devel

devel@lists.centos.org

10 participants
4617 discussions

CentOS 7.3 docker image for ppc64le available at Unicamp - Call for testers
by Murilo Opsfelder Araújo 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

Hi, CentOS community. We would like to welcome and invite all of you to test and provide us feedback as to the CentOS 7.3 docker image for ppc64le available at ftp://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/centos/7/images/ This tarball can be easily imported into docker with the information shown in the README file. The tarball was created with the following script https://github.com/fabianorosas/centos-docker-ppc64le/blob/master/centos-do… Consider this an early evaluation. We intend to get the required fixes integrated into CentOS so this image can be fully integrated with CentOS Registry. We would be glad to hear from you! Thanks! -- Murilo

3 4

test builds on private server (drivers, kernel, media, mesa, winehq, java)
by Andreas Benzler 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

Hello Guys, this is a duplicate from the standard centos(a)centos.org mailing list. MIght be interest for a developer. Thanks ... from christmas till now I updated follow packages in my privated builds: http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/ Drivers: libdrm 2.4.75 (update) vulkan 1.0.3 Kernel: 4.9.1 & firmware (update) Media: Kodi 17.0 + pvr addons & vlc 2.2.4 (update) Mesa: 13.0.4 with d3dadapter and vulkan (update) WineHQ: wine 2.0.1 & wine-stage 2.0.1 (update), winetricks http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/java/ Oracle Java 1.8.0 121 Netbeans 8.2.1 Sincerely Andy PS: This are no signed packages, but the source

3 3

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 144, Issue 5
by Andreas Benzler 06 Feb '17

06 Feb '17

Good evening, A few words to my repository. First I have gstreamer in as far as multimedia enabled so totem most, or all mine, Fromat plays off. Driver section was necessary because I installed Centos on flexible media and wanted to access the latest drivers. And yes it works to 99%. At Home, on my laptops and business pc. I have created the Repostorie to have a backup. Why should I not make my work available? Why should not others benefit from it and when they need it? Why not fedora? Have no desire to reinvent my desktop every 18 months. In the past, I had the opportunity to get evolution in the version 3.4 under Centos 6 with gnome 2.34 to run, because I am professionally connected to an exchange. And also this has worked with the keyring of gnome 2.3. Funny, isn't it? Who likes to sit alone at home and strive for a "his" stablies, usable system. I do not like the copyright of Ubuntu. Sometimes I get on better with RPMS. What would I like to do better with it? A matrix over the repository is built on. You can only use Drivers and the rest not. Wine, however, needs almost everyone. And who adds the repository "Other" just like "gnome mutter" with patched shadows. Therefore, a matrix would be cool. Good night. Andy Am Montag, den 06.02.2017, 12:00 +0000 schrieb centos-devel-request(a)centos.org: > Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to > centos-devel(a)centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-devel-request(a)centos.orgYou can reach the person managing the list at > centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: test builds on private server (drivers, kernel, media, > mesa, winehq, java) (Akemi Yagi) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 11:20:21 -0800 > From: Akemi Yagi <amyagi(a)gmail.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] test builds on private server (drivers, > kernel, media, mesa, winehq, java) > Message-ID: > <CABA31DqUi9qXywUU+j=FKg8wr2FgN5msmGxX10AAz-1_T5vxvQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Andreas Benzler <andreas(a)benzlerweb.de> wrote: > > Hello Guys, > > > > this is a duplicate from the standard centos(a)centos.org mailing list. > > > > MIght be interest for a developer. Thanks ... > > > > from christmas till now I updated follow packages in my privated builds: > > > > http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/ > > > > Drivers: libdrm 2.4.75 (update) > > vulkan 1.0.3 > > > > Kernel: 4.9.1 & firmware (update) > > > > Media: Kodi 17.0 + pvr addons & vlc 2.2.4 (update) > > > > Mesa: 13.0.4 with d3dadapter and vulkan (update) > > > > WineHQ: wine 2.0.1 & wine-stage 2.0.1 (update), winetricks > > > > http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/java/ > > > > Oracle Java 1.8.0 121 > > Netbeans 8.2.1 > > > > Sincerely > > > > Andy > > > > PS: This are no signed packages, but the source > > I assume you are offering those packages for public consumption, not > building just for personal use. If this is the case, I'd like to > suggest that you use a unique tag for your packages rather than the > .centos tag. In the past i was think about to take another tag for the packages and to sign that. But unfortunately my leisure time is limited and therefore I have not implemented it so far. Pick my rpm up. change it and let him run through mock. Everyone by hand. > Regarding the kernel, I see that it was rebuilt from ELRepo's > kernel-lt with modification(s). You may want to provide details on how > your kernel is different from kernel-lt [1] or kernel-ml [2] and how > you plan to maintain it. Everybody can use elrepo. I built it most time vanille, but got it handy in the "box". > [1] http:elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt > [2] http:elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml > > Akemi > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > ------------------------------ > > End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 144, Issue 5 > ********************************************

1 0

[Virt SIG] escalating 0012768: [ppc64le] build libvirt-daemon-kvm for 2.0.0-10.el7_3.4 for ppc64le to satisfy oVirt deps
by Sandro Bonazzola 05 Feb '17

05 Feb '17

hi, I'd like to escalate https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12768 for oVirt / Virt SIG. Right now x86_64 and ppc64le are shipping different versions of libvirt causing failures in ppc64le deployments / upgrades. Any chance I can help getting the new libvirt pushed to ppc64le repos? Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

3 2

[SCLo SIG] new sclo-php* packages available for testing
by Remi Collet 03 Feb '17

03 Feb '17

Yet another package available in centos-sclo-sclo-testing "Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library." A stable version was just released with PHP 5 and 7 compatibility. For rh-php56 (updated from 3.3.0): * sclo-php56-php-pecl-imagick-3.4.3-1 For rh-php70 (new package): * sclo-php70-php-pecl-imagick-3.4.3-1 Notice: this extension uses system ImageMagick 6.7.8.9 (EL-7) or 6.7.2.7 (EL-6), so only feature available in these library versions will be available in the PHP extension. Remi. P.S. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo

1 0

New ansible in Paas testing repo
by Troy Dawson 02 Feb '17

02 Feb '17

Hi, As many of you might have found out, ansible 2.2.1.0, which fixes a security update, broke openshift-ansible. We have built a new ansible that has been patched to not break openshift-ansible. It is in the Paas testing repo. Please give it a try, see if it fixed your openshift-ansible troubles that happened with the ansible update. ansible-2.2.1.0-2.el7 Thanks Troy

2 2

Ceph status update in the storage SIG
by David Moreau Simard 01 Feb '17

01 Feb '17

Hi centos-devel, François Cami posted in December, seeking help to maintain the Ceph packages within the Storage SIG intiative [1]. With this, we've got reinforcements -- the new members of the storage SIG for Ceph packaging are: - David Moreau Simard - Giulio Fidente - Thomas Oulevey We've already begun kicking the tires and tagged Ceph Jewel 10.2.3 for release (which had been in testing since September). Ceph Jewel 10.2.5 has been built and will likely be tagged to -testing after some initial testing. We're also in the process of updating Ceph Hammer from 0.94.6 to 0.94.9, although note that we're beyond the scheduled EOL territory for Hammer [2]. It does not seem Hammer is officially EOL yet, I'll reach out to upstream for details. After Jewel and Hammer are both up to date and released, we will consider if we have the necessary resources to handle Kraken or if we'd prefer holding out for the next LTS release. Also, one more thing to note is that we are moving away from maintaining our own dist-git repositories in favor of rebuilding straight from upstream source RPMs and have updated the github repository accordingly [3]. Please let us know if you have any questions ! David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] [1]: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-December/015479.html [2]: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/ [3]: https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/ceph/commit/2bc50feffe2683e90ac59d839…

2 3

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2017-02-01)
by Troy Dawson 01 Feb '17

01 Feb '17

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays Date: Today Wedensday, 01 February 2017 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current StatusI -- rpms -- Documentation -- Automated testing -- images / image building -- Multi-arch - Discussion on having seperate repo for each release -- example: paas7-openshift-origin-1.4, paas7-openshift-origin-1.5 - Open Floor

1 1

[POSTPONED] 2017-01-31 cbs.centos.org infrastructure upgrade.
by Thomas Oulevey 27 Jan '17

27 Jan '17

Dear All, Please note that next Tuesday cbs.centos.org intervention will be postponed due to some issue with the upgrade process I didn't catch earlier with alternative arch builders. We will announce a new time slot as soon as possible. -- Thomas on behalf of the infrastructure team.

1 0

weird (non-functional) downgrade
by lejeczek 27 Jan '17

27 Jan '17

dear devel is this true that every rpm downgrade goes kind of a ... "haywire" ? I've tried a few and... ~]$ yum downgrade ctdb --> Running transaction check ---> Package ctdb.x86_64 0:4.4.4-9.el7 will be a downgrade --> Processing Dependency: samba-client-libs = 4.4.4-9.el7 for package: ctdb-4.4.4-9.el7.x86_64 ---> Package ctdb.x86_64 0:4.4.4-12.el7_3 will be erased --> Running transaction check ---> Package samba-client-libs.i686 0:4.4.4-9.el7 will be installed <= ????? ~]$ yum downgrade bind Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package bind.x86_64 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3 will be a downgrade --> Processing Dependency: bind-libs = 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3 for package: 32:bind-9.9.4-38.el7_3.x86_64 ---> Package bind.x86_64 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.1 will be erased --> Running transaction check ---> Package bind.x86_64 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3.1 will be erased ---> Package bind-libs.i686 32:9.9.4-38.el7_3 will be installed <= ???? etc. and system has no signle 686 rpm. Some kind of a curse my boxes suffer from? :) b.w. L.

3 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel