devel

devel@lists.centos.org

10 participants
4617 discussions

Dockerfiles for CentOS containers with GlusterFS.
by Javier Romero 16 Feb '18

16 Feb '18

Dear all, I've built GlusterFS 3.12 image from Dockerfile and changed Gluster version and vendor, a pull request has been sent on Github. # docker images REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE dockerfile-gluster-3.12 latest 4647c9d71843 53 minutes ago 371.2 MB docker.io/centos 7 ff426288ea90 5 weeks ago 207.2 MB # docker ps -a CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES 9afa8c0ab468 dockerfile-gluster-3.12 "/usr/sbin/init" 38 minutes ago Up 38 minutes small_shannon # docker exec -it 9afa8c0ab468 bash # glusterd -V glusterfs 3.12.5 There was just a Dockerfile on the gluster-3.10 branch for building GlusterFS 3.10. Have updated that Dockerfile and sent a pull request on Github. # docker images REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE dockerfile-gluster-3.10 latest fbedfea074f6 36 minutes ago 435.5 MB docker.io/centos 7 ff426288ea90 5 weeks ago 207.2 MB # docker ps -a CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES 0269de7f42bd dockerfile-gluster-3.10 "/usr/sbin/init" 7 seconds ago Up 6 seconds high_jang # docker exec -it 0269de7f42bd sh sh-4.2# glusterd -V glusterfs 3.10.10 Have created a new Dockerfile for image creation to run containers on CentOS 7 with GlusterFS 3.13 already installed. Also sent a pull request on Github to merge a new branch named gluster-3.13 with this new Dockerfile included. Tested on Centos 7 release 7.4.1708 (Core) with kernel 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 and works ok: # docker images REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE dockerfile-gluster-3.13 latest 07931ac54c87 About an hour ago 371.9 MB docker.io/centos 7 ff426288ea90 5 weeks ago 207.2 MB # docker ps -a CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES 4e164d71256f dockerfile-gluster-3.13 "/usr/sbin/init" About an hour ago Up About an hour backstabbing_babbage # docker exec -it 4e164d71256f sh sh-4.2# glusterd -V glusterfs 3.13.2 Regards, Javier Romero

1 0

[Storage SIG] Building storage7-ceph-luminous-release for ppc64le
by Mark Hamzy 16 Feb '18

16 Feb '18

Hey y'all, So what scripts/process builds the group of rpms for the tag storage7-ceph-luminous-release? I would like to build them for ppc64le So the packages in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ceph-luminous/ Would end up http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/ceph-luminous/ Is this something I could help with? -- Mark You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Mahatma Gandhi Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present. -- Marcus Aurelius

1 0

Call for papers: CentOS Dojo, Singapore, March 25th
by Rich Bowen 16 Feb '18

16 Feb '18

We will be holding a dojo in Singapore, on March 25th, in conjunction with the FOSSAsia event. If you will be there, and have a proposal for a talk during that event, please let us know. https://goo.gl/forms/P2rFro03FUt2Tp3C3 More details on the event are available here: https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Singapore2018 Thanks. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @RDOcommunity // @CentOSProject // @rbowen

1 0

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2018-02-14)
by Troy Dawson 14 Feb '18

14 Feb '18

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays (date -d "1700 UTC") Date: Today Wedensday, 14 February 2018 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms -- Automated rpm building and Automated testing -- Multi-arch -- Documentation -- Images and Image building - Open Floor Minutes from last meeting: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2018/January/centos-devel.2018-01-24-17.03.h…

1 0

Cleaning-up Extras for inconsistencies (aka golang in aarch64)
by Fabian Arrotin 12 Feb '18

12 Feb '18

Last week I tried to build a pkg for infra, that has all the arches enabled (so x86_64, ppc64, ppc64le and aarch64) That package has "BuildRequires: golang >= 1.8" , which is in the base distro but the --scratch build failed starting with aarch64 and complaining with "DEBUG util.py:417: Error: No Package found for golang >= 1.8 " So, while there is a golang 1.8.3 package in [base], there is still an old version in [extras] : golang.aarch64 1.6.3-2.el7 extras And because koji will not pick automatically the higher ENVR, but rather a pkg based on the repository it's coming from (with different priorities), it doesn't want to use the one from [base], but rather the one from [extras] (so that it impacts everybody actually building in koji) So the proposal is : can someone have a look at cleaning-up older releases from extras when it was replaced by a newer version that landed in [base] ? Yum will always use the highest ENVR, but koji will not, breaking some builds on https://cbs.centos.org right now -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

1 0

Sharing Software Collections over NFS?
by Honza Horak 09 Feb '18

09 Feb '18

It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is *the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by NFS sharing *[1]. The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your favorite application stack (say Python 3.6 + NodeJS 8) and mount the /opt/rh on workstations. That way you have the same environment on all machines. Now, I'd like to request some feedback -- is there anybody on the list (or outside, but you at least know about it) who uses this feature for the Software Collections packages? Please, let us know! If you can't share it publicly, just drop me a direct mail. Of course, more feedback is welcome, but even simple YES would be also cool. [1] https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/06/29/maintain-software-collections… Thanks! Honza

3 2

Re: [CentOS-devel] [scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS?
by Honza Horak 09 Feb '18

09 Feb '18

On 02/09/2018 04:23 PM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote: > Hi Honza, > > On 09.02.2018 16:03, Honza Horak wrote: > >> It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that >> we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, >> which is *the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by >> NFS sharing *[1]. >> >> The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your >> favorite application stack (say Python 3.6 + NodeJS 8) and mount the >> /opt/rh on workstations. That way you have the same environment on all >> machines. > > Sounds nice, but how about config files that are installed in /etc/opt ? That's tricky, yes, and it's also a reason why we don't do it for stuff like databases (data files are even more tricky). This feature is used only for dynamic languages like python, ruby, nodejs, ... Honza > Cheers, > Marek > >> >> Now, I'd like to request some feedback -- is there anybody on the list >> (or outside, but you at least know about it) who uses this feature for >> the Software Collections packages? >> >> Please, let us know! If you can't share it publicly, just drop me a >> direct mail. Of course, more feedback is welcome, but even simple YES >> would be also cool. >> >> [1] >> https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/06/29/maintain-software-collections… >> >> >> Thanks! >> Honza >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SCLorg mailing list >> SCLorg(a)redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg >

3 2

sclo-php-pecl-xdebug 2.6.0 and php-pecl-mongodb 1.4.0 packages available for testing
by Remi Collet 09 Feb '18

09 Feb '18

Updated packages available in centos-sclo-sclo-testing For rh-php56 * sclo-php56-php-pecl-mongodb-1.4.0-1.el6 For rh-php70 * sclo-php70-php-pecl-mongodb-1.4.0-1.el6 * sclo-php70-php-pecl-xdebug-2.6.0-1.el6 For rh-php71 * sclo-php70-php-pecl-mongodb-1.4.0-1.el7 * sclo-php70-php-pecl-xdebug-2.6.0-1.el7 mongodb 1.4.0 with bug fixes and new features See upstream changelog https://pecl.php.net/package-changelog.php?package=mongodb WARNING: The mongodb extension add support for MongoDB 3.6 but drop support for MongoDB 2.4 XDebug 2.6.0 with bug fixes and new features See upstream changelog https://pecl.php.net/package-changelog.php?package=xdebug And author blog post https://derickrethans.nl/xdebug-26.html Feedback welcome. Remi. P.S. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Adjust type of rw in submit_bio from int to unsigned long
by wuzhouhui 09 Feb '18

09 Feb '18

Forward mail to centos-devel mailing list for getting more attentions! Sorry for disturbing. > -----Original Messages----- > From: wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui14(a)mails.ucas.ac.cn> > Sent Time: 2018-02-07 13:44:07 (Wednesday) > To: centos(a)centos.org > Cc: wuzhouhui14 <wuzhouhui14(a)mails.ucas.ac.cn> > Subject: Adjust type of rw in submit_bio from int to unsigned long > > Hi, I am a developer who worked on CentOS. Recently I am working on porting one of my > block drivers from CentOS 6.x to CentOS 7.x. In newest kernel (kernel-3.10.0-693.17.1.el7) > I found there is an issue in submit_bio()'s first argument: > void submit_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio) > The type of bi_rw of struct bio is unsigned long, and the number of enum rq_flags_bits > also exceeds 32, so we should better using unsigned long for rw in submit_bio(), like: > void submit_bio(unsigned long rw, struct bio *bio) > >

1 0

intro of me
by Daan Hoogland 07 Feb '18

07 Feb '18

H, I am Daan Hoogland. A fellow Apache Cloudstack PMC meber of Rohit, who you already met. I hope to get the cloudstack dirstibution into centos as a default rpm. Itried to subscribe to the cloud-sig at centos.org but couldn't find it yet. less intentional me: I develop java, python and hobby with remacs (rust/elisp) regards, -- Daan

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel