Hi!
Can I use the newest anaconda (e.g. 11.4.0.78-1) in my customized
CentOS5? Will it work fine with CentOS5's kernel rpms, paths of
configuration files, names of related rpms(redhat-logo, etc), etc? Will
there be any problems?
Thanks!
Ruomu
Hi all,
We have just added KVM-66 packages to the CentOS 5 testing repository.
This version of the Kernel Virtual Machine has numerous improvements
over KVM-36, which is currently in CentOS-Extras. One of the notable
new features is support for paravirtualized block and network devices
through the virtio architecture[1]. Currently, only Linux kernel
2.6.25 provides paravirtualized block and NIC drivers. A
paravirtualized NIC driver is available for Windows[2].
We'd like to hear from current KVM users whether this version has any
regressions for their applications compared to KVM-36. Of course, we
are interested in other bug reports as well!
Information on using the CentOS Testing repository can be found on the
CentOS Wiki at:
http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories
The KVM module package is named 'kmod-kvm', and has a dependency on
the userland KVM tool. So, the following command should do the trick,
and pull in all required dependencies:
yum --enablerepo=c5-testing install kmod-kvm
Thanks,
Daniel
[1] http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Virtio?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=…
[2] http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=180599&package_id=267…
Hi all,
qemu 0.9.1 packages are now provided through the CentOS 5 testing
repository. qemu is mainly provided for the qemu-img tool, but in the
future we may also add kqemu. We'd like to hear if qemu-img is working
ok for everybody. We can focus on testing qemu itself once kqemu is
packaged.
Information on using the CentOS Testing repository can be found on the
CentOS Wiki at:
http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories
The qemu package is named (surprise :)) 'qemu', and can be installed
after adding the testing repository:
yum --enablerepo=c5-testing install qemu
Thanks,
Daniel
Hi,
I often need to install CentOS5 on servers, I do this a lot, so I think
I need a respin dist (all updates included).
I wrote a script to generate my CentOS5-respin. My CentOS5 tree is at
/centos/5, it is rsynced with a Taiwan mirror daily. My generated
CentOS5 tree is placed at /centos/5-respin.
The generation of CentOS5-respin by my script runs fine, but the
generated CentOS5-respin tree has a problem: During network installation
using this CentOS5-respin tree, when it gets rpm installation, it always
complains "The file system-config-services-0.9.4-1.el5.noarch.rpm cannot
be opened.". In the text console, the error message is "Failed to get
http://myserver/centos/5-respin/os/x86_64/system-config-services-0.9.4-1.el…".
Anaconda should look for rpms in /centos/5-respin/os/x86_64/CentOS, but
it actually looks for rpms in /centos/5-respin/os/x86_64.
Any ideas?
It would be nice if anyone could point me to some useful docs.
Thanks!
Ruomu
P.S. Here's my script:
#!/bin/bash
#
# gen_respin_distro
#
# To use this script, the following rpms need to installed first:
# anaconda
# anaconda-help
# anaconda-runtime
# busybox-anaconda ?
# bogl
# booty
# netpbm
# netpbm-progs
# mkisofs
#TODO
# 1. Should we use pkgorder? If yes, when?
# 2. Do we need to run pkgorder before buildinstall?
# 3. Do we need to run createrepo? Buildinstall seems to calls it.
# 4. Why does it look for rpms in /centos/5-respin/os/x86_64?
# Check tools
rpmmerge=`dirname "$0"`/rpmmerge
if [ ! -x "$rpmmerge" ]; then
echo "$rpmmerge does not exist or is not executable." >&2
exit 1
fi
createrepo="/usr/bin/createrepo"
if [ ! -x "$createrepo" ]; then
echo "$createrepo does not exist or is not executable." >&2
exit 1
fi
buildinstall="/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/buildinstall"
if [ ! -x "$buildinstall" ]; then
echo "$buildinstall does not exist or is not executable." >&2
exit 1
fi
# Set variables and functions
src="/centos/5"
dest="/centos/5-respin"
distro="CentOS"
arch="x86_64"
version="5"
product="CentOS"
release="Respin"
prodpath="CentOS"
eval_retval()
{
test $? -ne 0 && exit 1
}
# Merge rpms
echo -e "*** Merge rpms ***\n"
$rpmmerge $src/os/$arch/$distro $src/updates/$arch/RPMS
$dest/os/$arch/$distro
eval_retval
# Create repo data
echo -e "\n*** Create repo data ***\n"
#cp -al $src/os/$arch/repodata/comps.xml $dest/os/$arch/$distro
#eval_retval
$createrepo -q -g $src/os/$arch/repodata/comps.xml -c $dest/os/$arch/cache \
-o $dest/os/$arch $dest/os/$arch/$distro
eval_retval
#rm -f $dest/os/$arch/$distro/comps.xml
#eval_retval
# Run buildinstall
export PYTHONPATH="/usr/lib/anaconda"
echo -e "\n*** Buildinstall ***\n"
sudo $buildinstall \
--pkgorder "$dest/os/$arch/pkgorder.txt" \
--version $version \
--product $product \
--release $release \
--prodpath $prodpath \
$dest/os/$arch
eval_retval
exit 0
hi,
we've to build a few kernel modules for rhel/centos which is not
included in the distro (or not working yet, like RTL8101E:
http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8101)
currently there are three ways for this:
- the obsoleted fedora way
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Obsolete/KernelModules
- dkms
- akmod. livna development start to use akmod for all new modules, but
there is not any kind of docs about it (or at least i can't find it).
i'd like to hear a few pros and cons about each of these and why should
we use the "good" one?:-)
what's centos teams plan for the future? and why livna switch from the
obsoleted fedora way to akmod instead of dkms?
thank you for your help in advance.
yours.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
Just wondering, is there a specific reason why CentOS RPMs released
don't always match the upstream RPM name?
E.g.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2008-April/014854.html
CentOS RPM name: virt-manager-0.4.0-3.el5.1.src.rpm
RedHat RPM name: virt-manager-0.4.0-3.el5_1.1.src.rpm
The binary RPMs for each arch differ in name similarly. Is this just a
bug, or a specific case where this is expected?
--
-Kevan Benson
-A-1 Networks
Linuxtag 2008 in Berlin is coming closer by the minute (May 28th to May
31st 2008) - and we are going to be there. And so can you - either as
a visitor or with us at the booth we have there! See
<http://www.linuxtag.org/> for more information about the event.
To coordinate this event, there is going to be a "Meeting" in the IRC
channel #centos-social on the freenode IRC network
(<http://freenode.net/using_the_network.shtml> for more information).
The meeting will take place on Sunday, March 4th 2008 at 22:00 CEST
(that's 20:00 UTC). Just connect to irc.freenode.net with an IRC client
and /join #centos-social then.
So if you want to be part of Linuxtag 2008: Be there on sunday! Or at
least drop us a mail. As this mail goes to centos-devel(a)centos.org *and*
centos(a)centos.org, please make sure that you only answer to both
lists when you are subscribed to both lists.
Best thing would be if you could subscribe to centos-promo(a)centos.org
and discuss matters there. See
<http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-promo> for subscribing
via the web.
Cheers, Danke, Thank you in advance, Grüße,
Ralph
Guys,
Could we move modern-CentOS wiki theme development into
projects.centos.org/trac ?. It is not directly related to CentOS
distribution but it would be very nice to learn manage it online with
others, inside CentOS realm.
Cheers,
al.
Hey all,
I just had pretty poor luck installing CentOS-5 on one of these:
http://koolu.com/Koolu-WE-Appliance/Works-Everywhere-Appliance.html
I'm trying to turn this into a home server/router and think CentOS
(with its long support cycles) is an ideal distribution for this
sort of application. The catch, of course, is that its a AMD Geode
(hence i586) based system, so the install doesn't get very far.
I saw there was a recent thread on this list about i586 support for
CentOS-5 and I was wondering if there is anyone currently working
on that. If there is I'd be interested in helping out.
Thanks,
Adam