devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4676 discussions

CentOS Release Timeline (Graphical Display) - Round 2
by Alain Reguera Delgado 15 Oct '08

15 Oct '08

Hi Guys, Check the following links once again, please: http://wiki.centos.org/AlainRegueraDelgado?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=… http://wiki.centos.org/AlainRegueraDelgado?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=… The following modifications were done: 1. Tried to follow the listed wiki update/maintainance dates. 2. A comment about full updates and maintainance updates was added. 3. Add an extra rounded box to reflect CentOS major version. 4. Add full and maintainance update inside CentOS major verion. 5. Add dates for full updates and maintainance updates cycle. Cheers, al.

3 4

Testing PHP 5.2.6 and PostgreSQL 8.2.9
by admin 15 Oct '08

15 Oct '08

Not sure of the protocols for feedback on tested packages, but I installed the PHP 5.2.6 and PostgreSQL 8.2.9 RPMs from the testing repo and both seem to work fine so far with Drupal 7. What is the difference between packages in the top level of testing and those in testing/RPMs, apart from the obvious fact that the top level ones are newer? Organisationally, are there two levels of testing? I downloaded and installed directly with rpm rather than using yum. Do you prefer that testers always use yum? Will have a go at CDS using yum once I get a clean Xen image spun up, I'm still building my infrastructure and things aren't as automated as they could be yet. Mick

2 1

CentOS betas (was: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora]])
by Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 12 Oct '08

12 Oct '08

Well, there you have it. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com> To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora] Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:55:33 -0700 On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 04:06 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > There's no lead time for your own local development and testing. You > would never expect one of the old RH X.0 releases to be production-ready > but the new releases would have new kernels, libraries, and utilities so > you could incorporate their features in your own work, which was likely > to proceed at approximately the same rate as the distro evolved toward > stability. With Centos you don't get anything to work with and test > ahead of time, and if you'd tested on an earlier Fedora there may or may > not be any relationship. A side effect was that the community of RH > users that reported/fixed bugs in the X.0 got something for their effort > in being able to continue using the updated release instead of being > abandoned as a wildly new X.0 came out. CentOS should be putting out betas that match the RHEL betas so that you can get access to it before the release. Use Fedora as the technology driver, use Betas as the bugfix cleanup for platform issues, and eventually you get the "Enterprise" release. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

4 6

Bug 2934
by admin 11 Oct '08

11 Oct '08

I'm attempting to build a PHP 5.2.5 package for CentOS 5.2 (x86_64) using a Fedora SRPM. Satisified all dependencies and looked like it was going to build, but barfed at the end with a known apr/apxs issue - CentOS bug 2934. A workaround suggested in bug report didn't work, but produced a related but different error (I've updated the bug report). There is supposed to be a yum package in testing that fixes this issue. Where can I access the testing repo, or this package? Thanks Mick

4 5

CentOS Release Timeline (Graphical Display)
by Alain Reguera Delgado 09 Oct '08

09 Oct '08

Hi Guys, Following Dag's idea (May I Dag ?) of create a CentOS timeline graphical table ... here is a variation of it made last month. Maybe it could be used on http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-fe8a0be91ee3e7dea812e8694491e1dde5b… as ilustration. It is a svg file with markers that could be included into our Artwork Building Environment to have it on different languages. Actually the "You are here" pointer is modified manually. Some way to automate this would be cool (IMO). See: http://wiki.centos.org/AlainRegueraDelgado?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=… http://wiki.centos.org/AlainRegueraDelgado?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=… What do you think ? Cheers, al.

6 13

Re: xfs volume can not be mounted with uuid or label, only scsi device name /dev/sdb (solved)
by John Shen 08 Oct '08

08 Oct '08

james, thank you so much for your help. indeed, the problem is that /etc/blkid/blkid.tab still has the old ext3 entry. i changed TYPE to xfs and updated the uuid for /dev/sdb, and now it mounts fine with UUID. since i prefer UUID anyway, i did not test label, but assume it was the same issue. yes, we do use the entire device, which never had problems with other fs types, which mount seem to update blkid.tab automatically. still not sure why it did not do so for xfs, but as long as it works, i am happy. cn=John Shen,title=Sys. Admin.,ou=Operations,dc=StumbleUpon,dc=com ----- Original Message ----- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:39:25 +0100 From: James Pearson <james-p(a)moving-picture.com> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Re: xfs volume can not be mounted with uuid or label, only scsi device name /dev/sdb To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <48EC8DDD.3010102(a)moving-picture.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Brandon Davidson wrote: > Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > >> John Shen wrote: >> >>> That was how I got the LABEL and UUID: >>> >>> [root ~]# /usr/sbin/xfs_admin -lu /dev/sdb >>> label = "/mysql2" >>> UUID = 2560a02a-239b-4ac5-affe-cf71f8e87150 >> >> >> /dev/sdb is the whole bleeding disk. Did you add partitions to it? Then >> one would expect something like /dev/sdb1 instead. > > > Good catch, Hugo! > > The mount(8) man page says: > -L label > Mount the partition that has the specified label. > -U uuid > Mount the partition that has the specified uuid. These > two options require the file /proc/partitions (present since Linux > 2.1.116) to exist. > > This would indicate that filesystem label detection only works on > partitions, not raw devices. John - try actually creating a partition > table on this disk, and then put your filesystem on /dev/sdb1. I am > guessing that you will find that detection magically starts working > after you do that. Works fine for me: # xfs_admin -lu /dev/sdb label = "/test" UUID = 9aa81fbd-3f6d-4d3d-a40f-2a5483f8fe5c # mount LABEL=/test /mnt/tmp # df /mnt/tmp Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb 11584 64 11520 1% /mnt/tmp # mount | grep /mnt/tmp /dev/sdb on /mnt/tmp type xfs (rw) # umount /mnt/tmp # mount UUID=9aa81fbd-3f6d-4d3d-a40f-2a5483f8fe5c /mnt/tmp # df /mnt/tmp Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb 11584 64 11520 1% /mnt/tmp # mount | grep /mnt/tmp /dev/sdb on /mnt/tmp type xfs (rw) i.e. the above is an XFS file system on the whole of /dev/sdb - which I can mount fine via its LABEL or UUID ... However, it appears that this only works if there is an entry for this file system in /etc/blkid/blkid.tab (that mount creates/updates) If I umount the file system, and then remove the line for /dev/sdb in /etc/blkid/blkid.tab - I then can't mount by LABEL or UUID - unless I previously mount by device ... This appears to be the case for ext3 as well as xfs ... Using a partition, then all works as expected. James Pearson ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 7 *******************************************

2 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] Re: xfs volume can not be mounted with uuid or label, only scsi device name /dev/sdb
by John Shen 08 Oct '08

08 Oct '08

That was how I got the LABEL and UUID: [root ~]# /usr/sbin/xfs_admin -lu /dev/sdb label = "/mysql2" UUID = 2560a02a-239b-4ac5-affe-cf71f8e87150 cn=John Shen,title=Sys. Admin.,ou=Operations,dc=StumbleUpon,dc=com ----- Original Message ----- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:03:37 +0100 From: James Pearson <james-p(a)moving-picture.com> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Re: xfs volume can not be mounted with uuid or label, only scsi device name /dev/sdb John Shen wrote: > sorry for the confusion, i did use the uppercase in fstab. > > # neither of the following works > # UUID=2560a02a-239b-4ac5-affe-cf71f8e87150 /var/lib/mysql xfs noatime 0 0 > #LABEL=/mysql2 /var/lib/mysql xfs noatime 0 0 > # only this works > /dev/sdb /var/lib/mysql xfs noatime 0 0 What does xfs_admin report about the label and uuid? : /usr/sbin/xfs_admin -lu /dev/sdb James Pearson

4 4

HPC Channel in CentOS
by Tsai Li Ming 06 Oct '08

06 Oct '08

Hi Will CentOS be considering to roll out their own hpc channel, since Red Hat has announced it[1]? The SRPMS will be out soon. Since Platform OCS is 100% based on Project Kusu[2], I will be able to assist to help CentOS to have their own hpc channel. Due to the specialized nature of HPC, my team will be ready to help out in the CentOS forums or mailing lists. -Liming Team Lead Project Kusu [1]http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2008/Linux_HPC_Platform.html [2]http://www.hpccommunity.org/index.php?pageid=Kusu

3 4

Re: xfs volume can not be mounted with uuid or label, only scsi device name /dev/sdb
by John Shen 06 Oct '08

06 Oct '08

sorry for the confusion, i did use the uppercase in fstab. # neither of the following works # UUID=2560a02a-239b-4ac5-affe-cf71f8e87150 /var/lib/mysql xfs noatime 0 0 #LABEL=/mysql2 /var/lib/mysql xfs noatime 0 0 # only this works /dev/sdb /var/lib/mysql xfs noatime 0 0 cn=John Shen,title=Sys. Admin.,ou=Operations,dc=StumbleUpon,dc=com ----- Original Message ----- John Shen wrote: > kernel 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.centos.plus > kmod-xfs-0.4-1.2.6.18_92.1.10.el5.centos.plus > xfsdump-2.2.46-1.el5.centos > xfsprogs-2.9.4-1.el5.centos > > the kernel comes back with device not found when i tried label= and uuid=, after changing the fs from ext3 to xfs. with ext3 all 3 works fine, but with xfs only the device name is accepted. any advice is appreciated. I think you need to use uppercase for LABEL= and UUID= James Pearson

2 1

kmod-xfs for 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5
by Jon Ernster 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

Is there an ETA on an updated kmod-xfs for the latest kernel? Looks like the package is still for the .10.el5 kernel. Thanks! J.

4 5

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel