devel

devel@lists.centos.org

3 participants
4662 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
by κiζs飛ゞ揚 13 Sep '12

13 Sep '12

Who are you? publishers？ ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Karanbir Singh"<mail-lists(a)karan.org>; Date: Thu, Sep 13, 2012 11:32 PM To: "The CentOS developers mailing list."<centos-devel(a)centos.org>; Subject: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release hi guys, One bit of feedback at LinuxCon this year from people was that we should ship epel with a lower barrier to entry. And I have mixed feelings about that. But I wanted to know what everyone else thinks about : 1) Shipping epel-release in CentOS-Extras, so its installable, usable out of the box. 2) Shipping epel-release in the distro itself, with the epel repos's enabled=false. This is the option that most people seem to want, but I am least keen on. 3) do nothing, leave things as they are. Ofcourse, if we do either (1) or (2) we would need to set some sort of a baseline standard that allows other repo's to be included as well ( as + if they meet the baseline standard ) regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

1 0

Updating The CentOS Artwork Repository
by Alain Reguera Delgado 30 Aug '12

30 Aug '12

hi Guys, I already began to download a working copy of The CentOS Artwork Repository with the intention of committing up the changes I've been working on through these last 3 years and this way, put in place all the information you need to test, verify and validate the work. I'm using a slow commutated connection with an average speed of 5KB/s but things are going on. I think the new directory structure should be online to the end of this month, if everything goes as planned so far. The CentOS Artwork Repository has changed significantly from that version currently online to that one I pretend to share this month. The directory structure currently online suffered significant changes as to be completely replaced. A preview of the new directory structure I want to share is in the following file: http://wiki.centos.org/AlainRegueraDelgado?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=… I would like to know what do we do with the old directory structure currently available online (https://projects.centos.org/svn/artwork/)? Do we remove it completely in the sake of the new one, or do we preserve it in some other place (maybe under tags/)? ... Once all the information be online and ready to be used, my plan is to update the wiki page (http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork) to introduce the changes and the steps you need to follow in order to test the new directory structure of The CentOS Artwork Repository. This info might probably answer some of the questions laying around. Best Regards, -- Alain Reguera Delgado <alain.reguera(a)gmail.com>

2 3

Image rendition fails when preparing the workstation?
by Alain Reguera Delgado 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

hi Guys, There was a problem with some old design models inside The CentOS Artwork Repository which prevented centos-art.sh script from rendering images at preparation process. The exact problem was given because of a wrong path inside those old design models, specifically when centos-art.sh script verified them. This problem was fixed and you should be able to render images right away, after updating your working copy of The CentOS Artwork Repository. Other changes were also committed. The exact changes can be found at: https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/timeline Best regards, -- Alain Reguera Delgado <alain.reguera(a)gmail.com>

1 0

CentOS 6.3 versions for upstart different between i386 and x86_64
by Greg Snyder 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

It looks like there are currently different versions on CentOS 6.3 for the upstart RPM between i386 and x86_64: http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.3/os/i386/Packages/upstart-0.6.5-10.el6… http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.3/os/x86_64/Packages/upstart-0.6.5-12.e… I'm not seeing any trouble as a result of this, but wanted to call it out. The current i386 RPM seems to be what CentOS 6.2 had. The upstream announcement http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0863.html , from 2012-06-20, is for the upgrade from upstart-0.6.5-10.el6 to upstart-0.6.5-12 . Thanks, Greg

2 1

Testing The CentOS Artwork Repository
by Alain Reguera Delgado 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

hi Guys, The CentOS Artwork Repository has been updated and needs to be tested by The CentOS Community. To test The CentOS Artwork Repository, you need to: 1. Follow the steps described in the page http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork to configure your workstation and your working copy. 2. Read the documentation at `trunk/Manuals/Tcar-ug/tcar-ug-xhtml/index.html' to get a background information about the production environment your working copy is and how you can make use of it. 3. Explore the directory structure and play with centos-art.sh script. Specifically with functionalities like render, help and locale. This functionalities are described in the documentation named before. The source code of these functionalities is also available at trunk/Scripts/Bash/Functions, in case you are interested to contribute. The present state (revision 880) of The CentOS Artwork Repository published at https://projects.centos.org/svn/artwork is still an ongoing work and needs much more attention. So, if you consider that something must be improved or isn't working as expected, please send an e-mail to centos-devel(a)centos.org describing what you've found. Likewise if you find your self in trouble performing any of the previous steps, send an e-mail to centos-devel(a)centos.org to find answers. Personally, I'm very interested about the community needs and wishes related to the creation of a consistent visual identity for The CentOS Project that can be refreshed/updated each time a new major release of The CentOS Distribution be published. Initially it may not be possible to satisfy everything immediately but knowing such information will help us to identify and give priority to those areas with higher demand and, this way, work on the routes that will help us to get there, where we want to be. Best regards, -- Alain Reguera Delgado <alain.reguera(a)gmail.com>

1 0

mod_security for CentOS-5 and CentOS-6
by Johnny Hughes 24 Aug '12

24 Aug '12

The latest version of mod_security has been built for CentOS-5 and CentOS-6. Also included with in the CentOS-5 build is the version of lua that ships with CentOS-6.3 as it is a requirement for the latest mod_security. Please test this build and provide feedback so that we can get this released or fixed if there are issues. http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/mod_security/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes

3 4

please add vnconfig to minimal install CD
by Christoph Galuschka 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hi, just to add these links from upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714035 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645796 Both state basically that vconfig is scheduled for removal from upstream, allthough it is not stated in which release. cheers Christoph

2 1

Update announcements
by Markus Falb 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

I noticed updates for dhcp and redhat-logos. From the changelog it becomes clear why there was no announcement nor update from redhat. As I understand this was only branding stuff. * Mit Aug 15 2012 Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> - 12:4.1.1-31.P1.1.el6.centos - created patch 1000 for CentOS Branding - replaced vvendor variable with CentOS in the SPEC file * Mit Aug 15 2012 Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> 60.0.14-12 - Bugfix for CentOS Bug #5704 But it is not clear to me why there was no announcement from CentOS, at least I can not find it. I am subscribed to centos-announce and I had a look at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-August/thread.html too. -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb

3 5

Little webapp / page to handle mirror requests
by Karanbir Singh 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

Hi Guys, We need to get a webpage or a webapp up that allows new mirror admin's to request addition to the mirror list and for people to request changed. It just needs to allow some specific bits of into, validate that input, make sure its a person doing the request - and file as an entry at bugs.centos.org. Anyone fancy taking this work up ? I'd be quite happy to help and provide all the info needed. Thanks -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 2

Re: [CentOS-devel] thanks for the offers to help test the installer
by Manuel Wolfshant 18 Aug '12

18 Aug '12

0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 -original message- Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] thanks for the offers to help test the installer From: Floris Bos <bos(a)je-eigen-domein.nl> Date: 11/01/2011 15:39 Hi, On Friday, January 07, 2011 12:36:53 am you wrote: > Here is what needs doing : > - Write a kickstart file that would either install an existing system[1] > - Write a bash shell script that can be run on the machine, which would > do some tests and exit with '0' if all goes well. > - Please name the kickstart file in a way that it ends in .cfg > - Please name the test script exactly the same as the kickstart file but > ending in .sh Attached a kickstart file that is known to work with Scientific Linux 6 alpha. As well as a kickstart file with a software RAID1 configuration that throws an error with Scientific Linux. The exact same disk layout does work with Centos 5.5, so submitting it as test case. -- Yours sincerely, Floris Bos _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel <<misc-kickstart-files.patch>>

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel