devel

devel@lists.centos.org

2 participants
4653 discussions

unit test generator for shared C/C++ library API
by Andrey Ponomarenko 16 Feb '10

16 Feb '10

Dear colleagues, Linux Verification Center at the Institute for System Programming of RAS and the Linux Foundation have released a free unit test generator for shared C/C++ library API. It helps to quickly generate simple ("sanity" or "shallow"-quality) tests for all functions from the library API using their signatures and data type definitions straight from the library header files. The quality of generated tests allows to check absence of critical errors in simple use cases and can be improved by involving of highly reusable specialized types for the library. This tool can execute generated tests and detect all kinds of emitted signals, early program exits, program hanging and specified requirement failures. It can be considered as a tool for low-cost sanity checking of library API or as a powerful test development framework. Also it supports universal Template2Code format of tests, random test generation mode and other useful features. This tool is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU GPLv2. We suppose this tool can be very useful for shared library developers and recommend it for including to Cent OS. For more information, please see: http://ispras.linux-foundation.org/index.php/API_Sanity_Autotest Andrey Ponomarenko Linux Verification Center at the Institute for System Programming of RAS

1 0

yum-3.2.22-23.el5.centos in c5-testing
by Karanbir Singh 13 Feb '10

13 Feb '10

Hi, yum-3.2.22-23.el5.centos is now available in the c5-testing repo, please check / test and post feedback. This is the yum which will most likely be released along with 5.5 so its important we provide feedback at this stage, so as many issues as possible are ironed out before release. -- Karanbir Singh kbsingh(a)karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

4 3

Call for Firefox 3.6.1 and Thunderbird 3.0.1 testers
by David Hrbáč 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

Hi, I have made complete rebuild and backport of Firefox 3.6.1 and Thunderbird 3.0.1 to CentOS 5. Packages come with language packs, debuginfo packages, xulrunner etc. I'm looking for QA testers. Upgrade from distro versions works pretty fine. Thanks, David Hrbáč

4 4

Về: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 3
by NGUYEN VAN TAN 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Dear Fabian Arrotin I cross-compiled the packages for ppc on x86 I just modified Makefile, configuration file or spec file if necessary to support to cross compile. For example, the spec file of bash package on the attachment I'm testing on PowerBook G4. --- Ngày Thứ 4, 10/02/10, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> đã viết: Từ: centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> Chủ đề: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 3 Đến: centos-devel(a)centos.org Ngày: Thứ Tư, 10 tháng 2, 2010, 0:00 Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to centos-devel(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-devel-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS? (Karanbir Singh) 2. Re: Fasttrack for C-5 (Karanbir Singh) 3. Forum thread -- "Another win for CentOS for me" (Alan Bartlett) 4. V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 (NGUYEN VAN TAN) 5. Re: V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 (Fabian Arrotin) 6. Re: Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS? (Marcus Moeller) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:11:27 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS? To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4B7053CF.7080109(a)karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 04/02/10 21:43, Marcus Moeller wrote: > As stated before, inclusion of the RHEL packages does not make much > sence, as they are soon out of sync. This conversation has gone past 2 full loops now. The only issue, as far as I can tell, not cleared up is that can packages in the stock EL4 and EL5 srpm tree be used against spacewalk 0.6 and 0.7 ? They might be 'outdated' in that perhaps all features may not be present, but is there an issue of these packages not being usable at all due to an api incompatibility ? -- Karanbir Singh kbsingh(a)karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:14:41 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Fasttrack for C-5 To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4B705491.2090303(a)karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 28/01/10 14:33, Ned Slider wrote: >> Does the filesystem package no longer require CentOS branding changes to >> be rolled in? >> $ rpm -q filesystem >> filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos.x86_64 Will look at that. > Looks like pirut still needs it's Requires for rhn components removed too. > error: Failed dependencies: > rhn-setup-gnome is needed by pirut-1.3.28-17.el5.noarch And this as well. thanks for acting as issue catcher, its good to know that stuff I farkup is going to be caught along the line :) btw, the major point of getting these packages into a repo was to work on the code that allows us to produce a package-db api. After a lot of feature creep and de-creep there is something that should mostly work. I'll post more details on that in the next few days. Also, by this weekend there should be yum-security working capability in this ft-testing repo. I'll post an email here when thats in place. -- Karanbir Singh kbsingh(a)karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:18:00 +0000 From: Alan Bartlett <ajb(a)elrepo.org> Subject: [CentOS-devel] Forum thread -- "Another win for CentOS for me" To: CentOS developers mailing list <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4e2e72e81002081018n2df9a6acjb7f7c7667733116f(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Just an appreciative comment [1] that I pass on. Alan. [1] http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=24711&start=0#fo… ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:18:15 -0800 (PST) From: NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk(a)yahoo.com> Subject: [CentOS-devel] V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 To: centos-devel(a)centos.org Message-ID: <955141.78284.qm(a)web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all I just mention to distro built from source code of CentOS 5. And now I'm trying to test the distro. Thank you, Nguy?n V?n T?n --- Ng?y Th? 4, 3/02/10, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> ?? vi?t: T?: centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> Ch? ??: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 ??n: centos-devel(a)centos.org Ng?y: Th? T?, 3 th?ng 2, 2010, 0:00 Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to ??? centos-devel(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? centos-devel-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at ??? centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." Today's Topics: ???1. CentOS test technique (NGUYEN VAN TAN) ???2. Re: CentOS test technique (Fabian Arrotin) ???3. Re: CentOS test technique (Timo Schoeler) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:11:27 -0800 (PST) From: NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk(a)yahoo.com> Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS test technique To: centos-devel(a)centos.org Message-ID: <183807.78931.qm(a)web62403.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all I have built a centos for my powerpc laptop. Are there any techique to test the distribution? Thank you. Nguy?n V?n T?n ? ? ? B?n lu?n mu?n k?t n?i v?i nhi?u b?n b? h?n tr?n blog v? trang web c? nh?n? T?o Pingbox m?i nh?t ngay h?m nay! http://vn.messenger.yahoo.com/pingbox/

1 0

Về: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1
by NGUYEN VAN TAN 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

Hi all I just mention to distro built from source code of CentOS 5. And now I'm trying to test the distro. Thank you, Nguyễn Văn Tân --- Ngày Thứ 4, 3/02/10, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> đã viết: Từ: centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> Chủ đề: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 Đến: centos-devel(a)centos.org Ngày: Thứ Tư, 3 tháng 2, 2010, 0:00 Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to centos-devel(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-devel-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CentOS test technique (NGUYEN VAN TAN) 2. Re: CentOS test technique (Fabian Arrotin) 3. Re: CentOS test technique (Timo Schoeler) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:11:27 -0800 (PST) From: NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk(a)yahoo.com> Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS test technique To: centos-devel(a)centos.org Message-ID: <183807.78931.qm(a)web62403.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all I have built a centos for my powerpc laptop. Are there any techique to test the distribution? Thank you. Nguy?n V?n T?n B?n lu?n mu?n k?t n?i v?i nhi?u b?n b? h?n tr?n blog v? trang web c? nh?n? T?o Pingbox m?i nh?t ngay h?m nay! http://vn.messenger.yahoo.com/pingbox/

2 1

Forum thread -- "Another win for CentOS for me"
by Alan Bartlett 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Just an appreciative comment [1] that I pass on. Alan. [1] http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=24711&start=0#fo…

1 0

CentOS test technique
by NGUYEN VAN TAN 02 Feb '10

02 Feb '10

Hi all I have built a centos for my powerpc laptop. Are there any techique to test the distribution? Thank you. Nguyễn Văn Tân Bạn luôn muốn kết nối với nhiều bạn bè hơn trên blog và trang web cá nhân? Tạo Pingbox mới nhất ngay hôm nay! http://vn.messenger.yahoo.com/pingbox/

3 2

yum-3.2.8 for Centos 4 backport, part II.
by David Hrbáč 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

Hi, I have again worked on yum 3.2.8 for Centos 4 today, after a long time. The result is backported package yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.5 which is the upgrade of yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.3 I've been using smoothly for quite a long time. Packages are in testing repos: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repodata/ I'd like to ask for QA tests. This patched version passes all the internal yum tests (aka 'make test'). Regards, David Hrbáč

8 43

Forum Thread -- Relating to the CentOS 5 Testing Repository
by Justin Albstmeijer 26 Jan '10

26 Jan '10

Hi, I hoped to use php-5.2 while keeping close to the centos packages (no external repositories). So I tried the packages from http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/RPMS/ . These packages seem to be compiled without mime-magic support (--without-mime-magic). The previous stable php-5.1.6 packages had this mime-magic support enabled. Any reason for this change? is there an add-on rpm packages supplying this support? Just tested php-5.2.10-1.el5.centos, with the same result. Justin

3 2

selinux-policy-2.4.6-255.el5_4.4
by kfx 26 Jan '10

26 Jan '10

Hi, I hope I am on the good list to ask this, if not I apologize. 5 days ago, Upstream released an errata for the nasty bug that was introduced with selinux-policy-2.4.6-255.el5_4.3, which prevented postfix-driven systems from sending email. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0063.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555793#c1 I would like to know if the fixed selinux-policy rpm was in the process to be deployed for centos as the lack of it prevent me to update servers. I know that it's bad to ask :( but as Upstream say in the first time "oh you will have to wait for 5.5 for a clean fix", this bug is getting me anxious. Thanks for your work, kfx

2 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel