crashes with this error:
--8<------
[oneadmin@xen var]$ sudo xl save -c 14 checkpoint
Saving to checkpoint new xl format (info 0x0/0x0/461)
libxl: cannot execute /usr/lib/xen/bin/libxl-save-helper: No such file
or directory
libxl: error: libxl_utils.c:363:libxl_read_exactly: file/stream
truncated reading ipc msg header from domain 14 save/restore helper
stdout pipe
libxl: error: libxl_exec.c:118:libxl_report_child_exitstatus: domain
14 save/restore helper [11440] exited with error status 255
Failed to save domain, resuming domain
------>8--
The package xen-runtime puts files in two different places (lib and lib64):
--8<------
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/libxl-save-helper
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/lsevtchn
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/pygrub
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/readnotes
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_restore
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_save
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/xenconsole
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/xenctx
/usr/lib64/xen/bin/xenpvnetboot
/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm
/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-ga
/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-img
/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-io
/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-nbd
/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-system-i386
/usr/lib/xen/bin/stubdom-dm
/usr/lib/xen/bin/stubdompath.sh
/usr/lib/xen/bin/tapdisk
/usr/lib/xen/bin/xenpaging
------>8--
Making symlinks from lib64 to lib of libxl-save-helper, xc_save and
xc_restore files makes this feature work.
Aside this problem the packages are working fine.
Cheers
--
Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 in Berlin from the 24th to the 26th of
September 2013!
Javier Fontán Muiños
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization
www.OpenNebula.org | jfontan(a)opennebula.org | @OpenNebula
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As we expand the scope of what we cover in the irc channels, we need
more help there. Both for content ( ~ helping and guideing new
people to the right answers ) and for moderation ( as irc ops ).
The channels in question here :
#centos @ irc.freenode.net
#centos-social @ irc.freenode.net
#centos-virt @ irc.freenode.net
#centos-devel @ irc.freenode.net
While anyone from around the world is welcome to get in touch, we
specially need cover from people in the far-east timezones and the
middle-east day time zones.
Do you see yourself as being able to help ? Get in touch with one of the
following :
Trevor Hemsley
Jim Perrin
Johnny Hughes
Karanbir Singh
Tru Huynh
Ralph Angenendt
Thanks!
- --
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
- --
Karanbir Singh, The CentOS Project
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlGJRRYACgkQMA29nj4Tz1s9VACfRYA0Fm3kNwSpfnSZaqUW7JCP
eqsAoIy5BxNrk6iNzzCGas06iWap92NY
=5/k1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
hi guys,
quick start:
drop http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/mariadb/mariadb.repo into
/etc/yum.repos.d/ and yum list mariadb\*
This is adapted from the Fedora spec adapted by Johnny for CentOS-6 and
upgraded to 5.5.29; we have done some basic testing on these packages
and they worked for us. We are now looking for wider testing and
feedback about both the packaging, the payload and how its setup as well
as any build issues.
These packages are setup to replace MySQL on your machine, so be
careful. And we consider these rpms to be of Testing grade, unsuiteable
for production at this point.
Post feedback as follow up to this email, or at bugs.centos.org/
Regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
hi,
Over the years, we have had a silent group of people, who have helped,
promoted, contributed code, helped QA, helped in various other parallel
efforts that all bring together the CentOS Ecosystem. Its time we did
something to promote these people, make them visible and to give them
credit for the work and efforts they have been putting in. After all, a
large chunk of reward for open source efforts is recognition.
To this end, I'd like to propose the CentOS VIP effort. A draft overview
is posted here : http://wiki.centos.org/KaranbirSingh/VIP
A key takeaway from this is that this group would in effect take over
running most of the project activities, with the CentOS Core team now
back tracking to running admin and project specific tasks ( eg. making
sure the centos.org domain name is paid for and renewed! ).
I am looking for comments on things to add / remove / change, as well as
a couple of voulenteers to help run the infra around this effort.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Jeffrey Johnson <n3npq(a)me.com>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Promoting contributor efforts
> Date: April 17, 2013 7:44:44 AM EDT
> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org>
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 7:22 AM, cernekj wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17.4.2013, at 11:43, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/16/2013 12:19 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>> To this end, I'd like to propose the CentOS VIP effort. A draft overview
>>>> is posted here : http://wiki.centos.org/KaranbirSingh/VIP
>>>
>>> Secondly, how does everyone feel about the title... VIP is clearly not
>>> the right term, Captains has been called cheesy, Ambassadors has been
>>> called misleading, Advocates and Consul seem to be the front runners
>>> here. Anyone fancy proposing another term ? or should we just vote on
>>> Consul and Advocate and run with that.
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> What about:
>> - Masters
>> - Chiefs
>> - Leaders
>> - Directors
>> ?
>>
>
> I'd even volunteer if my job title was actually
>
> mugwump
>
> 73 de Jeff
I had a conversation on IRC regarding torrents and trackers for centos
and the terasaur.org project. This is a note, so the group can get in
touch with me.
Thanks,
-John
Please look at these drbd83 and drbd-kmod83 testing RPMS:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6341
The link to the actual RPMS are there, here it is as well:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/drbd/5/
Please provide feedback to bug 6341 (first link above) and we can get
these moved into the extras repo.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
I see that the mirror currently has a binary
initscripts-9.03.38-1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm, but I don't see the
corresponding initscripts-9.03.38-1.el6.centos.1.src.rpm at
http://vault.centos.org/6.4/os/Source/SPackages/ --- am I looking in the
wrong place?
--
Nathaniel W. Turner
http://houseofnate.net/
Hi,
This may be by design or there may be a reason for it which I don't know.
In the x86_64 repository for CentOS 6.4, the i686 version of these
packages below are not up to date. This causes yum to complain about
'Protected multilib versions'.
* iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.873-2.el6
* iscsi-initiator-utils-devel-6.2.0.873-2
* control-center-filesystem-2.28.1-38
There may be others but these are the three I had to fix manually on my
system.
I just downloaded the i686 versions from the i386 repository which seem
to work fine.
John.
--
John Newbigin | ITS Senior Analyst / Programmer
Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies
ITS | Swinburne University of Technology | Melbourne, Australia
O: EN306 | T: +61 3 9214 8185 | M: +61 410 569 362
E: jnewbigin(a)swin.edu.au
W: http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin