devel

devel@lists.centos.org

11 participants
4618 discussions

Libraries not stripped in rebuilt rpms and larger packages
by Luigi Iotti 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Hi all I usually rebuild some CentOS rpm packges with some changes I need. I noticed that I obtain slightly larger packages than the ones found in the centOS distribution, even if I rebuild a source rpm without changing anything. I looked in it, and it turned out that my shared libraries are not stripped, where the ones found in your packages are. For example, I just rebuilt the openldap packages, and obtained a package that is about 3 times larger: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10899106 Jul 7 22:42 my/openldap-servers-2.3.43-3.el5.lux.2.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3202917 Jul 8 16:38 orig/openldap-servers-2.3.43-3.el5.i386.rpm I extracted the packages with rpm2cpio, and the difference in size are in the shared libraries, for example: # ls -l */usr/lib/libslapd_db-4.4.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6518365 Jul 8 16:42 my/usr/lib/libslapd_db-4.4.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1032880 Jan 21 10:00 orig/usr/lib/libslapd_db-4.4.so # file */usr/lib/libslapd_db-4.4.so my/usr/lib/libslapd_db-4.4.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped orig/usr/lib/libslapd_db-4.4.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), stripped Maybe the CentOS build system contains some macros that strip libraries, and the distributed macros do not. I put this in /etc/rpm/macros (the line calling brp-strip-shared was added to the analogous macro taken from /usr/lib/rpm/redhat): %__os_install_post \ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress \ %{!?__debug_package:/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip %{__strip}} \ %{!?__debug_package:/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-shared %{__strip}} \ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive %{__strip} \ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note %{__strip} %{__objdump} \ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile \ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars \ %{nil} Do you see any problems doing so? Why there is this difference between packages distributed by CentOS and the same packages rebuilt in a CentOS environment? Thank you

3 3

Where can I help?
by Adam Miller 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Hello all, My name is Adam Miller and I'm currently a Fedora Packager/Developer and Ambassador, also a RHEL admin by $dayjob. I've come to a point to where I rely on CentOS for my VPSs hosted via Linode.com and would like to contribute back to CentOS where I am able. I was curious if there are any areas of CentOS that are currently in need of help/involvement? Thanks in advance, -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments

4 3

Building an automated rpm build system
by carlopmart 06 Jul '09

06 Jul '09

Hi all, I need to setup a centos 5 x86_64 server to build custom rpms for centos5, rhel5 and oel5. My requeriments are: - Build rpms only from src.rpm packages and .spec files. - Restrict architectures: I only need to build these packages for i386 and x86_64 hosts. - See logs when packages are builded. - Easy to install and lightweight, if it is possible. I have seen mock and koji. Mock it seems ver older but can I use to accomplish these? And koji it seems very complex. Any ideas?? Exists another build system?? Many thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

4 6

RHWAS
by Christoph Maser 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

I had a look at the testing repo. Is it right there is only a fraction of RHWAS rebuild? Once packages are to stable will they go into plus or will there a rhwas repo? Chris financial.com AG Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitzender) | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553

3 3

Apache with mpm-itk
by Adam 26 Jun '09

26 Jun '09

Hello, Does anyone have an apache rpm with mpm-itk? Thanks, Adam

2 2

Resigning from the CentOS project
by Dag Wieers 24 Jun '09

24 Jun '09

Hi, It was not an easy decision and I feel sad for having to take it, but I decided to resign from the CentOS project. I hope the team can fix the project's leadership, communication and transparancy issues (even within the team), because each is very important for the health of the CentOS community. And while I will be no longer part of the team, I still feel deeply involved as a user and advocate. My resignation feels also like a personal failure because I failed to change those things that I still believe to be important. It's sad day if you have to conclude that resigning is the best option and this will take some time to heal. Good luck with the project ! -- -- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

4 3

missing src.rpm
by Farkas Levente 24 Jun '09

24 Jun '09

hi, it seems for me that mcelog and libipathverbs src.rpm missing from 5.3's base on the mirror sites. and also strange that the binary rpms for this packages are only in x86_64 but not in i386. yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

2 2

Howto change arch for FirebirdSS rpm
by Pavel Lisy 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

Hello I have this problem: I make my own php rpms, base on src.rpm from CentOS but with my patches (more options included). I have built it on my machine originally but now I want make it in mock environment. I solved almost everything but Firebird support for 64bit arch. Original RPM from http://www.firebirdsql.org/ are made with amd64 arch but my php is x86_64. And I don't know how to solve it. .src.rpm for FirebirdSS and/or FirebirdCS is on available. I have this section in .spec %if %{with_interbase} %package interbase Group: Development/Languages Prereq: php = %{version}-%{release}, perl Summary: A Sybase/MSSQL database module for PHP. Provides: php_database # BuildPrereq: /usr/include/gds.h /usr/include/ibase.h # BuildPrereq: /usr/include/iberror.h /usr/include/ib_util.h # BuildPrereq: FirebirdCS >= 1.5.0 # "AutoReqProv: yes" don't work because of fault in Firebird RPMs # # AutoReqProv: no # BuildPrereq: FirebirdSS >= 1.5.0 # # Requires: /usr/lib/libgds.so %ifarch i386 i486 i586 i686 BuildPrereq: FirebirdSS >= 1.5.0 %endif %ifarch x86_64 BuildPrereq: FirebirdSS.amd64 >= 2.0.1 %endif But mock failed with this: DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for FirebirdSS.amd64 >= 2.0.1 │54 I don't how to include amd64 arch rpm to my x86_64 repository. (my repo: http://ftp-hk.tmapy.cz/tmapy-twist/centos/4/os/x86_64/RPMS/) I think there are two possible solution, rebuilt Firebird rpm with different arch or include amd64 to x86_64 repository. Do you how to make it? My questions: 1. Can I reconstruct .src.rpm from binary rpm or change arc in binary arch? How? 2. How to include amd64 arch rpm to my x86_64 repository? Thanks in advance Pavel

3 3

z/System Build
by IT2 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

ALCON: Just curious to know a status of the z/System build for CentOS, and if there is any news of if it will function under the current version of Hercules when constructed? Thanks in advance. -- Very Respectfully, IT2 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR Las Vegas, NV / Beverly Hills, CA / Philadelphia, PA / Washington, DC Amateur Radio Call Sign: N3GWG (Extra) / Marine Radio Operator Permit (MROP) email: teners(a)bh90210.net (also carbon copies to my Blackberry) phone: +(1) 310.358.0202 (Beverly Hills, CA, forwards to mobile phone) phone: +(1) 215.338.6005 (Philadelphia, PA, voice mail only) E-Fax: +(1) 928.437.4505 (Telecopier, fax to email gateway) Military emails (checked monthly until remote NMCI access is secured) NIPRNET: stuart.tener(a)navy.mil NIPRNET: stuart.b.tener(a)us.army.mil NRO: teners(a)nro.mil TS/SCI: tenerstu(a)nro.ic.gov (GWAN) Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information, though strictly at the UNCLASSIFIED level. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the originate message.

1 0

wrong iscsi-initiator-utils version in updates?
by Farkas Levente 21 Jun '09

21 Jun '09

hi, there is an iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.868-0.18.el5.src.rpm in 5.3 base and also in updates with exactly the same version number (and of course there are also i386 and x86_64 packages with the same version number). imho it's a bug our faulty copied files. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

2 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel