devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4592 discussions

GSoC projects and SIG meetings
by Karanbir Singh 01 May '15

01 May '15

hi, All the GSoC stuff going through should map to a SIG ( or in some cases multiple ones ) - it would be great to see the GSoC students come along and interface with the SIG's, and maybe do updates on progress at the SIG Meetings. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

4 4

RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
by Lokesh Mandvekar 30 Apr '15

30 Apr '15

I'm hoping to reach a decision on how we handle docker rpms (vanilla +/- rh patches) There's the default docker that CentOS gets in extras from RHEL which comes with RH patches (of course). But this kinda comes quite a bit after upstream docker releases. Next up is 'docker' in virt SIG which usually tracks upstream releases. Would people prefer this build be vanilla upstream or with RH patches included. Then there is 'docker-master' in virt SIG which is a daily rebuild of docker upstream master branch + redhat patches. We could either: a) ship 'docker' in virt SIG with RH patches and also provide a 'docker-upstream' which is a vanilla upstream package b) ship 'docker' in virt SIG without any RH patches and provide a 'docker-redhat' with RH patches c) ...anything else?? Comments? -- Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD

8 18

[SIG Harden] Personal goals
by leam hall 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

My personal project goal is to work on scripts and Puppet content to meet STIG requirements. I'm not really talented enough to putz around with the kernel stuff but don't object if others do. Leam -- Mind on a Mission <http://leamhall.blogspot.com/>

4 9

[Cloud SIG] RDO/OpenStack test day, May 5th, 6th
by Rich Bowen 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

For those that are interested in the progress of the RDO OpenStack packaging effort, we'll be having an RDO test day May 5th and 6th (48 hours, so that folks from every timezone have a chance to participate at some point). We'll be testing the RDO packages of the Kilo release. We'd appreciate it if you can find an hour or two some time in that window to come help us out. Links: Main info: https://www.rdoproject.org/RDO_test_day_Kilo Test scenarios: https://www.rdoproject.org/RDO_test_day_Kilo_RC_milestone_test_cases Live discussion on #rdo (Freenode IRC). Async discussion on rdo-list http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com OpenStack Community Liaison http://rdoproject.org/

1 0

Using gcc -fsanitize=thread on C7
by Fred Smith 28 Apr '15

28 Apr '15

Hi all! I'm attempting to use the thread sanitizer (in gcc 4.8.x) on a multi threaded program. When I run the program I get a lot of terse output from the thread sanitizer, much of which refers to hits inside libtsan, libc, and libcrypto. I'm trying to find the debuginfo for those libraries with the hope that will allow human-readable info in that output. But so far I've not found anything that looks like the right stuff. Suggestions, anyone? Thanks! Fred -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex(a)fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ----------------------------- The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:3 (niv) -----------------------------

2 1

Fwd: RDO (Cloud SIG) meetup at OpenStack Summit
by Rich Bowen 28 Apr '15

28 Apr '15

FYI, for those of you who care about the Cloud SIG, and will be at the OpenStack Summit in Vancouver next month. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [Rdo-list] RDO meetup at OpenStack Summit Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:58:15 -0400 From: Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com> To: rdo-list(a)redhat.com <rdo-list(a)redhat.com> I am still working on getting a room for an RDO meetup at OpenStack Summit, but I wanted to go ahead and get this out there to start collecting agenda of what people want to discuss and/or work on at that meetup. I've put up an etherpad at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO_Vancouver where we can start collect those ideas, and where I will post times/locations once I get them. Thanks -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com OpenStack Community Liaison http://rdoproject.org/

1 0

CentOS7 Vagrant box with container runtime and tools
by Lalatendu Mohanty 28 Apr '15

28 Apr '15

Hi All, This is my first attempt to create a CentOS7 Vagrant box using CBS (CentOS build system). The idea is to create a Vagrant image which can used as development box for packaging applications in CentOS Linux containers. This Vagrant box will also have required Linux container tools (e.g. atomic command line, k8ns, etcd). If you want to see any tool in this Vagrant box, let me know. The present build includes Docker. The scratch build is at http://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10480 Here are steps how you can quickly test the image. I am looking for feedback on the same. More detailed information is present in the github project [1] . I have used Fedora21 to set-up Vagrant with libvirt/KVM backend. There is a effort going on to provide Vagrant packages on CentOS too as now it is not available through CentOS core. #Setting up Vagrant on Fedora 21 $yum/dnf install -y vagrant-libvirt vagrant #Running the Vagrant box with Vagrant and libvirt I have also uploaded the images in https://atlas.hashicorp.com/lalatendum/boxes/centos7-docker Step-1 : Initialising a new Vagrant environment by creating a Vagrantfile vagrant init lalatendum/centos7-docker Step-2 : To start the vagrant image and ssh in to it, please run following command vagrant up vagrant ssh vagrant ssh should take you inside of the Vagrant box #To destroy the Vagrant box vagrant destroy #Running docker inside the Vagrant box Inside the vagrant box, you should be run docker containers Example: (following commands should be run inside the Vagrant box) docker pull centos docker run -t -i centos /bin/bash [1] https://github.com/LalatenduMohanty/centos7-container-app-vagrant-box Thanks, Lala

2 1

Possible 7.1 Install Bug
by Kirk Bocek 27 Apr '15

27 Apr '15

Hope I'm not spamming the devs here, but I've got what really feels like a bug with the installer here. I've got a new SuperMicro X10-DRI motherboard with a 3Ware 9750 raid card that hangs during installation of 7.1. If I pull the card, the installer proceeds normally. CentOS 6.6 installs without error on this hardware so I know the hardware is working. I've documented this here: https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=52231 If there is more information I can provide, please let me know. Kirk Bocek

1 0

Upstream for dist-git [RFC]
by Miroslav Suchý 27 Apr '15

27 Apr '15

Hi, Adam Samalík took dist-git files from fedora-infra ansible.git. He separated what belongs to dist-git itself and what is Fedora specific and with cooperation of Dan Mach and Palo Babincak he created upstream for dist-git: https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git This is Fedora version of dist-git and already have passed first round of comments in fedora-infra. The changes from ansible.git version are described here: https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git/blob/master/changes.txt and he extracted some code to be configuration driven: https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git/blob/master/configs/dist-gi… I know that CentOS is one of the user of dist-git. It would be nice if you can contribute your changes to dist-git to this upstream and eventually use dist-git rpm package - it passed through package review in Fedora just now. Future plans: 1) Listen to your initial feedback and do alternations according to your feedback. 2) Change Fedora dist-git server to use this package. .... 5) Enjoy the benefits of common upstream. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys

2 1

confd spec file
by stephan schultchen 27 Apr '15

27 Apr '15

Hey CentOS fellows, i have created confd spec for centos 7, that is more or less based on the etcd spec file found on cbs ( http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=102) that i would like to contribute. I guess it would fit nicely to the SIGs that etcd is part off. What are the steps to take to get the spec reviewed and added to these SIGs? Cheers, schlitzer

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel