devel

devel@lists.centos.org

2 participants
4652 discussions

Fwd: Atomic ISO unavailable
by Eric Lehmann 17 Dec '18

17 Dec '18

Hello Please see below. CentOS mailing list was maybe not the right onw. Thank you. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Eric Lehmann <e.lehmann88(a)gmail.com> Date: Fr., 14. Dez. 2018 um 16:04 Uhr Subject: Atomic ISO unavailable To: CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> Hello The http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/atomic/images/CentOS-Atomic-Host-7-Install… provided in https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download is down. Does anybody know if there is a reason for that? Regards

2 2

CentOS Container Pipeline Service OpenShift upgrade to v3.10
by Bamacharan Kundu 14 Dec '18

14 Dec '18

Hi, We are going to upgrade OpenShift cluster for CentOS Container Pipeline service from OpenShift v3.9 to v3.10. For this we will be having downtime for container builds, there will be no downtime for registry.centos.org. Service: registry.centos.org Impact: There will be no downtime for the service and users will able to pull images normally. Service: CentOS Container Pipeline Service Impact: Service will be down, no builds will run Time: 14 Dec 2018, 0430 UTC to 0830 UTC Regards Bamacharan Kundu

1 1

[Meeting] RDO meeting (2018-12-12) minutes
by Haïkel 12 Dec '18

12 Dec '18

============================== #rdo: RDO meeting - 2018-12-12 ============================== Meeting started by number80 at 15:02:11 UTC. The full logs are available at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2018_12_12/2018/rdo_m… . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (number80, 15:02:43) * haproxy 1.8 packaging (number80, 15:04:55) * LINK: https://github.com/mwhahaha/kolla/tree/fedora (mwhahaha, 15:18:19) * AGREED: revisit haproxy 1.8 situation next week (number80, 15:26:48) * What to do with upcoming meetings (number80, 15:28:02) * AGREED: Cancelling december, 26 and January, 2 RDO meeting (number80, 15:29:57) * AGREED: Cancelling december, 26 and January, 2 RDO meetings (number80, 15:30:05) * ACTION: number80 Notify the list about meetings cancelled (number80, 15:32:11) * FOSDEM and DevConf.CZ booths and swag (number80, 15:32:17) * we need volunteers for openstack and RDO booths at FOSDEM/devconf.cz (number80, 15:34:23) * submit ideas for RDO goodies to leanderthal (number80, 15:34:32) * next meeting chair (number80, 15:35:14) * ACTION: number80 to chair next week (number80, 15:36:52) * open floor (number80, 15:36:59) Meeting ended at 16:00:16 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * number80 * number80 Notify the list about meetings cancelled * number80 to chair next week People present (lines said) --------------------------- * number80 (62) * amoralej (56) * mwhahaha (29) * ykarel (23) * dciabrin (17) * rdogerrit (8) * Vorrtex (8) * openstack (7) * Duck (6) * bandini (5) * quiquell (4) * jpena (2) * moguimar (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

1 0

CentOS Atomic Host 7.1811 Available for Download
by Jason Brooks 07 Dec '18

07 Dec '18

The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of CentOS Atomic Host (7.1811), an operating system designed to run Linux containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host. CentOS Atomic Host includes these core component versions: * atomic-1.22.1-26.gitb507039.el7.centos.x86_64 * cloud-init-18.2-1.el7.centos.1.x86_64 * podman-0.11.1.1-3.git594495d.el7.centos.x86_64 * docker-1.13.1-84.git07f3374.el7.centos.x86_64 * etcd-3.2.22-1.el7.x86_64 * flannel-0.7.1-4.el7.x86_64 * kernel-3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 * ostree-2018.5-1.el7.x86_64 * rpm-ostree-client-2018.5-2.atomic.el7.x86_64 ## Download CentOS Atomic Host CentOS Atomic Host is available as a VirtualBox or libvirt-formatted Vagrant box, or as an installable ISO, qcow2 or Amazon Machine image. For links to media, see the CentOS wiki (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) ## Upgrading If you're running a previous version of CentOS Atomic Host, you can upgrade to the current image by running the following command: # atomic host upgrade ## Release Cycle The CentOS Atomic Host image follows the upstream Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host cadence. After sources are released, they're rebuilt and included in new images. After the images are tested by the SIG and deemed ready, we announce them. ## Getting Involved CentOS Atomic Host is produced by the CentOS Atomic SIG (http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic) based on upstream work from Project Atomic (http://www.projectatomic.io/) If you'd like to work on testing images, help with packaging, documentation -- join us! You'll often find us in #atomic and/or #centos-devel if you have questions. You can also join the atomic-devel (https://lists.projectatomic.io/mailman/listinfo/atomic-devel) mailing list if you'd like to discuss the direction of Project Atomic, its components, or have other questions. ## Getting Help If you run into any problems with the images or components, feel free to ask on the centos-devel (http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel) mailing list. Have questions about using Atomic? See the atomic (https://lists.projectatomic.io/mailman/listinfo/atomic) mailing list or find us in the #atomic channel on Freenode.

1 0

Building Origin for s390x
by Neale Ferguson 07 Dec '18

07 Dec '18

I have been building Origin for use on s390x (aka Z Systems aka Mainframe) for a couple of years now. Currently, I have a script that will pull the appropriate release from github and build the various components: origin, registry, web-console, service-broker, and aggregate-logging. There are a handful of mods due to where the resulting images will be pushed and some logging package locations. I would like to replicate the build infrastructure used for the official releases rather than maintain some bash to get things going. I have access to a relatively well resourced Linux on Z virtual machine with external network capability. If this is feasible, I would like to identify what’s required. Neale

2 2

[SCLo SIG] new sclo-php72-* packages available for testing
by Remi Collet 07 Dec '18

07 Dec '18

RHSCL 3.2 was released a few weeks ago with a new PHP 7.2 Software collection https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_software_collections/… The rh-php72 packages are already available in centos-sclo-rh repostitory. The additional extensions are available in centos-sclo-sclo-testing, and will be shortly pushed in centos-sclo-sclo stable repository sclo-php72-php-ast-1.0.0-1.el7 sclo-php72-php-imap-7.2.10-1.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-amqp-1.9.3-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-apcu-bc-1.0.3-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-apfd-1.0.1-4.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-geoip-1.1.1-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-http-3.1.0-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-igbinary-2.0.8-1.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-imagick-3.4.3-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-lzf-1.6.5-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-memcached-3.0.4-2.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-mongodb-1.5.3-1.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-msgpack-2.0.2-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-propro-2.0.1-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-raphf-2.0.0-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-redis4-4.2.0-1.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-selinux-0.4.1-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-solr2-2.4.0-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-ssh2-1.1.2-2.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-uploadprogress-1.0.3.1-4.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-uuid-1.0.4-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-xattr-1.3.0-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-pecl-xdebug-2.6.1-2.el7 sclo-php72-php-phpiredis-1.0.0-2.el7 sclo-php72-php-smbclient-0.9.0-3.el7 sclo-php72-php-sodium-7.2.12-1.el7 sclo-php72-php-tidy-7.2.10-1.el7 Remi. P.S. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo

1 0

[ws_tunnel] mod_proxy_wstunnel on Centos 6
by Akshar Kanak 07 Dec '18

07 Dec '18

Dear team I have httpd 2.2.15 on Centos 6 . I need to install mod_proxy_wstunnel . mod_proxy_wstunnel has been provided in apache 2.4.5 . Is there any official document to back port the mod_proxy_wstunnel to httpd 2.2.15 Centos code . Thanks and regards Akshar

3 2

CentOS 7.6.1810 UEFI/Shim issue .. feedback wanted !
by Fabian Arrotin 06 Dec '18

06 Dec '18

We got some reports from people unable to reboot their nodes after updating to 7.6.1810, and basically to newer shim (v15). It seems to affect only nodes in UEFI mode, but without SecureBoot. We wrote that in the ReleaseNotes, including a link to the bug report : https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15522 We have now a workaround in that bug report, and also a new interim build (not signed by Microsoft yet) but we need feedback , as the only node on which I could test this myself is my old 2008 iMac computer .. :-( Once we'll have enough positive (but also negative) feedback about this new build, we'll be able to send to Microsoft for signing and so consider that bug closed. Worth also noticing that if we can have that ready in the updates, we'll be able to spin a monthly iso that will then work on such uefi nodes too. Kind Regards, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

1 0

building nfs-ganesha for ceph
by Ken Dreyer 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

Hi Niels and Kaleb, I'm wondering how we could best build nfs-ganesha's ceph FSALs in CBS. Right now, since we'll likely support multiple versions of nfs-ganesha simultaneously for different versions of Ceph, I'm leaning towards using a custom "dist tag" like thing in the Release field so we don't collide with what Kaleb's doing at http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=98 Eventually it would be nice to have a unified nfs-ganesha build shared between Ceph and Gluster. If we built it in storage7-common-candidate, we would have to tag gluster and ceph into that, which sounds kinda messy, because you only get to choose one version of each. It'd be more manageable to have a separate set of tags and targets just for nfs-ganesha versions. Like: storage7-nfs-ganesha-26-el7 storage7-nfs-ganesha-27-el7 ... etc But that still leaves the problem of shipping a nfs-ganesha-gluster sub-package that will not have its runtime deps fulfilled in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ceph-nautilus/ . Vice versa, we'd have a nfs-ganesha-ceph sub-package that lacks runtime deps in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-5/ What do you think? Just have separate nfs-ganesha builds for now? - Ken

3 5

building nfs-ganesha against older Ceph versions
by Ken Dreyer 05 Dec '18

05 Dec '18

Hi Matt, We're discussing building + distributing nfs-ganesha in centos-devel, https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-December/017121.html Does it make sense to build nfs-ganesha V2.7 against Luminous's librgw and libcephfs, and then also allow users to install that build along with Nautilus' newer librgw and libcephfs? It sounds like this is what Gluster's doing with their ABI guarantees for libgfapi.so. The idea is that we'd always build against the "oldest supported" version of Ceph, but distribute it so that Luminous and Nautilus users would install the same libfsalrgw.so and libfsalceph.so binaries. - Ken

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel