devel

devel@lists.centos.org

9 participants
4687 discussions

Testers needed: nx (upgrade to the 3.5.0 series) and freenx (SELinux fix)
by christoph.ascendos＠chello.at 23 Nov '11

23 Nov '11

On 10/23/2011 07:09 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > While you are there, please also grab the current (testing) version of > freenx ( freenx-0.7.3-8.el5.ay ). It has a fix for SELinux (thanks to > Dan Walsh) as detailed here: Installed freenx-0.7.3-8.el6.ay.i686.rpm nx-3.5.0-1.el6.ay.i686.rpm on C6 x86 (with a little guidance from KB's eMail) and working fine. No issues with fonts, but the machine was installed with minimal desktop anyway. Looking forward to nx being moved to the extras-repo. Cheers Christoph

3 3

Testers needed: nx (upgrade to the 3.5.0 series) and freenx (SELinux fix)
by Akemi Yagi 22 Nov '11

22 Nov '11

Hi all, I have a new version of nx ( nx-3.5.0-1.el5.ay ) for CentOS-5 and -6 available for testing: http://centos.toracat.org/misc/nx-freenx You can find the release announcement for 3.5.0 here: http://www.nomachine.com/news-read.php?idnews=343 More details on the CentOS version is here: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4901 While you are there, please also grab the current (testing) version of freenx ( freenx-0.7.3-8.el5.ay ). It has a fix for SELinux (thanks to Dan Walsh) as detailed here: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5052 Thanks in advance for testing these packages. Akemi

5 11

Re: [CentOS-devel] ksplice and CentOS
by Andreas Balg 20 Nov '11

20 Nov '11

Hello everybody, I remember Karan got the ksplice-code in order to be able to fork this great technology for CentOS and not let got Oracle all alone with this. So what happened the last weeks/months regarding this great idea ? I'd personally and professionally be interested in using it for our deployments but also to contribute where possible - we have no kernel-development knowledge here to help out but maybe we can help in other ways as well. Is there already any project fort he fork going on or did the idea die or sleep silently the last few weeks ?? Curious greetings from switzerland, Andreas

3 2

Dependency missing for ipa-server
by Baptiste AGASSE 17 Nov '11

17 Nov '11

Hi all, I've an up to date test vm running CentOS 6.0 with CR repo. I've tried to install ipa-server for testing purposes but the "yum install ipa-server" ends with dependencies problems: # yum install ipa-server [...] ---> Package ipa-server.x86_64 0:2.0.0-23.el6_1.2 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: pki-silent >= 9.0.0 for package: ipa-server-2.0.0-23.el6_1.2.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: pki-ca >= 9.0.0 for package: ipa-server-2.0.0-23.el6_1.2.x86_64 ---> Package setools-libs.x86_64 0:3.3.7-4.el6 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: ipa-server-2.0.0-23.el6_1.2.x86_64 (cr) Requires: pki-ca >= 9.0.0 Error: Package: ipa-server-2.0.0-23.el6_1.2.x86_64 (cr) Requires: pki-silent >= 9.0.0 I know that ipa-server is new in RHEL 6.1, consequently, this packages (and maybe some deps) are not present in CentOS 6, but ipa-server's package is present in CR repo. When i browsed RHEL's ftp on redhat i viewed "pki-core" package that's not present at this time in CentOS's CR repo. So, my question is: This package will be in CR repo or it will be released when C6.1 be ready ? Regards.

2 2

6 debug info
by Chris Cowley 15 Nov '11

15 Nov '11

Hello all Umm - does anyone know where the debuginfo packages have gone? Were they ever even there? $ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Debuginfo.repo # CentOS-Base.repo # # The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the # update status of each mirror to pick mirrors that are updated to and # geographically close to the client. You should use this for CentOS updates # unless you are manually picking other mirrors. # # All debug packages from all the various CentOS-5 releases # are merged into a single repo, split by BaseArch # # Note: packages in the debuginfo repo are currently not signed # [debug] name=CentOS-6 - Debuginfo baseurl=http://debuginfo.centos.org/6/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-Debug-6 enabled=0 However if you go to http://debuginfo.centos.org/6/ in a browser you get greeted with an empty directory :-( It makes GDB pretty useless! Chris Cowley R&D IT Engineer Snell Innovation in the Multi-Screen World T +44 (0) 23 9248 9103 (direct) T +44 (0) 23 9248 9000 (switchboard) F +44 (0) 23 9245 1411 snellgroup.com Southleigh Park House, Eastleigh Road, Havant, Hants, PO9 2PE, UK Routing <http://www.snellgroup.com/products/routing/> | Modular Infrastructure <http://www.snellgroup.com/products/modular-infrastructure/> | Conversion & Restoration <http://www.snellgroup.com/products/conversion-and-restoration/> | Live Production <http://www.snellgroup.com/products/production-and-master-control-switch ing/> | Automation & Media Management <http://www.snellgroup.com/products/automation-and-media-management/> | Control & Monitoring <http://www.snellgroup.com/products/control-and-monitoring/> This email and any attachments are confidential, may be legally privileged and are intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any use, disclosure, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If received in error, please delete this email and any attachments and confirm this to the sender. Snell Limited, registered number 1160119 Registered in England, registered office at Hartman House, Danehill, Lower Earley, Reading, Berkshire RG6 4PB

3 2

[C6] cr/SRPMS/Packages empty
by Alex Agranov 14 Nov '11

14 Nov '11

So what was the decision about the %subj%? Specifically, where can I find the SRPM for the latest kernel from CR/ repository? (kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm) I searched both CentOS mirrors and vault.centos.org but couldn't find anything... -- Alex ________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential material. They are intended solely for the use of the designated individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message

6 6

Identi.ca and GCL or clisp
by Isaac Cortés 08 Nov '11

08 Nov '11

Is there a identi.ca client that I can use? And why there is not GCL or clisp in the repo? How can I get them? -- *“But JavaSchools also fail to train the brains of kids to be adept, agile, and flexible enough to do good software design (and I don’t mean OO “design”, where you spend countless hours rewriting your code to rejiggle your object hierarchy, or you fret about faux “problems” like has-a vs. is-a). You need training to think of things at multiple levels of abstraction simultaneously, and that kind of thinking is exactly what you need to design great software architecture.” *

2 1

[urgent] Please, push tzdata update from CR into main 6.0 repo.
by Alex/AT 03 Nov '11

03 Nov '11

Good day. The "tzdata-2011h-3.el6.noarch.rpm" needs to be pushed into mainline 6.0 repo ASAP. The mainline 6.0 repo version of tzdata contains no update for latest Russian (and maybe some others, don't know) timezone changes, causing major headaches. I know it's against mainline policy, but here overal stability is an issue. Probably it has to be pushed as .centos update variant. -- Regards, Alexey Asemov Senior IPTech Specialist CJSC "SPb TELEPORT" (TTK-NW)

6 7

Word of Appriciation
by christoph 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

I would like to say a big "Thank you" to all of the developers of CentOS!! Especially since TUV released V6 it seems to have gotten a lot harder for you people in providing the community with this great OS (including but not limited to a lot of heat in the mailing lists). Thanks for carrying on! CentOS6 made my life at work much easier. I'm moving some 30+ machines (primary function iptables-Firewalling) from OpenSuSE to C6, so I won't have to do a major distro upgrade every 18 months. Since the first deployment of C6 starting this summer, it worked like a charm. Of course, I only use a very limited set of its features (basically "minimal desktop" is enough), but the long term support counts! Also the ps performance toolkit - which is based on C5 - works great, part to you guys providing the OS. The work you do is very much appreciated! Keep it up. cheers Christoph

2 1

automated response
by Jeff Donaldson 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

I'll be out of the office on Wednesday, November 2nd. I will respond as soon as I return. Thank you and have a great day!

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel