devel

devel@lists.centos.org

2 participants
4653 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] Red Hat IPA
by Sean Brady 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

I know that this was discussed back in May, but I am unclear on the status of IPA on CentOS. Any word on this, or has this indeed been dropped due to lack of interest? "little interest to keep it going in its present form either upstream or downstream" Does this mean that Redhat is backing off of the product as well, or am I reading this wrong? Thanks, Sean

2 1

WebsiteV2
by Will Fitch 30 Sep '09

30 Sep '09

Hello all, I am offering to lending a hand with version two the site (graphics design, cutting/creating templates or programming) per Karanbir. What can I do to help? ---------------------------------------- Follow me: http://www.twitter.com/willfitch http://www.phpfever.com Will Fitch Zend Certified Engineer Senior Operations DBA and Developer www.quepasa.com Cell: 931.205.8242 Fax: 931.914.1206

4 4

Custom Packages for WebEnvironment
by Marcus Moeller 30 Sep '09

30 Sep '09

Hi all. I noticed Russ's recent comments on the Web Infrastructure page and wanted to take it to the public instead of using the wiki for communication: http://wiki.centos.org/WebsiteVer2/WebEnvironment/Infrastructure?action=dif… There are a few challenges in a common infrastructure setup. We make use of components that are not part of the 'official' CentOS repositories atm. Most of them are web applications like Moin, phpBB, Mailmann, etc. These have to be packed and made available, either in a publicly accessible (preferred) or an internal repo. So maybe CentOS Extras or even Contrib is a good place to hold these new packages. Another advantage is the artwork and style setup. This could either be included directly within the corresponding application packages or packed separately. As we are also replacing some configuration files of HTTP (e.g. error messages) we may also have to re-pack this app. Having RPMs that replace other RPMs configurations is not the preferred way, I guess. Best Regards Marcus

3 2

rlm_ldap
by José Johnny RANDRIAMAMPIONONA 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

Hi all, I am on centOs5.3 and I d like to use freeradius server on it with ldap in remote server. I followed the faq and the tutorial but I am little bored because it seems that I need to install in the local server some ldap library but I don't know how to do it 'cause it doesn't work with yum or another basic system command. In another hand I have this kind of error after doing yum-complete-transaction and I don't know how to fix it: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *[root@mde ~]# yum-complete-transaction Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.ircam.fr * updates: mirrors.ircam.fr * addons: mirrors.ircam.fr * extras: mirror.in2p3.fr There are 1 outstanding transactions to complete. Finishing the most recent one The remaining transaction had 23 elements left to run There are unfinished transactions remaining. You mightconsider running yum-compl ete-transaction first to finish them. --> Running transaction check ---> Package ecryptfs-utils.i386 0:56-8.el5 set to be erased ---> Package gnutls.i386 0:1.4.1-3.el5_2.1 set to be erased ---> Package openssl.i686 0:0.9.8e-7.el5 set to be erased --> Finished Dependency Resolution ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Removing: ecryptfs-utils i386 56-8.el5 installed 322 k gnutls i386 1.4.1-3.el5_2.1 installed 813 k openssl i686 0.9.8e-7.el5 installed 3.3 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 0 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 3 Package(s) Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Erasing : gnutls [1/3] Erasing : openssl [2/3] erreur: %postun(gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_2.1.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 Erasing : ecryptfs-utils [3/3] erreur: %postun(openssl-0.9.8e-7.el5.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 Removed: ecryptfs-utils.i386 0:56-8.el5 gnutls.i386 0:1.4.1-3.el5_2.1 openssl.i6 86 0:0.9.8e-7.el5 Not removing old transaction files ---------------------------------------------------* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Best regards JJohnny RANDRIAMAMPIONONA Phone: +212663682554, +212533158575 National School of Applied Sciences ZIP 1818 TANGIER 90000 ---------Morocco ---------------

2 1

RHWAS for CentOS 5
by Greg Swallow 26 Sep '09

26 Sep '09

Red Hat has uploaded the mysql rpm they are builing with the RHWAS rpms now. I think they are all there now except for the java srpm they are using. Any chance CentOS will rebuild at least the non-java stuff in a separate repository? ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHWAS/SRPMS/ Greg

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Testing php 5.2
by Dylan Martin 25 Sep '09

25 Sep '09

And two months later I finally remember to report that it was, in fact, a disaster. I was attempting to upgrade to php 5.2, but dependencies went berserk, instructor web pages stopped working, bosses yelled at unix admins, etc... etc... Anyone who cares, probably already knows this and this is probably why php 5.2 has stayed in testing so long. I had said "unless you hear more from me", so this is that "more" from "me". -Dylan On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Dylan Martin <dmartin(a)sccd.ctc.edu> wrote: > Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this. As far as I can tell, > people who install packages from the testing repo should report the > experience here. If not, please let me know where the correct place > is and I will go away... > > I just enabled the testing repo with includepkgs=php* and ran "yum > update" I had to set "priority=1" to get it to work. There were > conflicts and dependency problems with with php-pecl-apc and > php-pecl-json. I removed php-pecl-apc because I don't use it and > php-pecl-json because the new php-common seems to include it. I've > added the error output below (thank you scroll buffer!) I've got 50 > odd students hammering on this, so unless you hear more from me, take > this as a good sign that this is stable. > > Transaction Check Error: > file /etc/php.d/json.ini from install of > php-common-5.2.9-2.el5.centos.i386 conflicts with file from package > php-pecl-json-1.2.1-3.el5.i386 > file /usr/lib/php/modules/json.so from install of > php-common-5.2.9-2.el5.centos.i386 conflicts with file from package > php-pecl-json-1.2.1-3.el5.i386 > > php-pecl-apc-3.0.19-1.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: php-zend-abi = 20050922 is needed by package > php-pecl-apc-3.0.19-1.el5.i386 (installed) > Error: Missing Dependency: php-zend-abi = 20050922 is needed by > package php-pecl-apc-3.0.19-1.el5.i386 (installed) > root@zephir1# rpm -q php-pecl-apc >

1 0

projects.centos.org
by Karanbir Singh 25 Sep '09

25 Sep '09

Site at projects.centos.org is now back online! Thanks to Concecentric for donating the resources. - KB

6 8

Documentation Help
by Brad Potts 24 Sep '09

24 Sep '09

Hello, Karanbir Singh told me that I might be able to help CentOS with the 5.3 documentation. He tell me the effort is something Tim Verhoeven has taken under his belt. Can somebody tell me how I might be able to contribute? Some background: I'm a programmer for a living (C#, Java) but am also fairly knowledgeable about awk, sed, perl, a little C, etc. Hope this helps... -- Brad Potts "Comfort is the antidote to success" — Unknown

5 11

CentOS projects website is down
by Patrice Guay 23 Sep '09

23 Sep '09

The website https://projects.centos.org is down. Is there a scheduled maintenance on this server? -- Patrice

5 12

Package backports - 5.4 kernel
by Jason Parker 23 Sep '09

23 Sep '09

According to upstream release notes, there were API/ABI changes with OFED stuff. If userspace is not updated accordingly, it is very likely that there will be breakage. There were several other things in the upstream release notes that I don't see mentioned anywhere with this kernel release (examples: ext4dev, bonding+ipv6). Are there plans to do this? As the release is already syncing to mirrors, I suspect the answer is "no". I can't agree with this new policy, and I hope these comments demonstrate why.

7 9

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel