devel

devel@lists.centos.org

17 participants
4590 discussions

CentOS 8 and codeready-developer repo
by Troy Dawson 27 Sep '19

27 Sep '19

Hi, Where is the CentOS 8 codeready-developer equivalent repo? I've looked through all the release notes I can find and don't see it anywhere. Nor does anything in "dnf repolist all" show anything. (cr stands for "continuous release" not "codeready") There are several developement things I cannot do on CentOS 8 without that repo. One of which is install the KDE desktop :) Troy Dawson

4 5

CBS and SIGs consuming CentOS 8 / Stream
by Sandro Bonazzola 26 Sep '19

26 Sep '19

Hi, how can SIGs start building their packages for the newly released CentOS 8 and CentOS Stream? CBS seems missing CentOS 8. Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours.*

9 10

ansible for CentOS 8
by Orion Poplawski 26 Sep '19

26 Sep '19

Are there any plans for ansible to be distributed in CentOS 8 in any way? Since RHEL8 provides it in the ansible-2.8-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms repo, it seems like it would be a candidate for extras or something similar. Work is just getting underway for ansible in EPEL - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744975 but I thought it might make sense to coordinate efforts. -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/

2 1

[ppc64le] Request to publish python-boto3 and python-s3transfer
by Michael Turek 26 Sep '19

26 Sep '19

Hello all, Recently our containers build job started failing to build gnocchi-* containers [0] due to missing python-boto3 [1]. After a discussion with avij, we found that this package also requires python-s3transfer [2]. Both of these are noarch packages can be found for x86_64 and aarch64 in the base repo [3][4]. Can these be published for ppc64le to restore our container builds? I've included a log showing a successful install using the packages from x86_64 on a ppc64le VM [5]. Thanks, Mike Turek <mjturek> [0] https://centos.logs.rdoproject.org/tripleo-upstream-containers-build-master… [1] https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=15271 [2] https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=15281 [3] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages/ [4] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/os/aarch64/Packages/ [5] https://paste.centos.org/view/45fdce6d

3 5

CentOS 8 srpms and debuginfos
by Dominique Martinet 25 Sep '19

25 Sep '19

Hi, (Welcome to supporting a new distro hell -- thanks for all the work getting CentOS 8 out and everything involved) As usual, I come myself needing some debuginfo packages pretty fast, and found that both debuginfo.centos.org and vault.centos.org (and thus their mirrors either) are yet to have any 8 directory (8.0.1905 or 8-stream) For the srpms, since I've already been told twice I've finally remembered I could get them on git.centos.org e.g. https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/commits/c8 For the debuginfos I can obviously just rebuild what sources I got locally and carry on. So this isn't a pressing question at all, but when are the two estimated to become more broadly available ? (Will the 'Stream' version work the same? git.centos.org does not have a c8-stream branch, for example, so it might just be a binary dump of some internal rhel git?) Cheers, -- Dominique

2 2

Meaning of separate kickstart/ and os/ folders in CentOS 8 repos?
by Anthony Alba 25 Sep '19

25 Sep '19

What is the significance of separate kickstart/ and os/ folders in the repos? (If you are using kickstart does that mean you should point to kickstart/ instead of os/ in the ks file?) I could not find a mention of it in the release notes. E.g. under centos/8.0.1905/BaseOS/x86_64/ my nearest mirror has kickstart/ os/ Cheers Anthony Alba

3 2

CentOS 8/7.7
by victor mason 23 Sep '19

23 Sep '19

What's the hold up on both of these? Are we back to the old days? https://linux.slashdot.org/story/09/07/30/130249/CentOS-Project-Administrat… The whole point of setting the update page at https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 was so people didn't constantly ask about release dates. Redirecting queries there is completely fair if someone updates the damn thing. It's now been a few weeks with complete radio silence. It's been 4 months since RHEL8 was released and we are coming over a month for 7.7 with a bunch of security updates piling up. Nobody from the outside who depends on this has any visibility into it and it's frustrating. Is this an IBM thing? What the hell is going on?

32 60

CentOS 7.7 sources
by Jacco Ligthart 19 Sep '19

19 Sep '19

Hi Guys, Thanks for the hard work. I noticed some minor issues with the 7.7 sources: 1. There are many SRPMs double in the os source tree. I guess that from every item from the 7.6 CR tree there is also still the old version present 2. There are some source packages *older* in 7.7 than previously in 7.6. I made this list with repodiff: Downgraded Packages: gnome-boxes: gnome-boxes-3.28.5-4.el7 -> gnome-boxes-3.28.5-2.el7 kmod-kvdo: kmod-kvdo-6.1.2.41-5.el7 -> kmod-kvdo-6.1.1.125-5.el7 libpsm2: libpsm2-11.2.78-1.el7 -> libpsm2-10.3.58-1.el7 nbdkit: nbdkit-1.8.0-1.el7 -> nbdkit-1.2.6-1.el7 nvml: nvml-1.5.1-2.1.el7 -> nvml-1.4-3.el7 opa-ff: opa-ff-10.9.0.0.204-1.el7 -> opa-ff-10.7.0.0.133-1.el7 opa-fm: opa-fm-10.9.0.0.204-1.el7 -> opa-fm-10.7.0.0.141-1.el7 oracleasm: oracleasm-2.0.8-26.el7 -> oracleasm-2.0.8-22.el7 shim: shim-15-2.el7.centos -> shim-15-1.el7.centos shim-signed: shim-signed-15-2.el7.centos -> shim-signed-15-1.el7.centos spice: spice-0.14.0-7.el7 -> spice-0.14.0-6.el7 spice-streaming-agent: spice-streaming-agent-0.2-4.el7 -> spice-streaming-agent-0.2-3.el7 tboot: tboot-1.9.9-1.el7 -> tboot-1.9.6-3.el7 vdo: vdo-6.1.2.41-4.el7 -> vdo-6.1.1.125-3.el7 Jacco

1 0

1:libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.ppc64le required kernel-core on POWER8
by Lance Albertson 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

I was working on upgrading some of our POWER8 ppc64le nodes and ran into the following issue with the libguestfs package that's currently in updates: $ yum upgrade libguestfs Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libguestfs = 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 for package: 1:libguestfs-tools-c-1.38.2-12.el7_6.2.ppc64le --> Processing Dependency: libguestfs = 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 for package: 1:perl-Sys-Guestfs-1.38.2-12.el7_6.2.ppc64le --> Processing Dependency: libguestfs = 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 for package: 1:libguestfs-tools-1.38.2-12.el7_6.2.noarch --> Processing Dependency: libguestfs = 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 for package: 1:python-libguestfs-1.38.2-12.el7_6.2.ppc64le ---> Package libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: kernel-core for package: 1:libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.ppc64le --> Running transaction check ---> Package libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: kernel-core for package: 1:libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.ppc64le ---> Package libguestfs-tools.noarch 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated ---> Package libguestfs-tools.noarch 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update ---> Package libguestfs-tools-c.ppc64le 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated ---> Package libguestfs-tools-c.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update ---> Package perl-Sys-Guestfs.ppc64le 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated ---> Package perl-Sys-Guestfs.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update ---> Package python-libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.38.2-12.el7_6.2 will be updated ---> Package python-libguestfs.ppc64le 1:1.40.2-5.el7_7.1 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.40.2-5.el7_7.1.ppc64le (updates) Requires: kernel-core You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest It seems as though this package was likely built using the power9 repos since kernel-core only shows up on the POWER9 nodes. Is anyone else seeing this problem? Thanks! -- Lance Albertson Director Oregon State University | Open Source Lab

2 2

llvm-toolset-7.0 availability
by Ken Roser 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

Redhat has had llvm-toolset-7.0 available since March 2019. It adds support for clang and llvm version 7. See https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019 ... rust-1-31/ <https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/03/29/red-hat-enterprise-linux-comp…> Is this going to be available on Centos 7 and if so, when? Don't confuse this with llvm-toolset-7 which supports the older clang version 5 which is already available with Centos 7.

5 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel