devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4640 discussions

issues with openshift-ansible and atomic-installer
by Karanbir Singh 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

hi guys am running into https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/issues/2719 using the released installer, when trying to deploy. should we try and backport the fix or just workaround for the next release ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

Checking signed repo metadata by default?
by Laurentiu Pancescu 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

Hi there, I stumbled upon an older post by Johnny Hughes about gpg-checking the repository metadata. [1] In the mean time, we seem to have signed metadata not only for "updates", but also for "base", "extras" and "centosplus" (just the "base" signature for CentOS Linux 6 is missing). What are the reasons for not enabling the repo gpg check in our default installation? Would it be a bad idea to do that in our Vagrant images? Best regards, Laurențiu [1] https://seven.centos.org/2015/05/signed-repository-metadata-is-now-availabl…

3 6

[opstools] overwriting package provided config files
by Matthias Runge 11 Jan '17

11 Jan '17

Hello, for opstools-ansible[1], which installs a monitoring server, we had the brief discussion of overwriting/replacing package provided config files vs. adding changes to a .d directory for the application. Specifically, this was the request for collectd. Additional plugins and are loaded and configured by placing a respective config snippet to /etc/collectd.d/...conf. The question is: is it a valid expectiation, that operators wouldn't want the package provided config file /etc/collectd.conf modified? Do you care at all? Best, Matthias [1] https://github.com/centos-opstools/opstools-ansible -- Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de>

2 1

[OPSTOOLS] First round of patches for oVirt
by Yedidyah Bar David 11 Jan '17

11 Jan '17

Hi all, Now pushed to gerrit a series of patches to allow using opstools-ansible for configuring collectd and fluentd on oVirt hosts. The first patch [1] adds documentation so you can read it first, even if eventually it might be merged later (or not at all :-( ). Some of the patches are probably useful even without the context of oVirt, and I pushed them separately so that they can be more easily reviewed. I don't mind squashing some/most/all if you find this easier to review. Best, [1] https://review.rdoproject.org/r/4274 [2] https://review.rdoproject.org/r/4275 -- Didi

1 0

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2017-01-11)
by Troy Dawson 11 Jan '17

11 Jan '17

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays Date: Today Wedensday, 11 January 2017 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms -- Documentation -- Automated testing -- images / image building -- Multi-arch - Open Floor

1 1

Update on status of CentOS Community Container Pipeline
by Bamacharan Kundu 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Hi All, Here is update for the work done recently in CentOS Community Container Pipeline. * Added scanner to check pip, npm, rubygems * Fixed weekly scan to support integer in tags * Updated ci script check dependency cycles. * New images got in pipeline: datamodel containers, mattermost integration with trello, gitlab * Fixed build worker to handle job with large logs In the coming days, we will be focusing on: * Add more checks to scanner check pip, npm, rubygems updates * Scaling up openshift nodes for parallel building * Writing logs for workers and builder and make them available for public access. * Get jenkins container images available from r.c.o * Fixing CI for pipeline to result with proper status of build Regards Bamacharan Kundu

3 3

Should we skip the next Vagrant release (v1612)?
by Laurentiu Pancescu 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Hello, we usually perform monthly releases for our Vagrant images, containing updated packages and some enhancements or bug fixes to the images themselves. Since we now have a C7 builder, I tried again to disable kdump in our images, but CBS still didn't play along. [1] As for updated packages, the only update missing from our last Vagrant images (v1611.01) is vim-minimal, whose size is just 436kB. From my perspective, that doesn't justify the work involved in releasing another Vagrant image, neither for us nor for our users. I would suggest staying with 1611 as the current release, at least until we have some significant changes. Best regards, Laurențiu [1] https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12169

2 2

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2017-01-04) (notes)
by Troy Dawson 04 Jan '17

04 Jan '17

Hello, I totally forgot to send out the PaaS SIG meeting agenda. So, I'm sending out the meeting notes instead. Very light turnout, probably because of the holidays and the email not going out. Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms --- origin 1.3.3 ---- will hopefully be released by the end of the week. ---- As soon as it's released, we'll build, test, and release it --- origin 1.4.0 rc2 or final release ---- soaking waiting for new bugs, no release estimate --- 1.5.0 alpha2 (rebase with kubernetes 1.5) ---- Still in a semi-freeze while the rebase goes along -- Multi-arch --- Upstream pull request - https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/12333 ---- A 1.5 rpm with that patch was created and tested on centos/cbs ---- aarch64 - success - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151289 ---- ppc64le - failure - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=151380 ----- The failure was not because of the patch, but golang. It might work better with golang 1.7 instead of golang 1.6. -- Documentation -- Automated testing -- images / image building - Open Floor

1 0

CentOS 7.3 aarch64 status
by Sandro Bonazzola 04 Jan '17

04 Jan '17

Hi, is there any update regarding 7.3 release for aarch64? Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

3 2

Virt SIG altarch publisher pirpeline
by Sandro Bonazzola 04 Jan '17

04 Jan '17

Hi, I've opened https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11457 3 months ago and didn't progress very much, trying to escalate. Current status is: - cbs.centos.org build packages for ppc64le and aarch64 - buildlogs.centos.org received aarch64 testing packages but not the ppc64le ones - mirror.centos.org is not receiving neither aarch64 nor ppc64le Any chance that we can get this working for Thursday publishing? Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel